Watch
Love
Your probable score
?
Love
2015
Drama
2h 15m
Murphy, an American studying in Paris, is living with Omi, with whom he has a child. At the beginning of the new year, he receives a phone call from the mother of his ex-girlfriend, Electra, which sends him on a course of reminiscence about his previous relationship.
Directed by:
Gaspar NoéScreenwriter:
Gaspar NoéLove
2015
Drama
2h 15m
Your probable score
Avg Percentile 40.16% from 1106 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews
(1117)
Compact view
Compact view
Show
Sort
Rated 10 Jul 2016
40
11th
Like most of Noe's work, it's interesting to look at, but you cannot escape the unlikable mumbling lead, which completely kills any messages that may be gained. The acting from everyone is pretty shoddy in fact, so if you want to see some high quality jizz shots, say yes. Otherwise just say Noe.
Rated 10 Jul 2016
Rated 20 May 2017
40
33rd
Other than the uniquely intruiging aspect of watching this film, namely trying to grasp what part of his life djross sees reflected in a plot rife with harddrugs, threesomes, and everything in between (I'm geussing it's his love for academic philosophy and the grave dangers inherent to it), there's not much to like. Expressionism? Sure, but its disjointedness and superficiality, insofar intended - it often isn't - feeds convolution, lowers patience and, in turn, at times, is gratingly annoying.
Rated 20 May 2017
Rated 02 Dec 2015
70
96th
Love (2015) is like a Fifty Shades of Grey (2015) for men. Got the same banal dialogue filled with the most basic neanderthal reactions, loaded with the standard male fantasies crapped on by the shortsighted hypocrisy of jealousy. Yet it delivers a nearly poetic and compelling drama about love, lust and passion. The graphic hardcore element feels right at home with the sensuality and frustrations of the story for anyone raised in the internet porn era. Love (2015) is sex in wonderful style!
Rated 02 Dec 2015
Rated 10 Nov 2015
80
75th
"...an experiment that works amazingly, and is above all, a rewriting of the possibilities of sex within cinema."
Rated 10 Nov 2015
Rated 23 Dec 2015
3
26th
Pretty bland to sit through. Painful dialogue which isn't saved by Noe's usual boundary pushing style because, well, its not all that interesting.
Rated 23 Dec 2015
Rated 21 Dec 2015
50
38th
Substitutes the violence for sex, but otherwise typical Noé. It's very stylish, visually pleasing and unflinching with its hardcore pornography between young beautiful people. The narrative and dialogue are bland, but not unlike Von Trier, Noé is now mainly concerned with testing the limits of how much he can cum on his film and still be considered a high artist. I found nothing to hate about this, but could have gotten more from viewing a better piece of porn and a better art film separately.
Rated 21 Dec 2015
Rated 30 Nov 2015
67
31st
Like the entirely of Noé's oeuvre, it's visually striking in a way that few films are. His movies have way of permanently stamping themselves into my psyche, and Love is no exception. But unlike the rest of Noé's work, this one didn't strike me on an emotional level. I didn't care about what the main character felt or said. All I saw was a selfish, lustful, simple-minded dolt who built a terrible situation for himself and then cried about it. The sub-par dialogue didn't help matters.
Rated 30 Nov 2015
Rated 05 Aug 2015
7
58th
Noé's latest shocker runs deeper than what the litany of daringly intimate love scenes might suggest, effectively conveying how loss and grief often become intrinsically intertwined, at a time when everything you love and knew begins to slip away, receding into the past like a fading memory. Granted, some of the dialogue borders on the inane and the acting is hit-or-miss at best, yet, all things considered, Love ultimately emerges as a unique vision from a bold and exciting filmmaker.
Rated 05 Aug 2015
Rated 24 Apr 2018
81
80th
Eat your heart out Nymphomaniac.
Rated 24 Apr 2018
Rated 18 Mar 2018
90
96th
The idea of combining sex and love is spectacular. The color scheme is diverse and mesmerizing like most of Noe's films. The non-liniar plot is a good touch. In general, this is a film I could not stop watching and had to revisit several scenes.
Rated 18 Mar 2018
Rated 28 Feb 2017
43
37th
None of the technical skill in Noe's other films is present, the acting is terrible, and the script is toe-curlingly cringeworthy. This score is for all intents and purposes rating a CGI enhanced load of sperm aimed at the screen, complete with plopping sound effects.
Rated 28 Feb 2017
Rated 12 Feb 2016
45
17th
I keep watching Gaspar Noe films because the guy has technical chops but I feel like Sideshow Bob in a field of rakes.
Rated 12 Feb 2016
Rated 10 Feb 2016
82
93rd
"Le temps détruit tout" becomes Murphy's law. LOVE is a movie about sex as the pursuit of passion and where that can lead, and it seemed to relate to aspects of my life in a way that I think perhaps I have never seen represented cinematically ever before. But unfortunately I can't tell you about that here. Some scenes produced a beautiful and complex feeling. Walked out of a 3D screening due to terrible lighting and poor sound, and very glad I ended up watching it in 2D.
Rated 10 Feb 2016
Rated 13 Dec 2015
50
67th
Indeed, with luck they will be united afterwards. They will have their own child. They will enjoy a long, happy life together. They will love music, alongside cinema and painting. Satie will be coupled with Schubert. At the end, the girl will have a stroke. The girl will suffer from unbearable pain, chained to bed. Sperms will be replaced with tears. She will not even be capable of suicide. The boy, her true lover, will put an end to her pain himself. Then one day it will all be over.
Rated 13 Dec 2015
Rated 23 Nov 2015
50
38th
Such a disappointment after a unique experience which was Enter the Void. While the narrative was somewhat lacking (just a bit), I think the biggest let-down was the acting performance outside the bedroom, which was of porn-caliber, at best. Ironic, right. If I viewed it as a generic festival flick, I could easily recommend it, however it's Gaspar, and I want more, much much more.
Rated 23 Nov 2015
Rated 19 Nov 2015
35
6th
Usually I'm that guy who embraces challenging films because we should praise really creative people that show no fear. Noe is likethat, but Love is a slog. Terrible acting most of the time with a few moments of redemption, and bad writing. I think Murphy reminds me a lot of Edward Cullen. Sex bored me. It was too much and there was nothing really behind it because the characters weren't interesting. Also, a couple good musical choices but also strange a lot of the time.
Rated 19 Nov 2015
Rated 17 Nov 2015
18
0th
Despite being a huge Noe fanboy, I wasn't looking forward to this and I was still sorely disappointed. There's so much to hate about this film: the laughably atrocious dialogue, the horrendous acting, the lazy directing (master shots everywhere), Noe's own projection on one of the most hateable, irresponsible, awfully selfish main characters any film has ever seen, and the sex scenes that were literally toe-curlingly embarrassing. I wished everyone in this shit-fuck of a film died of AIDS.
Rated 17 Nov 2015
Rated 13 Nov 2015
83
82nd
Imperfect, but excellent in spite of any faults. The use of 3D is brilliant - the texture and life of sex comes through in a manner that I've never seen another film capture. Sometimes erotic, sometimes repulsive, a sharp look at fragile male ego and ingrained chauvinism that leads to pathetic destruction.
Rated 13 Nov 2015
Rated 20 Nov 2024
90
84th
The beginning was very good :)3D effects, red lens that draws viewers into the characters' emotional experiences.
Rated 20 Nov 2024
Rated 11 May 2019
23
1st
Omi'nin, kürtaj karşıtı bir genç hanım olduğu gözüme sokulduktan sonra, hamile kalmak ve doğurmak suretiyle koynunda bulduğu yılanın adının Gâspar olmamasından hoşlanmadım. Murphy seni sevmedim. Elektra'nın annesi denetimsiz bir şekilde kızının arkadaşlarını neden arıyor? Elektra, annesinin yanında neden o kadar uysal? Tin ancak kendini doğuran koşulların yüzüne dimdik baktığında bir güç haline gelir, bunu bilmiyor mu bu bayan?
Rated 11 May 2019
Rated 11 Feb 2019
50
36th
this is literally just gaspar noé bragging about all the sex he had in his 20s (or what he imagines it was like). also do you ever see yourself in the main character and just feel like a piece of shit but without all the hot threesomes and orgies with skinny french girls?
Rated 11 Feb 2019
Rated 27 Nov 2018
40
18th
Noe's main character- murphy is an all-around knuckle-dragging idiot,flat, annoying, resentful, jealous. While stuck in a rut, murphy remembers all the sex that he has had in a past relationship. The movie falls flat in the emotions department. All main characters are jealous idiots and the sex scenes look like a rotating butchershop window. If Noe's intention was to make sex seem uninteresting, the film is a success. Benoit Debie's cinematography is great as always, Noe's self-indungence sucks.
Rated 27 Nov 2018
Rated 08 Sep 2018
65
36th
Noe's most pedestrian film. All its really about is a sexual relationship between two shallow, reckless, young adults. Its honest but unexceptional -- save for a few memorable moments that sync well with a maximalist soundtrack.
Rated 08 Sep 2018
Rated 19 Aug 2018
29
30th
Pointless movie really, with way too many boring sex scenes that doesn't add much to the already bland story. Starts off with literally a dick in your face, which makes you uncomfortable right from the start. The acting is very mediocre too which made watching this even worse. Even watching this on a faster speed and fast forwarding through the sex scenes was still a very tedious and unsatisfying experience.
Rated 19 Aug 2018
Rated 01 Jun 2016
45
30th
How many times is Gaspar Noe going to mention his own name in the film? With such selfish, egotistical and broken characters who are on a downward spiral by their own choices and lack of emotional intelligence, it is very difficult to feel anything about them in the film. One good sequence with Pink Floyd. One good sex scene. That's about it - bland and emotionless. And the ending goes on forever. No thanks.
Rated 01 Jun 2016
Rated 23 Apr 2016
3
3rd
Excruciating. Have the nay-sayers been right all along? Doubtful. imo, Noé has managed three bold & extraordinary movies in spite of himself: I've always been surprised at how, frankly, dim he seems in interviews, but his art takes on its own life. So, perhaps he was more than due for an utter flop [dick joke], and "Love"-- squandering of Benoît Debie's talents, excessively self-referential; risible ['nother], Wiseau-esque dialogue; and, -very- tellingly, gross, pornified "sex"-- is just that.
Rated 23 Apr 2016
Rated 31 Mar 2016
55
23rd
A guy mumbles his thoughts as he remembers all the sex he used to have. Okay? All the emotions fall flat, partly because of poor acting, partly because there's no coherent push by the film to do anything with all this angst on display. Noe's not the deepest of directors, but his previous films had both focus and amazing visual gimmicks, and this suffers without either of those. Or maybe he just wanted to make sex as boring as possible, in which case this is a resounding success.
Rated 31 Mar 2016
Rated 08 Feb 2016
25
17th
Visually fantastic, but everything else is a complete mess at best and probably just garbage. I've seen more believable dialog in actual porn. I'm not even sure comparing this script to Fifty Shades of Grey is fair - to Fifty Shades. The lighting and composition is outstanding and there are some great moments, but my god should they have cut almost everything right out of this. Has possibly the worst case(s) of self-insertion ever put on film, or for that matter in any manuscript.
Rated 08 Feb 2016
Rated 04 Feb 2016
35
25th
Some interesting scenes, and the lighting often perfect. The dialog drags badly though and the acting is not always the greatest. Wish it was 40 minutes shorter, I was really losing interest by the end.
Rated 04 Feb 2016
Rated 09 Jan 2016
30
8th
fena sicmis yonetmen film cekmemis icip efkarlanip ani anlatmis pehh
Rated 09 Jan 2016
Rated 11 Dec 2015
65
42nd
gaspar noe askin her halini kendi tarzinda isliyor. ask icin yeni bir sozu yok, belki olamazdi da ama onun bunu isleyisinde daha yaratici fikirler beklerdim. gunumuzun iliski tarzini aciklamayi abartirken hikayedeki vuruculuktan uzaaklasmis gibi
Rated 11 Dec 2015
Rated 24 Nov 2015
30
12th
Pretty fucking bad. Or pretty bad fucking. Either way this was a chore to sit through. Noe seems to think he's 'pushing the envelope' with this film, which couldn't be farther from the truth. The sex is mundane, the acting is bad (not wholly surprising as the script is awful) and it's mired in cliche. After the firecrackers that were his first 3 films this is a hugely disappointing limp wrist of a movie.
Rated 24 Nov 2015
Rated 18 Sep 2015
83
85th
A far cry from the frenetic chaos of 'I Stand Alone' and 'Irreversible,' and the consciousness-altering psychedelia of 'Enter the Void,' Noé's latest effort channels the grounded melancholy of Haneke in his most mature yet uninspired outing yet. Noé's treatment of the body mostly avoids sensationalism, while Debie's impressionistic imagery and an ambient, eclectic soundtrack overcome stiff (sorry) acting, poor dialogue, and Noé's own egocentricity. Interestingly, the violence is all emotional
Rated 18 Sep 2015
Rated 30 Aug 2015
88
85th
I was mind-blown by this film. The explicitness with which the sexual act is depicted is unbealievable. The 3D is not necessary for most of the film, but it gives you the fealling you are actually in there, in the room with the main heroes.
For many, this will be simply a porn. There is explicit sexual act with sperm ejacualtion. But in a certain way, it is very different to porn, and for me, it was about the physical part of love, the part not shown in any other film I have seen.
Rated 30 Aug 2015
Rated 01 May 2024
0
1st
Un grand gadget inutile pour dépravés qui ne s'assument pas.
Rated 01 May 2024
Rated 10 Feb 2023
60
20th
Looks really nice, great lighting and framing, and the soundtrack is expertly chosen. I did start to vibe with it in the third act, but my patience had pretty much worn out by then. Bad actors playing boring characters saying stupid dialogue
Rated 10 Feb 2023
Rated 10 Jun 2021
70
21st
"YaNındaKiyLe yaşLaNır akLınDakiyLe öLüRsün." Konyalılar'ın favori filmi.
Rated 10 Jun 2021
Rated 26 May 2021
63
39th
I'm not sure what Noé was trying to achieve with Love, besides indulging in unsimulated sex scenes. Newcomers Kristin and Muyock were tolerable, unlike Glusman's Murphy. Throughout the film he remains an indulged, hot-headed, hypocritical moron with serious jealousy and anger-management issues. The plot itself is unimpressive, as the film plays through moments of obsession, profession and sex that quickly becomes banal, with more cuts than a Bourne action scene. The soundtrack is great though.
Rated 26 May 2021
Rated 29 Jan 2021
74
8th
weak but 74 is only for recollection of love of my life
Rated 29 Jan 2021
Rated 04 Jan 2021
95
63rd
Murphy, a young man of 25, wakes up surrounded by his young wife and 3-year-old child. He listens to his answering machine. In the message, Electra's mother worriedly asks him whether he has heard from her long-gone daughter. She fears she has had a serious accident. Over the course of a long, gray day, Murphy finds himself alone in his apartment, musing on his greatest two-year love story with Electra: a passionate infatuation involving all kinds of promises, games, and excesses...
Rated 04 Jan 2021
Rated 07 Aug 2020
88
94th
The most provocative, bravest and attractive form of love. Sometimes it's annoying, sometimes it's disturbing, and sometimes it's too sweet. A love story where regrets, resentments and shames combine with passion and obsession. Gaspar Noé achieves a great integrity and originality with Love, with the color harmony, shooting techniques and storytelling style.
Rated 07 Aug 2020
Rated 07 Apr 2020
90
85th
w/ Gaye
Rated 07 Apr 2020
Rated 30 Dec 2019
70
62nd
I like a lot of what Noé does: the visuals, the music, some of the editing (the jump cuts got obnoxious really fast). But why do his characters (not just in this movie) have to speak like the entitled first-time backpackers that you would run into in overrun Thai tourist destinations if you didn't know better than to go there? As usual, bonus points for showing sex when people were having sex.
Rated 30 Dec 2019
Rated 09 Sep 2019
55
31st
murphy/gaspar noé: "i want to depict sex in a very fresh way like this!" ...and next very normative sex is shown
Rated 09 Sep 2019
Rated 01 Apr 2019
85
90th
This is the half of Blue Valentine that Cianfrance doesn't show.
Rated 01 Apr 2019
Rated 06 Jan 2019
60
18th
Too many cliches. Also Noe totally failed to reach his goal - to make erotic film showing real emotional sex. There are many pornographic films showing more love and emotion than this one, it's ridicilous.
Rated 06 Jan 2019
Rated 07 Dec 2018
84
72nd
5 extra points for the amazing sound track !
Rated 07 Dec 2018
Rated 18 Oct 2018
40
14th
Wish I could've found this as profound as others. Maybe I'm too dense. I missed the creative intellectual approach here. To me this was just a movie I had to watch with my blinds closed incase a neighbor walked by.
Rated 18 Oct 2018
Rated 03 Sep 2018
97
99th
The time I didn't spend yelling at the screen I spent crying. It sent me to some well-known destinations through unknown paths, and it felt very cathartic. The self-referencing is horrid though
Rated 03 Sep 2018
Rated 27 Dec 2017
27
19th
Gaspar Noe was pulling the boundaries again. Interesting idea but very bad acting, terrible script and unbelievably dragging scenes. Who was the third wheel in this story? Gaspar Noe himself maybe?
Rated 27 Dec 2017
Rated 04 Nov 2017
50
44th
Some sex scenes are stunning and so are the people in those scenes. But, given the substance and the depth of the dialogues (or lack thereof), I think this is what happens when you don't polish or let go of that "film idea" you had as a high schooler. I wish the superficiality and the dreadful acting here were intentional, but it doesn't seem so. Takes you about halfway into the movie to realize that it wasn't vigorously aiming for mediocrity.
Rated 04 Nov 2017
Rated 28 Nov 2016
75
17th
cool visuals and awesome soundtrack. sweet emotional sex scenes. lackluster dialogue and shit but its noe whaddyawant
Rated 28 Nov 2016
Rated 22 Oct 2016
73
32nd
This could have been truly excellent and game changing if the main characters were not so crappy.
Rated 22 Oct 2016
Rated 21 Sep 2016
10
0th
Gave up before the end. I get what he's trying to do, but you'd need likeable characters to pull it off and it's just tedium with sex thrown in
Rated 21 Sep 2016
Rated 30 Aug 2016
74
40th
Pretty meta, beautiful visuals and some nice music but it ends up dragging on in the last half and just losing its momentum.
Rated 30 Aug 2016
Rated 21 Aug 2016
41
11th
Not sure what the point of this was and the acting from the leads was frequently dreadful. Still, the cinematography shone through and the soundtrack had its moments but overall not for me.
Rated 21 Aug 2016
Rated 05 May 2016
50
34th
In 2016, I interpreted the film as insincere. But now I realize that I dont't understand anything about Noe's mind. he turns the Love into a manifesto, but he is cowardly to be ashamed of his own manifesto. If the goal is to make a bold movie, watch In the Realm of the Senses (1976). After that, I found Love completely pointless and cowardly.
Rated 05 May 2016
Rated 19 Apr 2016
69
27th
Nice dick, nice tits. And... well, no, that's it.
Rated 19 Apr 2016
Rated 12 Apr 2016
65
54th
Somewhat disappointing. I liked the general structure, at least at the beginning, and Noé's deliberate direction and composition were great. In terms of what the film was about, sometimes I thought it was a deeply personal film, and at other times I thought it was just self-indulgent, and at others, a brilliant piece on male psychology towards sex and love. In any case, it doesn't all quite come together and is a good 30 minutes too long.
Rated 12 Apr 2016
Rated 27 Mar 2016
70
45th
Stunning cinematography and music but Gaspar Noe's "Love" is purely masturbatory.
Rated 27 Mar 2016
Rated 25 Mar 2016
20
1st
ne aralardaki bayagi romantizm, ne de bach esligindeki seks sahneleri filan filmi kurtaramamis. bu filmin amaci ne diye dusunurken 'hayat ck zr yaae' gibi bi mesaj verildi en son. nymphomaniac'la karsilastiriliyodu mutemadiyen ama asla onun yanina yaklasamaz bile, nymphomaniac son derece dolu bi filmdi.. neyse, love'da bildigin sikilana kadar sinematografik porno izledik.
Rated 25 Mar 2016
Rated 07 Mar 2016
70
19th
Murphy (Karl Glusman) ist ein typischer humorloser junger Mann, wie wir ihn in einem Gaspar Noe Film erwarten. Murphy ist ausserdem ein lüsterner Mann, der während einer Szene erkennt: Er selbst sitzt in seinem Kopf fest... mehr auf cinegeek.de
Rated 07 Mar 2016
Rated 05 Mar 2016
76
57th
If I were less mature I might give this film a 69, but I think I liked it more than that. It isn't Noe's best, but it is an interesting depiction of human emotion. Shot well and a fun watch in 3D. Not the best nut I've ever had, but definitely a solid B grade ejaculation.
Rated 05 Mar 2016
Rated 15 Feb 2016
4
55th
noé's goal is to create a cinema that inhabits the kind of addictive, pure, ego-free experience adults usually only attain through love or drugs (he equates the two). that horror & ecstasy which arises from all-consuming desire/dependence--a close proximity to death/childhood. noé seems vapid & infantile himself and his texts increasingly reflect this, but that suits the tone he's going for IMO, and i remain mesmerised by these hallucinatory audiovisuals & the accompanying big dumb emotions.
Rated 15 Feb 2016
Rated 13 Feb 2016
20
17th
Rated 08 Feb 2016
86
89th
Devastating, haunting, visceral, beautiful.
Rated 08 Feb 2016
Rated 06 Feb 2016
60
39th
I am always a huge fan of Noe's formalism and hypnotic imagery but this time he seems to be the victim of popular trend of making "beautiful" movies with the help of digital aesthetics and passing over the content and force of the movie which were present somehow in all his previous movies. The question of love btw soul and body is a worthy one but the characters and dialogues are so shallow that at the end its just another vivid and shiny flaunting of images.
Rated 06 Feb 2016
Rated 31 Jan 2016
80
78th
"Let's call him...Gaspar!" YUCK. Still, Debie's cinematography shines.
Rated 31 Jan 2016
Rated 29 Jan 2016
90
73rd
Gaspar Noé is a good director and this movie is good but the love don't need to always fighting, shouting or throw to something each other.
Rated 29 Jan 2016
Rated 15 Jan 2016
68
72nd
of course no one would ever shoot a movie like that..
so good, so tense, so real, so sincere indeed.
Rated 15 Jan 2016
Rated 11 Jan 2016
39
11th
Good atmosphere, some nice moments, but all in all very disapointing.
Rated 11 Jan 2016
Rated 04 Jan 2016
40
19th
Cool poster. An interesting idea. Some great stuff here and there. But most of the time the often atrocious acting or Noé's pretensions (or both) kill the sexy mood. I find it baffling how a director brilliant enough to turn out a fully-fledged masterpiece ('Irréversible') is subsequently also capable of gargantuan ineptitude. But I still respect the guy. He aims for the stars (and, in one scene, the screen!), and the final product, though flawed, is IMO decidedly better than 'Nymphomaniac'.
Rated 04 Jan 2016
Cast & Info
Directed by:
Gaspar NoéScreenwriter:
Gaspar NoéCollections
Loading ...
Similar Titles
Loading ...
Statistics
Loading ...
Trailer
Loading ...
PSI
?