sign in
register
Watch
Starz History Vault Starz Roku Premium Channel
+8
Transporter 2
Transporter 2
+8
JustWatch
Your probable score
?
Transporter 2

Transporter 2

2005
Suspense/Thriller, Crime
1h 27m
Jason Statham returns in his signature role as ex-Special Forces operative Frank Martin, aka "The Transporter." Now retired in Miami, Martin makes a living driving for a wealthy family, including the young son, with whom he has unexpectedly bonded. But when the boy is abducted, Martin must use all his skills to bring him to safety and discover the kidnapper's master plan. (20th Century Fox)

Directed by:

Louis Leterrier

Screenwriter:

Luc Besson, Robert Mark Kamen

Starring:

Keith David, Matthew Modine, Jason Statham, François Berléand, Amber Valletta, Jason Flemyng, Alessandro Gassmann, Kate Nauta, Hunter Clary, AnnaLynne McCord, Ernest Harden Jr.

Franchise:

The Transporter

Genres:

Suspense/Thriller, Crime, Action

Countries:

France, Germany, USA

Languages:

English, French, Italian
imdb IMDb
Update history
Suggest edit

Transporter 2

2005
Suspense/Thriller, Crime
1h 27m
Your probable score
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer
Avg Percentile 31.8% from 4740 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

(4779)
Compact view
clear
Compact view
Show
Sort
barthalenBarthalen
Rated 23 May 2014
46
23rd
"And lo, in The Transporter the Second, The Statham giveth no fucks about the Laws that our existence is based on. For if The Statham wishes to drive off of a building and fly across the street into another building, it will be done. The way He gets rid of a bomb under his Transportation Device is so beautifully idiotic that not even readers of this Book, who are expected to swallow the idea of Some Dude creating the universe just because, would believe it. Amen." (Revelations 4:20)
Rated 23 May 2014
tonytheponyTonythePony
Rated 18 Jul 2009
47
11th
Viewing Disclaimer: Henceforth common sense, logic, the laws of physics (including gravity) have all been inverted. As such, to enjoy this presentation your brain has to be not so much in neutral as completely in reverse.
Rated 18 Jul 2009
derbarneyDer_Barney
Rated 03 Jul 2008
30
0th
I watched this for free on my brother's TV and I still want my money back. Some nice cinematography and nicely choreographed action sequences, but a mind-numbingly stupid plot and tons of annoying AND flat characters. Gah. Even the decidedly average first movie was better.
Rated 03 Jul 2008
wicheWiche
Rated 10 Nov 2009
64
45th
Fine movie to just sit down and enjoy the action because there was plenty of it. Sometimes a bit over the top and sometimes you had an 'O my God'-moment, but actually it's still quite good.
Rated 10 Nov 2009
hatman101Hatman101
Rated 18 Aug 2009
80
44th
Ridiculous(ly awesome)!
Rated 18 Aug 2009
abunchofcatsABUNCHOFCATS
Rated 26 Apr 2009
60
15th
If Crank didn't exist I'd probably look upon this better, but Crank showed how to do an over-the-top action flick right, with Jason Statham.
Rated 26 Apr 2009
pickpocketPickpocket
Rated 17 Oct 2008
4
35th
Can we get less minor characters and more STATHAM?? Amber Valletta can't act. Go away.
Rated 17 Oct 2008
cestmoicestmoi
Rated 17 May 2008
50
26th
Spouse made me watch this. He owes me.
Rated 17 May 2008
blargetyBlargety
Rated 14 Aug 2007
30
8th
Horrible, absolutely horrible. Makes the first one look like high art.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
fuxoftfuxoft
Rated 14 Aug 2007
45
20th
Stupid but not fun enough
Rated 14 Aug 2007
thedenizenTheDenizen
Rated 29 Jan 2007
70
63rd
The crane hook/bomb under the car bit was worth the price of admission.
Rated 29 Jan 2007
tankisTankis
Rated 08 Dec 2024
63
4th
An over-the-top sequel that leans into absurd stunts and non-stop action. Jason Statham is effortlessly cool as Frank Martin, handling the role with precision and charm. The Miami setting adds a vibrant flair, but the story feels thin and heavily reliant on outrageous sequences. While it sacrifices realism for spectacle, the movie remains entertaining thanks to its stylish execution and Statham’s magnetic presence. A fun, guilty pleasure for fans of high-octane action.
Rated 08 Dec 2024
slaterman2slaterman2
Rated 30 Nov 2023
57
18th
Pretty bad, but still enjoyable.
Rated 30 Nov 2023
quintonjaminQuintonjamin
Rated 22 Jul 2023
50
35th
Not as good as the first and its reliance on outdated cgi doesn't do it any favors. Will watch the third because I was still entertained.
Rated 22 Jul 2023
tevtev
Rated 16 Jul 2023
30
17th
don't remember it
Rated 16 Jul 2023
scholar69420Scholar69420
Rated 04 Sep 2022
40
14th
It’s really bad. Visually, it looks made for tv rather than the big screen. Total trash.
Rated 04 Sep 2022
petrostserPetrosTser
Rated 27 Aug 2022
30
5th
Cringey, stereotypical villains with an idiotic, unnecessarily complicated, unabashedly unoriginal master plan about a virus that spreads like a wildfire, yet somehow the hero doesn't get it and it can be contained by a magical antidote? Check. Shallow, cliched bond between the hero and a kid, whose mum either drools over the hero or shows her maternal instincts? Check. Ridiculous dialogues, mediocre CGI and absolutely impossible, preposterous action? Check. The stunts were really good though.
Rated 27 Aug 2022
glumpy99glumpy_99
Rated 26 Jan 2022
66
30th
Pretty much same song, second verse and if you like the tune that's playing, it's reasonable escapism; probably a bigger problem for genre hounds is that this same basic material has been done with greater conviction in the hands of Norris/Bronson etc., and (later) more spectacularly in the hands of Neeson, which makes these films feel so far like an empty compromise of the two approaches. As before, Statham is serviceable if not memorable; ditto his bland array of villains.
Rated 26 Jan 2022
exirelExirel
Rated 26 Sep 2021
5
39th
The plot is terrible, but the action scene are way better than the first one. Trigger warning for casual sexism and full male-gaze.
Rated 26 Sep 2021
nutcrackrnutcrackr
Rated 05 Jan 2021
62
19th
Too many ludicrous moments, like the plane remaining intact after crashing into the ocean. Some neat combat bits, like the firehose, but many others are too strange: the metal pole bends like rubber. Story is okay to decent (aside from the last bit) but this sequel fails with the set pieces because they're silly not clever.
Rated 05 Jan 2021
hakkanarejohakkanarejo
Rated 07 Sep 2020
95
63rd
One of the best movies ever acted out by Jason, The movie was so awesome I bought the exact same car. And believe me it drives like a dream.
Rated 07 Sep 2020
dakota99Dakota99
Rated 28 Aug 2019
3
16th
I'll give it a slight edge over the first one for the sake of the kid and Statham's connection. It does actually give you something to root for which I appreciate. However, the over the top madness of these films don't justify the actual action itself. Once again, Statham, his charisma, and his insanely bad one liners are what has become this franchise's bread and butter. It's hard not to like, but it would be nice to see a bit more effort put into the rest of the film.
Rated 28 Aug 2019
pfightmasterPfightmaster
Rated 09 Apr 2018
55
35th
Awesomely awful.
Rated 09 Apr 2018
synthonosynthono
Rated 26 Nov 2017
82
56th
Something so silly needs a sillier plot - crying mom in a bad marriage grinds the movie to a halt every time she shows up on screen - but then you get the fire hose scene and all is forgiven.
Rated 26 Nov 2017
timon88Timon88
Rated 25 Jul 2017
20
8th
Utterly idiotic. The first few totally implausible/impossible action sequences are entertaining enough, but... an entire movie of Jason Statham defying all physical laws? The tone is ever-so-slightly jokey... it's difficult to tell whether all these physically impossible feats are genre-parody or not, and it's equally difficult to decide whether making it more jokey would improve things or not. And Matthew Modine, what the hell happened to you? You were an actual actor once upon a time.
Rated 25 Jul 2017
sirrobbieSirRobbie
Rated 06 Mar 2016
60
24th
It is what it is, and what it is, is mindless fun.
Rated 06 Mar 2016
glm01glm01
Rated 15 May 2015
61
24th
61.000
Rated 15 May 2015
rymRYM
Rated 29 Mar 2015
47
15th
2.33/5
Rated 29 Mar 2015
lonewolf2003Lonewolf2003
Rated 03 Dec 2014
72
51st
More cliched in its approach to both plot and characters as the first. But the action is even better than the first (that hose scene; wow!), making it even more enjoyable . That some of the stunts defy reality is part of the fun.
Rated 03 Dec 2014
lookjabbaLookJabba...
Rated 15 Oct 2014
3
14th
The Transporter 2 is just a carbon copy of the first film and it's completely forgettable. Jason Statham has a car chase, a few fist fights and handful of shoot outs, the end. The first film wasn't particularly great and this sequel offers nothing new. It's dumb but tolerable and worth a watch once though.
Rated 15 Oct 2014
lauftLäuft.
Rated 15 Sep 2014
34
9th
The action is sometimes great, sometimes cheap looking, but the overall film is just too dumb and unrealistiv to handle.
Rated 15 Sep 2014
myfavchordsmyfavchords
Rated 23 Jun 2014
73
37th
This movie sequel is a fun action ride. Jason Statham is great in the lead role and there are a lot of entertaining and exciting action sequences. There are a couple moments that are really far fetched even for an action movie, Overall I would recommend this film.
Rated 23 Jun 2014
zapperlifeZapperLife
Rated 01 Mar 2014
19
12th
Revisited (4+) [uncut]
Rated 01 Mar 2014
dashDash
Rated 20 Aug 2013
80
80th
Even better action sequences then the first, if you were willing to forgive how ridiculous some of the scenes were. Worse plot, but better characterization than the first.
Rated 20 Aug 2013
scurryscurry
Rated 03 Jul 2013
40
33rd
Actionactionaction
Rated 03 Jul 2013
siminsimin
Rated 23 Feb 2013
40
5th
craaaapp
Rated 23 Feb 2013
the_pirateThe Pirate
Rated 18 Apr 2012
50
10th
It...had it's moments.
Rated 18 Apr 2012
matthew_parkinsonMatthew Parkinson
Rated 27 Sep 2011
60
62nd
Transporter 2 fixes almost all of the problems that its predecessor had, and ends up being quite the enjoyable little film. It has a plot, which is usually a plus, while also having inventive action scenes and at least one memorable character. It has elements to complement the almost relentless action scenes, and since those are improved too, you'll have a lot of fun with this one. All in all, I enjoyed this Transporter quite a bit.
Rated 27 Sep 2011
davidjohnsonDavidJohnson
Rated 10 Sep 2011
51
26th
Kind of similar to the first in that, the first hour was pretty good, and the last half hour was kind of boring. This is worse then the first though because the storyline was kind of lame. The action in this is also a lot more unrealistic. Oh and Kate Nauta is fucking hot.
Rated 10 Sep 2011
glmissexyglm_is_sexy
Rated 31 Aug 2011
65
25th
64.500
Rated 31 Aug 2011
helveticaHelvetica
Rated 30 Jul 2011
74
19th
Undoubtedly the weakest film in the series. An incoherent plot and some absurd scenes manage to spoil a film set in a stereotypical city of choice, providing little incentive for repeat viewing.
Rated 30 Jul 2011
slantmagSlantMag
Rated 08 Nov 2010
15
21st
"The Transporter 2 is a martial arts-obsessed action movie inadvertently reconceived as cartoonish parody." - Nick Schager
Rated 08 Nov 2010
hellboy76hellboy76
Rated 21 Sep 2010
58
23rd
Plenty of action, just nothing else. Statham needs a new agent.
Rated 21 Sep 2010
jkathrensjkathrens
Rated 01 Sep 2010
40
13th
Was this idea really sequel-worthy (much less series-worthy)? His rules are great until he breaks them at will. A few LOL moments of ridiculousness. Might be great fodder if you're looking for something to throw on that you can laugh at with some friends.
Rated 01 Sep 2010
x_humanx-human
Rated 20 Aug 2010
77
53rd
Turns our anti-hero into a regular American hero; and that misses the fun. What was great about the original is that he was a villain with principles. The eurotrash also seems to bring this one down a bit with Kate Nauta being the film's bright spot.
Rated 20 Aug 2010
kortoxkortox
Rated 06 Jan 2010
30
15th
Shoot a helicopter with a machine pistol and it explodes.
Rated 06 Jan 2010
pewbengpewbeng
Rated 05 Dec 2009
50
34th
sequel degradation
Rated 05 Dec 2009
capttesticleCaptTesticle
Rated 21 Sep 2009
35
8th
Screeching tyres, violence, threats of untold destruction... actually it was very similar to a time I was delivering emergency sanitary pads to my girlfriend.
Rated 21 Sep 2009
mochajetmochajet
Rated 01 Aug 2009
78
66th
good, but lacked a bit of edginess from the first one.
Rated 01 Aug 2009
pepsi_manPepsi-Man
Rated 20 Jul 2009
2
39th
Stupid as hell, but has such a dumb, cartoony sense of logic that it can be enjoyed for what it is. Most should stay away.
Rated 20 Jul 2009
vandelay1Vandelay1
Rated 10 Jul 2009
44
43rd
Much worse as the first part
Rated 10 Jul 2009
nimnonimno
Rated 14 Jun 2009
56
48th
I think it would have been a better movie if they had decided to forego the CGI car stunts and stuck to real driving. If something is physically possible and you've got the guts to do it, that makes a great movie. But something that defies the laws of physics and exists only in a CGI world defeats the purpose of the movie.
Rated 14 Jun 2009
pigletPiglet
Rated 09 Jun 2009
60
29th
There should be a law against watching these kind of movies outside Sundays. But on a Sunday it works just fine.
Rated 09 Jun 2009
johnsandwichJohnSandwich
Rated 13 May 2009
85
90th
this series' curious mixture of james bond, john mcclane and jackie chan really finds its stride in the second installment, which is over-the-top-of-the-top and enormously entertaining.
Rated 13 May 2009
sliderccslidercc
Rated 20 Apr 2009
45
42nd
Not as bad as the original, but still not that entertaining.
Rated 20 Apr 2009
qvtQVT
Rated 29 Mar 2009
15
23rd
Pretty junk. So bad I forgot to review it!
Rated 29 Mar 2009
robotjazzrobotjazz
Rated 07 Feb 2009
58
35th
One of the worst movies I ever liked. Please ah-scuse me.
Rated 07 Feb 2009
lrampartllrampartl
Rated 07 Feb 2009
55
38th
Let's see: a script written by Homer Simpson, awful one-liners, tons of goofy and unintelligible accents, evil villain databases, and impossible action sequences. It's an American-ized Jackie Chan kind of film, and it's not bad. It's a terrible movie, definitely, but that doesn't mean it's not fun.
Rated 07 Feb 2009
fslherofsl_hero
Rated 03 Feb 2009
81
32nd
In some ways better than the first one, Transporter 2 is action packed although mindless and unrealistic, but it works for this kind of movie. Recommended.
Rated 03 Feb 2009
xaddictxaddict
Rated 21 Jan 2009
65
39th
A bit less awesome as the original but still action-packed and a lot of beautifully filmed scenes
Rated 21 Jan 2009
favrewanabfavrewanab
Rated 18 Jan 2009
75
47th
Good action movie.
Rated 18 Jan 2009
garythellamaGaryTheLlama
Rated 16 Dec 2008
25
17th
I loved the first one, but this is just a terrible, terrible movie. So terrible it's memorable and I'm giving it a decent score.
Rated 16 Dec 2008
evnEv@n
Rated 09 Dec 2008
82
72nd
The best of the series. Great action and a smokin' hot woman which the third movie lacked. Grade: B Plus
Rated 09 Dec 2008
errorabbiterrorabbit
Rated 08 Dec 2008
34
7th
so bad when the prequel was so good
Rated 08 Dec 2008
mentaculusMentaculus
Rated 11 Sep 2008
55
28th
Leterrier confessed that this Frank Martin is gay. Things like oil slick judo, spray hose fighting and a bomb being ripped from the undercarriage of a car not only carry much more thematic weight, but become infinitely more hilarious.
Rated 11 Sep 2008
cinematicespCinematicESP
Rated 19 Aug 2008
77
40th
Awesome fight scenes, especially the scene with the fire hose (wasn't that in Romeo Must Die?). The villains are unbelievable and ridiculous, as in the first film, but that's all part of the fun. And why did Francois Berleand's character become so damn silly all of the sudden?
Rated 19 Aug 2008
justin052Justin052
Rated 27 Jul 2008
83
67th
Better than the first, surprisingly, and very well done.
Rated 27 Jul 2008
doctor7doctor7
Rated 16 Jul 2008
47
28th
Well I thought it was better than the first only because the action sequences are entertaining. Mostly due to how they're filmed this time around (they are still completely over the top, which can be good or bad depending on your viewpoint). The story isn't particularly interesting, has plenty of roll-eye moments and really just feels like Man on Fire but nowhere near as bad ass. Plus the antagonists are really lame. I thought chicks in bikinis with guns went out of style in the 90's?
Rated 16 Jul 2008
davebirchdavebirch
Rated 11 Jul 2008
50
16th
Disappointing after the first one. Yes they both silly, but the dramatic licence with the ending actually takes the piss a bit.
Rated 11 Jul 2008
babbigwenBabbiGwen
Rated 28 Jun 2008
73
20th
Fun action, but again with the throw away love interest, only this one comes with her own special needs that feels really tacked on at the end. I'm no dude, but I'm assuming the target audience of dudes does not care about mushy feel good crap, so just bring on the action and don't stop.
Rated 28 Jun 2008
bharathbharath
Rated 13 Jun 2008
60
29th
Not as good as the first part.
Rated 13 Jun 2008
weirdyodaweirdyoda
Rated 01 May 2008
79
59th
Motherfucker can kick guns out of dude's hands! Nothing really makes sense and pretty much everything is out of the realm of physical possibility, but, who cares. Jason Statham is the man, just enjoy the craziness.
Rated 01 May 2008
spamhead80spamhead80
Rated 23 Mar 2008
60
17th
Mindless action flick.
Rated 23 Mar 2008
warchildWarchild
Rated 22 Feb 2008
86
71st
Apart from the non-believable stunts, the movie is great. Not as much fighting as in the first, and the story is very contrived, but not a waste of 2 hours.
Rated 22 Feb 2008
alidedealidede
Rated 27 Jan 2008
90
67th
good film
Rated 27 Jan 2008
monstergearMonsterGear
Rated 19 Nov 2007
60
20th
It's ridiculous excess, but some of the fight scenes later in the film were actually not totally forgettable.
Rated 19 Nov 2007
peaceanarchyPeaceAnarchy
Rated 15 Nov 2007
67
19th
Minimally better than the first one but still a silly movie with a stupid plot. The action is pretty good, though, so if you go in simply for that it's not bad.
Rated 15 Nov 2007
kavuKavu
Rated 11 Nov 2007
74
54th
The movie totally lacks a script and common sense, which is why it's so great. Jason Statham ftw.
Rated 11 Nov 2007
trowbridgetrowbridge
Rated 09 Nov 2007
75
23rd
action action and some more action
Rated 09 Nov 2007
nandorizzinandorizzi
Rated 09 Nov 2007
55
41st
More action, less story. Jason Statham do well this type of movie. But not exactly something creative.
Rated 09 Nov 2007
piratexgirlpiratexgirl
Rated 07 Oct 2007
85
72nd
I liked it better than the first movie, not to say that that one was bad, this one is just really really awesome. Jason Statham is the next big action movie star, this is one of his best sofar.
Rated 07 Oct 2007
joshk84joshk84
Rated 16 Sep 2007
80
70th
This movie looked like it should have been cool, but it was not quite as good as the first one. I do sort of hope for another one day though.
Rated 16 Sep 2007
dustydDustyd
Rated 16 Sep 2007
40
11th
Tries to outdo itself with silliness while forgetting to be exciting.
Rated 16 Sep 2007
wraithwraith
Rated 12 Sep 2007
35
8th
Bomb on BMW...
Rated 12 Sep 2007
mohkoMohko
Rated 29 Aug 2007
75
72nd
Go Jason Go Jason Go!
Rated 29 Aug 2007
stflyst_fly
Rated 21 Aug 2007
39
39th
Alright action. The first part is far superior.
Rated 21 Aug 2007
tejascarltejascarl
Rated 19 Aug 2007
70
9th
The first one was fun, this one was stupid.
Rated 19 Aug 2007
servantdagonServantDagon
Rated 14 Aug 2007
66
18th
"Your flight's been cancelled!" => "No, YOU've been cancelled!". Yeah, that's what earned it its 66.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
scottScott
Rated 14 Aug 2007
0
1st
"The Transporter" is a great action movie. "The Transporter 2" is absolutely horrible; horrible writing, poor acting, ridiculous plot points, and the same old hackneyed 'action flick' crap we've seen a hundred times before.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
jeanie93Jeanie93
Rated 14 Aug 2007
78
46th
First one was better for a story line, second had better effects.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
easydiffeasydiff
Rated 14 Aug 2007
72
79th
Forces you to accept it is a loud, silly popcorn movie... then has all the fun you could hope for.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
ripviciousripvicious
Rated 14 Aug 2007
80
67th
Just as good as the first.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
svicciarellisvicciarelli
Rated 14 Aug 2007
75
21st
Just OK - lacking the charm and charisma of the better than decent original, but it gets points for being so ridiculous and inventive in its stunts.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
aushabfanaus_hab_fan
Rated 14 Aug 2007
65
14th
More of the same
Rated 14 Aug 2007
mrbeckmrbeck
Rated 14 Aug 2007
60
25th
Not as good as the orignal, but still worth seeing once to follow up in the traditional "Well I need to watch the sequel" fashion. In this one the level of action seems unproportional to the amount of plot happening, but it keeps the mindless-entertainement factor there.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
mlightle3mlightle3
Rated 14 Aug 2007
60
14th
Not nearly as good as the first one.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
mystericemysterice
Rated 14 Aug 2007
10
16th
Physics died in the movie.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
ssmodkssmodk
Rated 14 Aug 2007
90
84th
Stylisticly overdriven sequel to the straightforeward martial arts film, this molds itself into being a new hyperkinetic James Bond-like francise, something that XXX aspired to be beneath its "extreme sports" trappings. Gleefully silly but wholly enjoyable.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
spitfireSpitfire
Rated 14 Aug 2007
45
13th
Some good combat sequences ruined by over the top scenes that keep ruining the suspension of disbelief making it hard to enjoy the action.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
teamanistonteamaniston
Rated 14 Aug 2007
13
8th
take a guess...
Rated 14 Aug 2007

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...