Your probable score
?
![Nocturnal Animals](https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Nocturnal-Animals.webp?1718720651)
Nocturnal Animals
2016
Drama, Suspense/Thriller
1h 56m
A wealthy art gallery owner receives a draft of her ex-husband's new novel, and once she starts reading it she just cannot put it down. (imdb)
Directed by:
Tom FordNocturnal Animals
2016
Drama, Suspense/Thriller
1h 56m
Your probable score
Avg Percentile 60.01% from 3104 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews
(3147)
Compact view
Compact view
Show
Sort
Rated 10 Feb 2017
56
47th
At least Michael Shannon never disappoints you.
Rated 10 Feb 2017
Rated 12 Sep 2016
87
97th
I was expecting style and I got substance.
Rated 12 Sep 2016
Rated 23 Dec 2016
40
19th
Under its affective and well-structured narration, the film hides an exploitative and moralistic tale on love and commitment. It says, "to leave someone who loves you for an asshole is like raping and murdering his wife and daughter", which is far from acceptable! Then the director offers retaliation for that! He says, "Torment your ex by using the power of mimesis in your story". O.K. Justice is done, then what? Could be something if its main conflict wasn't that shallow and lame.
Rated 23 Dec 2016
Rated 17 Jul 2018
91
67th
I thought this was very good. The story isn't too complex that it's hardly understand and Ford has a good visual eye for detail. The story was sad, mean, upsetting, intense, and sharp. I thought just about all of the acting was good as well. Michael Shannon is always an absolute joy to watch and I loved Gyllenhaal and Adams. Overall the movie has great pacing and a well written story. Worth an easy watch if you haven't seen it yet.
Rated 17 Jul 2018
Rated 16 Dec 2016
38
10th
God this was horseshit. We have a dual narrative : the "present tense" is an infuriatingly passive art curator. And then there's the manuscript she's reading which is an emotional allegory for her past marriage. So she lies around reading this Cormac McCarthy story, lies around in bed, lies in a bathtub. Flashbacks, regrets. Everyone spills adjectives about themselves WITHOUT DOING. What an absolute waste of a great cast, set design. Also, awful editing that Nic Roeg would be ashamed of.
Rated 16 Dec 2016
Rated 22 Mar 2017
80
80th
I respect the craft behind it. Top-notch all around. Its dual layered psycho-noir revenge tale is constantly entertaining, elegantly told, satirically thought-provoking, and often damn creepy. I can't help feel, though, that its basic premise, an artist saying the inexplicable through art, is a bit contrived, forced... What I'm trying to say is, Tom Ford just masturbated right in my face and for some reason I kind of enjoyed it.
Rated 22 Mar 2017
Rated 07 Jan 2017
75
77th
Beautifully shot and an engaging cinematic experience. But until I rewatch it (which I'm looking forward to), I'm deducting some points. Because as much as I love the idea of dual layer narration, I didn't find it satisfying here. If there aren't more connections than I picked up on the first time around, I think that Adams' storyline is pretty disposable. As for the acting, Gyllenhaal (who I normally like) is overdoing it, Taylor-Johnson is very good, and a hard-as-nails Shannon is on top form.
Rated 07 Jan 2017
Rated 21 Nov 2016
75
51st
Elements of this film really resonate, but so much of its potential is left unrealized. The cast is fantastic across the board but the script at times gets very clunky.
Rated 21 Nov 2016
Rated 14 Mar 2017
80
84th
A rather gorgeous effort. The story-within-a-story segment was very effective, unbearably tense and unpleasant in parts, and quite affecting; I thought it linked well with the other stories. Solid acting throughout; Shannon in particular is great, and I can't get enough of Adams at the moment. I could nit-pick about the arty aims of this film, and how successful they ultimately are, but I'm not going to. I think it'll take me another watch to totally engage with it, but this is some fine cinema.
Rated 14 Mar 2017
Rated 22 Dec 2016
60
30th
This has to be one of the weaker scripts in recent memory. The dual narrative definitely doesn't do anything to make it worth it since one of them is just Amy Adams looking distraught and dropping the book every 15 min. But inside the Cormac knockoff book is some good stuff. Although this rural revenge thing is getting a tad played out.
Rated 22 Dec 2016
Rated 15 Dec 2016
86
63rd
Here's what I can say: there aren't many films I watch anymore that leave me scratching my head some hours later. Not that Nocturnal Animals is confusing. It's actually insanely engrossing with Ford's fashionista aesthetic. He's got an excellent eye for detail and editing. And I think, in the end, I get it. But if I do, it's not exactly that... great? There's not enough on Adams' end of the story to leave any emotional resonance, so we're left with, "Hmm. Oh. Okay. Neat, I think. Yeah."
Rated 15 Dec 2016
Rated 01 Mar 2017
80
90th
Not as intricate as the multiple layers would've allowed for, but still a worthwile and inventive revenge story carried by a great cast, especially badass shannon. Ford nicely contrasts the shallow and apathetic reality with its dirty emotional truth boiling underneath.
Rated 01 Mar 2017
Rated 17 Feb 2021
70
66th
The story within the story would've been a good movie on its own. Everything with Amy Adams felt a little too artsy for me.
Rated 17 Feb 2021
Rated 20 Nov 2016
83
82nd
Could be an hour longer and I don't say it a lot.
Rated 20 Nov 2016
Rated 21 Dec 2016
3
24th
The acting really saved this one (especially Shannon, who is the best actor working today) I liked when it was inside the novel, but if you want to set your movie in the south everyone won't be wearing TOM FORD GLASSES so you have to throw in some shit of Amy Adams rolling around her bed wearing TOM FORD GLASSES. Outside of the novel every piece of dialogue is utter shit but at least they're wearing TOM FORD GLASSES. "I did something bad, so bad, so evil, I had body autonomy" TOM FORD GLASSES.
Rated 21 Dec 2016
Rated 26 Dec 2016
89
88th
Based purely on comfort levels during watching it, I'd rate this about a 37, but when you need a doppelganger for Amy Adams and you cast Isla Fisher you've got all the points I can throw at you. I am an ever growing Amy Adams fan and snogs nailed that in his/her review.
Rated 26 Dec 2016
Rated 30 Dec 2016
75
87th
Between this and THE NEON DEMON, Jena Malone is setting herself up to be the linchpin of the burgeoning Detached Aesthetes Cinematic Universe (DACU).
Rated 30 Dec 2016
Rated 23 Feb 2017
4
70th
The surprisingly intense story-within-a-story, and its analogous treatment of the relationship between the main character and her ex, gives way to a fairly potent (albeit arch) examination of the power of metafictional narratives and the ability of fiction in general to express and transform emotion and experience.
Rated 23 Feb 2017
Rated 11 Jan 2017
98
95th
A cinematic gut-punch in the best possible way; Ford expertly weaves three separate narratives into a poetic, haunting tale of acrimony and bitterness, while simultaneously telling a riveting and terrifying thriller on its own terms (the opening is as uncomfortable, suspenseful and horrifying as any set piece in recent memory). Superlative performances all round; Gyllenhaal and Shannon in particular have rarely been better. An uncomfortable watch, but one that lingers and grows in the memory.
Rated 11 Jan 2017
Rated 11 Jan 2017
8
78th
An engaging, well-told story of long-gestating revenge, not the kind of callous, violent retribution as apparent in the film's seamlessly integrated framing device, but one that is rooted in a more solemn, psychological sentiment. Performances are top notch across the board, notably Gyllenhaal who deftly navigates dual roles and Taylor-Johnson - words I never thought I'd see in the same sentence - as a depraved and vile maniac. Along with A Single Man, that makes it two for two for Ford so far.
Rated 11 Jan 2017
Rated 20 Mar 2017
2
31st
I'd really wanted to dig this completely and it does offer some excellent scenes and acting, especially from Taylor-Johnson and Shannon. However, the dual layer narration only had a few connections, but leads to frustratingly nowhere. It's nothing but an empty, dark little exercise in despair, thinking itself more clever than it actually is. *Okay
Rated 20 Mar 2017
Rated 14 Sep 2018
40
26th
A relationship is ended by a woman whose superficial, bourgeois tendencies too closely resemble those of her superficial, bourgeois mother. The man, accused of weakness, writes a novel about a man who learns to be strong (that is, to kill): through doing so he exacts vengeance on his ex. Perhaps this film is intended as a comment on our taste for revenge, but it does tend to come across as justifying it, especially when those who reject us are shallow women who fail to perceive our true virtues.
Rated 14 Sep 2018
Rated 24 Nov 2016
90
94th
A gorgeously shot thriller with a legitimately innovative structure. It is essentially a revenge film embedded inside of another revenge film- one psychological and one physical. This shifting perspective lends itself to some lucid, almost Lynchian, moments. Ford wasn't afraid to veer into deep waters with this, and what a treat it was. For me, the best overall film of 2016 and one that I will revisit often as a great marriage of style and substance.
Rated 24 Nov 2016
Rated 19 Feb 2017
88
96th
I had the rare pleasure of knowing literally nothing about this movie going in, so the way it developed was even more rewarding. The screenplay and editing for this are out of this world. As each of the three-ish narratives moves forward, they inform and contextualize the other two narratives in an extremely well-balanced way. It's one of the smartest films in recent memory and it deserves a second viewing.
Rated 19 Feb 2017
Rated 14 Feb 2017
48
21st
A good example of a weak script in the hands of professional actors. You get a step up in the portrayals on show & they really are trying to make it work, in fact the directing is trying to make it work too, but the script is just too vapid. Worse, when it tries for real immersion, it becomes superfluous & melodramatic. On the plus side, the plot within a plot device was a unique way to offer an untethered insight into Gyllenhaal's char's impressionist reaction to events unfolded.
Rated 14 Feb 2017
Rated 12 Mar 2017
75
92nd
One of the best of the year that I have seen. Its beautifully shot and hauntingly acted. As wonderful a fuck you story that's ever been filmed. It's mean and sad and smart.
Rated 12 Mar 2017
Rated 06 Dec 2016
10
5th
I hope at least one person enjoyed this film so Michael Shannon's performance wasn't a complete waste.
Rated 06 Dec 2016
Rated 19 Nov 2016
66
22nd
This is a joke. This is a goddamn parody.
Rated 19 Nov 2016
Rated 22 Nov 2016
70
49th
The only things saving this film from total anonymity are the opening act of the "story within a story" and Michael Sheen's snarling detective. Otherwise a pretty forgettable affair. A film in which there are good performances, but not actually a good film on anything past the surface level.
Rated 22 Nov 2016
Rated 10 Aug 2020
79
62nd
Ambitious effort that didn't fully work for me, but still enjoyed overall, especially when Jake Gyllenhaal and Michael Shannon's characters were on screen. SPOILERS --> I appreciated the ending and effort to have a deeper meaning connecting the story within the story to the story, but ultimately I was just annoyed when Amy Adams was on screen and wanted the novel to come back. Also, I don't normally deduct points for things but the opening credits made me want to make an exception... horrible.
Rated 10 Aug 2020
Rated 31 Oct 2016
87
87th
Framing narratives can often feel lite and unnecessary, but the story-within-a-film story here is (despite its fiction status) intense as fuck and utterly engrossing -- the narrative outside of it works brilliantly against it as it quietly examines cathartic creativity and how it may affect those it alludes to, delicately teasing out the character relations and doing so in an appropriate order. All the acting was superb, intelligently directed and shot, and parts of this are really unforgettable
Rated 31 Oct 2016
Rated 16 Dec 2016
20
12th
Tom Ford should stick to making pants.
Rated 16 Dec 2016
Rated 24 Dec 2016
50
28th
#whitepeopleproblems
Rated 24 Dec 2016
Rated 22 Jul 2018
10
97th
Jesus christ, the timing of me watching this is amazing. I hope my ex never sees this film.
Rated 22 Jul 2018
Rated 13 Feb 2017
52
55th
I was going to write it tries too hard to be deep, but I can't even say that. I think it's a pretty straightforward simple movie with a 'deepness' polish to it.
Rated 13 Feb 2017
Rated 06 Jan 2017
75
32nd
I liked it. It is beautiful to watch, and I think that both narratives would stand by themselves if told separately. Maybe the two narratives combined were not good enough. Regarding acting, both Amy Adams and Jake Gyllenhaal were under utilized. Michael Shannon, however, had a great performance. Good. Not great.
Rated 06 Jan 2017
Rated 25 Dec 2016
76
84th
Ford turns the classic two narrative structure in a thrilling tale about revenge and forgiveness. Beautifully manifested in the cinematography and overall style. I expected more from Adams though, who is easily outplayed by superbe performances from Shannon and Gyllenhaal. However, the ending sticks with you quite some time.
Rated 25 Dec 2016
Rated 24 Dec 2016
79
54th
Tom Ford could easily do a straightforward thriller if he'd want to. Here he goes instead for a dual narrative I'm not quite sure yet what to think about. Could certainly have done without some of the corny dialogue in the real world. Loved every moment of the story within the story though, especially Michael Shannon shines again.
Rated 24 Dec 2016
Rated 03 Nov 2017
81
74th
Tom Ford definitely has a strong visual style. The look of everything feels so meticulous. There are great performances here that deliver on a script that's slightly lacking. Aaron Taylor-Johnson really surprised me. His performance was so transformative and definitely scary at times. Michael Shannon also great as usual. Ultimately, I think the message of this film is muddled. If the film tried a little less hard to be ambiguous, I think some of its more nuanced moments would have hit harder.
Rated 03 Nov 2017
Rated 09 Nov 2016
72
40th
I found Amy Adams character to be most unlikeable and I was unable to feel invested in her character. However the film makes a well observed commentary on the head vs heart choices we make in relation to creativity and relationships with creatives. Furthermore Gyllenhaal and Shannon put in great performances in a gripping fictional story set within the main film, which proves to be a great allegorical tale that provides juxtoposition with the"real life" story both in style and content.
Rated 09 Nov 2016
Rated 03 Oct 2017
3
45th
Everything about this concept, from its parallel narrative threads to its sharp couture visuals, is so high in the stratosphere that it risks sterility and pretentiousness, but after all it lands with a bit of grace. With his first two films, Tom Ford has demonstrated a sleek and intellectual method, a perspective at least unique from many of his contemporaries.
Rated 03 Oct 2017
Rated 11 Feb 2017
65
44th
Ford can definitely direct, the writing wasn't to my liking though
Rated 11 Feb 2017
Rated 26 Nov 2016
90
74th
As my friend said, "a great marriage of style and substance", and there is no better way to encapsulate Nocturnal Animals, the beauty of the film is found in it's ability to allow for interpretation as many parallels can be drawn to Mulholland Drive, a true psychological thriller.
Rated 26 Nov 2016
Rated 05 Jun 2017
75
69th
I found the creepy revenge movie within the movie a bit disturbing and manipulative, almost exploitative. I did not get out of this movie what the descriptions says - that the woman in any way felt threatened or personally disturbed by the book or the fact that it was dedicated to her. In the end, the real "revenge" seems to boil down to standing up his ex for dinner? Is that supposed to be a joke?
Rated 05 Jun 2017
Rated 03 Apr 2017
56
27th
There is an incredibly tense sequence near the beginning which set a high standard the rest of the film failed to match, despite the best efforts of Michael Shannon. The story within a story framework holds the attention for the most part, but is let down by a very weak ending where I'm supposed to believe that standing someone up for dinner equates to effective 'revenge'.
Rated 03 Apr 2017
Rated 27 Jun 2018
78
64th
Weird and beautiful, with great performances and assured direction. For some reason, I don't want Tom Ford to be good at filmmaking... but I have to admit he is.
Rated 27 Jun 2018
Rated 07 Apr 2017
77
62nd
A thriller about reading a hella good book.
Rated 07 Apr 2017
Rated 31 Jan 2017
55
29th
The novel within the film is much better than the film itself, featuring as it does a couple of tense scenes, but like the film proper it doesn't really say anything or go anywhere. Gyllenhaal and Shannon are interesting, but almost everything else here is pretty bad. It's all very stagey and contrived and the dialogue feels forced, leading to some awkward performances and giving the film an artificial feeling.
Rated 31 Jan 2017
Rated 08 Jul 2021
86
82nd
Powerful in its premise and its pacing. Even though the story within the story is a work of fiction, it's extremely upsetting in all the right ways, and makes you constantly wonder what Susan could have done to make her ex husband write it? When you finally understand both stories, it resonates with you and adds a lot more skepticism about the ending. My theory, SPOILERS, I believe he killed himself and that's why he didn't join her at dinner.
Rated 08 Jul 2021
Rated 20 Sep 2017
73
63rd
Mostly very good, and engaging, but thoroughly unpleasant to watch.
Rated 20 Sep 2017
Rated 08 Apr 2018
47
33rd
Making women dance and lay down naked is not any kind of art; not even nudism. Amy Adams was so disappointing with her "insomniac" performance. Unconvincing characters, bad casting, cliche climax which climax itself was a joke. To be honest; I'm not sure why this movie got good credits. If you think I don't get the "thing", please feel free to explain it to me.
Rated 08 Apr 2018
Rated 10 Dec 2016
72
53rd
A bit of a letdown for me, but Nocturnal Animals is a decent film. The story within a story narrative works well enough for the most part. Adams and Gyllenhaal are ok, but it's Michael Shannon that steals the spotlight. I found the ending a bit anticlimactic but I am glad it didn't go somewhere super odd. I preferred Ford's debut, but this film doesn't make me think much less of him as a director.
Rated 10 Dec 2016
Rated 01 Oct 2017
87
80th
A gorgeously mounted, smartly written, superbly acted (especially by Michael Shannon) piece of multi-layered storytelling, as a real-life crumbling marriage and a fictitious, tragic quest for revenge intertwine. Not for all tastes - how you feel about the audacious opening credits will probably determine how you feel about the whole thing - but for connoisseurs, a fascinating and rewarding experience; the highway-abduction scene is truly wrenching. Gorgeous score by Abel Korzeniowski.
Rated 01 Oct 2017
Rated 23 Dec 2016
75
54th
The story within a story was the best part, easily, giving us an emotional revenge tale where Shannon and Gyllenhaal give great performances. The problem is that the real world parts with Adams are... okay. Adams does what she can to try to save the material but it is just a lot of her dropping books and moping. You never really get into her. But regardless, it's also we beautifully shot film with a subtly crushing ending, despite the lack of interest in Adams' character. Still a success.
Rated 23 Dec 2016
Rated 13 Dec 2016
92
94th
The nasty desert Texas and the cold blue of New York merge into a green dress that Amy Adams wears with grace ... Ladies and gentleman, a Tom Ford movie! Enjoy!
Rated 13 Dec 2016
Rated 21 Dec 2016
70
69th
Best movie I've seen since the last Amy Adams movie I saw
Rated 21 Dec 2016
Rated 14 Apr 2017
90
88th
A hauntingly beautiful movie about a woman who traded a spouse with a creative spirit for a cold, Bourgeois hunk. The first husband reappears and makes her realize through story just how awful she had been towards him, and how big of a mistake she had made.
Rated 14 Apr 2017
Rated 29 Apr 2017
8
87th
The story within the story is some of the rawest shit, damn. The way it's presented and acted makes it seem disturbingly way too real. The way the movie leaves you guessing why that story is being told is well done. I wasn't satisfied by the ending at first, but a while later it clicked and I now enjoy it way more in retrospect. Might even be worth a rewatch now that I figured out the real story arc of the movie.
Rated 29 Apr 2017
Rated 09 Nov 2016
90
91st
A glossy, clever, nerve-wracking, emotionally charged metaphysical gut-punch. Aaron Taylor-Johnson has never been more terrifying. Also that guy from Love seems to be redeeming himself the more I see him
Rated 09 Nov 2016
Rated 29 Dec 2016
35
20th
Just read the names to his endless line of perfumes to feel what kind of luxury trash this is.
Rated 29 Dec 2016
Rated 15 Jan 2017
40
28th
It has a very weak base story and interweaving it with two others doesn't make it very special. It is somewhat saved by excellent performances of the cast, but all in all it didn't work for me.
Rated 15 Jan 2017
Rated 02 Feb 2017
25
1st
Rich White People Being Sad: The Movie
Rated 02 Feb 2017
Rated 30 Mar 2017
70
64th
I did enjoy its dual narrative goodness.
Rated 30 Mar 2017
Rated 22 Mar 2017
80
76th
toughest break-up therapy ever.
Rated 22 Mar 2017
Rated 15 Jan 2017
4
51st
An impressive outer shell. Great visuals, great narrative structure. Everything in between is, to parrot this film's favourite word, weak. The story-within-a-story starts strong and ends on an unfortunately predictable note whereas the main thread is unfocused and undercooked. The connective tissue between these two plots is interesting, and with an especially clever dual parting shot, but can't rescue the overall lack of emotional depth.
Rated 15 Jan 2017
Rated 06 Dec 2016
3
92nd
Simply one of the best films of 2016, it is that simple. Ford has crafted an intricate film with multiple layers that leaves you wondering what actually happened when the credits roll. Satisfying, in a way that it is not too ambiguous. Just right, quite impressive for a fashion designer his second attempt. All actors perform admirably, direction is spot on and the story remains interesting til' the very end. Ford's style goes hand in hand with the script its substance. Special, these days.
Rated 06 Dec 2016
Rated 02 Aug 2018
85
74th
Can't explain why this is such a creepy but satisfying revenge tale surrounded with substance and style. Always an easy re-watch for me.
Rated 02 Aug 2018
Rated 07 Mar 2017
40
26th
A film-within-a-film that plays out like The Neverending Story. If I hadn't known this was an adaptation I would have presumed the debutant guff had been tacked on to fill out a humdrum thriller and give Amy Adams more screen time. The kidknap/revenge story is decent enough - well directed, acted, and adds some tension - but the rest is criminally dull drivel. Shannon is the standout (again), Gyllenhaal decent, and Adams does her thing - whatever you think of that.
Rated 07 Mar 2017
Rated 25 Mar 2018
83
84th
NOCTURNAL ANIMALS is a mesmerizing potboiler about a woman reading a book manuscript. Think about that for a minute. Tom Ford's remarkable command of cinematic language elevates a gimmicky concept into an addictive thriller that explores how people get under your skin, and resurface in the most unexpected ways. Ford pulls no punches, examining the consequences of physical and emotional brutality. Not for the faint of heart, but not without a clear humanity of its own.
Rated 25 Mar 2018
Rated 29 Dec 2016
80
88th
Something about the pure simplicity of this movie really got to me. Obviously you're in for some great acting with these superstars, but the storytelling is superb in this movie. You are basically watching 3 different stories at a time. 1 horrific one (main and ficticious), 1 past (shortest) and 1 current which both others have an impact on (which ends up with the conclusion too). The ending sent shivers down my spine and I needed to find out what it meant.. LOVED it.
Rated 29 Dec 2016
Rated 09 Feb 2017
65
73rd
Good film.
Rated 09 Feb 2017
Rated 21 Mar 2017
70
77th
Tech Scores: Directing 8 Screenplay 8 Cinematography 7 Editing 8 Acting 8 Sound Design & Music Score 7 Other Techs ... 7 Overall Scores: Whole Movie 8 Myself 8 WoW 1(Michael Shannon!!!)
Rated 21 Mar 2017
Rated 04 Mar 2018
75
75th
Not an easy watch, a slow-burner but narratively, cinematograpically and actingwise a very well made movie!..
Rated 04 Mar 2018
Rated 06 Nov 2016
89
91st
A gorgeous, smart, and utterly intense picture. One of the best casts of 2016, and very possibly the best cinematography. While I understand the complaints that it's too detached, I absolutely cannot agree - I felt so much for every character and was emotionally drained by the end.
Rated 06 Nov 2016
Rated 31 Jul 2017
85
85th
great movie best thing i watched this year.
Rated 31 Jul 2017
Rated 15 Apr 2023
79
64th
Enemy 2: Lady Doppelganger ft. Michael Shannon instead of a spider.
Rated 15 Apr 2023
Rated 24 Feb 2017
55
74th
#17#, exp3, rw3, story, ratings, cast
Rated 24 Feb 2017
Rated 18 Apr 2021
74
56th
kind of forgettable, unfortunately. The Edge (1997) had a similar theme but did it much better
Rated 18 Apr 2021
Rated 13 Mar 2021
65
32nd
Funny
Rated 13 Mar 2021
Rated 26 Dec 2016
90
93rd
Hubdrifting+exstory+partyassespullfamover+getoutcar-sotense+takedaughter+wife+hearhubaffair+guyditchhim+backhides+withcopsfindgirlsdead+exgreatdinnertalk+calledher+booknocturnalanimals+shelefthimcuzdidnthavefaith-fornewbusinessdick+gotsidekick+getmainguy+yellpunchhim+DAletgo+coplikwhowbadyouwantjustice+getlead+side+couldntshoot-copkillsside+ISHOULDASTOPPEDIT+findshim+accusedsodid+shootstwice-stillhitlol+bothdie-bs+endstandsherupindatesheasksforlol
Rated 26 Dec 2016
Rated 06 Jan 2017
80
70th
Concerned in the early-going as the acting feels stilted. Not melodramatic, just... stilted. When the novel begins the movie really picks up and becomes interesting. Really, Gyllenhaal is the main attraction and it's his characters, real- and novel-world, that carry the intrigue (along with Michael Shannon). In a sense this is the most crushing aspect of the film, as Gyllenhaal's real-world character can be seen as wholly unsympathetic after the events of what is a pretty great ending. See this!
Rated 06 Jan 2017
Rated 04 Jan 2017
80
74th
It's another style-over-substance film from Ford, but it does have plenty of both. To look at, much of the film is just sumptuous. As rich as a triple dark chocolate gold-leafed gateau. The story-in-story effect and transcendence of characters and themes is also striking. Ultimately I'm not sure how much depth these two stories have, but the effect sure is memorable. To top it off, fantastic performances from Shannon, Gyllenhaal and Adams round out the sense of a "luxury cinema" aesthetic.
Rated 04 Jan 2017
Rated 26 Nov 2022
73
66th
This had been on my watchlist for years and I finally got to it this evening. On one hand it creates visceral reactions to some of the scenes, and on the other I found my attention drifting from time to time during some of the slower scenes. Very beautifully shot and well acted. It's well worth a viewing, but somewhat over the top with some of the metaphors. 7.3 for me.
Rated 26 Nov 2022
Rated 20 Nov 2016
60
28th
Has everything going for it but a dark, pointless storyline
Rated 20 Nov 2016
Rated 25 Dec 2016
35
19th
Bad, but has some good acting by people other than Gyllenhaal.
Rated 25 Dec 2016
Rated 31 Mar 2018
35
15th
I kept thinking that 'nocturnal animals' in 'nocturnal animals' would make a terribly boring book
Rated 31 Mar 2018
Rated 11 Jan 2017
67
57th
It is a brilliantly creepy movie. It also has one very effective jump scare out of nowhere.
Rated 11 Jan 2017
Rated 25 Dec 2016
62
61st
I was worried this would be an exercise in form and style with no substance but it was good, not sure what happened exactly but it's good, not a masterpiece
Rated 25 Dec 2016
Rated 07 May 2020
51
70th
what did it suppose to mean, I didn't understand. At least it is always good to watch Amy Adams.
Rated 07 May 2020
Rated 07 Feb 2017
55
29th
scorsese "imajlar artık bir şey ifade etmiyor" derken ne dediğini anladığımı sanmıştım, ta ki bunu izleyene kadar. hikaye de tarz da işliyor belli bir noktaya kadar, ama filmi seksileştirmek için elinden geleni yaparken ford sinema ve anlam adına çok şeyi kaçırıyor. her şeyin *reklam kusursuzluğunda* çekilmesi gerekmiyor. yani modacı olmanın iyi yanı: adams'ı daha da güzel gösterebilmek. kötü yanı: adams'tan kötü performans alabilmek.
Rated 07 Feb 2017
Rated 15 Dec 2016
77
62nd
Second view: Criminally underrated.
Rated 15 Dec 2016
Rated 08 Mar 2017
90
96th
Didnt like end thats all. Wonderfull movie...
Rated 08 Mar 2017
Rated 18 Mar 2017
84
81st
A thoroughly gripping, intense, thought provoking drama that is just superbly well acted, filmed, scored and scripted, which I will watch again soon to learn more of it's message. Amy Adams is simply amazing. The idea of a "story about death" being used as an "explanation" (even revenge?) for someone's damaged future is cleverly done, but in truth doesn't really ring true: Surely such a harrowing tale would affect anyone? How did Tony know that Susan would be suspectible to this after so long?
Rated 18 Mar 2017
Rated 17 Jan 2024
75
60th
Opinión personal: 7.5 Actores: 6.5 Guión: 8 Fotografía: 7.5 BSO: 8 Otros:8 Iluminación: FX: Director:8 Humor: Vestuario/caracterización: Ritmo:8 Total: 75
Rated 17 Jan 2024
Rated 29 Jan 2023
84
80th
2023'de #IzlediğimFilmler ; 16. Nocturnal Animals (2016) Kızımla birlikte izledik, oyunculuklar ve metaforik anlatım mükemmel. 8/10
Rated 29 Jan 2023
Cast & Info
Directed by:
Tom FordCollections
Loading ...
Similar Titles
Loading ...
Statistics
Loading ...
Trailer
Loading ...
PSI
?