sign in
register
Watch
Apple TV Google Play Movies Fandango At Home
+4
Red Planet
Red Planet
+4
JustWatch
Your probable score
?
Red Planet

Red Planet

2000
Sci-fi, Suspense/Thriller
1h 46m
Mission Commander Kate Bowman (Moss) is the pilot and commander of the most important mission of the 21st century: saving the human race. It's 2050, Earth is dying, and colonizing Mars is the only alternative to obliteration. (Warner Bros.)

Directed by:

Antony Hoffman

Screenwriter:

Chuck Pfarrer

Starring:

Benjamin Bratt, Simon Baker, Val Kilmer, Tom Sizemore, Terence Stamp, Carrie-Anne Moss, Bob Neill, Jessica Morton, Caroline Bossi

Genres:

Sci-fi, Suspense/Thriller, Action, Adventure

Countries:

Australia, USA

Language:

English
imdb IMDb
Update history
Suggest edit

Red Planet

2000
Sci-fi, Suspense/Thriller
1h 46m
Your probable score
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer
Avg Percentile 28.7% from 2234 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

(2249)
Compact view
clear
Compact view
Show
Sort
spleenspleen
Rated 06 Jul 2013
78
61st
I'm always confusing this with Mission to Mars: RP=Carrie Ann Moss showers, MTM=Don Cheadle grows a beard. RP=nearly everyone killed, MTM=almost everyone killed. RP=Val Kilmer flips off a planet, MTM=there's always time for Van Halen breakout number. There ya go, I just saved you four hours.
Rated 06 Jul 2013
mrarnmrarn
Rated 15 Sep 2021
41
36th
The "Red Planet" is overdramatic with contrived disasters that keep getting more ridiculous as the film progresses.
Rated 15 Sep 2021
metalhankmetalhank
Rated 02 Mar 2017
70
76th
Good sci-fi that gets you thinking. Pretty solid visuals and pacing with solid acting.
Rated 02 Mar 2017
mwgerbmwgerb
Rated 15 May 2013
27
12th
I was going to write about the massive incompetence throughout, and how the movie tried to incorporate so many story lines that eventually none of them worked, but I think I'll just leave this quote from NASA about why they didn't work on this: "The science was just so off the wall that eventually we felt, 'You guys go ahead and make your movie.' If there's something that's going to be so misleading to the public that we don't want to participate, then we'll say no."
Rated 15 May 2013
brandt64brandt64
Rated 02 Jul 2009
40
16th
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Rated 02 Jul 2009
luna6ixLuna6ix
Rated 29 May 2008
84
86th
It's rather unique, and intriguing, with enough on-goings to keep you quite interested. Anyone who says it's forgettable is suffering from serious memory loss problems, and should see a doctor immediately.
Rated 29 May 2008
gleebgleeb
Rated 27 Dec 2007
39
7th
Well, it's red all right.
Rated 27 Dec 2007
doctor7doctor7
Rated 14 Aug 2007
68
49th
Some cliche movie points but I thought it was an interesting take on a subject that's been done a few times before. I didn't find it great but I didn't find it nearly as bad as it is widely claimed to be.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
grimsoothgrimsooth
Rated 14 Aug 2007
20
6th
Don't confuse "interesting" with "good"
Rated 14 Aug 2007
gritGrit
Rated 20 May 2007
40
35th
It might be noithing special, but it certainly isn't bad either.
Rated 20 May 2007
paula1980paula1980
Rated 25 Jun 2023
78
89th
Really good movie.
Rated 25 Jun 2023
glumpy99glumpy_99
Rated 31 Jul 2022
60
19th
Well-produced sci-fi raises some interesting existential questions, but unfortunately fails to follow through on them - an odd dramatic disconnect sets in once the action moves to the titular planet, not helped once Stamp disappears from the film; he gives far and away the most lively performance. Kilmer is far too low-key to sustain the drama on the ground, and the odd inclusion of a robot antagonist almost feels like a ring-in attempt to spice up the drama a bit. Watchable on its own terms.
Rated 31 Jul 2022
scribScrib
Rated 09 Jun 2022
50
14th
One of those curious enigmas in which two films with strikingly similar premises come out the very same year, with no clear linkage (Red Planet's convenient peer is De Palma's Mission to Mars and I refuse to believe its coincidence). The score is horribly dated, it suffers from an overreliance on CGI, and it has a silly "robot-dog gone wrong" sub-plot that's borderline superfluous; but otherwise, it's a fun little space-survival romp that's generally funny when it fails.
Rated 09 Jun 2022
nutcrackrnutcrackr
Rated 03 Jul 2016
65
24th
Got this confused with Mission to Mars and expected something different. In the end you get a B grade sci-fi movie that is pretty slow going. Val Kilmer is quite weird in this role and the opening and closing monologues are kinda stupid. Most of the deaths are pretty weak.
Rated 03 Jul 2016
realmacgyverRealMacgyver
Rated 06 Dec 2015
50
15th
so much bad science....so much....
Rated 06 Dec 2015
badfurdayBadFurDay
Rated 30 Oct 2015
3
11th
It wasn't awful. But it sure wasn't good either. And the CGI sucked big time. People underrate this movie as they expect accurate sci-fi and get a thriller instead. It was stupid but fine as a thriller. Increased the score by 10% for the little russian mascot on the computer.
Rated 30 Oct 2015
ehk2ehk2
Rated 27 Oct 2015
10
14th
even worse than "Mission to Mars"
Rated 27 Oct 2015
smuhusmuhu
Rated 06 Sep 2015
49
13th
Worth missing out on.
Rated 06 Sep 2015
tonykbTonyKB
Rated 06 Nov 2014
10
0th
Lol
Rated 06 Nov 2014
raftermanRafterman
Rated 30 Apr 2014
4
19th
A good bad film?
Rated 30 Apr 2014
rttntomatoesrttntomatoes
Rated 03 Jan 2014
14
3rd
While the special effects are impressive, the movie suffers from a lack of energy and interesting characters.
Rated 03 Jan 2014
naurunauru
Rated 01 Jun 2013
43
37th
This film gets a lot of undeserved hate. It has an interesting premise, convincing special effects, a very strong cast, and a couple of great scenes. The soundtrack is for the most part poorly chosen. Still, if you are looking for a space-based, slow-burn thriller, Red Planet isn't a bad choice.
Rated 01 Jun 2013
mlingkhmlingkh
Rated 19 Dec 2012
64
24th
You know I didn't think it was awful. Not good, but not awful. Val suffering from hypoxia was pretty terrifying, but that is a serious space-related phobia of mine. Remember, phobia=IRRATIONAL.
Rated 19 Dec 2012
kingofjewkingofjew
Rated 08 Mar 2012
69
31st
Above average science fiction flick about the end of earth an the need to populate mars in order to survive. Bunch of scientists go up an check out mars, and of course everything goes terribly wrong. The cast gives great performances and really do their best at making the story come to life. The fx are decent, the story/script, tho often predictable, had its moments. A recommendation for anyone who likes sci fi , or is a fan of Val's work.
Rated 08 Mar 2012
hellboy76hellboy76
Rated 21 Sep 2010
27
7th
Laughably bad. I kept getting this one confused with the other Mars movie around the same time, but I guess it really doesn't matter.
Rated 21 Sep 2010
geodaciusGeodacius
Rated 18 Sep 2010
28
5th
Woooo, star trek meets mars, except star trek is actually watchable.
Rated 18 Sep 2010
davidblastDavidBlast
Rated 27 Nov 2009
30
13th
Isn't that the one with that killer-cat-like-robot-something chasing poor Val Kilmer? Yeah, didn't like that one.
Rated 27 Nov 2009
freqflyerfreqflyer
Rated 31 Jul 2009
75
36th
Original, if a tad boring, imagining of a trip to mars.
Rated 31 Jul 2009
gobmanGobman
Rated 25 Jul 2009
30
3rd
Watched this recently with Mission to Mars as part of a 'kill-my-own-brain' ploy, this is infinitely better but still pretty bad, some nice spacey special effects type stuff, that's about it.
Rated 25 Jul 2009
rocketluccoRocketlucco
Rated 28 Jun 2009
30
16th
Overall Enjoyment: 10/40, Plot/Themes: 10/20, Cinematography/Direction: 5/20, Acting/Writing: 5/20
Rated 28 Jun 2009
vandelay1Vandelay1
Rated 28 Apr 2009
33
25th
Dont Like It Much
Rated 28 Apr 2009
seryxaSeryxa
Rated 09 Apr 2009
0
15th
Dreary science-fiction, with the actors inhibited by their space-suits; nothing interesting happens very slowly.
Rated 09 Apr 2009
garlonussGarlonuss
Rated 18 Feb 2009
63
11th
The story-telling here is a bit heavy handed and rushed. More time should definitely have been taken in helping us identify with and care about the characters here. It's not a terrible concept or a terrible story so far as SciFi goes, but it is inhabited with people who do little more than fill the space where people need to be.
Rated 18 Feb 2009
biedronskiBiedronski
Rated 30 Dec 2008
31
11th
Is this the one with the robot... Yeeeeah this one's not very good.
Rated 30 Dec 2008
chrissoChrisso
Rated 09 Nov 2008
70
36th
deduct five if you dont like sci fi much.
Rated 09 Nov 2008
korin05korin05
Rated 06 Sep 2008
70
22nd
pathetic
Rated 06 Sep 2008
gr8googlyGr8Googly
Rated 20 Jun 2008
19
3rd
A waste of time and special effects. So is the movie about Mars that came out simultaneously, Mission to Mars. Both stink like Martain methane.
Rated 20 Jun 2008
geopoopGeopoop
Rated 29 Mar 2008
21
20th
I don't know what to say, beyond being wracked with implausibilities, bad acting, and a lame Nasa-esque CG department, this film wound up giving me .00089 seconds of enjoyment
Rated 29 Mar 2008
yilbyilb
Rated 08 Mar 2008
80
92nd
Finally a sci-fi flick that delivers! Hardware, techno-babble, smart resourceful characters, action, thrills & a stack of interesting situations unfolding together. Decent laughs, effects & almost always in the realm of reasonable. This is no M2M2, this is a real movie. Go.
Rated 08 Mar 2008
spaceflohspacefloh
Rated 27 Feb 2008
65
71st
ger; die menschheit nötigt die besiedelung des mars, doch die sauerstoffproduzierenden algen verschwanden
Rated 27 Feb 2008
emtiltemtilt
Rated 09 Feb 2008
21
3rd
Absolutely terrible.
Rated 09 Feb 2008
mjvmoviemanMJVmovieMan
Rated 20 Jan 2008
28
5th
Lame Mars flick.
Rated 20 Jan 2008
mistersplicemistersplice
Rated 26 Oct 2007
70
64th
7- recommended, good
Rated 26 Oct 2007
shephardShephard
Rated 26 Oct 2007
34
13th
Really dull and boring.
Rated 26 Oct 2007
dustydDustyd
Rated 16 Sep 2007
65
49th
Flawed, but good looking and occasionally exciting.
Rated 16 Sep 2007
lapierre520lapierre520
Rated 31 Aug 2007
90
73rd
Even though it stars Val Kilmer this movie is excellent.
Rated 31 Aug 2007
stflyst_fly
Rated 24 Aug 2007
35
35th
ok
Rated 24 Aug 2007
kojilessKojiless
Rated 14 Aug 2007
24
25th
Little tension, less suspense. Anthony Hoffman does a wonderful job of making Mars as boring as the Australian outback.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
agentsnipeAgentSnipe
Rated 14 Aug 2007
41
4th
There have been a lot of failed movies about Mars. This one is fairly boring, even though there is some grave danger that everyone seems to be in. I can't force myself to remember plot details.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
ytadelYtadel
Rated 14 Aug 2007
3
28th
One of the top 10 most forgettable films ever made?
Rated 14 Aug 2007
bbbdBBBD
Rated 14 Aug 2007
60
25th
I don't remember hating this movie when I saw it, but I didn't think it was anything special either. Overall, pretty forgettable, but not awful.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
daniellanDaniellaN
Rated 14 Aug 2007
55
6th
Fun, but nothing special.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
fudgiebfudgieb
Rated 14 Aug 2007
77
36th
A sci-fi film with a little different feel to it. I've seen this film about 10 times, but have only watched it completely through about once.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
juicejuice
Rated 26 May 2007
56
51st
Cool looking robot.
Rated 26 May 2007
haphap
Rated 09 Mar 2007
30
10th
With such a great cast, it's amazing how bored I was by this movie.
Rated 09 Mar 2007
thedicemanTheDiceman
Rated 26 Feb 2007
40
19th
Passes the time.
Rated 26 Feb 2007
catawampusjCatawampusJ
Rated 27 Dec 2006
48
23rd
Absolute drivel. Waste of my time.
Rated 27 Dec 2006
killgreedykillgreedy
Rated 11 Dec 2006
85
58th
i actually liked this one, and it kinda dissapeared
Rated 11 Dec 2006

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...