Revolt of the Zombies

One plain, dull hour. One can't blame Halperin for wanting to make a sequel to White Zombie, and they had the germ of a concept, but it is painfully obvious that he and his brother could barely scrape together a budget anymore. (Ironically, the expensive legal fight over this film's status as a "sequel" contributed to that.) The reused cuts of Bela Legosi's eyes evince more life in two seconds than the entire cast put together across the picture—and I'm not talking about the zombies.

An interesting idea killed by an uninteresting and melodramatic love triangle.

Revolt of the Zombies! Starring.... Bela Lugosi's EYES!!! A cheap production hoping that the word 'Zombies' would be enough to make people see the film. Interesting idea about zombie warriors in Cambodia, but anything good stops there. And it's not the production values that makes this a poor movie. It's the dreadfully boring story! Executed without any form of excitement or interesting characters! And don't expect many zombies. This is mostly just talk about the legend of it.

No real zombies to speak of, and actually, not even a real revolt. Just a mediocre drama with a few mystical elements added in. Probably not worth the time, even though it's only an hour.

Good plot, carried down by a lackluster execution. This plot needed a good shot in the arm of thrills and chills to make anything halfway decent.

Good: hum... There's one good scene. Bad: Boring, basically no zombies, short but I Felt it went for 3 hours, not even so bad it's good.

Deathly boring (and you won't even recognize Dean Jagger).