sign in
register
Watch
Apple TV Google Play Movies Fandango At Home
+4
Look Who's Talking Too
Look Who's Talking Too
+4
JustWatch
Your probable score
?
Look Who's Talking Too

Look Who's Talking Too

1990
Romance, Comedy
1h 21m
Small babies comment on the disagreements between a husband and wife. (imdb)

Directed by:

Amy Heckerling

Screenwriter:

Amy Heckerling

Starring:

Elias Koteas, Bruce Willis, Damon Wayans, John Travolta, Olympia Dukakis, Roseanne Barr, Kirstie Alley, Mel Brooks, Gilbert Gottfried, Twink Caplan, Paul Shaffer

Franchise:

Look Who's Talking

Genres:

Romance, Comedy, Family/Kids

AKA:

Look Who's Talking 2

Country:

USA

Language:

English
imdb IMDb
Update history
Suggest edit

Look Who's Talking Too

1990
Romance, Comedy
1h 21m
Your probable score
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer
Avg Percentile 16.64% from 2291 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

(2304)
Compact view
clear
Compact view
Show
Sort
okkervilOkkervil
Rated 31 Jul 2009
9
7th
I would have enjoyed this movie more if Travolta's chin had also been dubbed with a voice.
Rated 31 Jul 2009
bojanglesBojangles
Rated 24 Jan 2008
25
8th
God this title is so clever. So fucking clever. Do you get it? See, cuz it's like, usually on a sequel it'll be all like 'Such and Such II.' But you see what they've done here is use 'Too' the adverb in place of the number 2. It's really quite ingenious. The movie, not so much.
Rated 24 Jan 2008
hellboy76hellboy76
Rated 21 Sep 2010
11
3rd
I prefer to think of it as, "Look Who's Talking Also".
Rated 21 Sep 2010
boobjuiceBoobjuice
Rated 28 May 2008
9
4th
Okay everybody, you're in for a treat... two hours of back-sassing babies talking! Well, they're not really talking... they're just kind of looking at shit and smiling while grown adults inexplicably perform voice-overs for them. Anyway, just know that somebody got really fucking high and decided to make a movie.
Rated 28 May 2008
gtown1479gtown1479
Rated 05 Mar 2008
60
20th
This is tough to watch, and the second you hear Roseanne you know you are in trouble. And to quote the great Bonjanglesmn the movie title is "quite ingenious".
Rated 05 Mar 2008
eveeluneveelun
Rated 24 Nov 2007
35
5th
Really, what better way to spend an hour and a half than to listen to the shrill and obnoxious barking of Roseanne as the voice of an infant. Bravo, studio execs, bravo.
Rated 24 Nov 2007
lachapellelachapelle
Rated 14 Aug 2007
11
2nd
This is a bad sequel to a bad movie. Then, to make it even worse, they cast Roseanne. Roseanne! Sigh, the score is a gift because I used to like Kristie Alley.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
war_machineWar Machine
Rated 29 Feb 2020
70
54th
Bemypottyboysonglool+girlbabyscarilyfunnylol+imaginesbeingbigbro+trynaholdinbirthatworklol-demonvoice:P+imaginesmonsterslol+penisnopenislol+hedancesatbabygym+brochaserobber-fire+savedsis+thoughtyouhatedme-dosometimesetc-bondnice/makepact i felt like it was better than 1 lol but i gave that a 77. this is funnier but the story/romance is worse
Rated 29 Feb 2020
glumpy99glumpy_99
Rated 27 Sep 2018
24
2nd
What happened??! With no personnel changes from Part 1, this should have been at least passably enjoyable, but there's no bad idea unexplored here; manufactured conflict between Travolta and Alley is idiotic, the plottiest aspect is literally centred around "pee-pee", and less said about the "feuer und wasser" finale the better (though we get to see Travolta struggle with a fire extinguisher for no apparent reason). Sole bright spot is Roseanne's voice-over, which is admittedly well delivered.
Rated 27 Sep 2018
uksubsUKSubs
Rated 26 Nov 2016
4
2nd
When we asked where John Travolta went, it was movies like this that made his career go away. And Roseanne Barr as a talking baby...because the first movie made money, let's add a talking baby, who wasn't particularly foul mouthed. No one ever asked for that.
Rated 26 Nov 2016
survivorfansurvivorfan
Rated 03 Sep 2014
68
22nd
While not as funny as the first, and there is a lack of actual content, its still pretty funny.
Rated 03 Sep 2014
freqflyerfreqflyer
Rated 25 Aug 2013
0
3rd
Fuck off
Rated 25 Aug 2013
clark_novaClark Nova
Rated 25 Aug 2013
70
31st
Born Harder
Rated 25 Aug 2013
jnsonejijnsoneji
Rated 27 Jul 2013
90
59th
funnier than the first one. Kids' view of the surroundings is pretty amazingly shown.
Rated 27 Jul 2013
tamcamTamCam
Rated 04 Jul 2013
5
0th
It's a lazy Sunday afternoon in front of the TV and you just can't decide if you want to puke or kill yourself due to feeling just too embarrassed of what's happening on the screen...
Rated 04 Jul 2013
mervtaylorMerv_Taylor
Rated 16 Jun 2012
50
18th
Nostalgia
Rated 16 Jun 2012
glmglm
Rated 30 Apr 2012
42
8th
41.500
Rated 30 Apr 2012
krukru
Rated 16 Mar 2012
6
1st
The first was adorable, the second just pitiful.
Rated 16 Mar 2012
tsvetetsvete
Rated 12 Jan 2011
89
56th
2-3
Rated 12 Jan 2011
eric_janeric-jan
Rated 01 Dec 2010
45
1st
Loved it when I was a kid :). Ofcourse part 1 was better.. this is just overdoing it.
Rated 01 Dec 2010
mikesnydermike.snyder
Rated 22 Feb 2010
20
0th
Jesus.
Rated 22 Feb 2010
mangoluver4umangoluver4u
Rated 04 Jan 2010
0
5th
All i know is baby's talking is not funny. Maybe if they where saying profanities or something, but this movie would still suck.
Rated 04 Jan 2010
myszatekMyszatek
Rated 07 Sep 2009
40
11th
The idea was charming for the first one. The second had its moments. Is it really that bad or is it just too much of it on tv?
Rated 07 Sep 2009
anselmi86Anselmi86
Rated 27 Jul 2009
34
8th
Yeah, it's kind of funny, but still really bad. And why would I pay to have to listen to Roseanne's voice?
Rated 27 Jul 2009
pigletPiglet
Rated 22 Jul 2009
40
7th
Talking babies.....big whoop.....
Rated 22 Jul 2009
funkyastroFunkyAstro
Rated 15 Jul 2009
15
13th
i had this marked 51 for a long time. obvious typo. fixed now.
Rated 15 Jul 2009
bishopmlbishopml
Rated 13 Jul 2009
70
21st
Cool idea for a movie even though this a sequel. We have our comedic elements and it has its moments where you find yourself chuckling. It is really one of the first american films that tries to give parents an idea of what it going on in a childs head. Irregardless it is silly, and not a necessity for a collector. The kiddies will enjoy it and parents can relate, Roseanne and Bruce Willis do a great job with the voices. All in all don't need to rush out and rent this one.
Rated 13 Jul 2009
martrynmartryn
Rated 02 May 2009
17
2nd
Really, they should have stopped with the first one, which was ok, but not fantastic. We've seen the talking babies thing, now let's move on with John Travolta's career.
Rated 02 May 2009
sakuragirlsakuragirl
Rated 02 Apr 2009
40
12th
Ne olur devamini cekmeyin bazi filmlerin...
Rated 02 Apr 2009
achewoodACHEWOOD
Rated 14 Feb 2009
50
4th
screw these movies
Rated 14 Feb 2009
tathieltathiel
Rated 03 Feb 2009
40
5th
I liked it then, I like it when I see it on TV, but it's not a high-class-movie...
Rated 03 Feb 2009
fudgiebfudgieb
Rated 19 Jan 2009
50
14th
So irratating. One thing Roseanne Barr should NOT be is a voice actress.
Rated 19 Jan 2009
councillorCouncillor
Rated 21 Dec 2008
15
12th
Look who's desperate to make some money.
Rated 21 Dec 2008
cultofsamecult_of_same
Rated 18 Nov 2008
0
0th
The film would have been better if they let the babies speak for the adults.
Rated 18 Nov 2008
irvinejumpirvinejump
Rated 25 Sep 2008
10
6th
God I'd forgotten about this. Just shite, but still better than three
Rated 25 Sep 2008
edkrakedkrak
Rated 20 Aug 2008
15
4th
x0
Rated 20 Aug 2008
robinmayRobinMay
Rated 15 Aug 2008
50
38th
Little babies talking! And one talks like Bruce Willis and one talks like Roseanne, awww...
Rated 15 Aug 2008
cheeseclarkcheeseclark
Rated 03 Aug 2008
40
3rd
a sequel in the usual way
Rated 03 Aug 2008
therealj_roTheRealJ-Ro
Rated 31 Jul 2008
10
2nd
If ever there was a movie that deserved a sequel, it's this one! *GONG*
Rated 31 Jul 2008
vandelay1Vandelay1
Rated 14 Jun 2008
39
33rd
not so good
Rated 14 Jun 2008
luna6ixLuna6ix
Rated 02 Jun 2008
69
32nd
Talking infants really only appeal for about an hour and a half, and the first one already covered that.
Rated 02 Jun 2008
nickeyelyssenickeyelysse
Rated 09 May 2008
88
82nd
very sweet.
Rated 09 May 2008
pickpocketPickpocket
Rated 26 Mar 2008
1
12th
Oh goddammit come on now.
Rated 26 Mar 2008
gravymaximusGravyMaximus
Rated 22 Mar 2008
20
11th
I loved these movies as a child. What the hell was wrong with me?
Rated 22 Mar 2008
recklessmessrecklessmess
Rated 06 Mar 2008
15
9th
The first one gets a pass because it was unique. This is just buttering toast with shit.
Rated 06 Mar 2008
shmendrekShmendrek
Rated 24 Feb 2008
1
10th
Off-putting and gross.
Rated 24 Feb 2008
mjvmoviemanMJVmovieMan
Rated 20 Jan 2008
47
16th
Bad sequel.
Rated 20 Jan 2008
nandorizzinandorizzi
Rated 08 Oct 2007
25
15th
It is not all bad, when I was a child, was cool, but would not see again.
Rated 08 Oct 2007
dustydDustyd
Rated 17 Sep 2007
45
14th
not very good
Rated 17 Sep 2007
tripleshTripleSH
Rated 14 Aug 2007
5
2nd
When I saw this, I was 10 or 11...don't judge me.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
thedenizenTheDenizen
Rated 14 Aug 2007
5
1st
Complete garbage.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
servantdagonServantDagon
Rated 14 Aug 2007
71
25th
Funny as a kid. It's been years since I've seen it, though I've seen it a bunch of times.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
heandhishairheandhishair
Rated 14 Aug 2007
38
16th
Talking babies. Okay the first time. Second time? Uh-uh.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
saucyjacksaucyjack
Rated 02 Jun 2007
29
6th
Unbearable
Rated 02 Jun 2007
askailAskail
Rated 08 Mar 2007
22
2nd
Forgettable and boring.
Rated 08 Mar 2007

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...