sign in
register
Watch
Amazon Prime Video MGM Plus fuboTV
+10
Spectre
Spectre
+10
JustWatch
Your probable score
?
Spectre

Spectre

2015
Suspense/Thriller, Action
2h 28m
A cryptic message from Bond's past sends him on a trail to uncover a sinister organization. While M battles political forces to keep the secret service alive, Bond peels back the layers of deceit to reveal the terrible truth behind SPECTRE. (imdb)

Directed by:

Sam Mendes

Screenwriter:

Jez Butterworth, John Logan, Neal Purvis, Robert Wade

Starring:

Naomie Harris, Ralph Fiennes, Monica Bellucci, Daniel Craig, Jesper Christensen, Andrew Scott, Ben Whishaw, Léa Seydoux, Christoph Waltz, Rory Kinnear, Dave Bautista, Stephanie Sigman

Franchise:

James Bond

Genres:

Suspense/Thriller, Action, Adventure

Countries:

UK, USA

Languages:

English, Spanish, French, Italian, German, Ukrainian
imdb IMDb
Update history
Suggest edit

Spectre

2015
Suspense/Thriller, Action
2h 28m
Your probable score
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer
Avg Percentile 38.07% from 3732 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

(3768)
Compact view
clear
Compact view
Show
Sort
barthalenBarthalen
Rated 02 Feb 2016
59
35th
My dinner-while-watching versus Spectre: the gyros was meatier than the plot, the rice was steamier than the movie's love angle, and the tzatziki was more refreshing than the overly familiar structure. Doing the dishes gave me a sense of satisfaction, unlike Spectre's climax. How the hell can you make a Super Secret Evil Organisation in the Bond universe so boringggg arghhhh.
Rated 02 Feb 2016
matthew_parkinsonMatthew Parkinson
Rated 06 Nov 2015
50
47th
With a rotten screenplay and a bored Bond, Spectre is a tough movie to truly enjoy. You have to ignore a lot of negative things to have a good time, even if the action is quite entertaining. But it wastes its two main villains and feels more like a sightseeing tour than a cohesive narrative. Its opening sequence is one of the best of the franchise, and its action is solid throughout, but it's hard to ignore how bad this screenplay is, and how many good elements are either wasted or ruined.
Rated 06 Nov 2015
spleenspleen
Rated 17 Jan 2016
71
44th
Memorable only for having the most forgettable theme song ever.
Rated 17 Jan 2016
kmcneilKMcNeil
Rated 01 Nov 2015
4
32nd
Terrific opening scene. Unfortunately it's all downhill from there. Thoroughly unremarkable.
Rated 01 Nov 2015
mikehMikeH
Rated 31 Oct 2015
54
9th
50 points for the opening, 4 for the rest. So the entire Bond universe has just been about a petty family feud? James Bond has officially become Austin Powers - anybody else reminded of Dr. Evil and Scott? Starting to think maybe the next instalment will be about Bond being treated for sex addiction before he's let out into the field again. How about a Bond film where he and the girl don't even think about boning cos they've got more important things to worry about?
Rated 31 Oct 2015
bakcheiabakcheia
Rated 08 Nov 2015
32
29th
This achieved Brosnan-era levels of cliches, phoned-in acting, pointless car/weapon porn, and inane storytelling. I get it, Skyfall was hard to follow, but this movie was laughably ridiculous at points and seemed to lack any of the genre self-awareness and higher-brow writing that made Skyfall and CR so compelling. In between characters vomiting exposition like Reagan in The Exorcist and almost all the regressive female characters lacking any agency around Bond, I could barely stand this movie.
Rated 08 Nov 2015
terrymacterrymac
Rated 26 Oct 2015
84
92nd
Really enjoyed this, and the 148 minute running time flew past. It felt balanced - the action, spectacle, plot and flashes of humour were delivered in suitable proportions. Craig acquits himself well in the role again, and the supporting cast were very good. It maybe needed a bit more Waltz. The fiendish plots and dastardly villains helped define it as a Bond film, but it never got too contrived or ludicrous. Nicely shot and directed; probably very expensively. Great fun, and well worth seeing.
Rated 26 Oct 2015
ofterdingenOfterdingen
Rated 25 Oct 2015
76
89th
Brimming with confidence and rightly so. Puts the spectacle back in Bond (without overdoing it) and elegantly connects all four films with Craig as 007. The love story is hardly believable but hey - it's James Bond.
Rated 25 Oct 2015
p_u_l_pP u l p
Rated 29 Jan 2016
45
34th
They should make this kind of movies with running time under 100 minutes.
Rated 29 Jan 2016
sirstuckeySirStuckey
Rated 10 Nov 2015
40
14th
After a great tracking shot scene at the beginning of the film everything becomes a formulaic Bond film with possibly the worst versions of every element of said formula. Useless main henchman, derivative action scenes (and maybe the most uninspired car chase ever), lame attempts at comedy, and constant exposition. It's nothing you haven't already seen before only done better and in less than 148 minutes.
Rated 10 Nov 2015
lookjabbaLookJabba...
Rated 26 Oct 2015
8
76th
Spectre had the unimaginable task of trying to match the success of Skyfall. And whilst Spectre may not prove to gain the mass appeal of Skyfall, I applaud Sam Mendes for giving lifelong James Bond fans an incredibly satisfying experience. The four films of the Daniel Craig era tie together nicely and there is a sense of completion. But most pleasingly, from the locations & costumes to the set pieces & reveals, there are so many nostalgic nods that call back to some of my favourite Bond films.
Rated 26 Oct 2015
beedubBeeDub
Rated 16 Jun 2016
78
39th
A disappointing movie that should have been amazing (the reintroduction of Blofeld and SPECTRE in modern times has endless potential), but instead it ends up being a pastiche of all the clichés the franchise should be past by now. Underwhelming for sure, but it still has some good bits for the hardcore Bond fans.
Rated 16 Jun 2016
tony_irwinTony Irwin
Rated 08 Nov 2015
98
97th
Adored it - packed with mesmerising sequences there was too much for me to take in through one viewing. All the criticisms I've read seem valid - underused stars, the masterplan is a bit flat, and it doesn't really hit the same intense emotionality as Casino Royale and Skyfall - but for a blockbuster action flick, part of an extraordinarily long franchise, it's top-notch stuff and successfully navigates its own path between Bourne and Mission Impossible - the two extremes of the superspy genre.
Rated 08 Nov 2015
the_pirateThe Pirate
Rated 06 Nov 2015
61
18th
Such a disappointment. It starts out well enough but very quickly descends into an unoriginal, phoned-in attempt to reboot the series' old story and villain instead of doing something original. A series needs to be able to move forward if it's to succeed; it can't just keep taking steps back and saying "Remember our old movies?" Everything about "Spectre" was rushed, forced, boring, and highly unworthy of the legacy it so shamelessly gloats about being a part of.
Rated 06 Nov 2015
kasperlKasperL
Rated 27 Oct 2015
75
77th
'Spectre' has great pacing, one of the most enjoyable plots since 'Dr. No' and probably my favorite opening mission since 'From Russia with Love'. Waltz and Bellucci are curiously underused, and I wish that Sam Smith hadn't been used at all, but what's much more important is that Craig and Mendes know the role of 007 inside out in this, their second and less serious collaboration, and Fiennes, Whishaw, Bautista and Christensen all provide excellent support.
Rated 27 Oct 2015
jodamicojodamico
Rated 30 Nov 2015
50
8th
Can we all agree now that even tentpole action movies need actual screenplays written by actual writers and not just angry prophecy madlibs? Two hours fifteen of a dark figure from the past and "this is what you're meant to do" mid-2000s trailer crap doesn't count.
Rated 30 Nov 2015
jenner1407jenner1407
Rated 14 Nov 2015
68
14th
Flat, boring (!), way too long, a wasted Monica Belucci, an even more wasted Christoph Waltz...sigh. What happened, Sam Mendes??
Rated 14 Nov 2015
koalafishKoalafish
Rated 11 Nov 2015
60
30th
Alright everybody, the marketing guys came up with a new bond algorithm to maximise profit: The list sais we need one chopper, plane, train and car scene each. That's Team A. Team B is responsible for bondgirl one and two, the mysterious bad guy, his badass henchman, a torture scene and some kind of computer hacking. Team C will build the villain base and blow it up. Desert would be nice, but snow is also fine. Any questions? - What about the story? - Hmm, lets see...nope, not on the list!
Rated 11 Nov 2015
ytadelYtadel
Rated 10 Nov 2015
5
57th
I would have to rank this one in the bottom tier of Bond movies simply on account of many plot holes, its strange daddy-issues take on Blofeld, and some so-so action scenes. But still, even lesser Bond I still enjoy. The pretitle sequence in Mexico City is one of the best of the series and maybe my favorite movie scene of 2015, singlehandedly boosting my score. (Ytadel's series ranking: #23 of 24)
Rated 10 Nov 2015
bionicninjasBionicNinjas
Rated 06 Nov 2015
90
83rd
An odd Bond film to be sure, Spectre is overly reliant on the established Bond formula, but executes it so flawlessly that you can't help but love it... until everything goes off the rails in the final 15 minutes, with a finale that's nonsensical even by Bond standards. Overall, Spectre does such a wonderful job evoking classic Bond, especially visually and stylistically, while wrapping up threads from modern Bond arcs, that it's well worth the ride.
Rated 06 Nov 2015
frederikaFrederikA
Rated 04 Nov 2015
60
49th
The way he ended Skyfall, Mendes didn't really leave him self other choices than to dive head first, arms spread wide into a familiar sea of established 007 tropes. This actually works extremely well for a long stretch, but when it comes time to stick the landing he lands on this stomach, as Waltz's Big Bad is revealed to be little more than a contrived backstory, an obvious twist, and loafers.
Rated 04 Nov 2015
gideonGideon
Rated 29 Oct 2015
2
59th
I'm tired of Mendes his stale direction, tired of Craig's tired Bond (let alone his bs about Bond being misogynous), tired of everything basically that came after Casino Royale. Spectre feels more like a continuation of QoS, rather than Skyfall. The latter has a better story and Deakins also works wonders, enough to mask Mendes his incompetence to direct a solid Bond film. I remember his quote about taking inspiration from Nolan's TDK. I want classic Bond back, a Bond with charm, a new Bond.
Rated 29 Oct 2015
nutcrackrnutcrackr
Rated 23 Jan 2016
60
16th
Mediocre and lazy. The car chase is adequate. The first romance is cringe and the second is not much better. Why fly a chopper like maniac when your boss is hanging on for dear life? Why drive to Rome from London? How does Bond find a plane atop a snowy mountain peak? How do they drive down? Why do the baddies send Mute Hulk to kill Bond when they let him in the secret base anyway? The final Bond movie for Craig is careless.
Rated 23 Jan 2016
indyatmnINDYATMN
Rated 12 Dec 2015
55
6th
W/ Skyfall Mendes made 1 of the best Bond films & w/ this, 1 of the worst. While the action -when it 2 infrequently occurs - is great, the rest is a dull travelogue w/ boring exposition. The biggest crime is its Dr. Evil-like villain who inexplicably does all he can 2 kill Bond, even though he says he is waiting 4 him & then refuses 2 kill him when he absolutely should. He's a genius except, u know, when he's self-evidently not. Safety nets also magically appear & bases explode from gunshots.
Rated 12 Dec 2015
stradivariusStradivarius
Rated 20 Nov 2015
15
4th
Ive rarely been so bored during an action/ thriller. Not only are the stakes low, the motivations are constantly murky and the decisions idiotic. Compares very unfavorably to this years Mission Impossible and UNCLE
Rated 20 Nov 2015
forehead1forehead1
Rated 08 Nov 2015
50
48th
Probably the best opening scene in the Craig era, and to be fair a decent enough Bond throughout, Spectre's 150-minute runtime starts to grate in the second half. You're all too aware of how long your arse has been planted in the seat, and for what? Just to watch the same old crap we've seen 20-odd times before getting unnecessarily dragged out one scene after another. The debate raging over the new 007 shouldn't be who, but why.
Rated 08 Nov 2015
billyshearsBillyShears
Rated 08 Nov 2015
65
42nd
This will be the James Bond movie where all the best parts involve people sitting in chairs.
Rated 08 Nov 2015
sellissellis
Rated 08 Nov 2015
40
11th
The very embodiment of generic. Maybe three moments total that aren't stolen from everything else you've ever seen.
Rated 08 Nov 2015
filmseekingfilmseeking
Rated 08 Nov 2015
75
82nd
Despite the beautiful cinematography, the gripping action and a humorous Craig at his best, this Skyfall sequel tries too much to be like its predecessor. But Waltz's villain is really uninteresting, as is the plot twist which unnecessarily tries to link all the previous Craig films. Nevertheless it has all the action, exotic locations, cars and beautiful women you'd expect from a Bond film.
Rated 08 Nov 2015
obdurateObdurate
Rated 08 Nov 2015
70
41st
I like it but I think the Craig version of Bond is running its course. That's not the fault of Craig, it is just becoming familiar and predictable. It starts out on a high note, with the excellent Day of the Dead atmosphere, but it doesn't maintain that. Waltz does a good job but they try WAY too hard to make him seem like an evil evil bad guy, and I didn't feel like the action sequences always worked. Could have been trimmed a bit too... that may have helped it.
Rated 08 Nov 2015
chrispalmChrisPalm
Rated 03 Nov 2015
70
25th
The story line lacks punch, is predictable and even feels "stupid". The villain is massively underdeveloped, with a truly boring scheme. The countdown "xx minutes until online" on Q's computer, how trivial isn't that? Hack/stop/trash/terminate it after its online then..
Rated 03 Nov 2015
corleoneCorleone
Rated 30 Oct 2015
65
53rd
Very entertaining to watch, but has some huge flaws. Love story was forced, Waltz's villain - underdeveloped and that finale had no suspense what so ever. I feel Mendes is running out of ideas already.
Rated 30 Oct 2015
luna6ixLuna6ix
Rated 01 Feb 2018
76
57th
When Craig first took the role nine years earlier, there was talk about him being too old to play Bond, and in his fourth entry he's looking his age, his version of the character has also lost some of the appeal it had at the beginning of his tenure--he was supposed to be a brutal, visceral version of Bond. It's a decent movie, a middle of the road Bond entry, but Craig's wave has crested.
Rated 01 Feb 2018
ecitizeneCitizen
Rated 29 Feb 2016
40
32nd
One of the most poorly written Bond movies ever. The plot is confusing and poorly explained. There is some good action, but the viewer is not engaged or included in much of the story. The love aspects was also not handled in a believable way. Many scenes were handled in a very unconvincing way. I also disliked the heavy handed story telling. Making Bond a rouge was ridiculous. There was a nice car chase & several good fights and stunts, except I really disliked the airplane chase sequence.
Rated 29 Feb 2016
okkervilOkkervil
Rated 22 Feb 2016
18
13th
Whilst I'm delighted that Daniel recovered from his stroke to gain almost all the movement back in his facial muscles, I will say that I found his inability to move his lips a trifle distracting. "Spectre" borrows the same awful screenplay style as "Skyfall" where things are explained. In very short. Poorly punctuated. Sentences so that. Idiots can understand. What is going. On. Tonally very singular & even more boring than previous Craig efforts, it's too often head-scratchingly stupid too.
Rated 22 Feb 2016
hellboy76hellboy76
Rated 11 Feb 2016
65
45th
More Quantum of Solace than Skyfall or Casino Royale, it is mired in a underwhelming plot. There are few decent stunts and beatings but at times it slows to a crawl. I still like Craig as Bond and love Waltz as Blofeld, but it needed a little more.
Rated 11 Feb 2016
christiaanbchristiaanb
Rated 08 Feb 2016
68
20th
Spectre is certainly one of the least appealing installments of the series I've ever seen. Actually, its opening scene is terrific: great decor, morbid costumes, some baffling, inexplainable camera movements. The problem is that the plot is unintelligible: What are the stakes? What drives the enemy? Where does Bond get his costumes? Why do women react to him the way they do? And so on. The result is a loose series of action scenes that is barely kept together by a framing story.
Rated 08 Feb 2016
andreaslutroandreaslutro
Rated 24 Jan 2016
45
11th
It feels like the movie could've started 2/3rds in and it wouldn't have made a difference. The main villain's motivations and actions are extremely weak, the love interest feels fake and shallow.
Rated 24 Jan 2016
farzanFarzan
Rated 16 Jan 2016
64
53rd
After the delightful Skyfall, I went into Spectre with high hopes. The opening tracking shot was FUCKING INCREDIBLE. Then the lustre of the film dissipated. I found myself confused at the events leading up to the conflict with Spectre and well into its conclusion. Spectre's plot felt rushed and disjointed. I loved the overarching premise and felt it could have been one of the best plots in Bond history. But it fell short, falling even further at the ridiculous romance we were meant to eat up.
Rated 16 Jan 2016
astrakhanastrakhan
Rated 29 Dec 2015
71
20th
A disappointing nail in the coffin of Craig's Bond career. Spectre misses most of its marks, with a confusing surveillance-themed plot, a baddy who's barely in it, and numerous scenes which feel like a re-hash of Bond's previous adventures (car chase, snow chase, train fight). Witty dialogue has been all but cut from the series, and the explosions and shootouts are more videogame-like than ever. If this is Bond's future, I don't want to see any more. Bring back Roger Moore.
Rated 29 Dec 2015
sophiesophie
Rated 13 Dec 2015
70
56th
Good, even though Waltz's role was a little shallower than expected. Plus, I didn't see the fuzz about "oh, finally a bond girl the same age as Bond" - Monica Bellucci had maybe 5 minutes of screen time..
Rated 13 Dec 2015
thedailynathanTheDailyNathan
Rated 12 Dec 2015
64
22nd
A generic and forgettable Bond. Very tame on the exotic locales, sexy women, and action choreography. Christoph Waltz was REALLY wasted here.
Rated 12 Dec 2015
wwallce4prezWWallce4prez
Rated 14 Nov 2015
66
37th
The bravado, the fancy clothes, the shiny cars, the sweeping aerial shots - its all there but with an underbelly of mediocrity. A so-so screenplay wrapped in very pretty paper, is, unfortunately, not up to par given the recent Craig films. Waltz, surprisingly, pales in comparison to other bond villains, and the climax has whiffs of Brosnan-era cheese. Disappointing.
Rated 14 Nov 2015
tds4aTds4a
Rated 11 Nov 2015
1
16th
The ~chilling revelations~ are predictable and insulting, the Bond Girls are a retrograde step, the themes are Skyfall's *again* only more one-sided and less coherent, Bond goes through a "rogue" arc for the fourth (!) film in a row, the climax is laughably free of tension, Craig seems bored, Waltz seems bored, the ending is painfully idiotic and nearly had me yelling at the screen...
Rated 11 Nov 2015
tjekhovTjekhov
Rated 11 Nov 2015
40
27th
While somewhat entertaining, Spectre falls short in every department related to the craft of creating stories, which are worth being emotionally invested in.
Rated 11 Nov 2015
begoniabolbegoniabol
Rated 09 Nov 2015
69
58th
It's a typical Bond movie: vehicle chases, explosions, women, a cool villain. The intro is really good, as is the intro song part was one of the best I've seen(but not the song, which was awful). Craig is not the best Bond, but also not the worst. If you liked the previous 3 movies, you'll probably like this.
Rated 09 Nov 2015
eastondEastonD
Rated 08 Nov 2015
35
26th
The Blofeld reveal was eyerolling, very Star Trek Into Darkness (oh really you're Khan? I had no idea). Skyfall was falsely regarded as a Bond highnote but at least it's competently handled in all aspects. This seemed more like let's fling shit until something sticks.
Rated 08 Nov 2015
overratedoverrated
Rated 08 Nov 2015
46
41st
First two thirds are fine, Mexico sequence is great to be more specific. Unfortunately Spectre is more reminiscent of QOS than CR/Skyfall, you can tell it's been hung drawn & q'tred by various writers. Introduction of Blofeld is great but then he turns out to have the most hacky motivation for revenge. Waltz phones it in as if he's fed up with playing villains, and the last act is M & Q playing espionage Scooby Doo - why London when the crater set was barely used? Disappointing in the end.
Rated 08 Nov 2015
lightning17Lightning17
Rated 07 Nov 2015
76
61st
With fantastic cinematography and direction, Spectre is another solid James Bond movie despite the fact that it doesn't make the most of its plot or characters.
Rated 07 Nov 2015
hamstercanhamstercan
Rated 06 Nov 2015
31
13th
Movie started unexpectedly okay then second half lived up to the expectations with the fakest 'love' story and the worst rip-off villian ever. So predictable with james 'the slut' bond falling in 'love' and chosing to be the good guy after killing all those people cold blooded as he throws away his weapon and going to his 'love' in the most cringy way. By the way someone should stop C.Waltz. Arent we all tired of seeing the same character over and over?
Rated 06 Nov 2015
dresd_r_e_s_
Rated 31 Oct 2015
2
31st
This was actually a bit disappointing. I could never hope for anything as good as Casino Royale, but with Skyfall, Mendes made me think that he was going back in the right direction with the franchise. The opening scene with the death festival masks and all, really set a tone and got my hopes up for a dark Bond movie. Unfortunately, the story was a bit bland, character development absent, the lame Bond jokes increased and definitely not Craigs best Bond performance. *Okay
Rated 31 Oct 2015
blockrockerBlockrocker
Rated 29 Oct 2015
88
82nd
Better than average Bond film. Beautiful camera work.
Rated 29 Oct 2015
benoliver999benoliver999
Rated 27 Oct 2015
70
56th
Spectre is a well made, very exciting thrill ride. It's gripping, it's funny and it's well written. Despite its unimaginative direction, this probably stands as one of the better Bond films.
Rated 27 Oct 2015
joelwatchesmoviesjoelwatchesmovies
Rated 22 Dec 2016
5
24th
A great long-take opening scene (starting with a masked Bond was brilliant) gives way to a mediocre story: A half-hazard clue-hopping mystery centered on a lame villain (Bond's escapes from the chair and the building were way too easy for him) and a vague evil conspiracy (tying together the previous villains felt contrived). On the other hand, the action is excellent, the visuals are nice, and the politically rebellious antics of M, Q, and Moneypenny add some flavour to Bond's solo missions.
Rated 22 Dec 2016
moribunnyMoribunny
Rated 28 Feb 2016
5
2nd
The franchise lost its charm decades ago and each recent installment recursively repeats the former's ever-dwindling pool of imbecilic tropes.
Rated 28 Feb 2016
misterlizardmisterlizard
Rated 25 Feb 2016
60
61st
Big expensive stunts full of real things blowing up. That's really all I want from a Bond movie and this delivers. It's somewhat strange that after 3 movies of Craig as gritty reboot Bond they suddenly revert to the ridiculous villains and contrived action scenes of the past, but I'm not complaining. I leave my brain at the door when watching any Bond movie.
Rated 25 Feb 2016
goremeatgoremeat
Rated 16 Feb 2016
50
31st
It's really not that bad. Lots of fun action pieces; just way too long and the second half of the film boring.
Rated 16 Feb 2016
chemtrailschemtrails
Rated 24 Jan 2016
60
52nd
"I think you've got a secret, and it's something you won't tell anyone... cause you don't trust anyone" -actual dialogue from motion picture "Spectre"
Rated 24 Jan 2016
bentienbentien
Rated 06 Jan 2016
75
83rd
Best Bond in years. Mostly because it combines the "realism" of Daniel Craig's Agent 007 with the old fashioned, over-the-top style that has been missing for a while.
Rated 06 Jan 2016
age_jellemaAge Jellema
Rated 29 Dec 2015
45
8th
The longlife Bond fan would be pleased with this film? I think not. It was a unnecessary movie. Even the great Waltz was not used right, what a lame villain, while Waltz can do anything. Maybe Tarantino should direct the next Bond, he know what to do with characters. It was a really boring long sit.
Rated 29 Dec 2015
barraocBarraoc
Rated 27 Dec 2015
70
64th
Good, but hopefully the next bond film won't be part of a trilogy.
Rated 27 Dec 2015
redactedredacted
Rated 27 Dec 2015
61
31st
Quite a safe Bond, I agree with most in that the Mexico sequence was a strong way to kick things off. A large opening set-piece has started to feel comfortable at the top of a Bond film of late. From there, however, this was a fairly tension free affair, the heart monitor had a blip during the drill sequence only to be sedated shortly after with another dry & brazen action drill. They are starting to feel like they could be fast-forwarded through & the plot would still be on the same trajectory.
Rated 27 Dec 2015
wulfstanleeWulfstanLee
Rated 19 Dec 2015
70
63rd
It is the unfulfilled potential of this one that disappointed viewers so much. After the success of Skyfall and the casting of Christoph Waltz, this one was expected to match the quality of some of the greatest Bond films but failed to deliver. The action is great, but the dialogue doesn't quite work as does the unharmonious attempt to yoke together all four Craig films. That said, this felt like an origin story for the villain, and I think there's a strong chance the next Bond will be great.
Rated 19 Dec 2015
tenhastenhas
Rated 16 Dec 2015
52
20th
Starting with helicopter scene and ending with helicopter scene... what a consistent story (!)
Rated 16 Dec 2015
lenaclena_c
Rated 23 Nov 2015
3
43rd
I have seen better, but it's (almost) always *Recommendable to watch a Bond movie
Rated 23 Nov 2015
mwgerbmwgerb
Rated 16 Nov 2015
43
32nd
An annoyingly pat wrap-up to the Daniel Craig version of Bond (assuming the rumors are true). Every James Bond cliche and iconic moment is incorporated after 3 films of trying to escape them. I imagine it was a blast for fans of the old-school style, and it does make for an action-packed popcorn flick, but this just felt lifeless to me. Not even Hoyte's gorgeous cinematography could save this from the bottom half of my ratings.
Rated 16 Nov 2015
groovysoulsGroovy_Souls
Rated 16 Nov 2015
65
47th
Probably my least favorite of the Craig Bond movies. It's ridiculous and while it does have its moments, it's nowhere near Casino Royale or Skyfall caliber. However Mendes and his cast prove they're still up for Bond, as really the main dragging points are the cliched plot and the inconsistant tone that is more akin to earlier Bonds. Not my favorite.
Rated 16 Nov 2015
lauftLäuft.
Rated 13 Nov 2015
42
14th
It is just sooooooo boring! Even the action seems are very unexciting for the most parts.
Rated 13 Nov 2015
therealj_roTheRealJ-Ro
Rated 12 Nov 2015
80
70th
I'd place Spectre a close #3 in terms of the Daniel Craig Bond movies. It doesn't sniff Casino Royale, but there are certain things that Spectre does better than Skyfall, and vice-versa. Lea Seydoux is wonderful (if a little ineffectual), and I think the best compliment to be paid is, this feels the most "Bond" that Craig has ever felt. If this is indeed the end of Craig's run as 007, it ends on a strong note, as Spectre is both a good movie on its own, and a solid addition to the Bond universe.
Rated 12 Nov 2015
juntakinte99juntakinte99
Rated 12 Nov 2015
65
28th
The latest Bond films have been odd mirrors of the Christopher Nolan Batmanverse. Skyfall built on the successful ground of The Dark Knight by ruminating on upbringing, temperament, & occupation. But Spectre tries to tell a The Dark Knight Rises style retirement story. It could've been cool if the action, fights, or romance were fun. But nothing gets ever takes off, making the hokey & uneven ending even worse. It's a marginal recommendation, albeit with beautifully photographed locales.
Rated 12 Nov 2015
amazedemonamazedemon
Rated 10 Nov 2015
71
85th
Spectre is a solid conclusion to the Craig quartet, tying together loose ends from the previous installments, although being fairly contrived in the process. The 1st half of the flim is great, bringing Bond back to his quippy, fun stereotype; while the 2nd half retreads familiar modern territory, though not nearly as gripping. Seydoux surprises, while villainous Waltz and Scott disappoint. Technically (cinematography, score, direction) the film is great, but overall it's not ground-breaking.
Rated 10 Nov 2015
twincinematwincinema
Rated 09 Nov 2015
65
42nd
I liked a lot about this film. The opening sequence is great, and the reveal of Waltz's character is great directing. The Craig-era films, especially the latter two, kind of move beyond Bond as a character to give him more nuance. He is a man who is nothing beyond the job, but is haunted by an emotional past (the empty apartment scene is a great example). This film builds up the idea of the pervasiveness of information technology, and then just sorta fizzles out. The last third just sorta ends.
Rated 09 Nov 2015
guitarmeeuwguitarmeeuw
Rated 08 Nov 2015
74
76th
Brilliant movie. I think this is my favorite Bond-movie ever. I really liked the soundtrack, the acting, and the cinematography in this film. I feel like this is a superbudgetfilm done right. The only thing that felt a bit fake to me was the scene with the first "Bond-girl". However, I think that this film has portraited me a more emotional version of Bond. A more personal film. Disliked the NWO theme. I think the movie shined in first 1,5 hour part, minus a few action scenes that were cliché.
Rated 08 Nov 2015
stewballStewball
Rated 07 Nov 2015
60
28th
Weakest opening I can remember with it's one-trick-pony helo acro stuff. How many, including other Bond movies, have dwelt on the Day of the Dead, not to mention films using it in the title. (We could probably make a forum thread out of it.) The music from the uninspired opening credits number to the boilerplate "action enhancement" strings was noticeable only because it was so unremarkable. And call me jaded, but this is Hollywood, and there are a lot better looking actresses than Léa Seyd [Full review]
Rated 07 Nov 2015
filmfreak88filmfreak88
Rated 07 Nov 2015
70
54th
Spectre returns the Bond franchise to some of its old school, more traditional roots, for better or for worse. Enjoyably diverting and a nice send-off for Craig, who remains excellent.
Rated 07 Nov 2015
letskillrobotsletskillrobots
Rated 06 Nov 2015
25
75th
We didn't see the main villain for like two hours.
Rated 06 Nov 2015
reisenderReisender
Rated 12 Dec 2021
75
16th
Making Christoph Waltz boring is quite the feat, I give them that.
Rated 12 Dec 2021
vv238vv238
Rated 17 Sep 2018
35
34th
Skyfall felt like it was pushing Bond into the 21st century. This feels like it is trying to drag it back into the past. Tying this to the previous three films is one of the most baffling decisions in a series of bad decisions this movie chooses to make. Every shot holds for too long with little substance, the action is so boring that it is often overlaid with exposition, and the villain is so underused it is insulting to an actor of Waltz' caliber.
Rated 17 Sep 2018
abdulabdulabdulabdul
Rated 09 Jul 2018
10
90th
The many sexual times of enjoyment Mr Bond can feel all the build up jealousy for his pleasure. But the action fighting will break the moment for love.
Rated 09 Jul 2018
nargNarg
Rated 05 Feb 2018
23
8th
Daniel Craig looks just as bored as I felt while watching. This movie is tired and bad and stupid.
Rated 05 Feb 2018
natebarriosnatebarrios
Rated 09 May 2017
55
25th
who else thought Ralph Fiennes was gonna say 'cunt'?
Rated 09 May 2017
jschlanskyJSchlansky
Rated 17 Feb 2017
50
27th
Why would you punch the guy flying the helicopter?
Rated 17 Feb 2017
thehynesthehynes
Rated 18 Jan 2017
48
26th
isn't it about time us folk, adults all, came to see the Bond franchise for what it is - a big pile of bollocks?
Rated 18 Jan 2017
sopachuco13sopachuco13
Rated 24 Apr 2016
80
62nd
Spectre pulls a lot of things together from the other Craig Bond films and puts them in a movie that brings things together in a pretty interesting way. Spectre is a good swansong for the Craig Bond films. It was nice to see him walk away with a female lead. It also shows that there is room for a sequel because Christoph Waltz, who in my opinion, is the strongest Bond villain in decades and wasn't killed off like most villains. My only complaint is they should have spent more time in Mexico.
Rated 24 Apr 2016
gkfilmgkfilm
Rated 16 Feb 2016
55
37th
Entertainment: 4/4. Spirit: 1/3. Sustainability: 0.5/3.
Rated 16 Feb 2016
spaceflohspacefloh
Rated 14 Feb 2016
60
58th
eng; [James Bond: Spectre]; james bond versucht eine datenverarbeitungs organisation aufzudecken, deren boss seit geraumer zeit gegen bond arbeitet und die gleichzeitig den secret service abschaffen will.;
Rated 14 Feb 2016
aron_ericsonAron Ericson
Rated 04 Feb 2016
52
29th
You may be through with the past, but the past is not through with you. Whatever technology and sophistication you tell yourself you have, in the end there will be a dude drinking, fucking, and fighting. Having Craig be a Bond for the 21st century has apparently gone out the window. Here instead they celebrate his status as a relic (or spectre). With such a realistic worldview, you'd hope it would be better.
Rated 04 Feb 2016
judge_holdenJudge Holden
Rated 01 Feb 2016
5
69th
Tries and fails to have it both ways in maintaining the darker undercurrents and being a throwback to the stylistic bond of the 60s. What churns out is a rather antiseptic but entertaining enough movie. What little the series gains this time around in acquiring Waltz, it suffers a fatal blow in losing Roger Deakins.
Rated 01 Feb 2016
kavuKavu
Rated 31 Jan 2016
65
39th
Two great action scenes don't quite cut it when the rest is more or less shoddily written and even the good stunts are largely wasted by inept directing. Disappointing.
Rated 31 Jan 2016
pecetpecet
Rated 30 Jan 2016
50
10th
Nkt bad. Just not good either.
Rated 30 Jan 2016
mistersplicemistersplice
Rated 30 Jan 2016
55
35th
5+ pretty good
Rated 30 Jan 2016
hsncrspywlhsncrspywl
Rated 26 Jan 2016
66
39th
Makes Skyfall look ultra-creative in comparison. Good ideas done in a rote way, obviously suffers from some intense third act rewrites, and a apathetic return to what the team *thought* worked, in that classic Bond fuckup way.
Rated 26 Jan 2016
muutanetmuutanet
Rated 23 Jan 2016
43
34th
There was two good jokes: the sofa scene and the first meeting with a cool car. The plot did not build anything nice out of it and action scenes did not impress me much. There was a short moment with Monica Bellucci who's getting old but still have the fibe on her.
Rated 23 Jan 2016
mrandersen10mrandersen10
Rated 19 Jan 2016
65
31st
It shoots itself in the foot by trying to be far too ambitious for its own good. In attempting to one-up the previous movies, they create "one villain to rule them all," which only served to place undue pressure on the rest of the film. It was a strange contrast with other parts of the movie which seemed content on being a superficial action flick. As a result of that dichotomy, Spectre lacks a clear identity. In one instance it's serious and somber in another it's silly and ridiculous.
Rated 19 Jan 2016
chmulcr0nchmul_cr0n
Rated 19 Jan 2016
37
8th
Too convenient to work as a drama. Not Bond enough to be a Bond movie. In other words: The writing is remarkably bad and the movie's boring. Which makes it a weak, dull pseudo Bond drama with a couple of action scenes and an uninteresting pseudo 60s look. And the worst romance of all time. Christoph Waltz is great (and underfeatured) and the only thing not uncool about this movie. Good ending, though. Even though it totally betrays the whole tone of the movie.
Rated 19 Jan 2016
peaceanarchyPeaceAnarchy
Rated 19 Jan 2016
81
64th
On par with the other Bond films with Craig. It's a bit uneven at times, but has a fun mix of set pieces and spy plot and pushes the character in interesting, if not fully developed, directions.
Rated 19 Jan 2016
vinegarbobVinegarBob
Rated 15 Jan 2016
50
24th
It's a Bond film. There's absolutely nothing new here, and any progress made to modernise the franchise has taken a huge step backwards with this entry: The stupid gadgets are creeping back in, and things are getting sillier again. It looks like I'm doomed to live in a world where the Bond films (with the exception of Casino Royale) are not what I'd like them to be.
Rated 15 Jan 2016
punqPUNQ
Rated 13 Jan 2016
50
77th
Stylish and as big a action as it wants to deliver, but Spectre (2015) was a surprisingly generic James Bond. So little personality here. I know Daniel Craig is the hard and serious James Bond, and I don't have a problems with that, but then you got to have some color in there.... somewhere! And there is none of that. The main villain was completely uninteresting. On a positive Dave Bautista looked badass! The movie is still good simply based on the spectacular action.
Rated 13 Jan 2016
evan_watersEvan Waters
Rated 10 Jan 2016
88
47th
An unapologetic embrace of Bond as over the top action hero; the entire film is a meta commentary on gritty, realistic spy dramas, the ugly reality of the modern surveillance state, and how we're maybe better off with a man who's above all that. Familiar sequences such as a villain conference and the slow-moving deathtrap are rendered in surprisingly entertaining ways.
Rated 10 Jan 2016
omgfridgeomgfridge
Rated 08 Jan 2016
3
26th
Dumb and seemed internally conflicted in what direction it wanted to head. Craig went full video game mode at stages which even for Bond is a stretch. Completely wasted Waltz in a plot that is complete nonsense.
Rated 08 Jan 2016

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...