sign in
register
Watch
Apple TV Google Play Movies Fandango At Home
+3
Westworld
Westworld
+3
JustWatch
Your probable score
?
Westworld

Westworld

1973
Sci-fi, Suspense/Thriller
1h 28m
A futuristic amusement park becomes a deathtrap when the androids and computer systems used in it begin to murderously run amok. (imdb)

Directed by:

Michael Crichton

Screenwriter:

Michael Crichton

Starring:

James Brolin, Richard Benjamin, Dick Van Patten, Majel Barrett, Yul Brynner, Norman Bartold, Alan Oppenheimer, Victoria Shaw, Steve Franken, Jared Martin, Linda Gaye Scott

Franchise:

Westworld

Genres:

Sci-fi, Suspense/Thriller, Action, Western

Country:

USA

Language:

English
imdb IMDb
Update history
Suggest edit

Westworld

1973
Sci-fi, Suspense/Thriller
1h 28m
Your probable score
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer
Avg Percentile 49.07% from 1469 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

(1481)
Compact view
clear
Compact view
Show
Sort
barthalenBarthalen
Rated 02 Dec 2013
55
32nd
I played a lot of Theme Park back in the day, and with that normally useless game-knowledge in the back of my head I wonder; how the hell does Westworld turn a profit?? Costs for transport, repair and personnel are in no way compensated by the 1000 dollars a day that its 15 visitors pay. IMMERSION RUINED. On top of that the pacing is horrid, the characters are bland and the decent premise is wasted on uninteresting filler. Brynner going all Terminator-y was cool though.
Rated 02 Dec 2013
terrymacterrymac
Rated 29 Nov 2017
67
50th
There's a very good film in here somewhere, but it gets lost amidst some dodgy pacing and bland stretches. The underlying concepts and the mighty Yul Brynner salvage it somewhat, however. It has occurred to me that I haven't read anything by Crichton. At least, I don't think I have. The films based on his books are generally pretty good, so perhaps I should. When Richard Benjamin grins, he reminds me of Rowan Atkinson. See this if you like theme park mismanagement films and proto-Terminators.
Rated 29 Nov 2017
martintellerMartinTeller
Rated 27 Dec 2006
71
37th
Despite being riddled with plot holes and science that makes little sense, it's a fun romp based on a clever premise. The movie is at its worst when it's indulging in corny Western clichés, most egregiously in the bar fight scene. But it gets pretty cool in the final act, and I loved the synthesized score. It's interesting as a precursor to Terminator, you can see a lot of the same elements and themes. I imagine it's only a matter of time before Hollywood remakes this, starring Will Smith.
Rated 27 Dec 2006
paxtonPaxton
Rated 20 Dec 2019
63
44th
It's such a stupid idea that people in the future will want to spend time in the past. Now let me get back to reading up on the new Jumanji/Charlie's Angels/Star Wars/Black Christmas/Ghostbusters/Terminator/Bill&Ted/Cats/The Matrix/Halloween/Mulan/The Grudge/Bad Boys/The Invisible Man/Sonic the Hedgehog/Top Gun/Fantasy Island/The Witches/Coming 2 America/The Craft/Godzilla vs. King Kong/Saw/Candyman/West Side Story/Rebecca/James Bond/Dune/Dolittle/Legally Blonde/Scooby Doo/Spongebob/Poirot/etc.
Rated 20 Dec 2019
nobletNoblet
Rated 24 Nov 2016
48
24th
horrible lead character and flat filmmaking ruin potential classic. i want to live in the universe where kubrick directed this.
Rated 24 Nov 2016
tripwyreTripwyre
Rated 28 May 2009
61
45th
The third act is dynamite, but it's slow-going getting there. Crichton, playing filmmaker for the first time, just isn't capable of pulling it off. The direction is especially off, as the movie takes its amazing concept and, impossibly, makes it boring with a wildly inconsistent tone and goofy "Old West" music. Brynner is a total badass here, playing The Gunslinger like an early model Terminator. Crichton would later perfect these ideas with Jurassic Park. Watch The Simpsons' spoof instead.
Rated 28 May 2009
boxcarsBoxcars
Rated 02 Oct 2016
5
19th
'Westworld' has a fun premise with a lot of potential, but too often it's squandered by lethargic pacing, underwhelming world-building, and an underdeveloped story. That being said, the score's effective, and Yul Brynner makes for an intimidating cowboy-Terminator.
Rated 02 Oct 2016
billyshearsBillyShears
Rated 11 Oct 2015
70
53rd
"Come on, Pete, let's go fuck some robots!"
Rated 11 Oct 2015
joseywalesjoseywales
Rated 02 May 2007
71
60th
This is one "cult classic" that I think could do with a remake. Sure it won't be great... it probably won't even be good. But there was something missing from this 70's version.
Rated 02 May 2007
3drevelation3dRevelation
Rated 11 May 2017
65
33rd
The premise is interesting, but the execution is off. Either that or the film hasn't aged well. Would probably have been better served with someone other than Crichton at the helm. At least the violence seemed to be shot Peckinpah style. Not sure the other worlds were needed. Brynner is fine, but the leads could have been better. The comparisons to Jurassic Park are obvious, and the latter was much better served by a different director.
Rated 11 May 2017
toddsaltertoddsalter
Rated 04 Feb 2017
92
85th
Really loved this. Watched after watching Season 1 of the new 2016 series Westworld. Everyone says the pacing is bad, but I enjoyed the slower pacing of the movie.
Rated 04 Feb 2017
backwardsuitbackwardsuit
Rated 15 Nov 2014
67
38th
Cool concept and plenty of good scenes but the bland characters and clumsy pacing drag it down somewhat. Also it's a bit awkward and uneven with the various ideas it's flirting with. Still interesting and entertaining enough by today's standards.
Rated 15 Nov 2014
skenkereSkenkere
Rated 28 Sep 2007
46
27th
I really dig the premise of this movie, and Yul Brynner is cold as hell in this, but overall it just didn't pull it off. It's a cool idea for a movie, but it ended up being far more boring than it should have.
Rated 28 Sep 2007
gritGrit
Rated 16 May 2007
78
84th
Classic cult thriller, Yul Brynner certainly makes a great "andriod gone bad". Very enjoyable and incredibly cheesy.
Rated 16 May 2007
anomalyAnomaly
Rated 23 Dec 2018
67
43rd
Simultaneously way ahead of its time and incredibly dated - this is one of the most 70s movies ever! Like many novelists who make the jump, Crichton doesn't quite get film pacing, leaving many scenes feeling extraneous. The Jurassic Park book is basically the same thing written better. That being said, the third act is excellent, and Crichton occasionally comes up with some brilliant imagery. Just needs the fat trimmed and the good content expanded on.
Rated 23 Dec 2018
yiannosYiannos
Rated 20 Jan 2017
60
48th
I'm no big fan of remakes, but Westworld always struck me as being a perfect candidate: it's a great idea imperfectly executed by an inexperienced director. In Crichton's defense he demonstrates some understanding of how to use space in the frame, but the film is sluggishly paced, tonally uneven and the acting is extremely variable. It also takes too long to build momentum. The final act is best with Brynner the bald wonder as a relentless killing machine in tense pursuit of Benjamin.
Rated 20 Jan 2017
wulfstanleeWulfstanLee
Rated 05 Apr 2016
70
63rd
A great performance by Brynner in a movie far ahead of its time given recent thinking on cyborgs and virtual realities.
Rated 05 Apr 2016
desertpunkDesertPunk
Rated 31 Jan 2014
74
57th
Makes absolutely zero sense and is riddled with missed opportunities, but it's put together so well you kind of forget sometimes. Yul Brynner is just god damn terrifying.
Rated 31 Jan 2014
kasperlKasperL
Rated 07 Dec 2013
80
86th
Do not play God. Heed your over-reliance on technology. Crichton's themes, while hardly groundbreaking, are evergreens, and the world he's thought up is fun and well explored. A marvellous oddity of a film.
Rated 07 Dec 2013
closefriendCloseFriend
Rated 08 Nov 2013
33
7th
Despite his writing talent, Crichton had no understanding of the language of film. What should feel like escalation feels overlong, repetitive, and torpid. Critical turns in the story go almost unnoticed and comic relief scenes fall on their asses, exacerbated by an inert score and wildly inconsistent cinematography. The climax lacks any tension whatsoever. Ironically, for a story about the human need to feel in control, the film could've worked if Crichton had ceded the directing reins.
Rated 08 Nov 2013
carpetgiantCarpetgiant
Rated 09 Jun 2013
86
69th
One day, I plan to make a Crichton-inspired theme park with areas based on books like Congo, Sphere, Timeline, Eaters of the Dead and The Great Train Robbery just to name a few. The trick to making it all work would be sparing some expenses. You see, that's what went wrong with Westworld and Jurassic Park.
Rated 09 Jun 2013
spleenspleen
Rated 25 Apr 2012
84
82nd
Very fun journey to the 1970's World Of Tomorrow, where people travel in hovercrafts, fight robot knights and cowboys and sleep with robot prostitutes, all while sporting feathered hair and really tight bellbottomed pants. Spectacularly ridiculous and fun.
Rated 25 Apr 2012
sebbysebby
Rated 08 Apr 2012
65
59th
Sometimes you just want to see Yul Brynner's face melt off.
Rated 08 Apr 2012
thedenizenTheDenizen
Rated 28 Feb 2012
70
63rd
At a futuristic wild west theme park, the robots go haywire and a malfunctioning gunslinger android relentlessly pursues the park guests. Enjoyable combination of science fiction and westerns with lots of gunplay and some nice slow motion squib shots. There's a bunch of dumb comedy mixed in for no real reason, but Yul Brynner uses his piercing glare to great effect as the robot killer.
Rated 28 Feb 2012
peaceanarchyPeaceAnarchy
Rated 20 Apr 2011
83
72nd
Great concept and while the execution is flawed it has that special something that makes it a captivating experience anyway.
Rated 20 Apr 2011
jodamicojodamico
Rated 06 Feb 2011
75
45th
Cameron and Spielberg both proved that all Crichton needed was a better director.
Rated 06 Feb 2011
vesupriavesupria
Rated 02 Aug 2010
1
5th
Mr Bean gets chased through the desert, gets thirsty, and feeds discharge to robot prostitute who subsequently gets that melted mouth feeling. Epic.
Rated 02 Aug 2010
burnmp3sburnmp3s
Rated 18 May 2010
71
44th
An uneven but interesting classic sci-fi film. Michael Crichton's bad directing hurts the film, mostly in the form of awkward pacing. Yul Brynner has by far the best performance as the evil gunslinger robot, James Brolin is good in his role, and Richard Benjamin is passable, otherwise the ensemble cast isn't noteworthy. Overall it seems like there are around 20 minutes of a great film, and the rest is filler.
Rated 18 May 2010
astrakhanastrakhan
Rated 16 Jul 2018
73
28th
Michael Crichton is a much better writer than he is a director. Just check any of his attempts to verify that. This, the most famous with his name on it, is quite the quiche Lorraine. The character development is non-existent, and the rudimentary attempt at backstory is very rough around the edges. The few scenes where Yul Brynner is stalking and shooting people, and his demise (visually referenced in Terminator 2?) are the only highlights. Like a lot of 70s sci-fi, it really has not aged well.
Rated 16 Jul 2018
kenmeistersKenMeisters
Rated 15 Jul 2018
70
57th
With decent effects and some genuine dread, this 70 sci-fi movie shows that these violent delights will have violent ends. Oldie, but a goodie.
Rated 15 Jul 2018
walkearthwalkearth
Rated 14 Jul 2018
45
30th
Another example of a film very much a product of its time. Westworld definitely feels as if it has lost some of its magic through the years, not least of all because of comparisons with the currently on-going HBO TV series, which encapsulates the gist of the otherwise brilliant idea in a superb and contemporarily resounding way. It is no surprise to mention that the 1973 film is slow paced and has a lot of the distinct "seriousness" of the era, i.e. Rollerball type of roll-eye methods.
Rated 14 Jul 2018
menialretconMenialRetcon
Rated 20 Mar 2018
72
47th
The tone is very odd- the shift to robot uprising isn't handled well at all.
Rated 20 Mar 2018
supersuiSuperSui
Rated 24 Oct 2017
76
70th
Terminator 3: The Westening
Rated 24 Oct 2017
ronthedogronthedog
Rated 18 Dec 2016
78
30th
Reasonable, but was wondering when the point was going to emerge when it ended.
Rated 18 Dec 2016
redactedredacted
Rated 15 Jul 2015
55
24th
Jurassic park for LARPers. The dialogue lacks any real zest & the directing is similarly flat, but at the same time that typical 70's futurist art direction just happens to best accompany any kind of dystopian plot-line.
Rated 15 Jul 2015
elmakebabielmakebabi
Rated 18 Jan 2014
75
78th
Yul Brynner significantly reminds me of T-1000 from Terminator 2: Judgment Day. I'm sure James Cameron was inspired from this character.
Rated 18 Jan 2014
eric_janeric-jan
Rated 02 Sep 2013
65
30th
Haha, actually an awesome story! Oddly enough, the machines going wild is not explained during the movie and I thought it was pretty funny how the scientists died of suffocation within a matter of minutes :P. Veryyy weird ending (you dont find out if the only remaining goodguy makes it out and he's left with a very bizar look on his face :D). The bald badguy machine is pretty gay as he's only after the 2 main goodguys :D, even after being "killed" twice.
Rated 02 Sep 2013
frankswildfrankswild
Rated 26 Jun 2013
75
63rd
A good idea that suffered from a handful of unnecessary explanatory and comic scenes. Yul Brynner saves it with his inscrutable but extremely menacing robot cowboy performance. I was tempted to say I would have wanted more of him in it but I don't think that is true.
Rated 26 Jun 2013
luna6ixLuna6ix
Rated 27 Oct 2012
72
41st
Brynner as a robot offing a bunch of people in a western theme amusement park sounds like fun to me, but Crichton really let us down on this one. Thankfully, he left most of his other sci-fi movies to be directed by someone else.
Rated 27 Oct 2012
chemical404chemical404
Rated 06 May 2012
63
67th
A seriously creepy thriller by sci-fi writer turned director Michael Crichton. It has little something that sets it apart from usual sci-fi movies of that era. 70's mustache riding Benjamin was a fitting lead, but Yul Brynner is a real star here. He and the soundtrack are the reasons why this film is so creepy. While it's not a great movie, it is thought provoking. And I'm pretty sure that it inspired Terminator directly.
Rated 06 May 2012
wezzoWezzo
Rated 10 Oct 2011
65
17th
Second viewing; I liked it a little better this time around, but it still doesn't really do it for me. Never particularly tense or thrilling, and stylistically it's not quite as timeless as many of its peers.
Rated 10 Oct 2011
kingjohnbbqKingjohnbbq
Rated 21 Jul 2011
94
79th
lots of people wanting a remake of this, I disagree. This is a classic if I ever saw one. Cheesy in parts, goofy in others, but awesome because of yul brynner, oh man is that guy creepy. What a great character this was. I thoroughly enjoyed this movie, the beginning had me wondering a bit, I won't lie, but once it gets into it, the movie is quite intense.
Rated 21 Jul 2011
aaaaaaarrgggaaaaaaarrggg
Rated 14 Jun 2011
71
73rd
Crichton gives his _Jurassic Park_ premise an initial run-through with this fun sci-fi thriller. Well done on an obviously tight budget, with Brynner great as a prototype of Schwarzenegger's Terminator character: an android who keeps coming back again and again every time it's "killed".
Rated 14 Jun 2011
indyatmnINDYATMN
Rated 30 Oct 2010
77
49th
The robots at this futuristic amusement park may look completely human, but the logistics involved in maintaining them isn't going 2 score any points 4 verisimilitude. And while Brynner is a perfectly creepy predecessor 2 Cameron's Terminators, the story's Computers-Take-Over storyline feels as routine as the overly long set-up. Crichton does provide some necessary subtext in terms of dissolute (& dissolution of) humanity & parallels 2 slavery, but only the former really makes sense.
Rated 30 Oct 2010
hellboy76hellboy76
Rated 16 Oct 2010
68
65th
A favorite from my childhood, it is definitely dated but I love the idea of it and I love Yul Brynner.
Rated 16 Oct 2010
jellyscudsJellyscuds
Rated 12 Sep 2010
55
54th
Full of plotholes, some horrible acting and direction, but the concept makes for a great sci-fi classic.
Rated 12 Sep 2010
jazzalohaJazzaloha
Rated 21 Nov 2009
74
83rd
Yul Brenner as a the Terminator before Arnold. Good flick.
Rated 21 Nov 2009
bellamyrbellamyr
Rated 08 Mar 2009
83
70th
Classic cult western horror giving Brynner a showcase for his cold gunfighter alter-ego. Ok so the plot has holes and there have been more recent improvements on the theme (Jurassic Park, Terminator, I-Robot) but this is a pathfinder film which still works on many levels today.
Rated 08 Mar 2009
muttermutter
Rated 27 Oct 2024
55
35th
The Foley artist heard "footsteps" and ran with it.
Rated 27 Oct 2024
gwulingwulin
Rated 23 Jul 2024
80
84th
Totally awesome, so much better than the new TV series. Of course the special effects have not aged well, but the whole atmosphere is just so great and absurd, a typical 70s movie! Yul Brynner nails every scene, hard to imagine a better cast.
Rated 23 Jul 2024
nathanbatesNathanBates
Rated 02 Oct 2023
60
35th
Crichton always had great story ideas, but the movie goes up and down with pacing issues (and too many problems in "the tenth quadrant"). You'd think if we spend time with a minor character he'd get more than just "I'm the sheriff now" scene. And the soundtrack was horrible. The last fifteen minutes help to save the movie from being a flop (and undeniably helped create the Terminator franchise).
Rated 02 Oct 2023
moraesfelipemoraesfelipe
Rated 02 Oct 2023
65
61st
More action than sci-fi, which is cool given the thin plot we've got here -- basically an entire amusement park and its collection of animal and human robots going berserk on the human guests. Of course there are better 70s flicks than this, but hey, it's just 89min long and we get Brynner's android gunslinger refusing to stop shooting around and acting cool.
Rated 02 Oct 2023
paula1980paula1980
Rated 07 Apr 2023
72
78th
Creative movie. I am sure this inspired one of the episodes in Star Trek Next Generation with Worf, Deanna Troy and Data in a Western holodeck story.
Rated 07 Apr 2023
jarobmuljarobmul
Rated 23 Feb 2023
62
31st
Poor pacing made this feel more like 2 hours, hard to believe it was really that short
Rated 23 Feb 2023
caocaocaocao
Rated 03 Dec 2022
69
51st
Nowadays there are no surprises held in this premise, but that doesn't make it any less fun. Unfortunately getting to the robot revolution is the funnest part. Once we arrive we're not sure what happened, and the climax is pretty flat.
Rated 03 Dec 2022
glumpy99glumpy_99
Rated 29 Sep 2022
20
1st
Dull and ponderous rendering of a fine dystopic, existential premise gets bogged down in mind-numbing exposition discussing the elusive “virus” controlling the robot androids – imagine JURASSIC PARK but seen through the eyes of one of the engineers safely bunkered away. Brolin and Benjamin do their best with the flat, colourless characters handed to them, and Brynner’s sadly underused malevolent intensity is a comparative highlight, but overall a complete bore. Ease up on the slo-mo!
Rated 29 Sep 2022
li0lili0li
Rated 23 May 2022
40
13th
Too slow.
Rated 23 May 2022
hadleyreisHadleyreis
Rated 13 Mar 2022
73
61st
If it's all based on heat, surely Medieval World would have been fine all along.
Rated 13 Mar 2022
gamul1Gamul1
Rated 02 Jan 2022
85
61st
Mainly good because it was such a unique concept.
Rated 02 Jan 2022
jols93Jols93
Rated 21 Oct 2021
50
28th
Definitely a movie ahead of it's time that influenced many movies for decades to come. The runtime is a little shorter than I would've liked and the pacing is bad the shift to real running park to malfunctioning killer robots happens to quickly and way too late in the film. The premise itself is very intriguing but it needed more interesting characters. Perhaps the medieval cutaway scenes wouldn't have been so jarring if they had developed those characters more.
Rated 21 Oct 2021
morphinapgmorphinapg
Rated 28 May 2021
53
12th
I watched this because I was a fan of the show and I was curious about its predecessor. I was not impressed. While I certainly thought the opening was decent enough introducing the world, they just didn't seem to have any idea where they were going with the story and it just got boring. Thankfully the show handled this much better. Although later seasons aren't as good, I think they're still better than this movie.
Rated 28 May 2021
decanusellisDecanusEllis
Rated 23 Feb 2021
79
64th
Love the concept, fun action, great unique soundtrack, decent acting and can be quite scary at times. Entertaining action flick no doubt.
Rated 23 Feb 2021
cerclerougeCercle_Rouge
Rated 23 Jan 2021
75
78th
Ultimately not very well executed, with uneven pacing and some bizarre editing, but it's a clever idea and undoubtedly entertaining. The (unnecessarily elongated) chase sequence in particular anticipates 'Terminator', but essentially it's an adult 'Jurassic Park', or what 'Jurassic Park' might look like when Michael Crichton decides to direct his own story - none of Spielberg's sentimentality or insistence on including annoying kids, but also none of his skill.
Rated 23 Jan 2021
quintonjaminQuintonjamin
Rated 19 Mar 2020
40
23rd
I like the concept, but there are a lot of plot holes and the acting isn't great. The scenes with Yul Brynner are good, but everything else is boring. Many of the other reviews compare it to jurassic park and terminator, and rightfully so.
Rated 19 Mar 2020
recepRecep
Rated 27 Jan 2020
50
12th
fikir güzel, işleniş kötü. jonathan nolan is a genius. böyle kötü işlenen fikri alıp başyapıt yapması muhteşem bir şey.
Rated 27 Jan 2020
spaceflohspacefloh
Rated 18 Oct 2019
70
83rd
eng; [westworld]; in einem park können besucher alles machen was sie wollen, da die protagonisten alles andoriden sind - bis diese rebellieren.;
Rated 18 Oct 2019
jimmy_suedeJimmy Suede
Rated 06 Oct 2019
50
17th
I wanted to like this more, but it was pretty bland. A let-down considering its cool premise.
Rated 06 Oct 2019
nathan_sNathan S
Rated 21 Jun 2019
2
21st
The general conceit is interesting, and it offers a lot to kick around: an early conception of computer viruses, frail masculine power fantasies, the American infatuation with the West. It even functions as a precursor to The Terminator, and this may all have renewed significance in a time when VR is gaining traction. But the simple and unfortunate truth is that the execution - dialogue, performance, costuming and setting, effects and audiovisual design - is all rather silly.
Rated 21 Jun 2019
comepeliculacomepelicula
Rated 24 May 2019
30
12th
An interesting watch, this is what happens when a great concept has a terrible development, story and execution, something that happens a lot in sci-fi. Some iconic moments like the homicidal robot and the designs, but the rest is pretty terrible.
Rated 24 May 2019
vv238vv238
Rated 01 May 2019
60
62nd
I feel like this doesn't quite live up to it's full potential. Being a slight letdown from it's premise doesn't disqualify it from being a bad movie, it is not. Its specific blend of sci-fi and western elements work more often than not.
Rated 01 May 2019
mismatched02mismatched02
Rated 14 Feb 2019
53
43rd
All due credit to this pillar of science fiction; the ideas just aren't developed enough and the pacing too slow to hold up in 2019. The premise is fantastic, though.
Rated 14 Feb 2019
vengefulkbmVengefulKBM
Rated 26 Oct 2018
50
25th
This certainly does have its moments, courtesy of Yul Brynner and James Brolin, but the tone is all over the place, and it manages to feel like it has filler scenes even at 88 minutes long. The Medievalworld scenes took me out of the movie with their unfunny slapstick and bad Disneyland walkthrough aesthetic. There's certainly a good core idea here, and Crichton does a good job of stretching his budget. I just wished the film had had more focus, and maybe some more interesting side characters.
Rated 26 Oct 2018
cairosmithcairosmith
Rated 25 Oct 2018
52
40th
On the verge of greatness, but not quite there. Plays with quite a few brilliant ideas that are decades ahead of their time, but doesn't manage to take any of them to a place of total satisfaction.
Rated 25 Oct 2018
onacOnac
Rated 22 Aug 2018
61
49th
The movie builds up tension much better than the HBO series, however in the end many plot lines are left in the air, unfinished.
Rated 22 Aug 2018
evolutionEvolution
Rated 07 May 2018
45
18th
Hilariously bad.
Rated 07 May 2018
evilmangoesEvilMangoes
Rated 23 Dec 2017
94
82nd
A-
Rated 23 Dec 2017
thehynesthehynes
Rated 21 Dec 2017
56
48th
when Im being pursued by a killer robot I too always walk off while it's still operational. Am I doing this wrong?
Rated 21 Dec 2017
calabriaCalabria
Rated 11 Dec 2017
73
22nd
I love the TV show. This? Not so much.
Rated 11 Dec 2017
burkayadaligburkayadalig
Rated 19 Feb 2017
85
76th
Very interesting concept, one of cult sci-fi s
Rated 19 Feb 2017
mrarnmrarn
Rated 22 Jan 2017
55
69th
Michael Crichton brings an interesting premise to the screen. It's amazing how dated the control room scenes have become.
Rated 22 Jan 2017
gorillanoshGorillaNosh
Rated 11 Jan 2017
70
4th
A bit dated and linear.
Rated 11 Jan 2017
instiInsti
Rated 11 Dec 2016
71
32nd
Ever have that dream that some unstoppable monster is chasing you? Ever thought it would make a good movie?
Rated 11 Dec 2016
muutanetmuutanet
Rated 15 Oct 2016
77
77th
Before I started the brand new TV series Westworld (which appeared to have pretty boring and sluggish opening chapter), I wanted to refresh my memory for the Michael Crichton's classic. The film was pure fun. I hope the TV series get better along the story.
Rated 15 Oct 2016
kavuKavu
Rated 14 Oct 2016
75
56th
Great idea, great score (in the third act), awesome Yul Brunner. Loads of fun this one.
Rated 14 Oct 2016
zoinkzoink
Rated 12 Oct 2016
65
50th
It's amazing how bleeding edge Michael Crichton was with some of his observations. Dated but if you're in the mood, or just getting in to the HBO serious not a bad flick.
Rated 12 Oct 2016
mjvmoviemanMJVmovieMan
Rated 04 Oct 2016
75
67th
There's greatness here, but pacing is an issue. The machines' rebellion also remains a bit of a question mark.
Rated 04 Oct 2016
mike365365mike365365
Rated 06 Sep 2016
55
23rd
Yul Brynner is great. Everything else not so much.
Rated 06 Sep 2016
killgazmokillgazmo
Rated 03 Sep 2016
10
56th
terminator was undoubtedly influenced by this. great representation of 70's sci fi thriller.
Rated 03 Sep 2016
smuhusmuhu
Rated 08 Jul 2016
46
11th
Interesting idea ridiculously executed.
Rated 08 Jul 2016
jbynjbyn
Rated 01 May 2016
50
9th
The concept for West World is amazing. I feel this is a perfect example of a movie that would benefit from being remade, because it has great content, but it does not age well. Its execution was too dull for my tastes. It started picking up towards the end but not enough to outshine my previous discouragement.
Rated 01 May 2016
ribcageribcage
Rated 17 Jan 2016
64
44th
The idea is cool and all and damn if brenner wasnt fantastic, and its the prototype for a handful of total classics, but it doesn't go any further than "what if robots killed" and even then its budget limited the film showing the full extent of this carnage and instead made it mano a roboto for way too long esp when the only really exciting part of the action is brenners cold face. Falls into the category of "great history, less so entertainment" for me
Rated 17 Jan 2016
davidblastDavidBlast
Rated 27 Dec 2015
40
28th
As the original 'Jurassic Park' the antiquated craftsmanship has turned 'Westworld' into a fossil in it's own right. If considered the original 'The Terminator' it hobbles over the finish line as a second rather indifferent entry into the series, starring Christian Bale. Today I learned that Michael Chrichton is no fan of theme parks.
Rated 27 Dec 2015
bizfinguybizfinguy
Rated 18 Apr 2015
82
63rd
Classic camp sci-fi
Rated 18 Apr 2015
randomdonnarandom_donna
Rated 03 Apr 2015
76
43rd
Yul Brynner is cool, menacing, and sexy as the Terminator. We sure are afraid of technology, though, aren't we? Or is this film really about a different kind of fear? Huh.
Rated 03 Apr 2015
geoffegeoffe
Rated 26 Jul 2014
98
90th
I love this film. I hope someday in the future reality theme parks will exist based on this film.
Rated 26 Jul 2014
guvolefouguvolefou
Rated 06 Nov 2013
65
28th
Gayet ilginç açılış sekansının vaad ettiklerinin altından birçok açıdan kalkamıyor. Gittikçe büyümesi beklenen film, küçülüp küçülüp sıradan bir maceraya sıkışıp kalıyor. Oysa, insanlaşan robotlarla, tüketim toplumu eleştirisinin kesişim kümesinden çok daha şık bir eleman çıkabilirmiş.
Rated 06 Nov 2013
alex_wsAlex WS
Rated 20 Jan 2013
68
58th
Great sense of unescapable danger from the villain. Cool setting too.
Rated 20 Jan 2013
walkenrollWalkenRoll
Rated 20 Dec 2012
40
7th
An interesting idea, poorly done. Yul is great, but everything else sucks
Rated 20 Dec 2012
cpreviewcpreview
Rated 04 Aug 2012
2
4th
Westworld primarily focuses on the theme of technology run amok, and very little... if anything... on the rest. Crichton's theme-park-gone-fubar plot would be repeated in Jurassic Park, while the idea of robots gone berserk would appear a decade later in a low-budget piece featuring a then unknown Austrian muscle man, and in some other cyberpunk flicks since.
Rated 04 Aug 2012
glmglm
Rated 23 Jun 2012
76
57th
75.625
Rated 23 Jun 2012

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...