Suture Self wrote:Stewball wrote:Suture Self wrote:Also, I don't think people are manufacturing anything. Color-grading has become a huge necessity in Hollywood now, and criticizing the way a movie is color-graded, just like you might criticize any other technical feature of a movie, is totally valid. Perhaps you should read this article: http://www.theguardian.com/film/2010/au ... -hollywood
No argument with genuine criticism, it's the purity for it's own sake that irks me; you know, like tradition being its own justification.
Well, you might better understand the "purity" angle when it comes to remastered blu-ray editions of movies. For example, in one of the links I provided, there's a picture of Badlands as originally released (top), then the criterion approved transfer (bottom):
There's an obvious difference, and the "purists" you're harping about have a right to point it out and criticize it if they dislike it, no?
There's more:
Those examples are valid objective criticisms, particularly the Badlands example where the orange and teal renders a greenish skin tone and a dingy t-shirt. Purists object based purely on defense of tradition and/or a resistance to change. Is that not what you took me to mean when I wrote in my previous post: "No argument with genuine criticism, it's the purity for it's own sake that irks me; you know, like tradition being its own justification." This happens all the time and I'm genuinely baffled.
So what IS you favorite b&w film?