She-Wolf of London

THERE’S NO FUCKIN WEREWOLF IN THIS WEREWOLF MOVIE LMAO

I can hardly believe this came from Universal. It's got a cheap (you never see any wolf makeup) and flat poverty row feel, only without the charm.

With dialogue that drops dead in the air as it's forced out of the actors mouths, and a plot that's identifiable within ten minutes, a lack of monster action or atmosphere, why should you watch She Wolf? You shouldn't. I wish it wasn't on the Universal Monsters boxset, what a waste of time.

One of the worst Universal horrors. Even at a barely feature length, this one drags.

Disappointing. It had the look and a good lead, but the plot was weak and nothing really happened.

A Fera de Londres estreava há 75 anos nos EUA. É um dos filmes mais fracos da série cinematográfica de monstros da Universal dos anos 30 e 40, tolinho mesmo. Box Ataúde Macabro.

She-Wolf of London (1946) is part of the Universal horror universe. Is it scary? Never. That didn't stop me from enjoying it. Simple and polished, with that Gothic touch Universal was known for. Mild psychological story which ended up being a rather pleasant experience for me.

The performances & the direction aren't bad, but the script is awful, especially because it's not what it's supposed to be, which is a Universal werewolf movie (it's included in the collection). It's not actually a monster film but even as an ostensible mystery thriller, it's a giant snooze. There's not much worse than knowing who the killer is well before you're supposed to, unless it's a film where the protagonist spends most of the film in bed & so little happens on screen it could be a play

It's only an hour long but seems longer than it was. The story is interesting but the overacting hampers things. The whole thing would've been better if they'd come up with a better reveal to the twist ending.

Nice twist but the rest of it is bunk.

There is a twist i wished for in the wolfman, but the whole movie is executed too poorly.