Your probable score
?
Santa Claus
1985
Family/Kids, Fantasy
1h 47m
The first half of this film, set hundreds of years ago, shows how the old man who eventually became Santa Claus was given immortality and chosen to deliver toys to all the children of the world. The second half moves into the modern era, in which Patch, the head elf, strikes out on his own and falls in with an evil toy manufacturer who wants to corner the market and eliminate Santa Claus. (imdb)
Santa Claus
1985
Family/Kids, Fantasy
1h 47m
Your probable score
Avg Percentile 25.75% from 222 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews
(222)
Compact view
Compact view
Show
Sort
Rated 22 Dec 2022
50
29th
Until now I had not seen this in what must be 30 years, and it is mostly as I remember it, although as an adult I have a greater appreciation for John Lithgow as the super-villainous B.Z. and for special effects (i.e., mechanical and optical effects, not visual effects). It remains an odd, and even at times disturbing, Christmas film.
Rated 22 Dec 2022
Rated 17 Jan 2013
39
19th
These points are for John Lithgow's classic bad-guy performance.
Rated 17 Jan 2013
Rated 19 Dec 2008
75
34th
I like how this movie is filmed. It looks like it's from the 60's. I love the first half, and wish the movie was more about Santa's origins. The second half is just silly Christmas fun. John Lithgow is ridiculous. Not as instantly classic as other Christmas movies are, but still worthwhile.
Rated 19 Dec 2008
Rated 25 Jun 2007
14
1st
I used to like this, I'll admit. But that was when I was 8 and the hardened shell of bitterness hadn't formed.
Rated 25 Jun 2007
Rated 19 Dec 2022
86
23rd
Mixed feelings on this one. I loved the first half, as an origin story. Then, it had to go down the cheesy villain route and disappointing second half. Still worth the watch.
Rated 19 Dec 2022
Rated 13 Dec 2022
58
19th
Frozebutchosen+cuzhesaidbestgetsjob+christmas2lol+likethexmassongchorus
Rated 13 Dec 2022
Rated 04 Dec 2022
67
19th
John Lithgow is good, the rest is ok
Rated 04 Dec 2022
Rated 14 Nov 2021
90
94th
Amazing when I was a kid. I shouldn't go back....
Rated 14 Nov 2021
Rated 20 Dec 2020
23
4th
Can you believe this had budget of $30-50 million? (Source: Wikipedia) It looked so bad, even for 80s. How many times did Santa and Joe fly by the towers?
Rated 20 Dec 2020
Rated 26 Jan 2020
44
13th
Really not as bad as they say, but it's not good either
Rated 26 Jan 2020
Rated 29 Dec 2019
45
14th
Somewhat ambitious failure tries to weld a Santa 'origins story' to a modern day one about the 'corporatisation' of Christmas, mixing warmth and cynicism with mostly tepid results. Santa is sidelined in favour of the Moore/Lithgow story, which is unfortunate because it isn't handled well and there was more potential in the origins story. Santa's toy factory is a colourful set, Huddleston is fine in the titular role, and the effects aren't bad for their time, but it never really takes flight.
Rated 29 Dec 2019
Rated 21 Dec 2015
1
3rd
I was an hour into this horseshit when I realised I'd seen it - at the scene where the businessman talks about how he likes the colour peuce. This is another We Hate Movies movie which I wouldn't watch otherwise
Rated 21 Dec 2015
Rated 26 Dec 2014
43
46th
One of the better Santa films probably because of Dudley Moore. Santa's sleigh taking off on the big day had more than a passing resemblance to the original Battlestar Gallactica
Rated 26 Dec 2014
Rated 16 Oct 2013
79
69th
Wonderful visual christmas splendor overload. Second half seems like a bit of a different film and therefore unbalanced and disjointed when watching back as an adult. The wonderfully shot Santa/origins story gets pushed aside half way through for the corporate villain plot but in a way that doesn't fully gel.
Rated 16 Oct 2013
Rated 17 Jan 2011
30
21st
If Christmas could punch you in the face. I like Lithgow and Moore so going to throw them some points!
Rated 17 Jan 2011
Rated 13 Dec 2010
60
33rd
If I'd watched this as a child I'm sure I'd have some emotional attachment to it. Unfortunately it's not as charming as it should be.
Rated 13 Dec 2010
Rated 27 Oct 2010
50
45th
A long lost classic. Most people don't know what I'm talking about when I mention this film, as it flew under most people's radars when it came out in 1985 (it bombed in theaters) The film is like two movies in one, with the first half set hundreds of years ago, dealing with the creation of Santa, then fast forwarding to 1985 where an elf named Patch gets involved with an evil toymaker who is set on destroying Santa forever. I'm sure you know how this turns out!
Rated 27 Oct 2010
Rated 13 Sep 2010
50
34th
really a terrible movie, but it's the first one I remember seeing in the theater.
Rated 13 Sep 2010
Rated 11 Jul 2010
55
31st
I guess I was a dumb kid, because I must've watched this movie a bajillion times. Loved it.
Rated 11 Jul 2010
Rated 08 Jun 2010
35
10th
I loved this movie as a kid, the scenes with the old geezer becoming santa was magical and I even thought it was all real, so much so that I wrote a letter to santa and put it on the christmas tree (how dopey was I?) But having watched it recently the 2nd half is so much weaker then the 1st, and the movie's anti-coprorate message is kinda stupid when you think about it. Whats christmas without spending loads of money?
Rated 08 Jun 2010
Rated 18 Feb 2009
19
4th
It's watchable, for reasons probably only Satan himself can explain. This film goes beyond camp into 'genius-dreadful' territory.
Rated 18 Feb 2009
Rated 11 Jan 2009
18
23rd
I had all these books made from this movie...or vice versa...I dunno. Anywho, enough about my extensive library. This movie was pretty terrible, but I did slightly...not hate it when I was younger.
Rated 11 Jan 2009
Rated 03 Dec 2007
5
8th
The worst Christmas film until the Santa Clause movies came out. Dreadful.
Rated 03 Dec 2007
Rated 21 Feb 2007
30
9th
Passes the time.
Rated 21 Feb 2007
Cast & Info
Collections
Loading ...
Similar Titles
Loading ...
Statistics
Loading ...
Trailer
Loading ...
PSI
?