sign in
register
The Godfather: Part III
The Godfather: Part III
Your probable score
?
The Godfather: Part III

The Godfather: Part III

1990
Drama, Crime
2h 42m
In this third film in the epic Corleone trilogy, Al Pacino reprises the role of powerful family leader Michael Corleone. Now in his 60's, Michael is dominated by two passions: freeing his family from crime and finding a suitable successor. That successor could be fiery Vincent (Garcia)... but he may also be the spark that turns Michael's hope of business legitimacy into an inferno of mob violence.

Directed by:

Francis Ford Coppola

Screenwriter:

Francis Ford Coppola, Mario Puzo

Starring:

Al Pacino, Bridget Fonda, Joe Mantegna, Andy Garcia, Diane Keaton, Talia Shire, Sofia Coppola, George Hamilton, Eli Wallach, Raf Vallone, Helmut Berger, Richard Bright

Franchise:

The Godfather

Genres:

Drama, Crime

AKAs:

The Godfather Coda: The Death of Michael Corleone, The Godfather Part 3, The Godfather Part III

Country:

USA

Languages:

English, Italian, Latin, German, Persian
imdb IMDb
Update history
Suggest edit

The Godfather: Part III

1990
Drama, Crime
2h 42m
Your probable score
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer
Avg Percentile 55.64% from 8541 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

(8606)
Compact view
clear
Compact view
Show
Sort
beedubBeeDub
Rated 24 Jan 2020
88
74th
OK, I get that this isn't the movie that everyone (including the filmmakers) hoped it would be - you have to qualify it a dozen ways before you can even start talking about it - but at the end of the day, it's a good movie with glimmers of the old Godfather greatness throughout. And seriously, folks, Sofia's not THAT bad.
Rated 24 Jan 2020
billyshearsBillyShears
Rated 21 Dec 2016
80
77th
Cartoon Al Pacino has absorbed the 70s powerhouse. Sofia constantly looks like she's going to bust out an Elvis impression. Joe Mantegna stretches for his Baby's Day Out role. Andy Garcia was a thing. Just when I thought I was out... they pull me back in.
Rated 21 Dec 2016
pickpocketPickpocket
Rated 02 Mar 2009
7
68th
Definetely not as bad as I've heard. I avoided this for a long time but I'm glad I saw how it ended. The climax is incredible and rivals the previous 2 films. My main complaint, like everyone else, is Sofia fucking Coppola. What are you doing in this movie? That chick can not act to save her life and (spoiler) when she dies it's actually kind of satisfying. Just when I thought I was out... they pull me back in.
Rated 02 Mar 2009
paxtonPaxton
Rated 20 Jun 2014
84
81st
I'm about to blow your mind and shatter everything you thought you knew about movies: Andy Garcia is no Robert De Niro.
Rated 20 Jun 2014
moribunnyMoribunny
Rated 16 Feb 2007
73
80th
Underrated. This is pretty good stuff, I dunno why people hate it so much.
Rated 16 Feb 2007
davidblastDavidBlast
Rated 17 Jan 2010
30
13th
Bad acting galore. It's easy to trash Sofia Coppola, but Andy Garcias psycho, that in one scene turns ice cold Godfather, is ridiculous. The biggest problem though, is the Michael Corleone character, morphed into a Pacino special. It's impossible to believe that it's the same character we left in Godfather 2. The movie goes bigger and more operatic, and thus the "buying out the catholics" plot is megalomaniac and over-the-top. Not as boring as part II, though, but by all means a poorer film.
Rated 17 Jan 2010
okkervilOkkervil
Rated 01 Aug 2009
74
74th
Much maligned, and harshly so. Still full of excellent performances and a great ending.
Rated 01 Aug 2009
melvin_smifMelvin Smif
Rated 10 Feb 2009
80
88th
It isn't Godfather I or II but it is Godfather III, so its not that bad.
Rated 10 Feb 2009
cagedwisdomcagedwisdom
Rated 16 Dec 2008
50
38th
Certainly not as good as the first two, but how did it ever have a chance? It's still a fine film, and Pacino once again satisfies completely with a wonderful performance. It's worth the length of the film just to watch the man act. A decent end to the best trilogy in film history. Really needs Sofia Coppola not to be in it though.
Rated 16 Dec 2008
lachapellelachapelle
Rated 14 Aug 2007
50
16th
This is not your father's Godfather. This film comes oh so close to ruining the reputation of the first two films. Still worth seeing, but just be warned. Go watch Goodfellas and the Sopranos.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
marc01marc01
Rated 11 Feb 2009
86
73rd
Better than most people would have you believe.
Rated 11 Feb 2009
nathan_sNathan S
Rated 06 Nov 2008
2
21st
Why do we need to see Michael slump in a chair some indeterminate amount of years into the future? Is that Coppola's idea of closure? This is the final inexplicable moment in a film full of them. Why does this movie exist? Michael Corleone is damned, this was made clear - with more subtlety, sadder resonance, and good acting - sixteen years before The Godfather pt III was ever released.
Rated 06 Nov 2008
manhattaManhatta
Rated 05 Jan 2008
39
17th
Not just a bad Godfather installment, it's a pretty bad film on it's own as well. Forgettable plot, weird incestual love stories, and Sofia Coppola.
Rated 05 Jan 2008
martintellerMartinTeller
Rated 14 Aug 2007
58
15th
There is a reason why no one likes this movie. Actually, there are several reasons, but the main one is Sofia Coppola.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
mentaculusMentaculus
Rated 25 Mar 2022
80
72nd
(Coda Edit) I appreciate this version ditched the III and adds Coda: it treats the events of the first two films as if they were myth, long since faded from waking memory, transcending into fable. The film’s choices in shots, acting technique, cadence, seem to want to repel the style of these tall tales - but like Michael, the more the film pushes them away, the more they haunt the living. It’s sometimes obtuse but the enterity of the opera sequence here is some of Coppola’s most poetic work.
Rated 25 Mar 2022
rudolph101Rudolph101
Rated 23 Mar 2022
83
64th
Continuing my 2022 tradition of seeing movies, I saw this movie
Rated 23 Mar 2022
twincinematwincinema
Rated 02 Jan 2021
70
52nd
Watched the Coda. This feels like a series of events that happen to occur, with a larger narrative not quite there. My favourite moment was the mobster exclaiming about his lucky coat.
Rated 02 Jan 2021
jaiguyJaiGuy
Rated 25 Feb 2020
70
26th
Some hammy stuff but very pretty. "Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in!" I found the opera and drama transparent, as if Coppola himself is trying to spoon feed us. I'm not falling for it.
Rated 25 Feb 2020
philamentalphilamental
Rated 23 Jan 2017
68
52nd
Effectively this feels like The Godfather: Part IV. There is too much of a disconnect from the first two films and it feels 'off' throughout. The most obvious example is the lack of Duvall's Hagan. Just a casual remark that he died to explain his absence and Hamilton fails to fill the gap. Is Sofia C's acting the worst ever in an Best Picture nominated film? It's up there. But all that aside, which is a lot, it still concludes the trilogy fairly well and there are a number of worthwhile scenes.
Rated 23 Jan 2017
letskillrobotsletskillrobots
Rated 23 Dec 2014
26
78th
Gosh, all over the place. A mix of some truly tremendous and appalling moments.
Rated 23 Dec 2014
groovysoulsGroovy_Souls
Rated 27 Jun 2014
80
73rd
Now let me just say, besides Pacino and Garcia, this movie had few redeeming qualities in terms of acting. Couple that with a good story, as long as you don't compare it to the first two, and it stands out as the weakest link. Yet, it is a terrific ending to the trilogy and fits nicely with the other two.
Rated 27 Jun 2014
lookjabbaLookJabba...
Rated 02 Dec 2013
6
41st
The Godfather: Part III had the impossible task of trying to recapture the quality of it's predecessors. This is by no means a bad film, it's just an unworthy sequel that feels disconnected from the tradition of the saga. Al Pacino somewhat feels like a different character and Robert Duvall in particular is sorely missed. The cast cannot live with the quality of their predecessors and whilst Andy Garcia is tolerable, Sofia Coppola is truly woeful. This is nothing more than an echo of nostalgia.
Rated 02 Dec 2013
mattorama12mattorama12
Rated 22 Mar 2013
71
64th
A solid movie that is unfairly maligned due to its predecessors, either of which could easily be considered the greatest film of all time. The only real problem is the acting is pretty sub-par by almost all involved, especially the atrocious performance by Sofia Coppola. And her character is given way too much story. That said, it's still a good movie. It's well made and provides a fitting and satisfying end for the trilogy.
Rated 22 Mar 2013
nicanicknicanick
Rated 09 May 2011
95
75th
Very underrated movie! Great story (again), beautifully written. Unfortunately, for me most of the charm of the first two Godfathers came from Al Pacino's Michael Corleone, I loved this silent, unpredictable and seemingly ruthless character. The story, however, required a character change, which I think was good but still disappointing. The only criticism I really have is Sofia Coppola's acting - compared to Andy Garcia and Al Pacino its just "bad". Without Godfather I and II it would be classic
Rated 09 May 2011
hellboy76hellboy76
Rated 22 Sep 2010
69
73rd
I didn't have the huge problems with it that others did. Obviously not as good as its predecessors but still an interesting wrap up filled with a (mostly) talented cast.
Rated 22 Sep 2010
danilofoltradanilofoltra
Rated 22 Jul 2010
97
92nd
Not as good as the first one, but still a great conclusion of this epic trilogy.
Rated 22 Jul 2010
cilogyCilogy
Rated 06 Jul 2010
60
6th
A film that never seems to realize how far it has drifted from its roots. It tries to emulate the dramatic structure of the original movie, yet ends up looking like a direct-to-DVD sequel.
Rated 06 Jul 2010
fuckeroofuckeroo
Rated 21 Jun 2010
30
11th
heartbreaking to see this epic trilogy end like THIS.
Rated 21 Jun 2010
cinemaasiaCinema_Asia
Rated 25 Jan 2010
75
71st
The only reason this doesn't rank lower is because the ending is a satisfactory conclusion to the trilogy. Despite how truly abysmal some of the acting is there are still some rather powerful scenes in the movie. It was a big mistake not getting Robert Duvall back though to reprise his role. The cast felt a little "light" without some of the old cast aside from Al Pacino.
Rated 25 Jan 2010
billkerwinbillkerwin
Rated 18 Dec 2009
70
14th
Fugeddaboutit.
Rated 18 Dec 2009
westknifewestknife
Rated 01 Dec 2009
50
17th
Why on Earth was this made
Rated 01 Dec 2009
pfellahpfellah
Rated 18 Sep 2009
30
10th
Not quite as awful as people say, but still not in the class of the first two, and yeah, Sofia Coppola sucked. When people in the theater CHEERED when she got shot at the end, you know you missed the mark.
Rated 18 Sep 2009
bownBown
Rated 11 Aug 2009
64
16th
Not a monstrosity, just kind of dull.
Rated 11 Aug 2009
moraesfelipemoraesfelipe
Rated 04 Aug 2009
65
61st
It isn't really as great as the first two - the third act of this beautiful crime saga is slower and more analytic than its predecessors -, but still has its qualities, such as the political intrigue and the deep examination of Michael Corleone.
Rated 04 Aug 2009
tangooooooTangoooooo
Rated 06 Jul 2009
20
2nd
Sofia Coppola, Nuff said
Rated 06 Jul 2009
prowlerprowler
Rated 04 Mar 2009
19
15th
pay robert duvall whatever he asks, spend some more time on the script, and this could've been great. as it is, it relies on parts 1 and 2 to work and it barely does.
Rated 04 Mar 2009
doggreenDoggreen
Rated 01 Mar 2009
45
9th
Coulda been a contender.
Rated 01 Mar 2009
tathieltathiel
Rated 30 Aug 2008
89
93rd
Still a very good sequel, only the performance of Coppola's daughter Sophia as Corleone's daughter is not really good, that's why I don't give it a 90. It's better that she is following into her father's footsteps now and makes movies instead of being an actor in movies.
Rated 30 Aug 2008
xakkmasterXakkMaster
Rated 15 Aug 2008
81
65th
Moments of brillaince surrounded by undercooked ideas and questionable casting choices. There's still some rewarding moments, but Pacino is basically fighting by himself to uphold the legacy of this classic American saga.
Rated 15 Aug 2008
davebirchdavebirch
Rated 07 Jul 2008
5
8th
Has 'did it for the money' written all over it. Considering the master class of the first two, the only thing I like about Part III is the line 'Everytime I try to get out, they pull me back in'.
Rated 07 Jul 2008
gritGrit
Rated 13 Jan 2008
64
66th
There could have certainly been a better end to the trilogy, but Part III still holds up well only fading slightly when compared to the first two. Coppola has done yet another good job at directing the often complex scenes and with some good acting and plot twists which have come to be expected in any Godfather film, it provides an entertaining if rather drawn out viewing.
Rated 13 Jan 2008
dustydDustyd
Rated 16 Sep 2007
75
79th
Aside from one weak performance, it's actually a pretty good film.
Rated 16 Sep 2007
joshk84joshk84
Rated 15 Sep 2007
76
55th
After the first two movies, Part III is a huge let down. I am not sure Mario Puzo's book was even as good as the first two. The acting is still good, the directing is still good, but the story is just not there.
Rated 15 Sep 2007
lapierre520lapierre520
Rated 31 Aug 2007
50
18th
Worst Ending ever.
Rated 31 Aug 2007
spoonerspotspoonerspot
Rated 14 Aug 2007
82
77th
The worst of the three but still damn good.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
barshkibarshki
Rated 25 Jul 2007
95
85th
Least interesting of the three but the trilogy is nothing without it.
Rated 25 Jul 2007
farzanFarzan
Rated 17 Jun 2007
75
68th
Really disappointing considering what the first two were, but putting that aside, The Godfather III is not a bad film, but it is in no way comparable to the first two. It is still the Godfather, and I can't really put my finger on why it is so inferior to the first two, I'm not really going anywhere with this review, and I guess i'm just thinking and typing simultaneously, but all i can say is that i recommend this, but be prepared to be disappointed.
Rated 17 Jun 2007
teddedonTedDedon
Rated 18 Mar 2007
83
67th
Not a bad movie in any way, but compared to the two greatest movies of all time that follow it, it's hard not to be crushingly disappointed by it.
Rated 18 Mar 2007
filliganFilligan
Rated 01 Feb 2007
95
92nd
A departure from the spirit of the first film, but that's because it's 20 years later and times have changed. While the film's story is a little more unnecessary than that of Part II's, it's interesting to watch Michael Corleone struggle with his inner demons instead of unleashing them. Pacino gives his most powerful performance of the trilogy.
Rated 01 Feb 2007
mistereeemistereee
Rated 11 Feb 2024
80
80th
It gets knocked because it’s not nearly as good as the first two, but three is still a good movie.
Rated 11 Feb 2024
shockularSHOCKULAR
Rated 16 Dec 2023
82
79th
I watched the reedited Coda version of this. It's a very good film in its own right. I think it's a bit underappreciated just because it's not the first two. Not nearly as bad as the reputation it sometimes has. Sofia Coppola, on the other hand, is as bad as the reputation for her part. I like her as a director, but she drags down just about every scene she's in here. It's not enough to ruin the movie, though, which is still pretty great.
Rated 16 Dec 2023
kabinicieglencekabinicieglence
Rated 18 Nov 2023
78
62nd
ilk iki filme göre bayağı alt seviye. ama seriyi bitirme misyonunu tamamlamış mı, tamamlamış. vincent'in ailede ipleri aldığı vakitten devam etmesini isterdim.
Rated 18 Nov 2023
braddad68braddad68
Rated 01 Aug 2022
92
65th
This one did lack something the other's had; i'm not sure what it was. However, this is quite a good film in itself and powerful.
Rated 01 Aug 2022
jschlanskyJSchlansky
Rated 04 Jul 2022
40
18th
I went in hoping to find another misunderstood and underrated 3rd entry like Halloween 3 or The Exorcist III, but this trilogy-capper lived up to its bad reputation. On its own in isolation, it's merely mediocre, but compared to the other two Godfather films, it's hot garbage, and Pacino isn't really even playing the same character. I never needed to see Michael Corleone gobbling down candy bars or see Francis Ford Coppola make his daughter who cannot act star in an incest love story.
Rated 04 Jul 2022
imomercetinImOmerCetin
Rated 14 Apr 2022
75
71st
Whether you like it or not, everything has an end. You can't make everyone happy. Oh wait, how did The Sopranos end?
Rated 14 Apr 2022
skeebosribshackSkeebosRibShack
Rated 02 Jan 2022
60
23rd
i guess wtf sofia
Rated 02 Jan 2022
metismetis
Rated 06 Aug 2021
80
70th
8???????????????????
Rated 06 Aug 2021
hombredemaizHombredeMaiz
Rated 06 Jul 2021
45
16th
Well-made film with weak screenplay that seems written to make sure there are as many references to the first two films as possible rather than to extend and build upon the story and characters. Lots of little mistakes that weren't present in the original two films also detract from enjoyment of watching previously captivating characters in a new setting. Coppola still hits good notes and Pacino does well with the thin material, but it feels like a Godfather fanfic more than a true epilogue.
Rated 06 Jul 2021
calabriaCalabria
Rated 04 Feb 2021
80
55th
It's not its predecessors but come on
Rated 04 Feb 2021
jonwashereJonwashere
Rated 28 Dec 2020
5
43rd
Nowhere near as good as 2, but Michael Corleone pays a fitting price for his lifestyle. Good/7
Rated 28 Dec 2020
onurgOnurG
Rated 22 Dec 2020
75
39th
A good complement to Godfather trilogy but we've seen the final mass execution scene before and I would like to watch something new.
Rated 22 Dec 2020
gnalkhereGnalkhere
Rated 18 Dec 2020
69
39th
This rating is based on the Coda re-edit. Good news lads he fixed it it's all better now! I kid, but to a degree. From the heresay, and clips i've seen on Youtube, i can say it's an improvement. Too bad it spends the entire time insisting upon itself.
Rated 18 Dec 2020
ajaywAjayw
Rated 10 Dec 2020
58
22nd
Coda: Some good drama, but the casting is terrible and the updated ending is still a let down. Still too long and nowhere near the brilliance of the first 2 in the series.
Rated 10 Dec 2020
wetwillieswetwillies
Rated 30 Nov 2020
75
26th
Viewed November 29, 2020.
Rated 30 Nov 2020
gargom04Gargom04
Rated 07 Aug 2020
69
24th
Opinión personal: 6,5 Actores: 8 Planos: 7 Guión: 6 BSO/FX: 7 Total: 69
Rated 07 Aug 2020
mddglumddglu
Rated 27 Jul 2020
73
71st
27.7.20(+)
Rated 27 Jul 2020
doyler29doyler29
Rated 22 Jun 2020
60
23rd
Is it as bad a film as people say? In one sense, no. If this were some generic gangster film with Pacino in the lead, it would be an okay flick you might watch again if you ran into it on TV. But it's not ... it's a sequel to two of the greatest films ever made. So it it fair to tar this film with comparisons to the first two films. Absolutely, because it begs you to compare this to them by echoing them at every opportunity.
Rated 22 Jun 2020
medikolaynmedikolayn
Rated 22 Jun 2020
83
84th
the guudfather
Rated 22 Jun 2020
amazedemonamazedemon
Rated 01 May 2020
63
39th
Coppola's conclusion to his epic trilogy still never manages too make me care about his characters. The ending is fitting, heavily foreshadowed and poorly executed. The dialogue is much more on the nose, while certain plot elements seemed recycled from Part 1. It's not a bad film, but it is drawn out and personally not that entertaining. Like the whole trilogy, the pink and sepia glow gives the film an outdated and ugly feel, though I suppose the mafia isn't aesthetically pleasing.
Rated 01 May 2020
evilmangoesEvilMangoes
Rated 23 Apr 2020
40
17th
C-
Rated 23 Apr 2020
solomonburrrSolomonBurrr
Rated 10 Mar 2020
79
74th
79.4
Rated 10 Mar 2020
bambibBambiB
Rated 17 Feb 2020
75
47th
Not completely horrible, but you're not missing much if you don't see it.
Rated 17 Feb 2020
ceekay19Ceekay19
Rated 25 Nov 2019
70
54th
Michael Corleone: "Just when I thought I was out... they pull me back in."
Rated 25 Nov 2019
capodelnullacapodelnulla
Rated 13 Jun 2019
80
81st
coppola's 2020 edit / this is infinitely a better film when it sticks to politics and pacino - even if andy garcia is still insufferable with his cartoonish fiery young gangster performance.
Rated 13 Jun 2019
gatoquentegatoquente
Rated 30 Apr 2019
95
70th
My SCORING: 99-96=Great; 95-90=Very good; 89-85=Good; 84-80=So-so; 79-70=Boring; Below 70=Forget it.
Rated 30 Apr 2019
cowmanCowman
Rated 12 Dec 2018
65
40th
The whole ‘guilt trip' doesn't work. Why should the viewer care if a mass murderer feels guilty? I just want multi-layered intrigue and ruthless violence. Failed to capture my interest.
Rated 12 Dec 2018
spaceflohspacefloh
Rated 29 Sep 2018
70
83rd
ger; [the godfather: part III; der pate 3]; der alternde pate möchte seine familie von den kriminellen aktivitäten befreien und einen nachfolger finden.;
Rated 29 Sep 2018
zanginZangin
Rated 19 Sep 2018
80
87th
Lightning rarely strikes twice. Here, Coppola not only attempts to make it strike a third time, but he does so a decade past his prime. The remarkable thing is, he comes pretty close! The film's composition doesn't quite match the perfection of the first two and although the point has been beaten to death, Sofia Coppola's performance is noticeably lacking. However, Pacino is still at the top of his game, the narrative is compelling, and the ending is an excellent conclusion to the trilogy.
Rated 19 Sep 2018
intrainterintrainter
Rated 30 Jun 2018
7
54th
7.5
Rated 30 Jun 2018
rcmaccrcmacc
Rated 17 May 2018
65
50th
Its actually kinda good, except kinda good in the realm of The Godfather means its terrible. The movie fails as it could not bring Tom Hagen back and a truly awful performance by Sofia Coppola. Andy Garcia does a great job as Michael's nephew and makes it really enjoyable. Also Al Pacino is really quotable again.
Rated 17 May 2018
oykurandoykurand
Rated 25 Apr 2018
70
18th
"I did not care for The Godfather."
Rated 25 Apr 2018
anttirAnttiR
Rated 06 Oct 2017
92
81st
My favorite of the series.
Rated 06 Oct 2017
oskarhuoskarhu
Rated 29 Aug 2017
70
19th
This deserves no praise if compared to the first two. Even without taking the trilogy into account, this is horribly generic in terms of direction and dialogue. Mediocre/horrible acting and mostly boring throughout. I can't but think that the destructive influence of the culture of production companies had Godfather part III doomed from the start.
Rated 29 Aug 2017
allengilliamAllenGilliam
Rated 08 Aug 2017
95
75th
Much maligned, but truly a great film. A fitting ending to the story.
Rated 08 Aug 2017
luordluord
Rated 05 Aug 2017
57
37th
Unnecessary sequel that does nothing new with the characters and goes on longer than it needed. Only survives thanks to the sheer strength of what came before.
Rated 05 Aug 2017
buffratingsbuffratings
Rated 15 Apr 2017
73
49th
Though at times it feels forced, thanks in part to Sofia Coppola's wooden performance, a shockingly unengaging premise, and a mysteriously distant screenplay, this third installment in Francis Ford Coppola's epic series still manages to stand on its own two feet, even if it happens to be overshadowed by its predecessors.
Rated 15 Apr 2017
rasnrasn
Rated 08 Feb 2017
95
70th
The Black Sheep of the Godfather Trilogy. I just think people misunderstood it. Yes it's different from the other two but hey, it's great with a mature and respected Pacino. Don't stop in the 1 or even the 2 movie, watch all of them!
Rated 08 Feb 2017
sweekodenSweekoden
Rated 17 Jan 2017
73
69th
Had a real hard time getting through this one--took me around 7 separate sessions spread across a week or two, all told. Liked the second half a lot more; it actually managed to go from "oof, this is pretty bad" to having some great, compelling scenes. Not a fan of the weird romance, but I have to say that the much-maligned Sofia Coppola really wasn't a bad casting decision in my view. Not sure about Bronson Pinchot as Vincent, though... Anyways, rating #500, woohoo! Uneven, but good.
Rated 17 Jan 2017
gorillanoshGorillaNosh
Rated 11 Jan 2017
75
7th
Something was lost on this 3rd and final installment. I often like to pretend it doesn't even exist.
Rated 11 Jan 2017
gravitynautGravitynaut
Rated 15 Sep 2016
57
25th
Boring. Long. Wasteful. Decently made. Watch the first two instead.
Rated 15 Sep 2016
bratingsbratings
Rated 06 Jun 2016
72
50th
Though at times it feels forced, thanks in part to Sofia Coppola's wooden performance, a shockingly unengaging premise, and a mysteriously distant screenplay, this third installment in Francis Ford Coppola's epic series still manages to stand on its own two feet, even if it happens to be overshadowed by its predecessors.
Rated 06 Jun 2016
daansDaanS
Rated 24 May 2016
60
27th
The Godfather has only two real parts: I and II. Everyone who tells you differently is lying. Ignore this dissapointment.
Rated 24 May 2016
dardandardan
Rated 30 Apr 2016
15
2nd
An act of desecration.
Rated 30 Apr 2016
thefbtimesthefbtimes
Rated 28 Oct 2015
72
17th
The first two films, combined, represent the definition of perfection in film. The Godfather: Part III, the black sheep, gets in the way from time to time. But this is, without a doubt, a fine installment to the series and I still hold it dear to my heart as well.
Rated 28 Oct 2015
hakkanarejohakkanarejo
Rated 20 Aug 2015
100
91st
As Michael Corleone (Al Pacino) ages, he finds that being the head of the Corleone crime family isn't getting any easier. He wants his family out of the Mafia, but the mob kingpin (Eli Wallach) isn't eager to let one of the most powerful and wealthy families go legit. Making matters even worse is Michael's nephew, Vincent (Andy Garcia). Not only does Vincent want a piece of the Corleone family's criminal empire, but he also wants Michael's daughter, Mary (Sofia Coppola).
Rated 20 Aug 2015
xacviantxacviant
Rated 26 Jun 2015
73
31st
The widely-debated third part of the Corleone saga is quite good when it's good, but pretty uninspiring when it isn't. When it sticks to Michael's inner turmoil and Vincent's gradual assumption of power, it's compelling, with Pacino and Andy Garcia in solid form. And the cinematography, especially the final shot, is strong. But the whole Vatican power struggle subplot is badly written and the second half tends to drag. Sofia Coppola is weak, though not quite as terrible as her reputation.
Rated 26 Jun 2015
moralreefmoralreef
Rated 16 Jun 2015
75
53rd
"Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in."
Rated 16 Jun 2015
dresd_r_e_s_
Rated 08 May 2015
3
65th
I did not expect anything at the same level as the first two, and that, I think, made me appreciate it more. There is some obvious similarities to the two other movies, but that is both it's strength as well as it's downfall. I enjoyed it, but more or less hated the ending... *Good
Rated 08 May 2015
normalchaosnormalchaos
Rated 07 Apr 2015
60
28th
Feels like an echo of the first two parts. It didn't really add anything to the trilogy. Tom Hagen was sorely missed, and Michael Corleone was just not the same. The plot was pretty convoluted. The cinematography was good.
Rated 07 Apr 2015
rymRYM
Rated 29 Mar 2015
65
58th
3.23/5
Rated 29 Mar 2015

Cast & Info

Directed by:

Francis Ford Coppola

Screenwriter:

Francis Ford Coppola, Mario Puzo

Starring:

Al Pacino, Bridget Fonda, Joe Mantegna, Andy Garcia, Diane Keaton, Talia Shire, Sofia Coppola, George Hamilton, Eli Wallach, Raf Vallone, Helmut Berger, Richard Bright

Franchise:

The Godfather

Genres:

Drama, Crime

AKAs:

The Godfather Coda: The Death of Michael Corleone, The Godfather Part 3, The Godfather Part III

Country:

USA

Languages:

English, Italian, Latin, German, Persian
imdb IMDb
Update history
Suggest edit

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...