Hi everybody and congratulations for Criticker guys for great predictions accuracy! Now to the point:
1. I find sorting by PSIs in "All our films" page a crucial feature, but it is flawed now. When I sort my list by PSIs (unseen films only), it first goes sorted from "My Sassy Girl" (PSI 100), through 37 other films to "Fanny and Alexander" (PSI 91). But then I have "This Is England" (PSI 99) and again a bunch of films with PSIs higher than 95. Then on next page again go down to 90 and back from 99 for another group of movies.
This is only a rough sorting, which "groups" high PSI rather then actually sorts them. But really, if there's a PSI of 99, I'd prefer to see it before PSI of 90.
2. Apart from that -- if I first choose "unseen films only" and then I apply any other filter (genre, release years) or just pass to the next page, I see all (seen and unseen) films again.
I'd like to ask Criticker guys and other fellow users to check if you have the same occurence with your PSI sorting.
Thanks in advance and keep up the great work!!!
Rafal
Bug in PSI sorting
- mpowell
- Posts: 4193
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 10:22 am
Re: Bug in PSI sorting
Thanks for the detailed descriptions of the problems... I think we've solved them now. Please check out your full list of PSIs again, and let me know if the filtering issues with unseen films continue to occur.
-
- Posts: 3
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 10:19 am
Re: Bug in PSI sorting
Dear mpowell,
Thanks for treating my remarks seriously. I've checked out my PSI-sorted films and I'm sorry to report that the bug is still there. It is placed in another part of sorted films list, but it is. And again, after the movie with PSI 90, the movie "This Is England" with PSI 99 comes, which obviously should have been earlier.
I don't think such a bug would apply just for me as an user, probably it occurs in other user list, too. But if you cannot see this occurence, I can send you an image of how the screen with bug-influenced sorting looks.
Thanks for taking care at the issue, but I hope you will succeed to hunt down this bug completely so the list is actually sorted and just so-so sorted.
Best regards,
Rafal
Thanks for treating my remarks seriously. I've checked out my PSI-sorted films and I'm sorry to report that the bug is still there. It is placed in another part of sorted films list, but it is. And again, after the movie with PSI 90, the movie "This Is England" with PSI 99 comes, which obviously should have been earlier.
I don't think such a bug would apply just for me as an user, probably it occurs in other user list, too. But if you cannot see this occurence, I can send you an image of how the screen with bug-influenced sorting looks.
Thanks for taking care at the issue, but I hope you will succeed to hunt down this bug completely so the list is actually sorted and just so-so sorted.
Best regards,
Rafal
- td888
- Posts: 863
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 10:44 am
Re: Bug in PSI sorting
rafalko6 wrote: Then on next page again go down to 90 and back from 99 for another group of movies.
How do you do that? I only get one page (50 PSI's), not an option to show the rest (?).
I also noticed some strange behavior. If I filter on 'just films I've seen', it still shows some movies I haven't seen. Also the same problem the other way around. And for some movies it shows the plot-description, and sometimes it's possible to rank the films I haven't seen yet.
- PeaceAnarchy
- Posts: 654
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 1:47 am
Re: Bug in PSI sorting
td888, in the middle of the PSI screen, right under the button that says "Generate more PSI's" there's a link that says"Your Full PSI List!" which gives all available PSIs.
- td888
- Posts: 863
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 10:44 am
Re: Bug in PSI sorting
Ah. Ok, found it My sorting looks ok, though...
- sengir
- Posts: 134
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 2:57 pm
Re: Bug in PSI sorting
Haven't had the same problem, my list seems to be in the correct order
- mpowell
- Posts: 4193
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 10:22 am
Re: Bug in PSI sorting
rafalko6 wrote:I've checked out my PSI-sorted films and I'm sorry to report that the bug is still there. It is placed in another part of sorted films list, but it is. And again, after the movie with PSI 90, the movie "This Is England" with PSI 99 comes, which obviously should have been earlier.
I've looked at your list from our perspective, and it looks to be properly sorted. There must be some reason that it appears incorrect to you -- can you send us a screenshot of the problem? Please email to info-AT-criticker.com
-
- Posts: 3
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 10:19 am
Re: Bug in PSI sorting
I've looked at your list from our perspective, and it looks to be properly sorted. There must be some reason that it appears incorrect to you -- can you send us a screenshot of the problem? Please email to info-AT-criticker.com
[/quote]
Well -- thanks for your willingness to help, but the sortin actually is OK now. Funny thing, as always when you turn to the specialist with your problem and he wants you to show him/her the problem, everything works perfectly. I've had it with some audio/video equipment, with a car -- and now with recommendation engine
Thanks for your help and I'm glad I can browse through neatly sorted list. I also greatly appreciate your "customer service". I've never seen anyone in forums left without help, advice or at least a comment. Now I've experienced this myself. This is a very important thing in any kind of services and you prove that you care about your service and its commuity
Big thanks,
Rafal
- Quicky
- Posts: 451
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 2:53 pm
Re: Bug in PSI sorting
rafalko6 wrote:I also greatly appreciate your "customer service". I've never seen anyone in forums left without help, advice or at least a comment. Now I've experienced this myself. This is a very important thing in any kind of services and you prove that you care about your service and its community.
I would like to second this, and add that I hope they will continue this level of commitment and transparent communication. **two thumbs up!**