sign in
register
Watch
Amazon Prime Video Amazon Prime Video with Ads Apple TV
+6
Quantum of Solace
Quantum of Solace
+6
JustWatch
Your probable score
?
Quantum of Solace

Quantum of Solace

2008
Suspense/Thriller, Crime
1h 46m
Seeking revenge for the death of his love, secret agent James Bond sets out to stop an environmentalist from taking control of a country's valuable resource.

Directed by:

Marc Forster

Screenwriter:

Paul Haggis, Neal Purvis, Robert Wade

Starring:

Mathieu Amalric, Judi Dench, Giancarlo Giannini, Jeffrey Wright, Eva Green, Daniel Craig, David Harbour, Olga Kurylenko, Gemma Arterton, Stana Katic, Oona Chaplin, Rory Kinnear

Franchise:

James Bond

Genres:

Suspense/Thriller, Crime, Action, Adventure

Countries:

UK, USA

Languages:

English, Spanish, French, Italian, German, Swiss German
imdb IMDb
Update history
Suggest edit

Quantum of Solace

2008
Suspense/Thriller, Crime
1h 46m
Your probable score
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer
Avg Percentile 38.03% from 8493 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

(8547)
Compact view
clear
Compact view
Show
Sort
billyshearsBillyShears
Rated 20 May 2019
50
21st
Crushed by disappointment. The villain is some small Frenchguy who wants to steal all the water of some who gives a shit country. Hey asshole, if you want to be a good Bond villain steal something like zinc. Zinc to fuel your lava palace. Who cares.
Rated 20 May 2019
jebJeb
Rated 12 Nov 2008
60
41st
I tried to like it, but unfortunately, it's one of the most disappointing films of the 2000s. While Casino Royale kickstarted back up the franchise, Quantum of Solace replaces all of the classy Bond lines, formulas and feelings with generic action and a raw, gritty Bond. However, Craig is perfect as usual for the role and it has some decent parts once in a while. All in all quite a letdown.
Rated 12 Nov 2008
beedubBeeDub
Rated 05 Jul 2015
78
39th
Watch Casino Royale, then the last five minutes of this movie. That's all you need.
Rated 05 Jul 2015
farzanFarzan
Rated 01 Dec 2008
38
26th
I really thought that Casino Royale was the best Bond film, and I was extremely pleased with Craig as the new Bond, and he was still charming here, but Quantum of Solace was a huge disappointment. I mean Casino Royale took its time, and built up anticipation, it was an adrenaline rush, whereas this one is just a straight up shoot em up action packed film that was extremely rushed, and didn't make all that much sense. Great action, worth a watch, but dont expect another Casino Royale.
Rated 01 Dec 2008
pickpocketPickpocket
Rated 12 Nov 2008
6
55th
I'm probably one of the few to think this but it is superior to Casino Royale by nearly every measurable metric. There's still no humor which is needed in these films to really make them special but the action is decent and they resolve all of the crappy plot hangups from the previous film to finally be able to move on. Craig's interpretation of Bond is still bizarre and it's a shame he didn't even nail the Bond girl in this, come on bro get your fuck on.
Rated 12 Nov 2008
begoniabolbegoniabol
Rated 15 Mar 2011
54
45th
Actually quite disappointing. The story was extremely weak, only the action parts were 'average'. The editing during those parts were extremely annoying too, I could hardly follow it. Almost fell asleep
Rated 15 Mar 2011
doctor7doctor7
Rated 07 Dec 2008
51
30th
This isn't James Bond. Ebert says it best in his review: "Bond isn't an action star." This is true. James Bond is a spy. Being a spy involves using methods other than violence to achieve your goals. Granted violence is necessary, especially in a James Bond film, but it shouldn't be endless like it is in Quantum of Solace. This movie, to me, is the sweet follow shot of Bond and a henchman falling through glass. Aside from that the villain is terrible and the movie just isn't very good.
Rated 07 Dec 2008
evolutionEvolution
Rated 09 Dec 2008
38
13th
The cuts during the action scenes were WAY too fast, and the whole parachute opening meters above the ground and them walking away?? Wow. I know Bond has always been over the top, but this is just plain silly. If Marc Foster does any more Bond films then count me out.
Rated 09 Dec 2008
robrob
Rated 14 Nov 2008
13
66th
I really don't understand people's criticism of this, it's just as solid as 'Casino Royale' as far as I'm concerned---and I rewatched the latter just before seeing 'Quantum...'. The plot is fairly straightforward, and stylistically it perhaps took a few too many cues from 'Bourne', but otherwise it's a solid sequel and a solid action film, more than worth a watch. It's not a masterpiece, but nor was 'Casino...' and nor, probably, was either intended to be.
Rated 14 Nov 2008
sarahg1988SarahG1988
Rated 08 Nov 2008
88
62nd
Equals Casino Royale and a more character driven piece than Casino Royale. No gadgets and over-blown scenes but more of an Art-House piece. Full of realism that really produces one of the best portryals of Bond in a single film for a long while. Stunning cinematography, another great performance by Daniel Craig and one excellent supporting role by Mathieu Almaric. So Underated by many people it's annoying. Having seen every Bond film up until now this is one of my favourites.
Rated 08 Nov 2008
kasperlKasperL
Rated 26 Oct 2012
55
39th
It's decent. The worst thing about it is that the action department's ambitiousness often far surpasses their skills. Point subtraction for uninteresting baddies. Bonus points for Olga.
Rated 26 Oct 2012
johnshaftjohnshaft
Rated 04 Jul 2009
69
40th
Not nearly as good as Casino Royale, and it suffers from bad action scene direction. However, it is still an all right film, and Daniel Craig is still on the top of his game, delivering a suitably intense and grizzled Bond.
Rated 04 Jul 2009
davidkahaneDavidKahane
Rated 25 May 2009
40
20th
The directing is clumsy all around. The digital hash of the editing is a familiar shortfall of modern action movies, but Foster's technique has more significant problems. During the action sequences, his camera is usually in too close, occasionally too far away and is rarely in the right place. Plane battles, boat chases, exotic locales, seductive women--it all gets dragged on to the screen, feeling obligatory and lifeless. The movie churns and grinds, to little effect.
Rated 25 May 2009
skenkereSkenkere
Rated 15 Nov 2008
60
39th
Maybe I'm being a bit harsh just because this was so dissapointing next to CR. It's a good action flick I guess, but it's barely a Bond movie. The plot is uninteresting, and while I like cold, hard, asshole Bond, he had just the right amount of charm in CR, which he doesnt here. Kurylenko is crazy hot but underutilized, and has little bearing on the plot. Amalric could be good, but doesn't get a chance and isn't menacing at all. Starts strong with great action sequences but fizzles - a lot.
Rated 15 Nov 2008
jmsenisejmsenise
Rated 10 Nov 2008
70
44th
A good action film, but not a real Bond film.
Rated 10 Nov 2008
cagedwisdomcagedwisdom
Rated 08 Nov 2008
50
38th
This suffers from having to follow Casino Royale's act. It furthers this problem itself from actually being a direct sequel. People are going to go in and expect Casino Royale 2, but it's not. However, disregard Casino Royale completely and it's actually pretty sweet on it's own. References many older Bond films (Goldfinger reference stands out), which is nice. It feels like more of a return to Bond after Casino Royale's departure from the formula. I really liked it, despite it's flaws.
Rated 08 Nov 2008
indyatmnINDYATMN
Rated 16 Sep 2020
74
36th
The action keeps things moving but that's often because they're so frantically edited it's hard to see exactly what's going on (especially whatever the hell happened w/ the ropes). There are at least 2 chases where Bond makes 1 move & vehicles are inexplicably destroyed. And although all Bond films have plot holes he also does at least 2 totally inexplicable things: he fails to question the beauty who's his best lead & his treatment of Matthis' body just makes him seem like a jerk.
Rated 16 Sep 2020
yoshinarutoYoshinaruto
Rated 12 Mar 2020
60
41st
This was enjoyable, but I ended up disappointed because everyone said it was “too gritty”. I expected some kinda near R rated kill fest, instead I got 00Bourne. That being said I could actually understand most of what was happening here, and Forster steadied the cam during non action scenes. Had this been directed by Paul Greengrass I would’ve likely lowered the score of this. It’ll disappoint hardcore Bond fans, but it’s a decent popcorn flick.
Rated 12 Mar 2020
philamentalphilamental
Rated 03 Nov 2016
23
2nd
Frankly this was terrible. I'm not a big Bond fan but was pleasantly surprised to mostly enjoy Casino Royale and expected this to effectively continue in the same vein. In reality, it mixed the weaker aspects of the old films (e.g. largely pointless bond girls) with the weaker aspects of the new (still no gadgets) and the result was utterly boring for this viewer. Even my wife hated it, and she's normally easily pleased by any half way decent spy/action film.
Rated 03 Nov 2016
easydiffeasydiff
Rated 05 Sep 2016
34
23rd
A nothing movie full of completely unmemorable characters enacting a plot they don't care to explain for reasons that are incomprehensible.
Rated 05 Sep 2016
ippeiIppei
Rated 04 Nov 2015
65
45th
As a stand alone Bond film, it might not be the best, but as a direct follow up to Casino Royale, it's pretty damn good. It's almost like watching a "filler" episode; it helps tie up loose ends and you understand the Bond character a little more. The action felt more brutal, than the kinetic action in Casino Royale, and it made Bond feel human.
Rated 04 Nov 2015
ecitizeneCitizen
Rated 03 Dec 2012
92
94th
Thrills and excitement throughout. Bond never fails to deliver. Daniel Craig has a great screen presence and Olga Kurylenko is absolutely gorgeous. The story is almost non stop action, intrigue and mayhem. Engaging from beginning to end. Of course some of the story is far fetched and implausible, but it doesn't fail to deliver on solid action and excitement. Great music and special effects also.
Rated 03 Dec 2012
naurunauru
Rated 13 Nov 2012
40
33rd
Lacks the style and panache of Casino Royale. Also lacks Eva Green and a coherent plot. I should also mention that this film is tied with On Her Majesty's Secret Service for absolute worst theme song in the entire Bond franchise. There are some nice bits of action but they are not enough to carry the film beyond mediocrity.
Rated 13 Nov 2012
bagarbjorneBagarbjorne
Rated 29 Jul 2012
62
53rd
Perhaps I'm judging it too hard after the first Bond movie with Craig set the expectations sky high, but I must say was a bit disappointed with this one.
Rated 29 Jul 2012
publiusdPubliusD
Rated 30 Dec 2011
80
54th
Despie the travesty of editing that opens, the film, QoS is a solid Bond film which I am fond of. It does feel a bit like Casino Royale: Addendum, though.
Rated 30 Dec 2011
laplacianLaplacian
Rated 17 Dec 2011
70
22nd
There are two ways to view this movie. The first is immediately after watching Casino Royale, and the second is on its own. While the acting is top notch, and the movie memorable for having a woman Bond doesn't sleep with, the disjointed action scenes and non-self contained plot make this movie tricky to watch on its own. It still remains a competent action movie without Casino Royale, but suffers unless you watch them together.
Rated 17 Dec 2011
kingcautiKingCauti
Rated 03 Aug 2011
55
40th
I love James Bond but for some reason... this doesn't feel like James Bond.
Rated 03 Aug 2011
hellboy76hellboy76
Rated 25 Sep 2010
65
45th
A bit of a letdown after Casino Royale but still stronger than the Brosnan regime.
Rated 25 Sep 2010
obidyObidy
Rated 18 Jul 2010
6
17th
It's clear from very early on that QoS's director, Marc Forster, should not have been the man in charge of this. He has shown a propensity in the past for smaller movies, but with QoS he is lost. As a result, it's a disjointed mess where the action scenes are incomprehensible, the plot is labyrinthine in an uninvolving way, and the characters are uninteresting. It makes sense the interesting character in the movie appears for about 10 minutes before being unceremoniously dumped - twice.
Rated 18 Jul 2010
coffeecoffee
Rated 06 Mar 2010
60
32nd
Is it ok to hate Bond?
Rated 06 Mar 2010
okkervilOkkervil
Rated 31 Jul 2009
37
25th
More modern, slick Bond, that has it's moments, but is again ultimately a failure. This feels like a even poorer version of the first Craig outing. It is too long, too bland, too humourless and too generic. A damp squib of a movie.
Rated 31 Jul 2009
spleenspleen
Rated 07 Jul 2009
65
32nd
Explosion, chase, building jump, hood slide, gunshots, bigger explosion, hot chick, chase, dead chick, revenge, gunshots, and finally the biggest explosion. Look I just wrote a Bond movie.
Rated 07 Jul 2009
terrymacterrymac
Rated 29 Jun 2009
53
22nd
Maybe tries too hard to be a Bourne film...
Rated 29 Jun 2009
melvin_smifMelvin Smif
Rated 27 Apr 2009
65
72nd
This movie features a footchase, a car chase, a boat chase, and an airplane chase! Needless to say I was exausted after viewing. Craig plays a great Bond maybe my favorite of all time, but where Royale mixed up the Bond universe to make it a little more gritty Solace goes too far beyond it to the point you sometimes forget your watching Bond.
Rated 27 Apr 2009
omgfridgeomgfridge
Rated 17 Apr 2009
4
33rd
Casino Royale was the first Bond movie I actually liked. What happened?
Rated 17 Apr 2009
agentcheagentche
Rated 07 Apr 2009
88
72nd
Best! Chase! Sequence! Ever!!!
Rated 07 Apr 2009
zombiebuffetZombieBuffet
Rated 06 Apr 2009
60
51st
Talk about sucking all of what makes Bond movies fun right out of the franchise. Cheeky inuendo, memorable villans, cool gadgets, classy Bond... all removed... and it shows.
Rated 06 Apr 2009
kojilessKojiless
Rated 01 Apr 2009
44
48th
After finally thinking the Bond series was good again, they decided to go back to the tired old formula from the Moore days. Other than a couple Bourne Identity-esque scenes and Dainel Craig's on-screen presence, this movie was an utter dissapointment.
Rated 01 Apr 2009
gritGrit
Rated 26 Mar 2009
31
24th
After the modernisation and inevitable failure of Casino Royale, this latest incarnation of the famous franchise sinks deeper into the pit of Hollywood over indulgence. Bond has lost his suave, his soundtrack and more importantly his humour and feels more like an overblown Tom Cruise at his worst in MI:2 than anything else. This leaves behind a shell of a production which could be comparible to any highly strung Hollywood action film of the past two decades. Some decent car chases, nothing else.
Rated 26 Mar 2009
andaghandagh
Rated 30 Jan 2009
55
16th
James Bond wanders into the movie Chinatown.
Rated 30 Jan 2009
tma1tma1
Rated 18 Jan 2009
70
58th
I'm still digging this bond, but p-lease, more plot, less action.
Rated 18 Jan 2009
kafka1325kafka1325
Rated 21 Dec 2008
56
42nd
I like that 007 and in this second movie show's that he is a killer...and do not fool around they are...camera is great, visual concept really good, but story is full of holes and jumps. Somehow when 007 goes in Bolivia all about that fall apart...I think that they make it to be continued...and that not gonna be good welcome at audience....
Rated 21 Dec 2008
timmotimmo
Rated 09 Dec 2008
50
10th
Entertaining, but really disappointing. Casino Royale was incredible. This one is bogged down in an extreme overuse of CG and a horrible director. Worth seeing, but far from great.
Rated 09 Dec 2008
jonnyboyjonny_boy
Rated 08 Dec 2008
72
62nd
Very good and logical sequel to Casino Royale but lacks the action and depth in story.
Rated 08 Dec 2008
mentaculusMentaculus
Rated 07 Dec 2008
46
21st
Don't let its main character fool you: this is more like Jason Bourne's second cousin than James Bond. Not so much a plot than an excuse to homage other Bond films (was that Goldfinger with the oil? From Russia... with the boat chase? etc.) and create one brutal action sequence after another. This script completely fails to take off and its action cannot remain engaging. At least Dame Judi Dench steals her scenes and makes some of the movie interesting.
Rated 07 Dec 2008
mohkoMohko
Rated 03 Dec 2008
60
45th
I really didn't like Casino Royale that much and this was even worse. Action scenes were really badly directed and I really didn't care about the the plot.
Rated 03 Dec 2008
teddedonTedDedon
Rated 01 Dec 2008
82
65th
Quantum of Solace may not have the same breakthrough impact that Casino Royale had, but after a second viewing I'd have to say I liked it nearly as much. The action is real and the story is just as interesting. Craig is easily as good, if not better than any Bond before him and this second serving with him proves that. This is one of the best action movies of the year and its massive negative criticism, in my opinion, is unwarranted.
Rated 01 Dec 2008
gellnergellner
Rated 30 Nov 2008
40
31st
NO GADGETS?! Worst bond film other than Lazenby's 'OHMSS'. NO GADGETS!? You might as well call this movie "Generic Hollywood Action Film #42"
Rated 30 Nov 2008
ayavaronAyavaron
Rated 29 Nov 2008
20
10th
Very nicely photographed but ultimately a relentlessly dull movie. There's nothing compelling here and none of the characters are interestingly played. The plot doesn't work and even the action scenes are kind of dead, like an egg in a freezer.
Rated 29 Nov 2008
browncoatBrowncoat
Rated 28 Nov 2008
60
28th
Whilst an action-packed, beautifully executed follow-up to "Casino Royale" in this new, grittier, more realistic Bond series, one can't help but leave the cinema feeling somewhat dissatisfied. While all the action that may have been missing from the last Bond flick was here, this film was lacking any appreciable plot and character depth - a major flaw in a film that should have been perfect to display Bond's humanity. Entertaining nontheless, but unfortunately I don't see it becoming a classic.
Rated 28 Nov 2008
torontodogtorontodog
Rated 27 Nov 2008
50
24th
No longer does Bond have charming exchanges with beautiful women, verbal sparring sessions with evil villains, disposable uber-gadgets or epic battles with superhuman henchmen. Now he moves from place to place killing his targets with all the efficiency of a terminator. Some good action scenes but no plot, no Bond gimmicks and no fun.
Rated 27 Nov 2008
johnnyzombieJohnnyZombie
Rated 24 Nov 2008
83
47th
Not as good as Casino Royale. I feel like Marc Forster may have not been the right choice to direct this movie. Daniel Craig turned in another good performance though.
Rated 24 Nov 2008
robotjazzrobotjazz
Rated 24 Nov 2008
32
13th
Let's face it -- this is one step away from a Steven Seagall Bond film. Old Bond plots aren't amazing, but the overall feel makes up for it. This one doesn't capture that feel, and the thin plot isn't enough to stand on.
Rated 24 Nov 2008
icarusIcarus
Rated 23 Nov 2008
60
26th
A solid action film, with some fun set pieces and exotic locales. The plot is pretty much ho-hum, and the writing takes far too many shortcuts in establishing any of the characters.
Rated 23 Nov 2008
anomalyAnomaly
Rated 17 Nov 2008
65
38th
Eh, it's okay. Some good action, great acting, bad shooting techniques, too little plot. I'm no Bond purist but this doesn't seem like what a Bond film should be; then again, this does seem to be chronicling Bond becoming Bond. Entertaining, but probably not something I'd watch again.
Rated 17 Nov 2008
difontaineDifontaine
Rated 16 Nov 2008
70
51st
Does build on from Casino Royale as I would have liked or expected. It seems almost sterile, bloodless despitge the well excuted action. I won't criticise it for "not being traditional bond" as some of those were wank (lasers in space? Invisible cars?!) I enjoyed it but it veered very close to being a Bourne knock off and not a film in it's own right. Plus the baddie is a bit wet. Still, if you aren't expecting the equilavent of Dark Knight for Bond, you should get your money's worth.
Rated 16 Nov 2008
filliganFilligan
Rated 16 Nov 2008
71
23rd
I'm going to go to Hollywood and smack every director who thinks it's a good idea to use this new Bourne Identity/Peter Berg shaky-cam phase as a means to intensify action. It always makes scenes partly or totally incomprehensible. That said, Forster's direction is all over the place, but in spite of the many flaws as compared to the polished Casino Royale, it’s still not a bad Bond flick.
Rated 16 Nov 2008
tripwyreTripwyre
Rated 16 Nov 2008
74
66th
Starts rough, as the movie is a little too desperate to open with a bang. Forster's action has little clarity of vision, and like Nolan in Begins, he uses shaky-cam to mask the fact that he's out of his element. It doesn't work. The film is still very exciting, but it's the quiet moments where it shines: Craig is terrific as Renegade Bond, and Amalric matches him step for step. It doesn't hold up as a stand-alone film, but it's a fine character study, and a solid entry in this franchise reboot.
Rated 16 Nov 2008
purgatospurgatos
Rated 15 Nov 2008
57
27th
This was okay. I liked most of it well enough and it was a decent action film with a sort of spy angle. However, it's like they went too far with trying to be different from the older Bond films. It doesn't have the over-the-top ridiculousness that's true, but it doesn't have the charm that made them distinctively Bond either.
Rated 15 Nov 2008
luna6ixLuna6ix
Rated 15 Nov 2008
75
52nd
after all the novelty of mixing up the bond standards have worn off, this movie fails to truly follow in the footsteps of it's predecessor. not only does it fail to come out of the shadow of the last one, it is hardly buoyant in the sea of modern action films. a let down, but good enough to watch.
Rated 15 Nov 2008
cinematicespCinematicESP
Rated 14 Nov 2008
70
20th
An adequate Bond film, though it teeters into Bourne territory at times. I love the way Daniel Craig just throws objects to the side when he's finished with them. The Tosca scene is the best part.
Rated 14 Nov 2008
lrampartllrampartl
Rated 14 Nov 2008
40
16th
This wasn't even a movie. It was just two hours of stuff blowing up in front of a shaky-cam, starring a character named James Bond.
Rated 14 Nov 2008
gecqGecq
Rated 13 Nov 2008
40
8th
This new Bond feature refuses to mark its check in most categories. I was bored.
Rated 13 Nov 2008
angrypierreangrypierre
Rated 11 Nov 2008
74
59th
The main criticism I've seen has been that this isn't Casino Royale. Well, boo friggin hoo. Personally, while it does lack some of the things that made CR great, it stands up well on it's own. While the villain is a bit pathetic, the mystery element isn't the main part of it. Bond's quest for comfort in revenge, seeing himself mirrored in his companion, that part is what grabbed me. It's by no means perfect, but still a cut above a lot of the action dross in theatres at the moment.
Rated 11 Nov 2008
nikobr02Nikobr02
Rated 26 Oct 2024
87
35th
Oily
Rated 26 Oct 2024
yesistastyyesistasty
Rated 31 Aug 2024
62
10th
Edited so relentlessly, so hysterically, so psychotically, that it explodes a contemporary Bond film into impressionistic fragments. A nauseating watch, tantalizingly intriguing compositions sliced and diced into flashes of bright light and film grain. This is one of the most challenging films I've ever watched, it's just ugly. A frustrating failure because some of the footage is magnificent, they just let the director and editor mangle it.
Rated 31 Aug 2024
barbienobleBarbieNoble
Rated 23 May 2024
65
0th
Después de Casino Royale se queda muy por detrás.
Rated 23 May 2024
christianmchristianm
Rated 30 Apr 2024
40
3rd
Worse than the original
Rated 30 Apr 2024
videoetronVideoetron
Rated 24 Jan 2024
79
94th
I don't get the hate. I liked how it followed the classic Bond recipe/structure with modern twists to it. The element of going sorta rogue reminds a bit of License to Kill and other Bonds. In a modern take, a bad guy doesn't have to take over the world, he can be causing humanitarian crisis for money, and that message felt fresh. Greene being a slimy coward made him unique. Good action, interesting Bond girl. The black and white and orange-gold esthetic was neat. Intro song sucked.
Rated 24 Jan 2024
croweycrowey
Rated 23 Jan 2024
45
35th
If this is your kind of movie, you might enjoy it more. It’s *not* my kind of movie but I loved CR so hoped for more.
Rated 23 Jan 2024
fredericg54frederic_g54
Rated 07 Jan 2024
6
35th
(2nd viewing) Not the worst Bond ever made but it just feels like they're going through the motions. Right from the start, this is an action heavy entry à la ‘Tomorrow Never Dies’ but without a clear vision or interesting story to latch onto. As if the writers were just out of ideas, I mean, we had to endure a full minute of M running her bath and putting on facial cream -- yeah thanks for that!
Rated 07 Jan 2024
montycircusMontyCircus
Rated 27 Aug 2023
20
12th
Paint-by-numbers Bond. Churn the film out in 2 years Bond. Crap villain. Crap Jack White theme song. I barely looked up from my laptop.
Rated 27 Aug 2023
cmonsterCMonster
Rated 28 Dec 2022
40
17th
Rewatched this for the first time in forever. It kinda sucks. The camera work makes action scenes borderline incoherent. The evil plot sucks. The World is Not Enough had a better boat chase. Olga Kurylenko and the whole sequence at the opera kick ass though.
Rated 28 Dec 2022
alanstrangalanstrang
Rated 08 Oct 2022
65
38th
alright.
Rated 08 Oct 2022
mysticMystic
Rated 14 Jan 2022
5
88th
Three words: Fuck the haters!
Rated 14 Jan 2022
revan007Revan007
Rated 17 Nov 2021
39
3rd
This Bourne-wannabe film often takes itself too serious despite its laughable script. Daniel Craig looks more like the next action hero than a suave or classy spy. In fact, in one of the most "believable" moments of this film, Bond shoots a gas pipe inside the room where he is. The explosion blows away the wall and adjacent rooms but the audience is supposed to believe that the desk in front of him saved 007 from danger. If that is the level of writing you are looking for, this movie is for you.
Rated 17 Nov 2021
badfurdayBadFurDay
Rated 26 Oct 2021
3
11th
I was waiting for something interesting to happen, and then the movie ended.
Rated 26 Oct 2021
nwileynwiley
Rated 24 Oct 2021
12
4th
Not good movie
Rated 24 Oct 2021
waltermittyWalterMitty
Rated 30 Aug 2021
69
19th
"Directed by Marc Foster". Wait, Marc Foster directed Stranger Than Fiction, why is now directing a Bond's movie? I was skeptic about the final result and I was right about it. Probably the worst car chasing I've ever saw: noisy, full of unnecessary cuts and dubious camera shots. The action scenes aren't any better so much so that in some points it seems that a drunk monkey have started jumping on the editor's keyboard. Topping on the cake: the non-action segments are utterly boring
Rated 30 Aug 2021
inzzzomniainzzzomnia
Rated 05 Aug 2021
2
18th
This isn't Bond, just some generic boring action flick.
Rated 05 Aug 2021
beneBene
Rated 16 Jul 2021
55
21st
Not as bad as it was made out to be, but more or less standard Bond-fare of old, which is probably the fastest a successfool and excellent reboot was ran into the ground qualitywise I can think of.
Rated 16 Jul 2021
imomercetinImOmerCetin
Rated 30 May 2021
53
19th
I cannot believe what I saw in this movie!
Rated 30 May 2021
hazelhawkshazelhawks
Rated 25 Dec 2020
47
24th
Worst henchman ever. He doesn't do anything and he looks like Joxer from Xena.
Rated 25 Dec 2020
morphinapgmorphinapg
Rated 26 Oct 2020
54
13th
It's quite obvious that this movie simply didn't have much of a script while they were filming it. The story is weak, so it relies more on action, but even the action feels weaker than usual. There may be a moment here or there that works but ultimately this is a forgettable Bond film.
Rated 26 Oct 2020
antonio_pAntonio P
Rated 12 Jul 2020
80
90th
This picks up where Casino Royale left off. Stopping a bad guy from gaining control of a countries resource. A lot of action here as you try to figure out who the bad enemies are. Bond is basically working on this mission solo as his own people are stopping him from doing what he has to do because he isn't following Protocol. Finally gets the enemy and leaves him in the desert. Skyfall follows up after this movie.
Rated 12 Jul 2020
matthagenmatthagen
Rated 02 Jul 2020
52
53rd
Played out like a straight ahead action movie, but it is truly great action. It lacks narrative spark however. Not nearly on the same level as Casino Royale, but certainly enjoyable.
Rated 02 Jul 2020
karbonaichKarbonaich
Rated 08 Jun 2020
55
8th
w/ Kaan
Rated 08 Jun 2020
michaelman99MichaelMan99
Rated 30 Jan 2020
60
27th
Not great, not terrible. Just average.
Rated 30 Jan 2020
mindman358mindman358
Rated 21 Apr 2019
55
7th
The most convoluted and definitely worst of the latest Bond franchises offerings. A booby.
Rated 21 Apr 2019
number5Number5
Rated 27 Feb 2019
85
35th
A good Bond movie from a man who (to my mind) is on occasion all that Bond should be.
Rated 27 Feb 2019
mspraguemsprague
Rated 27 Jan 2019
79
80th
Daniel Craig kicks some ass for Her Majesty.
Rated 27 Jan 2019
macswellMacSwell
Rated 26 Dec 2018
30
7th
It’s leaner and meaner than most, but in the end Quantum of Solace will likely go down as the most forgettable of all Bond films. Dull, joyless and bereft of levity, any promising action sequence is ruined by startlingly dreadful editing, and the villain is perhaps the least formidable ever faced in the series.
Rated 26 Dec 2018
speedmarqueSpeedMarque
Rated 17 Nov 2018
40
27th
By far the worst of the Craig, Bond movies. We're back to the days of Brosnan with "just" action and gadgets. Story is forgettable and didn't like Olga as the Bond girl. Nice throwback to Goldfinger though.
Rated 17 Nov 2018
vv238vv238
Rated 13 Sep 2018
38
37th
Quantum of Solace is proof that tortured, gritty, and nuanced Bond isn't enough to carry an entire film. Quantum of Solace is a largely unfocused descent into at least a different brand of mediocrity than Bond in recent outings but it feels like a missed opportunity because there are some truly standout sequences in the spy-thriller and Bond-as-a-character department but certainly not in action.
Rated 13 Sep 2018
mwestcottmwestcott
Rated 21 Jun 2018
55
22nd
Quantum of Solace may have a sweet title and a terrific final action set piece. It is just overall a lesser entry in the Bond franchise. The acting is fine for the most part, but Craig has not quite found his stride yet.
Rated 21 Jun 2018
rcmaccrcmacc
Rated 16 May 2018
30
19th
There have been 4 recent Bond movies. Two of them have been fantastic, and two of them have been underwhelming and boring. This is in the latter. It fails to be as engaging as Casino Royale or Skyfall and proves to be a dull entry to the franchise.
Rated 16 May 2018
iamdwgIamdwg
Rated 28 Apr 2018
46
6th
Re-watching this movie for the...at least 3rd, maybe 4th time. Any time I watch it, it's just because I'm a completist and it would feel wrong to jump to SKYFALL, even though I feel like that's what we should all do, anyway. This movie is incredibly hollow. It feels like NOTHING important. Even though it has a lot of great action, nothing holds weight, and so it's just...so...boring.
Rated 28 Apr 2018
picklemanPickle_Man
Rated 20 Mar 2018
65
27th
Underrated. Quantum of Solace delivers the most "Action Hero" Bond we've had for a while, and the stark contrast to the more understated CR is a bit off-putting. From what I understand, there was some sort of writers' strike during production and it shows, but that being said, everything else is still good, especially the action. If you go in expecting CR, you'll be sorely dissapointed, but if you're willing to accept this at face value it's actually decent.
Rated 20 Mar 2018
kito1kito1
Rated 14 Jan 2018
50
24th
A bit of a drag, and lacking in atmosphere.
Rated 14 Jan 2018
dyannethorneDyanneThorne
Rated 12 Sep 2017
65
54th
Yes, thank god! Something like 20 movies after that girl got torn to pieces by dogs, someone finally calls Bond out on the fact that the women around him tend to have very short life expectancies. And the way he disposed of Greene was delightfully cruel. I approve.
Rated 12 Sep 2017

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...