sign in
register
Watch
Max Amazon Channel Max Apple TV
+5
Saw
Saw
+5
JustWatch
Your probable score
?
Saw

Saw

2004
Suspense/Thriller, Crime
1h 43m
Obsessed with teaching his victims the value of life, a deranged, sadistic serial killer is abducting morally wayward people and forcing them to play horrific games for their own survival. Faced with impossible choices, each victim must struggle to win back his/her life, or else die trying. (Lions Gate Films)

Directed by:

James Wan

Screenwriter:

Leigh Whannell, James Wan

Starring:

Monica Potter, Danny Glover, Dina Meyer, Tobin Bell, Cary Elwes, Ken Leung, Leigh Whannell, Michael Emerson, Shawnee Smith, Alexandra Bokyun Chun, Makenzie Vega, Mike Butters

Franchise:

Saw

Genres:

Suspense/Thriller, Crime, Horror, Mystery

Country:

USA

Language:

English
imdb IMDb
Update history
Suggest edit

Saw

2004
Suspense/Thriller, Crime
1h 43m
Your probable score
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer
Avg Percentile 46.65% from 13759 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

(13865)
Compact view
clear
Compact view
Show
Sort
enthusiastEnthusiast
Rated 11 Jan 2009
50
10th
I think I finally get it: the "Saw" movies are cinematic meth. The camerawork and editing is jittery and paranoid. They broker in excitable themes that probably seemed profound at their conception but in the harsh light of day are actually quite mundane. The set design, lighting, and color all leave the taste of Clorox in your mouth. And they are very, very bad for you. Sitting through five sequels of a shitty nu-horror franchise isn't normal... but on "Saw" it is.
Rated 11 Jan 2009
lauratronlauratron
Rated 03 Aug 2008
81
76th
I think people would be inclined to rank this higher had it not been for the horrible franchise it spawned. I still like it though.
Rated 03 Aug 2008
leonardisLeonardis
Rated 12 Oct 2020
84
44th
I was expecting the torture porn that this series' reputation is built upon, but this ended up being a psychological thriller and a good one at that. Seeing the two leads piece things together and trying to outsmart the serial killer is pretty entertaining and they deliver the performances well enough. Parts of this reminded me of Se7en, which isn't a bad thing. You can definitely feel the small budget at times, and one has to wonder if these men really deserve this. Still, this is great.
Rated 12 Oct 2020
billyshearsBillyShears
Rated 25 Jul 2017
75
65th
The trap scenes do this bad fast motion effect that is poison. Murtaugh cannon ???
Rated 25 Jul 2017
desertpunkDesertPunk
Rated 15 Apr 2015
62
32nd
I bet Amazon sees a lot of bundle orders of Saw DVDs and Limp Bizkit posters.
Rated 15 Apr 2015
adoubleadouble
Rated 01 Nov 2012
83
71st
The acting in this leaves a lot to be inspired, especially from the two leads. The movie makes it for it with a fantastic atmosphere and slow unraveling of it's intricate plot. There are some legitimately tense moments in this movie and the twist is clever. My dislike of most of the Saw franchise does not keep this movie from being creative and well made.
Rated 01 Nov 2012
paxtonPaxton
Rated 30 Jan 2012
88
87th
I think this original one is a tight, clever thriller. I have since fallen in love with the style that James Wan brings to each of his films. The only thing missing was what should have been Cary Elwes last line, "As you wish."
Rated 30 Jan 2012
barthalenBarthalen
Rated 22 Sep 2010
29
14th
Anyone that likes this has never actually seen a good movie. Stick that in your saw and smoke it.
Rated 22 Sep 2010
manhattaManhatta
Rated 08 Mar 2008
12
6th
One of the best trailers and ad campaigns in recent years, which amounted to terribly-acted-serial-killer-twist-ending-movie #83. To call it a disappointment is to be much too forgiving to this kind of trash.
Rated 08 Mar 2008
eveeluneveelun
Rated 06 Dec 2007
67
35th
Better than I had expected, with some tense and unnerving scenes. But honestly some of the character decisions are so stupid and unbelievable that it becomes irritatingly obvious that the film just wants to find reasons to keep the torture going without bothering with the context.
Rated 06 Dec 2007
thmertensth_mertens
Rated 03 Sep 2007
31
8th
Has anyone actually seen such bad acting in such a big hollywood movie ?? Cary Elwes was terrible as was the twist at the end. Of course no one saw it comming, but I think they put the twist at the end to disguise what a bad movie this really is. The scenario was so terrible, characters miraculously remebering what happened to them (BAM !!, another flashback)... This is just violence for no reason, there is no underlying theme, .... a bad B-film sold as a big budget production.
Rated 03 Sep 2007
doctor7doctor7
Rated 20 Feb 2007
68
49th
Great visuals and horror movie atmosphere but some of the acting is pretty bad and the twist is very unimpressive.
Rated 20 Feb 2007
kem1kem1
Rated 24 Oct 2024
60
63rd
Saw a 20th Anniversary screening, having not seen it since it initially released in theaters. It holds up pretty well, even knowing the "twist." Some of the acting is not great, there are some badly jarring camera effects, and plot holes if you think too long about it, but it manages a good balance of suspense and mystery, and keeps you intrigued for the entire runtime.
Rated 24 Oct 2024
twincinematwincinema
Rated 07 Oct 2020
50
26th
Despite it's nu-metal aesthetic, it's serious tone becomes incredibly goofy. The twists are fun, even if the film feels like Se7en T2o.
Rated 07 Oct 2020
dakota99Dakota99
Rated 03 Jul 2019
9
95th
Never understood how this first one never resonated with critics, especially compared to other horror films, but this has to at least go down as one of the more influential horror films of all time. It's pretty self contained, creepy, and if you're stomach can handle it obviously, quite gory. Not the biggest fan in using gore to push your movie, but Wan actually makes it feel like it's in the background, unlike the others. On top of that twist, Saw borderlines on a classic for me.
Rated 03 Jul 2019
ag0stomesmerAg0stoMesmer
Rated 31 Jul 2012
2
46th
Stomach churning, nerve shredding, sickening and that's just the bad acting and plot holes.
Rated 31 Jul 2012
hofschneiderHofschneider
Rated 26 Feb 2012
36
4th
Isn't it great, when a flashback comes completely out of the blue and the characters say things like: "Oh, wait... now I remember".
Rated 26 Feb 2012
greatscott85GreatScott85
Rated 28 Apr 2011
35
10th
Feels like a bad, overlong CSI episode with more gore.
Rated 28 Apr 2011
jerkyJerky
Rated 18 Oct 2010
80
96th
Anyone who says they saw the twist coming is a FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT NO GOOD LIAR BASTARD OF A BITCH AND I'LL "VAN DAMME" THEIR GOD DAMN HEAD OFF. Best ending ever!
Rated 18 Oct 2010
moraesfelipemoraesfelipe
Rated 17 Sep 2010
45
23rd
Got some nice ideas, but deserved a better director. By the way, what is this poor and silly editing doing here? 2021 REWATCH: hasn't aged well -- freaky, 90s MTV-esque montages lol. Although influential as torture porn horror, pretty by the numbers procedural thriller - vibe is totally post-Seven-ish, heavily relying on rotten, dirty interiors and unlikable characters - whose main attraction is the horror that never actually happens and lazy backstories left to be fully in the twisty ending
Rated 17 Sep 2010
sirstuckeySirStuckey
Rated 24 Jul 2010
30
7th
When I first saw this I was pretty 'blah' about it. I don't mind gore in horror movies, but I'm not a big fan of it in the torture outlook. Now this movie seems like a walk in the park compared to the excessive crap that's been released since. Combine my total disinterest in these types of movies with bad acting and a relatively stupid script and you have this turd of a film. At least this one was so bad that I didn't have to waste my time trying any of the sequels out.
Rated 24 Jul 2010
wolfwoodeWolfwoode
Rated 24 Feb 2010
70
50th
The start of a dynasty that revitalized the horror genre. Though later installments are predictable and lack characterization, this is worth seeing.
Rated 24 Feb 2010
mentaculusMentaculus
Rated 01 Feb 2010
44
18th
A secondhand Se7en, meaning: the concept itself is solid, but nothing else is. There is some ridiculously bad dialogue (which leads naturally to bad acting) and stupid undercranking (which leads naturally to bad editing). The more the story "unravels", the less it makes sense, the less scary it is and the less you care.
Rated 01 Feb 2010
capttesticleCaptTesticle
Rated 10 Sep 2009
65
42nd
When you wake up in fucked up bathroom with your leg chained to a wall and you can't remember how you got there, it usually means you've just had a cracking good piss-up the night before. The fact this movie doesn't celebrate that makes it a bit of a killjoy.
Rated 10 Sep 2009
quickyQuicky
Rated 29 May 2009
35
9th
Saw was pretty much what I expected from it: a pretty boring "horror" film about some people stuck in chains that wasn't really scary at all, had a plot that made little to no sense, featured annoying music, and mediocre acting at best. In short, Saw was another one of those brainless gory movies that I'll have forgotten about next week.
Rated 29 May 2009
nearphotisonNearphotison
Rated 28 Nov 2008
52
28th
I love the concept behind Jigsaw, but my taste for this series lives and dies with him. I have no care to see anything outside of what little character development is given towards him, and the pointless gore and "clever" traps grow tiresome very quickly.
Rated 28 Nov 2008
willxcorewillxcore
Rated 06 May 2008
78
49th
It promised to be the next great serial killer thriller since se7en. That it was definitely NOT. What it was was a unique take on the horror killer genre with nice mind games and a satisfying twist at the end. Unfortunately it spawned a series of gore-porn sequels that will never amount to what the first film did.
Rated 06 May 2008
hellsditchhellsditch
Rated 08 Feb 2008
61
6th
Predictable, laughably over-directed and under-acted garbage.
Rated 08 Feb 2008
gogokaingogokain
Rated 27 Dec 2007
35
42nd
This movie is absolutely atrocious until the last 5 minutes. I'll admit, it's one of the few twist endings that I didn't see coming. It's too bad the rest of the movie is absolute trash.
Rated 27 Dec 2007
nandorizzinandorizzi
Rated 08 Oct 2007
95
97th
The movie fastens his attention of the beginning to the end and has an unexpected end that gives any sense to the story. Awesome.
Rated 08 Oct 2007
v3xationv3xation
Rated 14 Aug 2007
89
87th
Likely the best horror movie ever
Rated 14 Aug 2007
chow25chow25
Rated 14 Aug 2007
50
34th
Terrible acting and RIDICULOUS MTV cinematography holds this movie back from being good.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
tinythedoggtinythedogg
Rated 14 Aug 2007
100
99th
Saw is a unique and original movie that has a bit of nastiness and unforgiving cruelty to it that you just can't turn away from
Rated 14 Aug 2007
megladon8megladon8
Rated 14 Aug 2007
45
17th
Horribly acted horror film with no scares, an incredibly predictable ending, and production values of a TV movie. Writers and director seemed to think this was a very smat film...it's SE7EN for mentally challenged pre-teens.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
fowpfowp
Rated 14 Aug 2007
40
9th
Hilarious melange of genre cliches - ooh, scary. I was too busy laughing at the script. The sequel is actually better (but still al waste of time).
Rated 14 Aug 2007
tripleshTripleSH
Rated 14 Aug 2007
90
90th
Saw reinvented horror just a few years into the 21st century, and has already spawned a boatload of similar, stylish, psychological thrill-gorefests.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
veryrachelvery_rachel
Rated 14 Aug 2007
81
68th
Bad acting makes some parts seem corny, but the overall concept and plot twists make this movie worth seeing.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
jetjaguarjetjaguar
Rated 01 Jul 2007
20
1st
A movie that seems to think it's much deeper than it actually has any hope of actually being. The camera and editing trick wear out their welcome long before the story descends into absolute nonsense. I really hate this movie.
Rated 01 Jul 2007
jhezabeeJhezabee
Rated 11 Jun 2007
70
26th
At first I thought it was awesome, but the story falls apart when you actually begin to think about it. And the acting was horrible.
Rated 11 Jun 2007
fredericg54frederic_g54
Rated 29 May 2007
7
58th
Remember seeing it for the first time a couple of years ago...I have to admit the acting was sometimes horrible, but I love that ending.
Rated 29 May 2007
quintonjaminQuintonjamin
Rated 06 Oct 2024
70
66th
Pleasantly surprised by this. Wasn't nearly as gory as I expected. I think it used gore in the places it needed it and not too much. It's genuinely thrilling and has a pretty good mystery as well. Might not watch the sequels as I hear they lean into the torture way too much.
Rated 06 Oct 2024
muhammadjhhMuhammadjhh
Rated 21 Sep 2024
65
32nd
Hshsh
Rated 21 Sep 2024
eliesrbieliesrbi
Rated 24 Jun 2024
90
82nd
incroyable, beaucoup + thriller que les prochains, une régalade
Rated 24 Jun 2024
brrrpbrrrp
Rated 19 Feb 2024
10
1st
Fucking awful shit. I particularly loathed the flashy, utterly tasteless editing job. The creative death scenarios are not substantial or interesting enough to sit through an hour and a half of execrable filmmaking.
Rated 19 Feb 2024
mistereeemistereee
Rated 04 Feb 2024
1
0th
I hate horror films
Rated 04 Feb 2024
90sdisasterfilmbuff90sDisasterFilmBuff
Rated 09 Jan 2024
25
23rd
I just don't like gore for gore.
Rated 09 Jan 2024
cowmanCowman
Rated 11 Nov 2023
70
56th
Rewatch 20 years later. I'm positively surprised, I had a lot of fun! It's all a bit silly though and the whole thing doesn't make any sense.
Rated 11 Nov 2023
videoetronVideoetron
Rated 24 Oct 2023
64
62nd
I guess it was sort of original at the time, before everyone tried to copy the concept or parody it, and before it made its own silly devolution. Convoluted at times but not in a too unpalatable way. Not as bad as I expected it to be
Rated 24 Oct 2023
shockularSHOCKULAR
Rated 14 Oct 2023
79
67th
It's obviously super far-fetched and falls into the category of "mega mastermind planning out each detail perfectly in an unrealistic way" kind of film, but it's enjoyable and has surprises and red herrings all over the place. Made me potentially want to see some of the sequels. Good stuff.
Rated 14 Oct 2023
thatyoungmthatyoungm
Rated 08 Oct 2023
86
37th
I'm not the biggest fan of the Saw franchise, but this is undeniably the best of what became a tired and terrible franchise. The first movie actually manages to build a good amount of tension, features some strong character acting from Elwes and Glover, and a twist that you really don't see coming. I also like that it is fairly restrained in the gore that it does show and that makes those scenes much more effective. After this one and James Wan departed, the franchise took a nosedive sadly.
Rated 08 Oct 2023
zanginZangin
Rated 08 Oct 2023
63
46th
It's a solid thriller that borrows heavily from other films (Se7en and Cube most notably) but still has a hell of an original central concept at its core. But it has some big problems: first, the room of the death game is never allowed to feel properly claustrophobic because the film keeps cutting outside it and, second, how the game plays out, despite supposedly being the work of a mastermind villain, is particularly reliant on people acting uncharacteristically stupidly. Enjoyable but weak.
Rated 08 Oct 2023
greyspartanGreySpartan
Rated 25 Dec 2022
100
63rd
love it
Rated 25 Dec 2022
margustaMargusTa
Rated 23 Dec 2022
44
24th
Many talked about this movie. For me it was disappointment and not impressive at all. Not sure if a bigger budget would have done miracles when script has so much nonsense. Maybe sequels are better.
Rated 23 Dec 2022
mysticMystic
Rated 28 Jun 2022
1
6th
James Wan's first was definitely a forgetful affair. Too many twists and turns. Shallow acting. Some of the hallmarks of the future star director are present but not nearly sufficient to float the ship.
Rated 28 Jun 2022
ksrivasksrivas
Rated 18 Jun 2022
0
4th
The only thing that scared me was that I actually SAW this movie. Fuck you whoever wrote this. That horrible joke attempt was more worthwhile than this hardcore turd of a movie. Whoever did the makeup for Roberts, you are an asshole. You could have done better with talcum powder and a brick as an applicator. My friend just told me what happened in part 2, MILES of eyerolls.
Rated 18 Jun 2022
gargom04Gargom04
Rated 13 Apr 2022
74
53rd
Opinión personal: 8 Actores: 7 Guión: 8 Planos/técnicas: 6.5 BSO: 7 Otros:8 Iluminación:- FX:- Director:7 Humor:- Vestuario:- Metraje:9 Total: 74
Rated 13 Apr 2022
sirsassSirSass
Rated 01 Dec 2021
65
55th
Replace Danny Glover's partner with Mel Gibson and you have an amazing movie. RRRRIIIIGGGGSSSS.
Rated 01 Dec 2021
metismetis
Rated 06 Aug 2021
92
92nd
10???????????????
Rated 06 Aug 2021
iamianimaniamianiman
Rated 05 Aug 2021
71
83rd
SAW it the 2nd time and I didn't even see the twist coming, how cool is that!
Rated 05 Aug 2021
capoglierecapogliere
Rated 29 May 2021
65
58th
Rewatch atmamın ardından etkisi düştü tabii. İlk izlediğimde WHAT THE HELL?!??!!? olmuştum. Ayrıca oyunculuklar çok gözüme battı be. Senaryoya da kasmışlar ama bu seride işkence sahnelerini görmeyi daha ön planda tutuyorum ben. Neyse izleyin işte, sırf sonu için izlenir.
Rated 29 May 2021
mojojoestarMojoJoestar
Rated 24 May 2021
65
41st
I put this off for years because I always assumed it was overly gory torture porn, and... well.... much like how the original Texas Chainsaw Massacre has a reputation for being more bloody than it actually is, Saw isn't nearly as awful in the torture porn department. It's actually pretty clever for it's time. ...I'm still afraid of the sequels though.
Rated 24 May 2021
esperhartEsperHart
Rated 09 May 2021
90
43rd
https://esperwatchesfilms.tumblr.com/post/650737017236471808/saw-2004
Rated 09 May 2021
sgtpeppersgtpepper
Rated 16 Apr 2021
75
0th
nice plot
Rated 16 Apr 2021
soixistSoixist
Rated 29 Mar 2021
76
48th
Good
Rated 29 Mar 2021
hakkanarejohakkanarejo
Rated 04 Jan 2021
95
63rd
Dr. Lawrence Gordon and Adam, two men who have never seen each other before, wake up tied up in a filthy old bathroom. Between them lies the lifeless body of a man with a revolver in his hands and a tape recorder. When Adam and Lawrence listen to a tape with the help of the tape recorder, they discover that they are the latest victims in one of the sick games of a notorious serial killer, who is nicknamed 'Jigsaw'.
Rated 04 Jan 2021
twirlipofthemiststwirlipofthemists
Rated 29 Jun 2020
1
4th
One of those films where I question the morals of anyone who enjoys it.
Rated 29 Jun 2020
antonio_pAntonio P
Rated 28 May 2020
60
72nd
Good movie with riddles in this as they kill off the people in it.
Rated 28 May 2020
akatemossfanAKateMossFan
Rated 23 Apr 2020
9
39th
sambinosambino
Rated 16 Apr 2020
90
85th
Expected gore, got something even better, a good story
Rated 16 Apr 2020
darrenDarren
Rated 05 Apr 2020
66
39th
Decently creative set up and execution despite what the series later becomes. It's morally bankrupt but uhhh so is basically every movie!
Rated 05 Apr 2020
bookhouseboybookhouseboy
Rated 03 Apr 2020
53
67th
#20#, exp2, rw2, popcorn, story, (ratings)
Rated 03 Apr 2020
seethruskinSeethruskin
Rated 29 Mar 2020
4
51st
Gets overshadowed by how often they were just pumping these out, but this one holds up. I don't particularly think it's making some profound point or anything, but it's twisty and tied together story works remarkably well, with a final twist in the pantheon of those great earned twists. I do think Wan gets way better, cinematically, later in his career with this one definitely having a kind of numetal music video vibe.
Rated 29 Mar 2020
solomonburrrSolomonBurrr
Rated 10 Mar 2020
80
76th
79.6
Rated 10 Mar 2020
peyrinpeyrin
Rated 19 Oct 2019
15
3rd
Yeah sorry I don't think there's any way to watch this unironically in the post-creepypasta world of 2019.
Rated 19 Oct 2019
vv238vv238
Rated 11 Sep 2018
35
34th
A mostly boring and tedious affair. There are some decent ideas at play, it's such a shame they are so half-baked and easily disregarded. You can see some glimpses into James Wan's ability to direct large-budget horror films instead of this low budget trash. I'll give Tobin Bell some credit for being genuinely committed to his role. When this film chooses to display some visceral horror it works well because it is used sparingly and for character-effect and not for cheap gore effects.
Rated 11 Sep 2018
nicktheoNickTheo
Rated 08 Aug 2018
80
67th
The marketing will have you believe that this is just your average horror movie that relies way to heavily on gore and doesn't really offer anything more but no.This movie in its core is a mystery and a very compelling one at that.It keeps you guessing and does a great job of distracting you from the things that you actually should be paying attention to.The acting isn't always solid and the early 2000's style of directing hasn't really aged all that well but it's still very engaging throughout.
Rated 08 Aug 2018
intrainterintrainter
Rated 30 Jun 2018
7
54th
Too much blood and shit, but that's alright. A serious thrilling-horror movie.
Rated 30 Jun 2018
achuAchu
Rated 11 Mar 2018
77
41st
A good film. Watching the sequels makes it complicated.
Rated 11 Mar 2018
mwestcottmwestcott
Rated 03 Jan 2018
56
24th
James Wan shows a lot of future talent by giving this film a distinct style considering its very short shooting schedule. However, for the same reason the actors performances suffer. Although the brutality is fast and off screen for the most part. There are aspects some may find hard to swallow.
Rated 03 Jan 2018
iamdwgIamdwg
Rated 07 Nov 2017
80
62nd
Biased Score - 84% | Unbiased Score - 76%, I'm starting a new preparation marathon with the Saw franchise. This first film feels distinctly different than the others, which is mostly a good thing, as this is probably the strongest psychological thriller in the series. Its seriously demented, but has quite a bit of simplicity that grounds it...that being said, Cary Elwes is a terrible actor and is easily the worst part of the film.
Rated 07 Nov 2017
sagesledgeSageSledge
Rated 30 Oct 2017
65
38th
Whether it deserves to be or not, "Saw" has become the iconic horror classic it is for a reason, a micro-budgeted miracle of a film that, even though its overall quality is debatable to a sizable degree (often truly awful), proves that sometimes the best filmmakers can do so much more with so little, more than many genre-defining directors could do with millions of dollars and a studio behind it. Sometimes one room, two people, and impossible situation is all you need to terrify a generation.
Rated 30 Oct 2017
jordanraidenjordanraiden
Rated 26 Sep 2017
14
44th
7/7
Rated 26 Sep 2017
isaacmIsaacM
Rated 21 Jun 2017
0
1st
Cut. Cut. Cut. Cut. 7 second shot. Cut. Cut. Cut.
Rated 21 Jun 2017
syntheseizurSyntheseizur
Rated 21 Apr 2017
63
16th
Far less gory than expected and much more of a crime procedural, Wan and Whannell's first effort is nonetheless an aesthetic touchstone for the genre during the bleak and traumatic War on Terror years when torture, terrorism, and industrial warfare were subjects of international fixation. The chaos of the non-linear narrative and morally ambiguous characters only bolster the correlation, but the hokey script and abrasive editing choices make it hard to watch--and not in the way it's intended.
Rated 21 Apr 2017
psanket307psanket307
Rated 08 Feb 2017
80
63rd
classic movie
Rated 08 Feb 2017
arossaross
Rated 21 Nov 2016
66
26th
It's fine. Not sure how/why this got so famous, but it's just the only movie like this to be relatively mainstream. I don't have any interest in the multitude of sequels.
Rated 21 Nov 2016
evilmangoesEvilMangoes
Rated 13 Nov 2016
77
46th
B
Rated 13 Nov 2016
turkishnwaveturkishnwave
Rated 15 Apr 2016
80
85th
Impressing start to an overrated series of movies.
Rated 15 Apr 2016
untrustableuntrustable
Rated 15 Mar 2016
90
87th
On its own, ignoring the sequels, Saw was a revolution in the horror genre. A smart, gory thriller that hit all the right notes.
Rated 15 Mar 2016
lsbcmaLSBCMA
Rated 14 Jan 2016
84
71st
great thriller
Rated 14 Jan 2016
deaddillydeaddilly
Rated 20 Dec 2015
70
47th
Iconic in its own way. Could've been a cult-classic if the concept wasn't completely exploited in the franchise that ensued.
Rated 20 Dec 2015
mclb1218mclb1218
Rated 14 Dec 2015
70
26th
An ok film. Important to the horror revival of the 2000's but really not that fun of a movie to sit through once you've seen it once or twice.
Rated 14 Dec 2015
filmseekingfilmseeking
Rated 06 Nov 2015
72
76th
Much better than expected. The storytelling is pretty clever for a low budget film with a really cool ending twist.
Rated 06 Nov 2015
dorothyozDorothyOz
Rated 23 Aug 2015
55
18th
Terrifying!
Rated 23 Aug 2015
onetwothree4onetwothree4
Rated 12 Aug 2015
98
99th
The best final one can expect
Rated 12 Aug 2015
wicheWiche
Rated 26 May 2015
64
45th
Actually not too bad. I had the idea this would be a gruesome piece of junk and that's the reason I've never watched it. Untill now. And I have to admit this wasn't too bad. This isn't a series of sickening scenes with no story whatsoever, this is actually a tense movie which has some kind of plot and which grabbs and holds your attention.
Rated 26 May 2015
moviefartsMovieFarts
Rated 12 May 2015
6
46th
If Jigsaw truly wanted to torture his victims, he would create some form of fart related trap.
Rated 12 May 2015
mckenny92McKenny92
Rated 15 Apr 2015
93
70th
Much more suspenseful and well-crafted than its followers.
Rated 15 Apr 2015
wezzoWezzo
Rated 31 Mar 2015
78
44th
Re-watch with family. Holds up very well (it helps that, somehow, I didn't remember one of the climactic twists..) Alas, it's all downhill from here on out..
Rated 31 Mar 2015
rymRYM
Rated 28 Mar 2015
60
43rd
3.01/5
Rated 28 Mar 2015

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...