sign in
register
Watch
Disney Plus Apple TV Google Play Movies
+4
Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time
Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time
+4
JustWatch
Your probable score
?
Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time

Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time

2010
Romance, Fantasy
1h 56m
When an evil nobleman threatens to enslave the world by obtaining the Sands of Time -- a mystical hourglass that gives him control over the flow of time -- Prince Dastan (Jake Gyllenhaal) and spunky Princess Tamina (Gemma Arterton) must join forces to stop the madman. Mike Newell directs this sweeping live-action adventure based on the popular video game.

Directed by:

Mike Newell

Screenwriter:

Boaz Yakin, Doug Miro, Carlo Bernard, Jordan Mechner

Starring:

Jake Gyllenhaal, Alfred Molina, Ben Kingsley, Ronald Pickup, Toby Kebbell, Steve Toussaint, Richard Coyle, Gemma Arterton, Gísli Örn Garðarsson, Dave Pope, Thomas DuPont

Genres:

Romance, Fantasy, Action, Adventure

Country:

USA

Language:

English
imdb IMDb
Update history
Suggest edit

Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time

2010
Romance, Fantasy
1h 56m
Your probable score
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer
Avg Percentile 32.4% from 3773 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

(3801)
Compact view
clear
Compact view
Show
Sort
kasperlKasperL
Rated 20 May 2010
40
19th
The plot goes back and forth between the perfunctory and the absolutely ridiculous. Gyllenhaal (seeming not entirely comfortable in the role) and Arterton (pouting) have precisely zero chemistry. The action is unimpressive. I thought the film was unfunny and, even worse, no fun.
Rated 20 May 2010
omgfridgeomgfridge
Rated 30 May 2010
5
42nd
Decent popcorn flick that passes the time. Gyllenhaal and Artertnon had forced chemistry but as far as main players were concerned, Arterton was the weakest cast member. Highly predictable but there is some fun to be had even if it tries a bit too hard to be like 'Pirates of the Caribbean'. Impressive sand sliding and roof top scenes take this up a few levels to be enjoyable.
Rated 30 May 2010
farzanFarzan
Rated 29 May 2010
35
24th
Alfred Molina as the comic relief, and the decent action scenes were the only redeeming qualities of this film. Gylenhaal and Arterton had absolutely no chemistry, and the romance in general was just bathetic and pathetic. Also being Persian and seeing that sometimes you would hear Arabic in the background, and NOT Persian was bafflingly engrossing. Still, having so much to hate this film for, it is still one of the best video game adaptations to date, if that means anything, at all.
Rated 29 May 2010
difontaineDifontaine
Rated 24 May 2010
65
39th
HELLO IT'S SUMMERRRRRR. OK, so it's silly and loud but frankly, all I wanted was a silly loud film so I'm satisfied. Jake's accent is pretty good, Arterton is very pretty and does what acting is allowed in these films. It wasn't spoiled too much by having the reels in the wrong order either. Also, kudos to Alfred Molina as the comic relief.
Rated 24 May 2010
dardandardan
Rated 21 Sep 2015
45
38th
Most decent crap I have seen in a while.
Rated 21 Sep 2015
talyn_golicTalyn Golic
Rated 30 Aug 2010
55
13th
Gyllenhaal gives a charisma-free performance which only serves to show how lucky PotC was to have someone like Depp as the star. When combined with with Arterton's recycled 'every haughty princess ever' and a bad guy twist you'll guess in the first 5 minutes you're left with a movie that looks nice but is ultimately hollow. The movie really lacks any real heart, it comes off as a by-the-numbers attempt to create a franchise, PotC style, but doesn't have that movie's wit or sense of fun.
Rated 30 Aug 2010
tripwyreTripwyre
Rated 11 Jun 2010
56
37th
Enjoyable enough as a Cheap Ticket Tuesday summer movie. The opening is incredibly rushed (so is the ending, for that matter) which makes it difficult to care much for the characters. But the actors do their best with what little material there is. The middle section, where Gyllenhaal and Arterton are alone in the desert, is where most of the fun is had -- supplied largely by Alfred Molina, but also their royal bickering. The action is largely ruined by poor editing choices. Oh well.
Rated 11 Jun 2010
spunkieSpunkie
Rated 01 Jun 2010
40
24th
Any high adventure blockbuster without a threatening level of stupidity and decent flow is ok to go for me if I'm in that particular mood. This reminded me of Mummy, while that has better pacing, chemistry between the cast, they are very similar. I wish they give the actors some room to breathe in, there is nothing Kingsley can do with the bad guy makeup and stale character. Maybe this series will have more entertainment value as it goes along.
Rated 01 Jun 2010
cinemafan91Cinemafan91
Rated 10 Mar 2014
60
27th
It's very bland and predictable, but it isn't a totally waste. It is a passable popcorn movie.
Rated 10 Mar 2014
barthalenBarthalen
Rated 18 Sep 2010
61
40th
I know it's not very good, and yet I can't rate it too lowly. It's just a bit of harmless Disney-style entertainment without too many pretentions. The stunts that were lifted from the game were decent (despite obtrusive editing) and the whole thing looked nice at least. Yes, the acting was weak, the story laughable and the ending anticlimactic, and yet... and yet... I really can't hate it, even though I should. I'm getting weak.
Rated 18 Sep 2010
spleenspleen
Rated 02 Sep 2010
82
77th
Evidently everyone in Persia (Iran) used to have English accents. That is until Jake Gyllenhaal taught them to speak Scottish. That's what I learned from this movie. Thanks movie.
Rated 02 Sep 2010
luna6ixLuna6ix
Rated 02 Jun 2010
75
52nd
having played the video games prior i knew the deal, but WTF i thought this was going to be a whole bunch of time reversing awesomeness, instead he uses the dagger like twice, i am not happy with that. still, this movie has some decent action and whoever was doubling for gyllenhaal for that parkour stuff did a great job--and probably had more screen time that jake himself. i still can't ignore the english accents for everyone--so we're american? did they think we wouldn't notice?
Rated 02 Jun 2010
jebJeb
Rated 23 May 2010
69
50th
Gyllenhaal's acting and accent is completely forced, Arterton is awful and the plotline is really predictable. But still, the action is impressive and it has enough fun, adventure and excitement to keep one occupied. Very similiar to and reminds me of POTC. The best video game adaptation thus far.
Rated 23 May 2010
cagedwisdomcagedwisdom
Rated 19 May 2010
75
65th
Enjoyable the same way as PotC, just with a different cast and sand instead of water. Loved to see Gyllenhaal in the lead in such a big action flick as I love the man, and his accent is not a problem. Also Arterton is for once not awful and the rest of the supporting cast is good. Really predictable, and the exposition is horribly forced, but what do you expect. Set it aside the dreadful Clash of the Titans and it's hard to hate this. Easily the best video game adaptation movie out there.
Rated 19 May 2010
angrypierreangrypierre
Rated 02 Jan 2017
55
25th
Holy accents Batman!
Rated 02 Jan 2017
tancantancan
Rated 18 Jun 2016
79
60th
very fun to watch, but lacks any kind of depth
Rated 18 Jun 2016
ardynardyn
Rated 12 Feb 2015
80
53rd
The action is decent, the style is good, overall a pretty generic action film based off a video game.
Rated 12 Feb 2015
thehynesthehynes
Rated 13 Jan 2014
45
19th
Dull Disney multiplex fodder
Rated 13 Jan 2014
rttntomatoesrttntomatoes
Rated 03 Jan 2014
35
13th
It doesn't offer much in the way of substance, but Prince of Persia is a suitably entertaining swashbuckler -- and a substantial improvement over most video game adaptations.
Rated 03 Jan 2014
wicheWiche
Rated 24 Dec 2013
60
36th
Oh well... Worth a watch. Could have been better, but could have been worse too, I guess.
Rated 24 Dec 2013
okkervilOkkervil
Rated 23 Jul 2013
41
30th
A bit dim-witted and a good twenty minutes to a half hour too long, but as a harmless popcorn flick it's acceptable. Molina and Kingsley provide the only real moments of any quality, the action is basic but well enough thought out, Arterton is talentless but easy on the eye and Gyllanhaal is a bit flat but just about has enough presence to lead the film. Watchable.
Rated 23 Jul 2013
ryan_luedersRyan Lueders
Rated 26 Jan 2013
74
38th
This movie was too long. That was the biggest flaw with it. I thought the effects were really cool, especially the dagger's powers. I also thought that the assassins were cool with their killer snakes and throwing blades. Even Jake Gyllenhaal surprised me and came off being pretty Persian which I was dubious about. Gemma Arterton was also a very beautiful princess with a lot of 'tude. With all that combined though, the great length of this movie spoiled it for me and I grew bored. A shame.
Rated 26 Jan 2013
bellamyrbellamyr
Rated 31 Dec 2012
76
44th
I'm bucking the trend. Forget the video game or you'll be disappointed. However, with no previous knowledge this instantly carried the Disney hallmark - in a good way. It's not a deliberate pastiche and is enjoyable but it's a composite. Sets via Indiana Jones, Parcours from Casino Royale, desert scenes a la Star Wars, Arrows/knives by Robin Hood and a smattering of Pirate of the Caribbean. Not bad for its genre - far from the worst in class. Worth watching
Rated 31 Dec 2012
ag0stomesmerAg0stoMesmer
Rated 31 Dec 2012
2
46th
Disappointing action-er. A shame they used a western score rather than the excellent world/fusion game soundtrack. Whitewashed and lacking character -Mummy of the Caribbean.
Rated 31 Dec 2012
thegreyfoxthegreyfox
Rated 26 Sep 2012
60
32nd
PoP,SoT proves that just because a film is poorly cast, has a terrible story / script and lousy acting, it can still be good "popcorn fun". What Kingsley, Molina and Gyllenhaal were doing in this film heaven only knows; they make a mockery of the word "Persia" in the title. At times, Jake is looking at Gemma, almost mouthing her lines for her, like some on-screen prompter, as he waits for her to deliver another bit of much needed exposition, in order to make any sense of this. But hey, it's fun!
Rated 26 Sep 2012
nilay0045nilay0045
Rated 10 Jul 2012
90
46th
Although widely criticized, I actually found the film to be very entertaining. Not a great work, but certainly enjoyable.
Rated 10 Jul 2012
slantmagSlantMag
Rated 27 Oct 2011
10
9th
"Disney-Bruckheimer digital pulp with no instincts for derring-do or beefcake inspection." - Bill Weber
Rated 27 Oct 2011
cmonsterCMonster
Rated 02 Sep 2011
48
23rd
I didn't realize the Black Riders from The Lord of the Rings did other movies. I should probably write them into mine as well. Also, since they can only go back in time 1 minute I thought it would be funny if because of shock his brother waited about 65 seconds to hit the button so he would still have been dead.
Rated 02 Sep 2011
sirstuckeySirStuckey
Rated 02 May 2011
50
23rd
It's not awful. The plot is ridiculous, which wouldn't be an awful thing if the crux of the movie didn't make it so any dire situation could be taken back with the push of a button. The action scenes can be cool, but are too often laced with a bunch of lame free running stuff. As a video game adaptation it's good, but there aren't many other ones that aren't blatantly awful. Ending is pretty terrible and leaves a bad taste in what is by all accounts a mediocre movie.
Rated 02 May 2011
frederikaFrederikA
Rated 12 Mar 2011
55
41st
Pretty much what you could/should expect from the Bruckheimer/Disney-label it wears; Decent fantasy rump with great visual effect and so very little else (except for the most Caucasian-looking Persians I've ever seen)
Rated 12 Mar 2011
tjekhovTjekhov
Rated 20 Feb 2011
30
17th
Good if you're hung-over, probably because it's incredible retarded.
Rated 20 Feb 2011
chemical404chemical404
Rated 27 Dec 2010
28
9th
I always feel drained after watching those Hollywood blockbusters. There is nothing worthwhile in this film. Unless you enjoy films like third Mummy sequel don't waste your time. There are better films out there that don't require any mind-work.
Rated 27 Dec 2010
therealj_roTheRealJ-Ro
Rated 23 Nov 2010
70
42nd
REVIEW TO DO
Rated 23 Nov 2010
ewp805ewp805
Rated 26 Sep 2010
65
33rd
Gyllenhaal and Aterton have no chemistry on screen, the editing is poor, and the script is bad. Still, it's better than any video game movie I've seen and Molina provides some good comic relief. Popcorn flick.
Rated 26 Sep 2010
hellboy76hellboy76
Rated 25 Sep 2010
58
23rd
Looks neat. Unfortunately there is no coherent plot or actors that give a crap.
Rated 25 Sep 2010
peaceanarchyPeaceAnarchy
Rated 06 Sep 2010
75
44th
Saying this is the best video game movies is faint praise, but even so I quite enjoyed it. It's cliched and misses some opportunities but it's fun, coherent and well made.
Rated 06 Sep 2010
eric_janeric-jan
Rated 29 Aug 2010
65
30th
It was like watching the similar movie "the Mummy". What shameful acting and an even more horrible script. The special effects and the fact that it's based on such a legendary game keep this movie alive and watchable.
Rated 29 Aug 2010
naurunauru
Rated 16 Aug 2010
70
77th
Does a nice job of capturing the look and feel of the video games on which it's based. Although the sword fighting was poorly choreographed and the filming didn't show what was going on, the chase sequences were fantastic. Better than the Mummy, better than Pirates of the Caribbean, and better than Avatar. However for those who didn't play the games first, I can understand if they don't get as much out of this film.
Rated 16 Aug 2010
tfbTFB
Rated 24 Jul 2010
25
2nd
A very poorly written film, especially in terms of the character interplay which can only be described as "corny." Jake Gyllenhaal will go down as one of the biggest miscasts of 2010 as his undeniably American look combined with his unnatural accent stick out like a sore thumb amidst his Persian companions.
Rated 24 Jul 2010
leekennleekenn
Rated 30 Jun 2010
62
35th
Definitely one of the more enjoyable blockbusters of recent times. To be honest, I don't think Gemma Arterton is a very good actress (although she is stunningly hot) but this is one of her better roles, and the rest of the cast are good to watch, especially Toby Kebbell who as usual fills his role very well. The action sequences are good and there is plenty of light hearted comedy to be had. Can't really complain...
Rated 30 Jun 2010
obdurateObdurate
Rated 05 Jun 2010
60
23rd
I expected this to be awful, especially since I'm not a fan of the games. Jake did a good job, even though I think the casting was wrong. Everyone else mostly did a good enough job. The visuals were pretty awesome though, I especially liked watching time go back. The action scenes were entertaining. As someone said, pure popcorn flick, but I enjoyed my watch and I'll never watch it again.
Rated 05 Jun 2010
ytadelYtadel
Rated 01 Jun 2010
4
44th
While it falls short of the pinnacle of being good, it's basically competent, with pacing, structure, and production values that actually resemble a real movie. This pretty much by default makes it the best video game adaptation ever made. Jake Gyllenhaal is relatively charmless in the leading role - Dastan is sure as fuck no Jack Sparrow - but hey, it's still better than Clash of the Titans.
Rated 01 Jun 2010
filmfreak88filmfreak88
Rated 30 May 2010
40
15th
Pure popcorn flick. A mildly entertaining but thoroughly generic, superficial, and tepid videogame adaptation, which is to be expected really.
Rated 30 May 2010
rayRay
Rated 26 May 2010
50
39th
For a film about a game based on acrobatics, the filming of such scenes was very poor. The camera seemed to be going at a different pace to the action, and the CGI team were forced to do their best to cover this up with highly convenient motion blur. Acting wise it was fairly average, with Gyllenhaal delivering not his best nor his worst performance and Arterton...well, Arterton yelled "Dastan!" a lot. It has it's moments of sweeping action and it certainly has comedic value, but it isn't great.
Rated 26 May 2010
astrakhanastrakhan
Rated 24 May 2010
73
28th
Breathtaking... ly ridiculous. It's so over-the-top and nonsensical, but I didn't really mind that aspect. I think they got the casting dead wrong here, it would have been cooler with known actors playing the royalty and an unknown as the rogue. Jake did not convince for a second that he was Persian... or anything else except a cartoon. Action scenes were ok. Nothing memorable. Dialogue really bad. Didn't like the comic relief. Certainly no classic, but entertaining enough for a one-time watch.
Rated 24 May 2010
tarwebroodtarwebrood
Rated 19 May 2010
80
69th
20-5-2010 would have loved to see some true Persian ladies with those beautiful eyes in this movie, the european/american casting did hurt this movie. I've enjoyed it nontheless.
Rated 19 May 2010
evranaevrana
Rated 06 Dec 2021
60
24th
Well, the time-reversal scenes were cool and the princess was beautiful enough to jump around like a rabbit on amphetamines, but aside from that, the Price of Persia concept does not have enough to carry a feature movie. I used to suck at this game when I was a kid, so the nostalgia part does not work on me either and it washed over me.
Rated 06 Dec 2021
glumpy99glumpy_99
Rated 22 Nov 2021
75
49th
Enjoyable bit of B-grade Indy silliness (overtly stealing from THE TEMPLE OF DOOM in the final act) is perfunctory but agreeable entertainment, with Kingsley and Molina having fun hamming things up, and Gyllenhaal taking equal parts Harrison Ford and Johnny Depp's Jack Sparrow (Arterton all but disappears into the rabble). Newell keeps things humming along nicely, almost helping you forget that the MacGuffin renders most of the plot/plotting a shaggy dog by the finale.
Rated 22 Nov 2021
tj_monsterTJ monster
Rated 21 Aug 2021
90
97th
on par with john carter, wish it was more charchter intertwinement but theres always john carter of mars
Rated 21 Aug 2021
moviecinemaMovieCinema
Rated 17 Aug 2021
55
36th
I have not rewatch this film since I was eleven. First things first: white people pretending to be non-white people, the “magical black man who doesn’t speak and sacrifices himself for the greater good”, Stockholm syndrome romance and a variety of Hollywood clichés, especially when they attempt to make a videogame adaptation. Are the action sequences a joy to watch? Yes. Is it fun (if you can look past all the genuinely awful stuff)? Yes. So, is this a good movie? No.
Rated 17 Aug 2021
arossaross
Rated 03 May 2020
61
16th
Disappointing
Rated 03 May 2020
corbadCorbad
Rated 05 Mar 2020
60
31st
There is, of course, an unsurprising but still disappointing lack of Persians (or any Middle Eastern folk) in the cast, but that you could know going in. Everything else in the film could be known prior to watching it, too, though the staggering saturation of orange in the first half will still shock you. It's enjoyable, though, for the most part: light and silly.
Rated 05 Mar 2020
mspraguemsprague
Rated 18 Feb 2018
54
13th
Some of this was good but most of this was not worth the time.
Rated 18 Feb 2018
evilmangoesEvilMangoes
Rated 28 May 2017
66
33rd
B-
Rated 28 May 2017
ryanaRyana
Rated 20 Aug 2015
90
72nd
94
Rated 20 Aug 2015
hakkanarejohakkanarejo
Rated 11 Aug 2015
80
22nd
"Prince of Persia" is entertaining. While the performances were strong, I'd have to say that Alfred Molina is the shining cast member as Sheik Amar. It was fun seeing him in a humorous role. If looking for a popcorn movie, "Prince of Persia" might be a good choice, but just make sure to leave the young kids at home.
Rated 11 Aug 2015
alexshredsAlex_Shreds
Rated 13 May 2015
73
29th
I don't remember this movie, but I remember seeing it and thinking it was decent
Rated 13 May 2015
randallodimRandallODim
Rated 09 Nov 2014
65
17th
Ostrich races were fun. The rest of the movie, not so much.
Rated 09 Nov 2014
alberteAlbertE
Rated 29 Jul 2014
25
32nd
director didn't study about persian culture before making this movie so this is a movie full of stupid idea. just romantic ending was well.
Rated 29 Jul 2014
pluggedinPluggedIN
Rated 14 Apr 2014
70
72nd
Well, they couldn't, as you now know. And it apparently didn't matter much to them that half the Persia games so far are rated M. Because a lot of the game violence that pushed them into the "mature" category also makes its way onto the movie screen, Persia pushes the PG-13 rating pretty hard with heavy doses of sword-swinging, neck-slashing, bloody knife-to-the-chest violence. (pluggedin.com)
Rated 14 Apr 2014
chrispalmChrisPalm
Rated 09 Mar 2014
70
25th
Great actor, terrible movie/script
Rated 09 Mar 2014
grayson8Grayson8
Rated 09 Jan 2014
75
54th
cool movie based on one an awsome game, the conflict between brothers is very interesting and the acrobatics in the film are a lot of fun to watch, movie is guilty of the whole damsel in distress trope, otherwise it would probably be a 90.
Rated 09 Jan 2014
nick-hamdenNick Hamden
Rated 03 Jun 2013
60
47th
http://gorgview.com/prince-of-persia-the-sands-of-time
Rated 03 Jun 2013
whatismynamewhatismyname
Rated 16 Mar 2013
45
8th
Like a car wreck. You know its gonna be bad, but you still have to look with your own eyes. There was no suspense in the storytelling, its all laid out in front of you. Jake and Gemma, it was too contrived, it was laughable.
Rated 16 Mar 2013
theescapistTheEscapist
Rated 12 Jan 2013
76
81st
Very entertaining, plot is rather simple but the film has a nice atmosphere and good production value. Attractive leads. Overall a very enjoyable film.
Rated 12 Jan 2013
gadelatgadelat
Rated 12 Sep 2012
65
87th
Too much fantasy, dynamic action, unreal psychology of characters (how could they have no questioning why he killed his king when he picked him from street?), too much computer effect. But nothing too offensive in movie to not enjoy it.
Rated 12 Sep 2012
bookhouseboybookhouseboy
Rated 19 Jul 2012
37
43rd
Some funny scenes and some action-sequences that work, but not a good script or lead. *Preview*: #12#, re-2*, popcorn, Gemma.A/7, rewatch(2), R3 }*{ #10#, popcorn, hype, story, (cast).
Rated 19 Jul 2012
alo94Alo94
Rated 27 Jun 2012
90
20th
good movie
Rated 27 Jun 2012
thedicemanTheDiceman
Rated 05 Jun 2012
50
35th
Not bad.
Rated 05 Jun 2012
benoBeNO
Rated 26 May 2012
65
38th
Had some cool effects with his dagger and parkour scene at the start was cool.
Rated 26 May 2012
kramyessevKramYessev
Rated 11 May 2012
47
26th
It's painfully obvious that the crew behind this haven't played the games, it fails to captures the same spirit; falling into pits, reversing time and falling back into said pits. Another stain on what was once a great franchise, along with the 2008 game.
Rated 11 May 2012
paradiselostParadiselost
Rated 01 Mar 2012
20
2nd
Boring and uninspired. I noticed a strange disconnect between cuts in scenes, as if there was no physical link between two cuts.
Rated 01 Mar 2012
ebelcEbelC
Rated 29 Jan 2012
50
28th
It's a pity Gemma Arterton was so wasted, though she does her best to make the most of the character, doing an interesting princess. Kingsley just make a correct character, good but obviously wasted. The rest well, an entertaining movie, a bit overloaded in the aesthetic aspect and having a CG far from top quality, not really a bad idea for story but not done in an specially new way, and having some interesting winks to the game. It's better than some other adventure movies, but not memorable.
Rated 29 Jan 2012
burstbubbleBurstBubble
Rated 23 Nov 2011
100
94th
I liked it,
Rated 23 Nov 2011
dkeeperdkeeper
Rated 20 Oct 2011
20
1st
Slept during the film, never bothered to watch the rest.
Rated 20 Oct 2011
mennowomennowo
Rated 30 Aug 2011
78
64th
Beautifully shot and composited film, with interesting and entertaining twists, and nice acting by both lead actors.
Rated 30 Aug 2011
nothingtosaynothingtosay
Rated 16 Aug 2011
65
33rd
Never thought that Jake is a good action hero, but he did moderately well. The same cannot be said about the almost rediculous post-climax storyline, even dismissing the 'myth' setting.
Rated 16 Aug 2011
acyberexileacyberexile
Rated 12 Jul 2011
80
49th
i like prince of persia. i've liked the early ms-dos game, i've liked the first trilogy of ubisoft games and i've liked the most recent reboot of the franchise. jumping around and doing acrobatics in a middle-eastern fairy-tale setting is fun, and so is a fantasy storyline which involves old gods, time travel and mythology of the persian sands. the movie does all these well to, and to an extent, greatly achieves its aim of being the pirates of the caribbean of the fantasy genre.
Rated 12 Jul 2011
voldemortvoldemort
Rated 05 Jul 2011
40
7th
BORING.
Rated 05 Jul 2011
methad1methad1
Rated 19 Jun 2011
60
33rd
Another disappointing game to movie crossover.
Rated 19 Jun 2011
grouchoGroucho
Rated 04 Jun 2011
15
7th
"All about the empty spectacle, sound and fury building to multiple climaxes (without the pleasure)."
Rated 04 Jun 2011
greatscott85GreatScott85
Rated 03 May 2011
70
25th
Nothing particularly special, but an entirely competent, well-produced summer popcorn action flick.
Rated 03 May 2011
scorpusScorpus
Rated 27 Apr 2011
57
16th
Prince of Persia fails to live up to the great legacy of the video games
Rated 27 Apr 2011
vandelay1Vandelay1
Rated 29 Mar 2011
47
48th
Worth a watch
Rated 29 Mar 2011
wokelsteinwokelstein
Rated 20 Mar 2011
42
11th
Well, Jake Gyllenhaal is too cute to be an action hero. He's believable enough as bored thirty-something department store employee Jennifer Aniston's teenaged lover in The Good Girl. Not as much as the lead in a big-budget summer blockbuster. Other than that, it's just more hyperkinetic fast-food filmmaking in the Michael Bay tradition. I had no idea what was going on, but I won't deny feeling something visceral.
Rated 20 Mar 2011
fichincefi_chince
Rated 15 Mar 2011
55
5th
Takes itself too seriously. Many cliches.
Rated 15 Mar 2011
flashsamuraiflashsamurai
Rated 08 Mar 2011
67
16th
This is Pirates of the Caribbean meets The Scorpion King. The movie isn't anything that pushes new ground, where cinema is concerned, but it has the right flow to make it a mindless, fun adventure. The story is cliche and the story is predictable, but I still enjoyed it non the less. This is nothing like the video games, but it does take a neat spin of the idea of a time traveling dagger.
Rated 08 Mar 2011
telluridetelluride
Rated 06 Mar 2011
50
39th
Bland action-adventure, with an entertainingly hectic and mindless plot, although it is hard to ignore the awful accents.
Rated 06 Mar 2011
foxorzfoxorz
Rated 01 Mar 2011
55
30th
Although I'd have to say that it's one of the best video-games adaptation I've ever seen. It's still not a good movie.
Rated 01 Mar 2011
ahmetbadinahmetbadin
Rated 24 Feb 2011
85
40th
Gylenhaal looks like the prince we had been playing on our PC's. This movie offers a lot of fun. I think it is a must-watch fantasy/action movie of 2010.
Rated 24 Feb 2011
matthew_parkinsonMatthew Parkinson
Rated 23 Feb 2011
50
47th
Look, you don't go into a film like Prince of Persia and expect great depth. That's just not how it is, and if that's what you do, you need to realize that a film like this isn't going to bring you that. Instead, you get fun action sequences held together by a barely relevant plot, with characters that have no real personality other than to accomplish their main task. That's fine, but adjust expectations accordingly when considering watching this film. Once it's over, you'll forget it exists.
Rated 23 Feb 2011
guy-piranhaguy piranha
Rated 21 Feb 2011
25
4th
why is disney doing anything besides cartoons of mickey mouse and donald duck again?!?
Rated 21 Feb 2011
vahidtrvahidtr
Rated 20 Feb 2011
56
8th
I played the video games and I tell you that it's not the movie I expect . the problem is with the scenario and the bad ending with the matter of back to the past . it was terrible .
Rated 20 Feb 2011
darkmandarkman
Rated 14 Feb 2011
68
28th
There are some nice moments in this movie, but overall it's pretty tried and not really great. I liked the video games way more.
Rated 14 Feb 2011
jetpacjetpac
Rated 11 Feb 2011
64
6th
not terrible action scenes, but the plot had almost every cliche in the book
Rated 11 Feb 2011
tathieltathiel
Rated 09 Feb 2011
36
4th
Left the movie after being halfway through it. Boring as hell.
Rated 09 Feb 2011
kevinjosephkevinjoseph
Rated 07 Feb 2011
55
9th
Meh. If you're gonna make a bad movie, at least make it entertainingly bad.
Rated 07 Feb 2011
cruelclowncruelclown
Rated 20 Jan 2011
45
16th
The screen couple has some chemistry, Molina is funny and Kingsley is So-So, but everything else suffers from stupidity.
Rated 20 Jan 2011
burkayadaligburkayadalig
Rated 09 Jan 2011
59
18th
nice movie considering its a `game movie`...felt sorry for Gyllenhaal, how did he end up in this role? BY the way I loved the fact that Persians attacked Alamut thinking there were `weapons of mass destruction` and actually there werent any:)
Rated 09 Jan 2011
logiccureLogicCure
Rated 09 Jan 2011
75
44th
Haven't played any of the Prince of Persia games. Maybe that's why I liked this movie...
Rated 09 Jan 2011

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...