sign in
register
Watch
Apple TV Google Play Movies Fandango At Home
+6
The World Is Not Enough
The World Is Not Enough
+6
JustWatch
Your probable score
?
The World Is Not Enough

The World Is Not Enough

1999
Suspense/Thriller, Crime
2h 8m
Bond uncovers a nuclear plot when he protects an oil heiress from her former kidnapper, a terrorist who can't feel pain.

Directed by:

Michael Apted

Screenwriter:

Ian Fleming, Neal Purvis, Robert Wade, Bruce Feirstein

Starring:

John Cleese, Pierce Brosnan, Sophie Marceau, Colin Salmon, Robert Carlyle, Ulrich Thomsen, Robbie Coltrane, Judi Dench, Denise Richards, Desmond Llewelyn, Patrick Malahide, Michael G. Wilson

Franchise:

James Bond

Genres:

Suspense/Thriller, Crime, Action, Adventure

Countries:

UK, USA

Languages:

English, Spanish, Russian
imdb IMDb
Update history
Suggest edit

The World Is Not Enough

1999
Suspense/Thriller, Crime
2h 8m
Your probable score
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer
Avg Percentile 34.07% from 5559 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

(5591)
Compact view
clear
Compact view
Show
Sort
beedubBeeDub
Rated 10 Jul 2024
75
29th
Huh huh huh, "comes."
Rated 10 Jul 2024
billyshearsBillyShears
Rated 19 May 2019
65
42nd
The big bad who can’t feel pain is a bad villain, the idiot goes around holding molten hot rocks while his skin sizzles “uhhh pretty sure you can still get infections idiot” Super real talk: Denise Richards in the 90s was so stupid attractive.She's a fox. In French, she would be called "la renarde" and she would be hunted with only her cunning to protect her.
Rated 19 May 2019
febrarofebraro
Rated 14 Aug 2007
20
2nd
Denise Richards' Boobs Are Not Enough.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
paxtonPaxton
Rated 04 Feb 2012
49
20th
The plot and action sequences are not enough.
Rated 04 Feb 2012
derbarneyDer_Barney
Rated 08 Dec 2008
72
20th
Chase scenes? Check. Explosions? Check. Hot girls? Check. Friggin' bagpipes with integrated flamethrowers? Check. Nukular bombs OMG!!!111one? Check. A smooth operator called James Bond sipping Vodka Martinis, ruining cars and wooing the ladies? Check. YEP - IT'S A 007 MOVIE ALRIGHT! Note to fellow reviewers: How is Christmas Jones any more stupid a name than Pussy Galore or Holly Goodhead? Oh, five extra points for this movie having John Cleese in it. Not the best in the series but entirely OK.
Rated 08 Dec 2008
pickpocketPickpocket
Rated 19 Dec 2015
2
21st
Every direction you hope they go they go the other way so it makes for a very frustrating viewing experience. The villain may have worked with a better actor being cast and if they would've cut out the emotional side of him and made him more Zorin-esque but unfortunately he almost gets to the brink of tears in one scene which is laughable for a Bond villain. With some cool action scenes in the previous film you are really left wanting here, there's not one memorable scene.
Rated 19 Dec 2015
mrandersen10mrandersen10
Rated 02 Jul 2012
55
13th
Enjoyed the first half, then it drops off a cliff. Everything starts to drag and get stupid when Richards shows up. Absolutely loved the theme song by Garbage.
Rated 02 Jul 2012
overratedoverrated
Rated 14 Jan 2010
23
14th
Sophie Marceau as a femme fatale was awesome. Denise Richards as a nuclear scientist, not so much.
Rated 14 Jan 2010
auritechauritech
Rated 14 Aug 2007
23
12th
Bond films hit a low with this one, following every formula that made the series stale and stagnant.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
twincinematwincinema
Rated 14 Feb 2023
50
26th
I think the Brosnan-era Bonds all get a slightly higher rating from me because the late-90s/early-00s action blockbuster feels so nostalgic. Also, I have been saying, "I thought Christmas only comes once a year" in a British accent over and over again since I have seen this, and my partner is getting irritated.
Rated 14 Feb 2023
indyatmnINDYATMN
Rated 09 May 2020
86
79th
Yes, Denise Richards is not a remotely plausible physicist (although her performance is fine for the series) & would work better in a campier entry, but her silliness (& other silliness) sticks out b/c there is some great stuff here. Marceau plays the 1st Bond girl since Diana Rigg to have her own backstory & arc. Then the writers deliver something truly original: the 1st Bond girl/villain. Bond's face-off w/ her feels truly personal & the sub climax is 1 of the series' most thrilling.
Rated 09 May 2020
picklemanPickle_Man
Rated 19 Mar 2018
50
14th
Drops the previous entry's reliance on bad technobabble. The first half is actually pretty good - on track for maybe a 7.5/10. Then Denise Richards shows up. She doesn't singlehandedly ruin the rest of the movie (not for lack of trying), but signals a general downturn after which everything goes wrong.
Rated 19 Mar 2018
ocelotOcelot
Rated 10 Jan 2015
20
12th
"I thought Christmas only comes once a year." Fuck you.
Rated 10 Jan 2015
synthonosynthono
Rated 27 Feb 2011
82
56th
Denise Richards is woefully miscast, but it's also got one of the best pair of villains in the series - medically improbable, perhaps, but great personality - which pulls it up again. Then there are the sawblade helicopters, which seem like they should be a mid-boss in a Megaman game, so down it goes. But then there's the cold open... It's a frustrating movie at the end of the day, because some great ideas are hidden by some really poor decisions.
Rated 27 Feb 2011
timmotimmo
Rated 17 Jul 2009
40
6th
Denise Richards ruins it. It could've been a lot more fun without her.
Rated 17 Jul 2009
joseywalesjoseywales
Rated 21 Apr 2009
52
24th
Carlyle and Cleese are great, everything else is meh. It's hard to take a movie serious when it stars Denise Richards as a nuclear scientist named Christmas. The best part about watching this movie was when I realized I had caught up on all the 007 flicks I hadn't yet seen and didn't have to watch any more.
Rated 21 Apr 2009
mentaculusMentaculus
Rated 10 Sep 2008
62
37th
Imagine the film without Dr. Christmas Jones. Actually a halfway decent movie, isn't it?
Rated 10 Sep 2008
purgatospurgatos
Rated 09 May 2008
19
5th
This is the absolute worst Bond movie. It's not just bad, it's boring too.
Rated 09 May 2008
doctor7doctor7
Rated 08 Dec 2007
41
24th
Continues the steady decline of the James Bond franchise. Some good scenes but overall just not very good. And Denise Richards as a nuclear scientist named CHRISTMAS? Right...
Rated 08 Dec 2007
mrbeckmrbeck
Rated 14 Aug 2007
70
58th
What can I say, it's another James Bond movie. I happen to like the series, and I happen to like Pierce Brosnan in the role... sort of mindless action, and you think it'd be cliché by now, but still a good movie in my books.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
thmertensth_mertens
Rated 12 Aug 2007
19
1st
Let's hope for the writers of this crap that James Bond will never capture them, because this is a pure act of terror.
Rated 12 Aug 2007
teddedonTedDedon
Rated 18 Mar 2007
66
35th
Not the best Bond movie by any stretch, but it's still thoroughly entertaining and worth seeing if you like the character. It could have been worse and it certainly could have been a lot better.
Rated 18 Mar 2007
magbMagb
Rated 16 Dec 2006
25
5th
Brosnan is the only thing that's keeping things at least marginally afloat at this point.
Rated 16 Dec 2006
lonewolf2003Lonewolf2003
Rated 15 Nov 2024
62
24th
2nd viewing
Rated 15 Nov 2024
videoetronVideoetron
Rated 20 Jan 2024
81
97th
It has many fun action scenes, special settings, and tense moments. The bodyguard theme is new and interesting, though it limits the scope of the story a little, which forces to try and keep it tight. It underlines the few parts where it wobbles at times. The scene with the beluga felt a bit like clownery, but the tense end scenes bring it back up and makes you forget previous issues. Christmas is abysmally bad and ruins a lot of the dialog and action scenes she is in. Still smooth overall
Rated 20 Jan 2024
fredericg54frederic_g54
Rated 27 Dec 2023
6
35th
(2nd viewing) Shave off a solid 20 minutes and you would’ve had a film as swiftly paced as its predecessor. Which is a shame because it starts off with what’s easily one of the best pre-title sequence of the franchise, but it takes a nosedive from there with too many slumps where the film loses momentum and the villain is instantly forgettable. I’ll end on a positive note, I think Brosnan may just be the best actor to have ever played the part, dude just owns it.
Rated 27 Dec 2023
akjnakjn
Rated 02 Jul 2023
40
10th
bond cekiciligiyle lezbiyen kızı hetero yapıyor hd full izle
Rated 02 Jul 2023
bfnbfn
Rated 31 Jan 2023
64
30th
“The insurance company is never going to believe this”
Rated 31 Jan 2023
eastondEastonD
Rated 16 Jan 2022
15
16th
A well scraper, dull as a papal bull, ropier than a crime scene but it’s all worth it for the “I thought Christmas only comes once a year” line. I can still feel the audible groan in my bones from my father and the entirety of the audience near twenty years later.
Rated 16 Jan 2022
kasperlKasperL
Rated 06 Nov 2021
50
29th
Very watchable Bond film. But despite the solid use of Marceau, it's a decidedly forgettable one.
Rated 06 Nov 2021
hazelhawkshazelhawks
Rated 12 Apr 2021
31
9th
Joyless, vapid, and dull. A casting switch might have helped - Richards could have been a hoot as Elektra, the villain-as-spoiled-brat (prescient too given that, in 1999, Britney and Paris were just starting to make waves) and Marceau would have at least been passable (though still boring) as a nuclear physicist...but no such luck. It's no fun at all, which makes it the worst Bond ever.
Rated 12 Apr 2021
antonio_pAntonio P
Rated 22 Mar 2021
60
72nd
I thought this movie was good. Denise Richards and Sophie Marceau are in this. So basically Bond is protecting Sophie in this movie to protect a pipeline. Then you find out a lot of betrayals in this movie and who the real bad guy or Woman is. Not a lot of action in this movie. Not one of the better movies but not crap either.
Rated 22 Mar 2021
nuotionuotio
Rated 20 Apr 2020
57
57th
I recalled this as one of the very worst Bonds, but turns out I mostly mixed it with Die Another Day. It's a good looking film, surprisingly story driven and Apted handles the action & drama equally. Elektra's character has more depth than usual; that's why Carlyle's cliched bad guy feels out of place. Denise Richards as scientist also requires a lot of suspension of disbelief. It only starts to run out of breath when it gets to the nuclear submarine, continuing the trend of lackluster endings.
Rated 20 Apr 2020
vv238vv238
Rated 17 Sep 2018
32
29th
I started my review of TND by saying that it's straight from 1964. This feels like it was spawned by that god-awful Casino Royale non-MGM/Eon production only given more money and a B-movie script. This is officially where James Bond should have had it's dark and gritty reboot because it seems like no one in charge of production realized that the 60's was about to be 40 years in the past.
Rated 17 Sep 2018
gpppgppp
Rated 28 May 2018
68
26th
tter than the previous one, but still too many boring action scenes. The intrigue in the plot is pretty good though.
Rated 28 May 2018
mwestcottmwestcott
Rated 07 Jan 2018
55
22nd
The World is Not Enough is by far the most forgettable of the Brosnan films. It falls short by missing the fresh thrills of GoldenEye and the delightful campy tone of Tomorrow Never Dies. However the 19th in the series is saved by some incredible action set pieces and an great performance from (still not a superstar yet for some reason) Robert Carlyle.
Rated 07 Jan 2018
dyannethorneDyanneThorne
Rated 25 Jul 2017
35
17th
Deals with sexual abuse and Stockholm Syndrome with all the tact and intelligence you would expect from a Bond movie. Otherwise pretty much as bad as the other Brosnan movies.
Rated 25 Jul 2017
mist600Mist600
Rated 24 Jul 2017
48
10th
Robert Carlye is best thing in it by a country mile.
Rated 24 Jul 2017
igormacheteigormachete
Rated 06 Jul 2016
70
39th
Solid Bond movie with everything you would expect from a Bond movie, plus some new ideas. The only real problem this movie has is Denise Richards
Rated 06 Jul 2016
evilmangoesEvilMangoes
Rated 24 Jan 2016
57
26th
C+
Rated 24 Jan 2016
vengefulkbmVengefulKBM
Rated 29 Dec 2015
50
25th
I enjoy the return of Robbie Coltrane, Sophie Marceau plays a very fun baddie, and the score makes good use of the awesome theme song. Brosnan is also my favorite actor for the role of Bond, so it does make up some points for that. But the plot is extremely tired, the action sequences aren't all that memorable, and Denise Richards is as terrible as everybody says she is. In this case, the good and the bad completely balance each other out.
Rated 29 Dec 2015
hakkanarejohakkanarejo
Rated 30 Aug 2015
95
63rd
After a bomb blows up the powerful Sir Robert King (David Clader) in the middle of MI6 headquarters, M (Judi Dench) has had enough She suspects that infamous terrorist Renard (Robert Carlyle) is behind this. He targeted the King family previously, kidnapping the lovely young Elektra (Sophie Marceau) M sends her best agent James Bond (Pierce Brosnan) to protect Electra and find out what Renard is planning The game is just beginning and Bond finds out he is only one of the many pieces on the board
Rated 30 Aug 2015
benoliver999benoliver999
Rated 25 Aug 2015
50
29th
The World is Not Enough isn't an instant classic but fifteen years on it still feels quite modern and innovative. It's a very solid entry into the catalogue and cements Brosnan into history as James Bond for a generation.
Rated 25 Aug 2015
prestobixPrestoBix
Rated 20 Aug 2015
61
28th
Seen 2x
Rated 20 Aug 2015
rymRYM
Rated 29 Mar 2015
50
21st
2.50/5
Rated 29 Mar 2015
tjlmovfrks23TjlMovFrks23
Rated 23 Nov 2014
70
38th
The plot is full of B-movie action clique,while the actors are performed on unbalance constancy. its the case with The bond still seriously attractive,but there is a struggle of acting between the more experience Marceau and inexperience Richards at that time. on the other hand, Brosnan still make a solid bond despite his slowly worn-out charm. nonetheless, he simple bond formula is still there to give us a modest entertainment.
Rated 23 Nov 2014
backwardsuitbackwardsuit
Rated 13 Nov 2014
59
21st
Nearly gets away with it.
Rated 13 Nov 2014
ecitizeneCitizen
Rated 06 Oct 2014
70
70th
Pierce Bronson was adequate in the role. Great music and high production quality. Plot is poor to bad. Sophie Marceau is gorgeous and wonderful. Rather poor gadgets and silly vehicles. Typical bond plot, mostly unconvincing. He inexplicably manages to be in the right place at the right time and his luck is beyond belief. Denise Richards was beautiful but unconvincing. Good pacing and tons of action make it worth watching, but you have to turn your brain off to enjoy it.
Rated 06 Oct 2014
amazedemonamazedemon
Rated 18 Aug 2014
65
62nd
I've seen The World is Not Enough a few times before, but watching it again in 2023 reinforces how forgettable it is. The film peaks with its opening sequence but fizzles out mostly due to lousy villains with a silly plot. Notable events: Cleese is introduced as Q's replacement; Dench's M gets more involved; Carlyle is wasted; Marceau is not good & I liked Richards as a nuclear physicist more this time round. The action sequences are fun despite some dated CGI. Ultimately it's just forgettable.
Rated 18 Aug 2014
troothTrooth
Rated 25 Jun 2014
61
33rd
At this point, they are clearly throwing in a ton of action for action's sake. Not that this is necessarily a bad thing, or unfamiliar territory for a Bond movie, but it's all grown a lot less subtle.
Rated 25 Jun 2014
glm01glm01
Rated 24 Mar 2014
62
25th
62.000
Rated 24 Mar 2014
spleenspleen
Rated 13 Mar 2014
64
31st
Just when I had recovered from the idea of Denise Richard as a nuclear physicist, I get sucker punched with a line like "welcome to my nuclear family". Painful, just painful.
Rated 13 Mar 2014
3drevelation3dRevelation
Rated 24 Feb 2014
51
15th
Definitely nowhere near Bond's finest moment. One more Christmas pun would have pushed me over the top.
Rated 24 Feb 2014
shosannaShosanna
Rated 06 Nov 2013
20
19th
Boring Bond flick that goes through the motions without bringing anything new or interesting to the table. The villains had some potential, but were squandered. I do have to admit that Richards was a great choice for Brosnan's sidekick, being equally wooden and devoid of charm. (2/5)
Rated 06 Nov 2013
paraguay1001Paraguay1001
Rated 27 Sep 2013
72
20th
Robert Carlye is best thing in it by a country mile.
Rated 27 Sep 2013
tonydaltonydal
Rated 19 Sep 2013
85
88th
The only deficit here is that the action gets awfully cartoonish, even by the standards of this series. Also I didn't find the Marceau character quite believable. But the actors portraying the two main villains are great, and Coltrane is a lot of fun too. And it's well-directed, with a very nice look (and atmosphere).
Rated 19 Sep 2013
kingofjewkingofjew
Rated 26 Aug 2013
70
39th
A solid follow up to the resurrection of the bond franchise , created by the masterpiece known as Goldeneye. Great villain, cool henchmen and excellent stunts, this was where it was still decent. The next two with Brosnan is where it really started going down hill
Rated 26 Aug 2013
dashDash
Rated 22 Aug 2013
50
28th
This Bond movie failed to impress. The action was okay, but the plot sucked and was plagued with inconsistencies.
Rated 22 Aug 2013
nilkynarfynilkynarfy
Rated 22 Jul 2013
50
34th
Blahblahblahcoolactionsequencesboringeverything. Did anyone notice Denise Richards at all? She was like a coat rack.
Rated 22 Jul 2013
elmakebabielmakebabi
Rated 29 Jun 2013
13
2nd
A Bond film, really?
Rated 29 Jun 2013
lookjabbaLookJabba...
Rated 14 May 2013
6
41st
The World Is Not Enough is another mediocre Bond film of the 90's. Despite Pierce Brosnan's best efforts, the wrest of this film is of uneven and of mixed quality throughout. The cast is strong on paper but Robbie Coltrane is the only worthy addition. And despite the huge array of exciting set pieces, ultimately they only cover the cracks of a forgettable and uninteresting Bond film. However the pre-title River Thames sequence and the skiing sequences are undoubtedly impressive and enjoyable.
Rated 14 May 2013
alex_wsAlex WS
Rated 18 Jan 2013
66
51st
Lazy Bond is still Bond.
Rated 18 Jan 2013
gogokaingogokain
Rated 10 Jan 2013
70
73rd
That last line is horrible. Marceau makes this the best of the Brosnan era.
Rated 10 Jan 2013
ndkchkNdkchk
Rated 12 Dec 2012
70
48th
Denise Richards is the best Playboy bunny...oh, sorry, nuclear physicist.
Rated 12 Dec 2012
rossRoss
Rated 05 Nov 2012
50
44th
Solid unambitious film with a lot of action. Marceau is stunning and Richards is laughably bad. Once again the theme song is better than the film itself.
Rated 05 Nov 2012
xacviantxacviant
Rated 05 Nov 2012
49
9th
The clumsy, overlong prologue gets THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH off to a suitable start: the film that follows is generally dull, lacking in wit, energy, or fun--my least favorite of the Bond series, and possibly the weakest as well. Even if you cut it slack for being incredibly ridiculous, that doesn't overcome the villains' lack of flair, the humdrum action scenes, Denise Richards' miscasting as a nuclear physicist, or the limp, murky writing. Brosnan does what he can, but that isn't enough here.
Rated 05 Nov 2012
misterlizardmisterlizard
Rated 25 Oct 2012
40
43rd
Not that terrible. If nothing else, it attempts to make Bond a less one-dimensional character much like OHMSS. There are a few nice action pieces in here, but they can't save it. Scores some points for Marceau and Richards as Bond girls, but Richards as a nuclear scientist in hot pants? Like the previous film, the theme song is the best part.
Rated 25 Oct 2012
shaunksshaunks
Rated 07 Oct 2012
58
12th
Common what happened in the gap between the last movie?! still better than the gap between "quantum of solace" and "cassino royale"...
Rated 07 Oct 2012
baggerBagger
Rated 02 Oct 2012
55
23rd
Any goodwill this movie had takes a sharp hit when Robert Carlyle utters the dumbest and most awkward oneliner in the entire series. "Welcome to my nuclear family. Ugh... that would make even fans of Roger Moore quips cringe.
Rated 02 Oct 2012
brandonsbrandons
Rated 10 Jul 2012
54
31st
This Bond flick focuses a little too much on action, with a plot too weak for the movie's length.
Rated 10 Jul 2012
braddad68braddad68
Rated 27 Jun 2012
80
5th
The only thing notable about this Bond was that John Cleese was introduced as Q's future replacement. That was short-lived however. The plot was confusing, and the villain was unimpressive.
Rated 27 Jun 2012
cotote2018Cotote2018
Rated 16 May 2012
50
7th
Pierce Brosnan is my favourite bond. But this film makes me want to fall asleep.
Rated 16 May 2012
mattorama12mattorama12
Rated 29 Mar 2012
61
36th
Elektra is a fun character and at least a little bit of a twist for the series. Most things in the movie are serviceable, but not especially memorable. Richards is ridiculously hot, but man is she a terrible actress. Presents a real Seinfeld-esque brain v. ball chess match watching her on screen here.
Rated 29 Mar 2012
bakcheiabakcheia
Rated 07 Jan 2012
1
13th
lol
Rated 07 Jan 2012
joeliusJoelius
Rated 27 Dec 2011
35
48th
Some of the stuff was ridiculously corny, but for the most part it really captured the happy, go-lucky James Bond feel. And for that I liked it.
Rated 27 Dec 2011
laplacianLaplacian
Rated 17 Dec 2011
70
22nd
A good Bond movie overall, with some entertaining yet cheesy action, requisite one-liners, loads of double crosses, and some interesting yet one-dimensional characters. While this movie is entertaining, has some fun ideas, and is fun to watch, its lack of depth unfortunately means that it is promptly forgotten for better recent Bond movies such as Goldeneye or Casino Royale. Fans of Bond should watch it for sure, but general action fans may not be enthralled.
Rated 17 Dec 2011
naurunauru
Rated 04 Sep 2011
15
10th
Probably the worst Bond film of them all, right down there with On Her Majesty's Secret Service. Judi Dench is irritating, the plot stinks, and Denise Richards has the dumbest lines I've ever heard. The villain isn't really compelling either and the action is kind of boring. Very disappointing.
Rated 04 Sep 2011
nothingsgoodNothingsGood
Rated 27 Jul 2011
50
46th
One of the quirkier Bond flicks, the World is Not Enough suffers from one of its more absurd and convoluted plots, as well as Denise Richards setting a new low for Bond-babe acting but high for Bond-babe hotness.
Rated 27 Jul 2011
cmonsterCMonster
Rated 24 Jul 2011
55
31st
2nd best Brosnan Bond flick. Not great, but definitely head and shoulders above Tomorrow Never Dies and looms over the corpse of the franchise that was Die Another Day. A few parts it just goes to far, even for a Bond film, and Richards would be a decent Bond girl if her acting wasn't as stiff as me when I watch her. If those two things had been amended, it would be one of the better Bond films. Also the helicopters with hanging saw blades were just stupid.
Rated 24 Jul 2011
clark_novaClark Nova
Rated 15 Jun 2011
89
60th
ho ho 00
Rated 15 Jun 2011
rewilde-brewilde
Rated 04 Mar 2011
30
6th
Dreadful. Bond in dire need of a reboot.
Rated 04 Mar 2011
johnnydarkjohnnydark
Rated 30 Dec 2010
5
0th
boring. just a string of action scenes.
Rated 30 Dec 2010
montycircusMontyCircus
Rated 29 Nov 2010
20
12th
I completely lost interest in the film for the last third. The theme song is Garbage.
Rated 29 Nov 2010
nunstranglernunstrangler
Rated 27 Sep 2010
57
35th
The numerous action sequences overwhelm the characters and Bond has little to pit himself against since the villains are so low-key. There is a welcome darker edge to both Bond's character and the plot that the franchise should build on, rather than trying to top its death-defying stunts each time.
Rated 27 Sep 2010
sinclairSinclair
Rated 01 Sep 2010
62
11th
Not very good, with an obvious "twist." Don't name a character Elektra than act like her betrayal is supposed to be a surprise.
Rated 01 Sep 2010
dunbardunbar
Rated 30 Aug 2010
60
25th
There isn't much of a pulse beneath this dull and uninspired addition to the Bond franchise.
Rated 30 Aug 2010
bookhouseboybookhouseboy
Rated 28 Aug 2010
26
21st
#00s(l)#, popcorn, oldies(2) }*{ #00s(e)#, popcorn, hype, story
Rated 28 Aug 2010
peaceanarchyPeaceAnarchy
Rated 27 Jul 2010
70
26th
It delivered what I expect from a Bond film, so I can't complain much but it didn't go beyond or do anything particularly special.
Rated 27 Jul 2010
petrostserPetrosTser
Rated 27 Jul 2010
50
24th
Arguably the weakest Bond film of all, "The World Is Not Enough" is just not good enough (pun intended): the unfocused direction (fuck all the melodrama) makes for an underwhelming result despite some memorable scenes. On the plus side: M in a more active role, John Cleese as R and Q bowing out in an eerily prophetical way: one month after the premiere, Desmond Llewelyn, 85, would pass away, having appeared in 17 out of the 19 Eon Bond films. His last words and exit are touching on many levels.
Rated 27 Jul 2010
mr_filmMr. Film
Rated 26 Jul 2010
57
34th
Brosnan is starting to grow tired of this role, but the film still entertains
Rated 26 Jul 2010
brightpointbrightpoint
Rated 17 Apr 2010
49
17th
Denise Richards plays a ....nuclear physicist.Bwahahahhahahaha.I need not go on.Point has been made.
Rated 17 Apr 2010
omgfridgeomgfridge
Rated 16 Mar 2010
1
8th
Terrible Bond flick. "GoldenEye" is the only Bond film featuring Brosnan you should watch.
Rated 16 Mar 2010
leekennleekenn
Rated 14 Mar 2010
66
41st
Good film, one of Brosnans three decent stabs at the Bond title.
Rated 14 Mar 2010
lukey86lukey86
Rated 05 Jan 2010
30
5th
A Bond shitfest. Has a absolutely no redeeming qualities. Though its sad to say that it is not the worst of the series.
Rated 05 Jan 2010
freqflyerfreqflyer
Rated 01 Jan 2010
60
23rd
Decent, i spose, although Richards as a nuclear physicist was simply atrocious.
Rated 01 Jan 2010
obdurateObdurate
Rated 21 Oct 2009
51
15th
I don't think i've ever seen a Bond movie that wasn't entertaining (though I'll admit I haven't seen that many). That's about all I can say for this.
Rated 21 Oct 2009
ofterdingenOfterdingen
Rated 18 Oct 2009
46
29th
Some things are good like the exciting opening scene on the River Thames and Sophie Marceau's terrific Bond girl. The action however is slow, Brosnan seems bored and Denise Richards is a travesty. A strangely dull and stilted entry.
Rated 18 Oct 2009
baljot187baljot187
Rated 04 Oct 2009
30
6th
One of the worst Bond movies ever made; really bad action scenes, innuendo-filled dialog that, even for a Bond movie, is groan-inducing. When Denise Richards is your Bond girl, you know you're in trouble.
Rated 04 Oct 2009
chemtrailschemtrails
Rated 03 Oct 2009
40
24th
Man this is pretty lame
Rated 03 Oct 2009
aesoptiniumaesoptinium
Rated 18 Aug 2009
10
3rd
Mediocre, cheesy, poorly written, and generally unentertaining.
Rated 18 Aug 2009

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...