I don't think djross is being miserable or self-righteous at all.
Anyways, I still think there should be a language tag regardless, since I think it's a lot more useful for finding films, and I think that generally people tend to think of films by language more than by country. e.g. when people talk about Italian films, they don't usually talk about The Good, the Bad, the Ugly, but rather as films actually made in the Italian language.
(Although, there are films that contain multiple spoken languages and even with a a language tag, the problem we have country tags might also be a problem. For example, will The Godfather be tagged as an Italian-language film just because of the scenes set in Sicily? But anyways, that's a problem for later and I'm getting distracted.)
A solution to this problem, that would almost certainly work at clarifying country of origin in a clear and reasonable way, but might be too complicated to practically be implemented would be some sort of points system. For example, here in Canada the Canadian Government currently uses the following point system to determine whether a film or TV show counts as a "Canadian Production."
- Director (2 pts.)
Screenwriter (2 pts.)
First and Second Lead Performers (performer or voice) (1 pt. each)
Production Designer (1 pt.)
Director of Photography (1 pt.)
Music Composer (1 pt.)
Picture Editor (1 pt.)
A Film needs to get a minimum of 6 points to be considered "Canadian."
So I don't know, maybe we could institute a criticker version of this? 3 points for each director listed, 2 points for each writer, and 1 point for each actor listed on criticker? Any country or countries that get atleast 33% of the total maximum possible number of points is listed as the country of origin. And the criticker pages for each filmmaker already include what country they're from, so this is something that could conceivably be coded into the criticker system.