sign in
register
Watch
Amazon Prime Video MGM Plus fuboTV
+14
Star Trek: Nemesis
Star Trek: Nemesis
+14
JustWatch
Your probable score
?
Star Trek: Nemesis

Star Trek: Nemesis

2002
Sci-fi, Suspense/Thriller
1h 56m
The Federation is about to encounter its greatest challenge - The Romulans want peace. Conceived in the regal senate halls of Romulus and forged in the dilithium mines of Remus, comes a nemesis bent on destroying Picard and the Federation... exactly in that order.

Directed by:

Stuart Baird

Screenwriter:

Brent Spiner, John Logan, Gene Roddenberry, Rick Berman

Starring:

Ron Perlman, Dina Meyer, Patrick Stewart, Tom Hardy, Jude Ciccolella, Brent Spiner, Jonathan Frakes, LeVar Burton, Michael Dorn, Gates McFadden, Marina Sirtis, Shannon Cochran

Franchise:

Star Trek

Genres:

Sci-fi, Suspense/Thriller, Action, Adventure

AKA:

Star Trek 10

Country:

USA

Language:

English
imdb IMDb
Update history
Suggest edit

Star Trek: Nemesis

2002
Sci-fi, Suspense/Thriller
1h 56m
Your probable score
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer
Avg Percentile 33.39% from 2559 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

(2573)
Compact view
clear
Compact view
Show
Sort
mentaculusMentaculus
Rated 25 Sep 2020
35
10th
I was that kid who remembered young Picard from the show had hair and knew immediately this was made for idiots and/or those who don't know Star Trek. Still feels that way. It's an unnecessarily ugly and dark and nasty film that forewarns the Kurtzman era of goth Trek, which has no place in the franchise.
Rated 25 Sep 2020
beedubBeeDub
Rated 14 Mar 2016
75
29th
Has a mildly interesting idea (Picard clone!) but does nothing interesting with it. Ends the Next Generation era with a whimper rather than a bang. What a shame.
Rated 14 Mar 2016
juntakinte99juntakinte99
Rated 04 Sep 2021
50
8th
This film was optimistically released on the heels of The Matrix, Unbreakable, and X-Men--pictures that gave legitimacy to sci-fi films previously only enjoyed by nerdy fanboys. But instead, it killed the franchise. It's full of bad Star Wars style C-Span coverage of alien politics, weird flashbacks, and weak action. But the worst part is a horrendous telepathic rape scene. The only reasons to watch are to document the cast horror stories & to see a young Tom Hardy. Otherwise avoid at all costs.
Rated 04 Sep 2021
hawkinsHawkins
Rated 04 Feb 2020
46
11th
Bless Tom Hardy for acting his butt off but the 24th century should be able to offer so much more than cool bad guys in lame fight scenes.
Rated 04 Feb 2020
kasperlKasperL
Rated 09 Oct 2011
40
19th
It's not very surprising that this put a stop to the features... and I'm glad that J.J. Abrams' reboot revived the original crew instead, as Picard, Data and Co. simply don't cut it. Hardy looks weird in this.
Rated 09 Oct 2011
cosmicmonkeyCosmicMonkey
Rated 26 Nov 2020
65
24th
There's a lot of ingredients for a good movie in this: World-building, character development, an interesting and sympathetic villain, emotional peaks and valleys. a director who knows how to shoot and edit action scenes, and somehow with a lower budget it has higher production values than any other trek film before this, it looks glossy! This is almost a decent film, except the pieces just never quite come together in a polished way, but it's not deserving of nearly as much hate as it got.
Rated 26 Nov 2020
therealj_roTheRealJ-Ro
Rated 14 Oct 2017
70
42nd
Having just finished binge-watching all of TNG, I've decided to tackle the movies. Here's something I never appreciated fully in the past: mothafuckin Tom Hardy! I would say that this is arguably Patrick Stewart's best performance in the four TNG films. Part of that could well be from having a foil the calibre of Hardy, even in 2002. The killing off of Data is I'm sure a sore point for some Trekkies even today. I would have preferred a different send-off for the TNG crew. It is what it is: fine.
Rated 14 Oct 2017
djrossdjross
Rated 31 May 2013
25
7th
Good guys tussle with bad guys. Doppelgänger theme goes nowhere. Probably the emptiest, least interesting of the series, if not quite the worst (that honour goes to GENERATIONS). Baird would never again be given the opportunity to direct. 2016 Update: BEYOND is definitively the worst.
Rated 31 May 2013
agentsnipeAgentSnipe
Rated 22 Jun 2008
75
40th
Its so sad to me that the adventures of The Next Generation cast had to end with this abyssmal finale. It's flat and has an unnecessarily tragic ending. Considering this was the final bow for Picard's crew, this film doesn't have any emotional weight.
Rated 22 Jun 2008
glumpy99glumpy_99
Rated 25 Sep 2022
66
30th
Oddly harsh and cold farewell to the NG crew has an interesting premise, and a committed performance by Hardy, but its cruel tone and screenplay (including a misbegotten rape scene (?!)) makes it tough going, as if a Roger Moore Bond film had been invaded by Daniel Craig sensibilities. Film still can’t dim the loveable appeal of our heroes (the best ST crew for my money) and while a climactic sacrifice is given short shrift in its execution, the finale packs a quiet, requisite emotional punch.
Rated 25 Sep 2022
videoetronVideoetron
Rated 25 Jun 2021
61
49th
It felt like a regular episode somehow, even if it had events and characters which would have deserved something bigger. I guess it's okay still
Rated 25 Jun 2021
caffecaffe
Rated 12 Jun 2021
23
3rd
It's fun to see Tom Hardy as a TNG villain and there are nice action moments, but the atmosphere is just weird and as usual there's nothing for the crew beyond Data and Picard to do. Oh except, for when Troi gets sexually assaulted in a very disturbing way, which was something I didn't need. Thanks to Wil Wheaton for showing up for all of 0,5 seconds to sit at a table.
Rated 12 Jun 2021
doyler29doyler29
Rated 13 Apr 2021
50
13th
Tom Hardy's back story is disturbingly similar to Bane's. Surely that must be a coincidence. The film should really revolve around Hardy's plan to get revenge on Romulus. What the hell did Earth do to him? Data has another brother??? Did the film ever explain how Shinzon found him? Picard drives a dune buggy. This should be amazing.
Rated 13 Apr 2021
jonwashereJonwashere
Rated 02 Dec 2020
5
43rd
Eh... If you like Star Trek this is good enough but I was dissapointed. RIP Data. Good/7
Rated 02 Dec 2020
margustaMargusTa
Rated 18 Oct 2020
39
18th
THis film is targeted to Trekkies ... or actually not. Probably Trekkies don't like how new adventures were executed. From positive side: there is good interaction between Picard and Shinzon; CGI effects are beautiful and events wont rush forward.
Rated 18 Oct 2020
pointtonullpointtonull
Rated 17 Nov 2019
30
12th
Probably the worst of Star Trek movies. It should be declared non-canon. That'll be Data back.
Rated 17 Nov 2019
antonio_pAntonio P
Rated 09 Nov 2019
40
46th
Ok I guess.
Rated 09 Nov 2019
metalhankmetalhank
Rated 04 Jan 2019
81
95th
This Star Trek flick is much darker and more serious than most of the other films. There are still some good action scenes especially in the final third with a good/evil battle. A lot of philosophical questions are raised as well that any trekkie should enjoy.
Rated 04 Jan 2019
ecitizeneCitizen
Rated 24 Apr 2013
50
49th
I somehow missed this when it came out. Not the best Star Trek movie, but damn how did I miss the Picard clone and movie where Data dies? I was surprised when I finally saw this on cable a few days ago. The story was pretty bad, but still worth watching if you are a fan.
Rated 24 Apr 2013
htimanhtiman
Rated 17 Jul 2012
78
75th
I liked this more than most people. It had a pretty good story (although it had some flaws, like Troi's encounter with the reman) and some cool moments, including a heroic sacrafice by one of the crewmembers.
Rated 17 Jul 2012
overratedoverrated
Rated 15 Jul 2012
31
23rd
Deserves a lower score but I'm a big gay for Tom Hardy.
Rated 15 Jul 2012
vandelay1Vandelay1
Rated 13 Jun 2008
36
30th
not so good
Rated 13 Jun 2008
spin73SPiN73
Rated 14 Aug 2007
69
24th
A barely adequate Star Treck flick. Not nearly as good as First Contact.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
sebageeksebageek
Rated 14 Aug 2007
76
46th
Gets too much flack, I think. One of the better of the later Treks.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
battletoadBattleToad
Rated 14 Aug 2007
70
37th
Star Trek: Nemesis is fun thanks to the fact that is is jam-packed with sci-fi action more than any other of the Star Trek films, but it's also quite nonsensical. It's enjoyable to see how the now legendary characters have evolved over time, and it easily draws in Trek fans, but it might be a little stupid and confusing to a new audience. Meh!
Rated 14 Aug 2007
ytadelYtadel
Rated 14 Aug 2007
2
14th
Utterly generic popcorn sci-fi. It would have been ok as a TV two-parter, but it didn't belong in the theater.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
monstergearMonsterGear
Rated 28 May 2007
69
29th
It's not the worst Star Trek movie ever, but it's far from the best.I distinctly recall thinking that it was a better James Bond movie than the last one that had come out (Die Another Day) but I can't really remember why.
Rated 28 May 2007
juicejuice
Rated 26 May 2007
45
24th
More Star Trek... bleh.
Rated 26 May 2007
tenfoldtenfold
Rated 09 Jul 2023
20
13th
Bad, overly dramatic, overly actiony.
Rated 09 Jul 2023
scribScrib
Rated 02 Dec 2022
60
31st
Not nearly so bad as its reputation would suggest, but it lacks a spark. All the ingredients are there for an adventure as dramatic and emotional as First Contact, but it just doesn't click. It's interesting how something so deeply connected to Picard can feel so emotionally weightless.
Rated 02 Dec 2022
filliganFilligan
Rated 08 Aug 2022
84
55th
Sure, it’s Wrath of Khan again, but I feel it cloaks itself in enough new ideas to stand on its own. I find Trek fans are never satisfied, but though this traversed darker territory, I found it engrossing and fun, if not satisfyingly dumb. Hardy and Stewart are great together.
Rated 08 Aug 2022
kafka1325kafka1325
Rated 22 Jul 2022
30
11th
It was mean do die the day that Stuart Baird take it over. This guy made that movie from 2002 look like 20 year old film in that time. No logic in edit and some bizarre shots and way the movie go...
Rated 22 Jul 2022
ericamblerericambler
Rated 12 Dec 2017
40
9th
STAR TREK: NEMESIS is a misguided attempt to bring the franchise into the modern blockbuster era with an overmatched cast better suited for cerebral drama than CGI-powered spectacle. The film mostly eschews TREK's tradition of thoughtful sci-fi, and offers little of interest besides a promising tete-a-tete between Patrick Stewart and a debuting Tom Hardy. Harsh, grim, and dull.
Rated 12 Dec 2017
daigoroDaigoro
Rated 14 Oct 2017
3
11th
Has a lot cool sci-fi action scenes, but that's pretty much all it has going for it. TNG deserved a far better ending.
Rated 14 Oct 2017
bobblesBobbles
Rated 25 Sep 2017
54
24th
Probably my favourite TNG film. That really doesn't mean much though.
Rated 25 Sep 2017
evilmangoesEvilMangoes
Rated 12 Nov 2016
63
30th
B-
Rated 12 Nov 2016
glm01glm01
Rated 19 Oct 2016
57
17th
56.500
Rated 19 Oct 2016
wulfstanleeWulfstanLee
Rated 23 Sep 2015
50
43rd
I'm not a big Star Trek fan, so maybe my expectations for Nemesis were low, but I enjoyed it. Patrick Stewart always gives his great performance, and I think this film was a testament to Brent Spiner's work as some of the film's more impactful moments are between Data and B-Four. That said, the whole plot to destroy Earth is a bit convoluted, and I'm never getting that Riker sex scene out of my head.
Rated 23 Sep 2015
vengefulkbmVengefulKBM
Rated 11 Feb 2015
65
42nd
Honestly, I didn't think it was that bad. It plays like a decent episode of the show, and it's certainly an improvement on Generations and (especially) Insurrection.
Rated 11 Feb 2015
amazedemonamazedemon
Rated 29 Nov 2014
63
39th
It's not bad; the effects and plot actually make it watchable, but it is not the end that TNG deserved.
Rated 29 Nov 2014
ajrafflesAJ_Raffles
Rated 14 Sep 2014
74
61st
I don't care. I liked it. It's got Tom Hardy and Ron Perlman in it and the crew is back! Yes it has many, many flaws but Data...
Rated 14 Sep 2014
lookjabbaLookJabba...
Rated 16 Aug 2014
2
7th
Nemesis just like its predecessor Insurrection was ultimately the death of the Next Generation films. First Contact set a respectively high standard for the Next Generation films. Sadly though the trend wasn't continued and the overall standard of this film is poor. There's a handful of enjoyable set pieces but it's the loveable and reliable characters that carry this dull film. The highlight though is a solid performance from a young Tom Hardy. Otherwise this film is completely forgettable.
Rated 16 Aug 2014
desertpunkDesertPunk
Rated 10 Jul 2014
59
27th
Struggle to care as Bane and his army of space-Nosferatus battle the mighty Enterprise. To be honest, this movie has some incredible action sequences, probably the best in the franchise, but that doesn't justify the rest.
Rated 10 Jul 2014
crazybobcatcrazyBobcat
Rated 21 May 2014
40
32nd
ultimately disappointing
Rated 21 May 2014
cinematicespCinematicESP
Rated 13 Mar 2013
48
3rd
I'm a big Hardy fan, but he doesn't have any material to work with to save this thing from being generic and boring.
Rated 13 Mar 2013
alex_wsAlex WS
Rated 19 Jan 2013
42
18th
Retarded plot and Trek characters acting nothing like themselves.
Rated 19 Jan 2013
snowgraysnowgray
Rated 17 Jan 2013
50
27th
These points are for Tom Hardy.
Rated 17 Jan 2013
bentienbentien
Rated 02 Jan 2013
38
13th
Maybe my least favorite Star Trek film, the only interesting thing being the interplay between Stewart and Hardy. The story, on the other hand, lacks the depth that characterize the franchize, and the effects are already dated. Good thing J. J. Abrams came along after this...
Rated 02 Jan 2013
glmglm
Rated 27 Jun 2012
59
26th
59.000
Rated 27 Jun 2012
mervtaylorMerv_Taylor
Rated 17 Jun 2012
77
42nd
So, Picard has lost his mind?
Rated 17 Jun 2012
braddad68braddad68
Rated 14 May 2012
95
84th
My favorite of the Next Generation films.
Rated 14 May 2012
axleblazeaxleblaze
Rated 17 Mar 2012
20
2nd
An ugly, unfun senseless mess that wants to be Wrath of Khan so hard yet JUST DOESN'T GET IT. Why can't any of the new Star Treks try and be the one with the Whales?
Rated 17 Mar 2012
joseywalesjoseywales
Rated 12 Feb 2012
45
19th
So much wasted potential. What a silly plot!
Rated 12 Feb 2012
zachreviewsZachReviews
Rated 14 Jan 2012
40
16th
What the -?
Rated 14 Jan 2012
frederFreder
Rated 02 Mar 2011
10
14th
Apparently everyone in the universe now wears designer clothing. Finally broke the odd-number curse by being an even-number yawn fest.
Rated 02 Mar 2011
slantmagSlantMag
Rated 18 Oct 2010
30
78th
"Could it be true? After so many years of bloodshed and war, can peace between the Federation and the Romulans actually be at hand?" - Roxanne Blanford
Rated 18 Oct 2010
hellboy76hellboy76
Rated 25 Sep 2010
62
30th
Better than some of the other Next Generation films, but that isn't saying much. Was this the one where the federation has four wheelers for some reason?
Rated 25 Sep 2010
sinclairSinclair
Rated 04 Sep 2010
55
7th
Dumb
Rated 04 Sep 2010
jkathrensjkathrens
Rated 29 Aug 2010
70
45th
Star Trek: The Extended Episode. No wonder this was the final film of the series... it feels tired. Watch it if you can catch it on television and it'll feel about right.
Rated 29 Aug 2010
difontaineDifontaine
Rated 08 Aug 2010
30
4th
Oh so deeply poor. It took till after the film to work out it was a Wrath of Khan knock-off as Wrath of Khan was good and this is piss dribble.
Rated 08 Aug 2010
nunstranglernunstrangler
Rated 18 Jul 2010
43
16th
The venerable (some may say dusty) franchise ends(?) its "Next Generation" incarnation with this disappointing outing. Stewart brings his usual gravitas to the role of Picard, even he can't save this snooze-fest that even tried the patience of hard-core Trekkers.
Rated 18 Jul 2010
babamotsbabamots
Rated 12 May 2010
45
23rd
A long, mediocre episode with a budget.
Rated 12 May 2010
talyn_golicTalyn Golic
Rated 23 Feb 2010
30
4th
And so arrives the nadir of Star Trek, a film so bad it essentially killed the franchise. The film is the second TNG remake of Wrath Of Khan, this time far more blatant. It's another Picard and Data show, with Picard again wildly out of character. There's plenty of plot holes and Shinzon's motivations seem to change at the drop of a hat. The movie almost seems needlessly violent too as if they felt dark and violent is why First Contact did well. A sad end to The Next Generation.
Rated 23 Feb 2010
greymalkyngrey_malkyn
Rated 25 Jan 2010
10
43rd
Oh, come on. Most of the cast sleepwalked their way through this one. Time to let the NexGen cast go along their merry way.
Rated 25 Jan 2010
sm0k1nggnusm0k1nggnu
Rated 17 Jan 2010
35
10th
Mitleidspunkte, weil ich Star Trek Fan bin
Rated 17 Jan 2010
bigjimBig_Jim
Rated 16 Nov 2009
2
14th
For a clone, he doesn't look much like Picard(?)
Rated 16 Nov 2009
chemtrailschemtrails
Rated 04 Oct 2009
35
17th
Augh why was this even made, why why why
Rated 04 Oct 2009
mr_freezemr-freeze
Rated 30 Sep 2009
70
24th
The best Star Trek Movie i know.
Rated 30 Sep 2009
hankhank
Rated 22 Sep 2009
70
36th
A decent member of the movie series.
Rated 22 Sep 2009
kdevinekdevine
Rated 19 Aug 2009
80
35th
At least it had an epic feel to it, but some scenes seem to have been put in to say "We aren't doing any more movies!"
Rated 19 Aug 2009
okkervilOkkervil
Rated 01 Aug 2009
61
55th
Not as awful as many make out and while probably not too far off par with the likes of "Generations" and "The Search for Spock", it's nowhere near as bad as "The Final Frontier". That said, this is certainly not one of Trek's finest. The plot is silly and the acting and script worse than its compatriots. There is some nice action, but this film really misses an opportunity to expand on the Romulan's as a race. Strangely enough it does improve with repeat viewings.
Rated 01 Aug 2009
the_ratlingThe Ratling
Rated 15 Jul 2009
70
13th
This is the movie in which the TNG era actors start to show their age. While the plot was decent, it was launched in exactly the wrong time in theatres, lost among giants. Decently acted, though tends to wander.
Rated 15 Jul 2009
thedenizenTheDenizen
Rated 16 Jun 2009
45
21st
Marginally better than Insurrection, but only marginally. Too much personal focus on Picard.
Rated 16 Jun 2009
giroroGiroro
Rated 18 May 2009
34
15th
. . . what?
Rated 18 May 2009
joojooJooJoo
Rated 01 Jan 2009
2
16th
The worst Star Trek experience.
Rated 01 Jan 2009
uniquenameUniqueName
Rated 30 Dec 2008
30
4th
WHY BERMAN WHY?!?!?
Rated 30 Dec 2008
cultofsamecult_of_same
Rated 18 Nov 2008
50
56th
:( yes I know I know...I'm a nerd.
Rated 18 Nov 2008
somnivoresomnivore
Rated 05 Nov 2008
40
1st
Easily the worst Star Trek movie. What were they thinking?
Rated 05 Nov 2008
garlonussGarlonuss
Rated 16 Oct 2008
65
15th
Good action sequences but this movie could have done with a few more character moments.
Rated 16 Oct 2008
irvinejumpirvinejump
Rated 10 Oct 2008
40
25th
The Generations gap's a bitch I tells ya
Rated 10 Oct 2008
tathieltathiel
Rated 30 Aug 2008
80
67th
There were better Star Trek movies - the story seemed a little bit forced. And it's sad, that some characters die, but I can understand the actors behind that.
Rated 30 Aug 2008
easydiffeasydiff
Rated 25 Aug 2008
20
10th
Wholly underwhelming. Would've been a bad two-parter; as a feature film I'm glad I waited until it was on cable for free.
Rated 25 Aug 2008
jebJeb
Rated 12 Aug 2008
3
5th
I though Final Frontiers was bad...
Rated 12 Aug 2008
gr8googlyGr8Googly
Rated 10 Aug 2008
78
64th
Underrated final TNG era Star Trek film
Rated 10 Aug 2008
sanlitedksan@lite.dk
Rated 23 Jul 2008
70
33rd
good star trek movie!
Rated 23 Jul 2008
purgatospurgatos
Rated 09 May 2008
22
6th
I'm sure that the script is based on a fanfic written by a high schooler.
Rated 09 May 2008
gogokaingogokain
Rated 12 Apr 2008
20
32nd
Great action scenes, but doesn't make any sense at all, even by established Star Trek rules. Pathetic end to one of the best sci-fi shows ever.
Rated 12 Apr 2008
doctor7doctor7
Rated 24 Mar 2008
70
52nd
I didn't find it as mediocre and bad as most people seem to. In fact I think this will end up a bit like Star Trek VI where it's initially met with mediocre reviews but years later people will really begin to appreciate the film. I liked it, but I can acknowledge that after 2 decades of knowing nothing about Romulans this movie really missed an opportunity. Yes, we learned some things but not enough to satisfy my tastes. Also what the crap was up with the Dianna Troi psyche battle?
Rated 24 Mar 2008
ktappektappe
Rated 23 Mar 2008
55
25th
And yet another in the odd-numbered-bad-ST-films series.
Rated 23 Mar 2008
auritechauritech
Rated 07 Mar 2008
45
35th
Passable fare, but cheesy nonetheless. My problems with it were mainly storywise, but it didn't inflame me any. Note: I'm not a fan of the Star Trek universe, so I honestly don't really care about the series.
Rated 07 Mar 2008
bellamyrbellamyr
Rated 03 Jan 2008
79
53rd
A disappointing end to the Star Trek run of films, but as the title of the last STTNG episode says 'All good things..' Special effects are good and the story is ok but the film is average at best and forgettable at worst. Still in two minds as to whether it really worked as a Star Trek film. Ironically it may have been better as a stand alone sci-fi.
Rated 03 Jan 2008
shephardShephard
Rated 18 Oct 2007
50
29th
I'm biased. It was kinda just okay, but I enjoyed being back with the characters again.
Rated 18 Oct 2007
caocaocaocao
Rated 06 Oct 2007
70
55th
I'd rate this as the 2nd best of the Next Generation Trek films. The stakes are high and that feels real. There are some weird touches (what's with the All Terrain Vehicle?) but all in all it's a solid effort.
Rated 06 Oct 2007
fyngyrzfyngyrz
Rated 28 Aug 2007
9
62nd
Good trek fare.
Rated 28 Aug 2007
mistersplicemistersplice
Rated 28 Aug 2007
10
1st
+ absolute torture
Rated 28 Aug 2007
svicciarellisvicciarelli
Rated 14 Aug 2007
85
50th
Good special effects, interesting sci-fi story.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
citysqwirlcitysqwirl
Rated 14 Aug 2007
71
38th
Great title, looks fantastic, great to see the characters again, but didn't care so much about the plot.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
saladmanSaladMan
Rated 14 Aug 2007
45
12th
It's like they're trying to ruin Star Trek.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
ratedec10_iiratedec10
Rated 14 Aug 2007
49
9th
My first foray into the Star Trek universe was not a good one (I didn't expect much). But watch out for Tom Hardy who played Shinzon. He's one to watch for in the near future.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
fuxoftfuxoft
Rated 14 Aug 2007
35
9th
Probably the worst Star Trek ever. First of all, it's not Star Trek, it tries to be "hip and cool". Second, it's not hip nor cool.
Rated 14 Aug 2007

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...