sign in
register
Watch
Apple TV Google Play Movies Fandango At Home
+3
Jumper
Jumper
+3
JustWatch
Your probable score
?
Jumper

Jumper

2008
Drama, Sci-fi
1h 28m
A genetic anomaly allows a young man to teleport himself anywhere. He discovers this gift has existed for centuries and finds himself in a war that has been raging for thousands of years between "Jumpers" and those who have sworn to kill them. (imdb)

Directed by:

Doug Liman

Screenwriter:

David S. Goyer, Jim Uhls, Simon Kinberg

Starring:

Tom Hulce, Samuel L. Jackson, AnnaSophia Robb, Jamie Bell, Michael Rooker, Kristen Stewart, Max Thieriot, Diane Lane, Hayden Christensen, Rachel Bilson, Shawn Roberts, Tony Nappo

Genres:

Drama, Sci-fi, Suspense/Thriller, Adventure

Countries:

Canada, USA

Languages:

English, Mandarin, Japanese, Italian
imdb IMDb
Update history
Suggest edit

Jumper

2008
Drama, Sci-fi
1h 28m
Your probable score
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer
Avg Percentile 27.61% from 6126 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

(6177)
Compact view
clear
Compact view
Show
Sort
tonytheponyTonythePony
Rated 06 Apr 2010
44
10th
How could they get such a fun premise this wrong? The romance is dull and Christensen as lead certainly is an albatross for any movie, but even that could have been overcome. What truly sinks this is the idealogical bent of the antagonists. Instead of mining the societal implications of Jumpers and their potential positives, we get - God say bad, we kill. As Spunkie noted - check out "Tiger! Tiger!" by Bester.
Rated 06 Apr 2010
psixaospsiXaos
Rated 13 Jun 2008
55
19th
The premise was good, they have built a f***ing garbage over it unfortunately! But it can be seen in a non-serious, just-for-fun way with friends in an uneventful evening. It have some funny moments like one on the top of sfenks.
Rated 13 Jun 2008
doctor7doctor7
Rated 12 Jun 2008
60
38th
It has great special effects, great action scenes, a great premise that leaves just enough unexplained to maintain an intriging air of mystery instead of explaining everything. The fictional "jumping rules" are established well. With that said the movie itself just feels incomplete or rather interesting part of the film, Samnuel L. Jackson's character, is incomplete. The teen romance part is complete but honestly it sucks so you really don't care. Bottom line? See if for the special effects.
Rated 12 Jun 2008
gritGrit
Rated 20 Mar 2008
14
11th
Jumper has a great premise, but ultimately fails to execute any of these aspects properly. The plotline is convulted and uninvolving, relying on CGI effects to create any kind of momentum leaving the poor acting of Christensen and bad script bare for all to see. The complete lack of any kind of explanation as to the heritage of Jumpers and Paladins was a great missed opportunity and leaves numerous plot-holes. Bell is the only redeeming aspect, putting in by far the best performance of the film.
Rated 20 Mar 2008
jebJeb
Rated 26 Jul 2008
15
12th
The premise is actually pretty interesting, but it just falls short and ends up being a train wreck.
Rated 26 Jul 2008
whatismynamewhatismyname
Rated 12 Jul 2008
45
8th
This could have been soo much more. The action scenes are pretty good, but feels like a puzzle was put together in a rush.
Rated 12 Jul 2008
spunkieSpunkie
Rated 13 Mar 2008
35
19th
When I heard about the movie "Tiger, tiger" by Alfred Bester came to my mind. Jumper is so thin in every aspect that there is not much to argue, if you're in the mood fire&forget. Though it doesn't stop long to explain messy storyline fortunately, so if you can bear the major bullshit you may enjoy the series of fine jump effects.
Rated 13 Mar 2008
tj_monsterTJ monster
Rated 30 Oct 2021
2
0th
the glaring plotholes, awful script and terrible acting is almost the worst ive scene. and i hate evn more because of how simpy this story is. the amin charachter overtakes avatar as the biggest simp in history. the potential was great, but they make a film about a simp and how much of a tosser he is to everyone who knew him and helped onece, and then he goes and leeches like a parasite off there generosity.
Rated 30 Oct 2021
kgbelliveaukgbelliveau
Rated 15 Jan 2020
65
17th
It's weird that a movie where the central premise is people who can jump from place to place could have benefitted the most from being less jumpy. The concept is cool but very rushed. The performances are mediocre including all the veteran actors I expected more from. Run of the mill sci Fi film that doesn't explain the lore and yet somehow expects to want audience's to understand what is happening.
Rated 15 Jan 2020
metalhankmetalhank
Rated 30 May 2018
70
76th
This is a film that is somewhat polarizing, when it first came out there were so many negative reviews. It is nice to see that it now has a respectable score on Imdb. It is an interesting flick that has different tech. that the average movie in its style. The jumping sequences are really well done and the acting is just fine.
Rated 30 May 2018
bunkenBunken
Rated 01 Feb 2012
30
15th
Samuel L. Jackson beats Nic Cage in the worst haircut category! And Hayden Christensen still can't act...
Rated 01 Feb 2012
okkervilOkkervil
Rated 18 Dec 2011
30
21st
It's predictable, poorly written, and poorly performed, particuarly by the useless Bilson and Christensen. I didn't outright hate it and I've certainly seen worse, but found its stupidity irritating.
Rated 18 Dec 2011
jordandcfcJordanDcFc
Rated 07 Jul 2011
45
11th
Yuk. It was so unintrusive I almost forgot I was watching a film a few times. No real characters, an undeveloped and rushed plot, just a pointless, needless waste of 86 minutes. A good idea too, might read the novel because the premise is interesting, the execution is woeful.
Rated 07 Jul 2011
trixrabbiTrixRabbi
Rated 11 Jun 2011
0
0th
Fuck this movie.
Rated 11 Jun 2011
cosmicmonkeyCosmicMonkey
Rated 05 Apr 2009
30
2nd
Before I jump on the band wagon (no pun intended) of hate-filled reviews, I would like preface it by saying that this film did actually have a lot of potential. Okay, catch that? Good. Now onto the review: It Sucked.
Rated 05 Apr 2009
gecqGecq
Rated 13 Nov 2008
40
8th
Fresh idea, the whole execution stayed way below its potential, though. Hayden Christensen's performance was painful to watch.
Rated 13 Nov 2008
somnivoresomnivore
Rated 05 Nov 2008
65
9th
A premise with great potential, poorly executed.
Rated 05 Nov 2008
peaceanarchyPeaceAnarchy
Rated 28 Sep 2008
62
14th
There is so much potential here for a fun and somewhat intelligent story here, but the choice seems to have been to make things as dumb and fast paced as possible. It's not terrible, but all the interesting plot points are glossed over in favor of flashy stunts and a short runtime.
Rated 28 Sep 2008
miss_jesusmiss jesus
Rated 08 Sep 2008
32
11th
Not worthy of actual hatred, but sadly distant from good. The advertising should have focused less on the showy cinematography and more on the fact that this is a movie about teens with teen logic. There are no appealing characters, and the "surprise" villain is almost intolerably caffeinated and abrasive. One female character is a liar, and the other is naive and easily pushed around. Hope you enjoy the one special effect the film uses; it's about all it has going once you've seen the trailer.
Rated 08 Sep 2008
strangepantsstrangepants
Rated 20 Jul 2008
60
36th
Now if someone had thought to merge the scripts from 'Jumper' and 'Wanted' ... we might have had something to talk about
Rated 20 Jul 2008
skenkereSkenkere
Rated 20 Mar 2008
54
32nd
You know, its fairly generic, and Hayden Christensen is a godawful actor, but this movie has two saving graces (and Samuel L Jackson isn't one of them, he sucks here). 1: the concept of being able to teleport is just so fucking cool, and they have a lot of fun with it. A lot of the movie is just him having fun teleporting everywhere, and its shallow but enjoyable. 2: Jamie Bell's character fucking rocks the shit. This would have been an awesome movie if it were about him instead of Hayden.
Rated 20 Mar 2008
wardmobwardmob
Rated 18 Mar 2008
50
9th
It just didn't do it for me really. Didn't finish. had no depth. Could have been done really well but just didn't get there
Rated 18 Mar 2008
walkaboutwalkabout
Rated 10 Mar 2008
55
26th
the idea is interesting, but the film doesn't really use that potential right. jamie bell is probably the only thing that works. the best parts of the film, the best action and the best humor, all include him...
Rated 10 Mar 2008
mjvmoviemanMJVmovieMan
Rated 17 Feb 2008
70
46th
"Jumper" has a clever idea that it fails to explore. The characters are a bit bland, the plot is too silly (it wants to be a comic-book movie, but it's not), but, like a ridiculous Michael Bay film, the action is plenty fun and over-the-top. With a more serious take and less stupid side-plots about mothers being jumper-hunters, and secret factions of existing jumper-hunters wanting to kill the jumpers for no reason, oh and if people would notice these teleporters- it could've been great.
Rated 17 Feb 2008
drortiz3drortiz3
Rated 15 Feb 2008
25
1st
Probably the WORST movie I've ever seen. Weak storyline that jumped (no pun intended) all over the place. BOOORRRIIINNNNGGG.
Rated 15 Feb 2008
rihreyrihrey
Rated 10 Nov 2024
15
6th
Bad in every aspect of filmmaking and storytelling.
Rated 10 Nov 2024
croweycrowey
Rated 26 Aug 2024
1
2nd
I’m too angry that they bought the rights to one of my favorite semi-obscure books and then made a movie with no bearing whatsoever on the books, thereby all but guaranteeing a good movie will never be made, to show this same rating charity I show other moderately bad movies. Rot in hell, responsible parties! 🔥
Rated 26 Aug 2024
mrarnmrarn
Rated 22 Feb 2024
48
54th
"Jumper" presents a captivating concept where a teenager acquires a superpower, yet the narrative execution falls short, leaning heavily on the action sequences to showcase the hero's abilities. This film exemplifies potential unfulfilled, primarily due to its overreliance on CGI effects instead of developing a compelling story.
Rated 22 Feb 2024
scholar69420Scholar69420
Rated 16 Feb 2024
31
6th
A terrible premise totally squandered by the blandest of villains. Could’ve been good, but it’s not. Fun seeing Kristen Scott opposite Hayden Christensen for a classic hello moment.
Rated 16 Feb 2024
badcosmonautBadCosmonaut
Rated 09 Jul 2022
2
6th
Hayden Christensen's character was not really likeable in any way. He was selfish and only used his power for materialism and slacking off. He made only stupid, bad decisions, then even after he found out that people close to him would be put in danger he went ahead and made contact with those people which put them in danger. I couldn't root for him since he did everything wrong and nothing right. His character didn't even have a good personality. He was just awkward and quiet.
Rated 09 Jul 2022
glumpy99glumpy_99
Rated 24 Apr 2022
65
28th
Silly action/sci-fi effort gets runs on the board by default for getting through everything it needs to in under 90 minutes; on its own terms, it's an efficient time-killer, with Christensen an appropriately inscrutable hero, and Jackson fair straining at the leash to go right over the top, but having to satisfy himself with a bleached (!!) hair-do. It’s a minor shame that the intriguing teleportation concept is never really capitalised on (maybe it was to be saved for an anticipated sequel?)
Rated 24 Apr 2022
evranaevrana
Rated 02 Oct 2021
62
31st
Christensen was not that bad of an actor (after his disastrous Anakin Skywalker). It could have been a good movie, it has the visual gusto for that but the bottom line of the story is so flimsy that it prevents the film from reaching its potential. Since the excellent Nightcrawler effects in the first X-Men movie, I knew that someone will say (let's do a movie with a character like this, it is cool!) This is THAT movie.
Rated 02 Oct 2021
moviecinemaMovieCinema
Rated 17 Aug 2021
49
23rd
Another sci fi movie with kinda cool concept but boring execution
Rated 17 Aug 2021
mjoc0723mjoc0723
Rated 28 Apr 2021
10
2nd
I could tell from the first two minutes that this was shit.
Rated 28 Apr 2021
timon88Timon88
Rated 10 Aug 2020
10
2nd
Hayden Christensen has finally found material perfectly suited to him.
Rated 10 Aug 2020
ocelotOcelot
Rated 09 Mar 2020
20
12th
a very bad movie that has the rare and intriguing quality found in so few other bad movies. instead of asking "why is this so bad," I found myself asking "why isn't this better?" the concept is cool, the world is fun, Samuel L. Jackson has blonde hair. Doug Liman directed the Bourne Identity and Edge of Tomorrow, two of the iconic action movies of the past two decades. I expected studio meddling but that appears not to be the case. so what happened? *sees written by credits* ah that explains it
Rated 09 Mar 2020
gatoquentegatoquente
Rated 12 Apr 2019
94
61st
Don't be deceived by its simple title. The movie comes filled with interesting action and fresh take on the possibility of man's long-time dream of breaking the material-metaphysical divide. MY SCORING: 99-96=Great; 95-90=Very good; 89-85=Good; 84-80=So-so; 79-70=Boring; Below 70=Forget it.
Rated 12 Apr 2019
vv238vv238
Rated 02 Oct 2018
35
34th
It's more or less just a vehicle for Hayden Christensen and Rachel Bilson to be terrible. It's watchable but I wouldn't recommend this to anyone.
Rated 02 Oct 2018
moraesfelipemoraesfelipe
Rated 16 Oct 2017
35
9th
Such a cool premise wasted on the laziest superhero script ever written. Liman tries hard to elevate the material by rushing the shots and merging the visual with David's powers, but there is not much to do with a screenplay that seems more interested in building a mythology than believable characters -- Rachel's character is the worst example of damsel in distress. Hayden should not be blamed for anything. Only for K-Stew completists.
Rated 16 Oct 2017
luordluord
Rated 09 Aug 2017
45
20th
It almost works as a superhero movie, it has all the trappings, so why was I bored? It drowns itself with too much exposition and not enough cool fights; the shadowy agents were unnecessary too.
Rated 09 Aug 2017
yoshinarutoYoshinaruto
Rated 20 May 2016
65
55th
A poor script, but a very entertaining film. Had the romance been cut and the premise been more of a Thriller, this would’ve probably been pretty solid. Still worth seeing if you can turn your brain off.
Rated 20 May 2016
dunbardunbar
Rated 11 Mar 2016
40
8th
Hey that's an interesting concept you got there, I like it, I think it can work. But from here on out everything we do to advance this film project will have to involve a big streaming dump.
Rated 11 Mar 2016
evilmangoesEvilMangoes
Rated 06 Dec 2015
59
26th
C+
Rated 06 Dec 2015
hakkanarejohakkanarejo
Rated 29 Aug 2015
93
51st
David Rice is a high school student in Ann Arbor, abandoned by his mother at five, living with his callous, alcoholic father, enamored with Millie, a fellow student, and picked on by at least one classmate. On a winter's day, while about to drown, he discovers he can transport himself instantaneously to anyplace on earth. He runs away to New York City robs a bank vault, and comes to the attention of a shadowy group of hunters. He heads home, searches out Millie, invites her to travel with him.
Rated 29 Aug 2015
glm01glm01
Rated 08 Jun 2015
53
13th
52.500
Rated 08 Jun 2015
gkfilmgkfilm
Rated 14 May 2015
50
23rd
Entertainment: 5/4 -- some of the best special effects I've seen. Spirituality: 0/0. Sustainability: 0/0 -- it's stupid that the "good guy" in this movie robs banks and says he'll pay it back "one day".
Rated 14 May 2015
rymRYM
Rated 29 Mar 2015
38
4th
1.92/5
Rated 29 Mar 2015
smuhusmuhu
Rated 27 Feb 2015
69
55th
Ahead of its time, aged with time.
Rated 27 Feb 2015
jymkatajymkata
Rated 07 Jan 2015
20
6th
What if you lived in a future where nothing was interesting or cool? Jumper is a film brave enough to ask such a question
Rated 07 Jan 2015
ferzathFerzath
Rated 29 Dec 2014
45
10th
The story was bland, the characters undeveloped and the ending horrible. Something a twelve year old might still enjoy, but that says it all.
Rated 29 Dec 2014
andreaslutroandreaslutro
Rated 20 Oct 2014
45
11th
Decent action movie ridden with wooden acting and angsty teenage drama.
Rated 20 Oct 2014
sedricsedric
Rated 03 Oct 2014
75
69th
Too short, but nice
Rated 03 Oct 2014
kierenKieren
Rated 14 Sep 2014
77
17th
77
Rated 14 Sep 2014
jmac525JMac525
Rated 09 May 2014
29
10th
Jumper misses its mark due to cardboard cutout performances from its leads, unfocused narrative, and bad editing of fight scenes.
Rated 09 May 2014
ninebreakerninebreaker
Rated 28 Feb 2014
83
43rd
Maybe hayden's "whinest" role ever
Rated 28 Feb 2014
redeyedtissRedeyedtiss
Rated 11 Feb 2014
85
82nd
Badass.
Rated 11 Feb 2014
matjohmatjoh
Rated 12 Jan 2014
80
31st
It's not woolly
Rated 12 Jan 2014
ronnydibbleRonnyDibble
Rated 12 Aug 2013
10
3rd
Jumper is all over the place. the plot doesn't make sense, character development is non-existent, as well as the acting is...well....yeah.
Rated 12 Aug 2013
naurunauru
Rated 25 Jul 2013
7
4th
Wish fulfillment for 13-year-olds. Bad writing, bad acting, bad action, bad film.
Rated 25 Jul 2013
theescapistTheEscapist
Rated 28 Jun 2013
64
31st
Not that bad, enjoyable for the most part but not very exciting. The idea of 'jumping' is pretty cool.
Rated 28 Jun 2013
hologramhologram
Rated 28 May 2013
45
3rd
Sometimes you gotta watch dreck like this to remind you how good the Iron Mans and X-Mens of the world are.
Rated 28 May 2013
hellwighellwig
Rated 14 May 2013
95
92nd
Awesome...I'm waiting for a sequel.
Rated 14 May 2013
dingobergerDingoBerger
Rated 27 Feb 2013
69
67th
Interesting concept, poorly written screen play, the usual.
Rated 27 Feb 2013
kingjohnbbqKingjohnbbq
Rated 08 Feb 2013
40
5th
good idea for an action movie. bad execution of said idea.
Rated 08 Feb 2013
danastevensdanastevens
Rated 30 Nov 2012
30
6th
Jumper not only makes the rules up as it goes along; it neglects to tell us what those rules are, which is both unfair and unfun.
Rated 30 Nov 2012
matthew_parkinsonMatthew Parkinson
Rated 14 Nov 2012
40
31st
I was glad that Jumper was only 88 minutes. If it happened to be longer, I probably would have lost interest due to the poor plotting, underdeveloped characters, lackluster action scenes and cardboard lead actors. It's a superhero film that has based its success on whether or not a sequel will be made, and the chances of that seem slim to none. It takes us on an impressive visual tour, showing us many sights all over the world, but when you look past the visuals, there's nothing underneath.
Rated 14 Nov 2012
misterlizardmisterlizard
Rated 05 Oct 2012
20
22nd
There might be a spark of a good premise in here, but the execution is terrible. Jackson calls it in as the bad guy whose sole motivation is 'being the bad guy'. Christensen gives another wooden performance, and the plot jumps all over the place more often than the characters.
Rated 05 Oct 2012
mskfdrmskfdr
Rated 07 Sep 2012
50
11th
This could have been a good movie if the acting wasn't so awful.
Rated 07 Sep 2012
ag0stomesmerAg0stoMesmer
Rated 30 Jul 2012
2
46th
Promising concept but too shallow. Holey plot and poor action scenes ruined what could've been a fun Butterfly Effect/Final Destination style romp.
Rated 30 Jul 2012
princeharryprinceharry
Rated 10 Jul 2012
7
21st
An amazing story that, after the lights came up, left me wanting more... of everything. Still an enjoyable popcorn flick that I manage to re-watch at least three times a year.
Rated 10 Jul 2012
cinematicespCinematicESP
Rated 02 Jul 2012
64
10th
Despite a compelling concept, good special effects and decent action, it manages to be fairly generic. The predictable "reveal" at the end is not as interesting as it could have been. I would have liked the characters themselves to at least philosophize about WHY they have this power, even if it's never explained. You can tell it was made with the desperate hope for a sequel.
Rated 02 Jul 2012
beebeedeedopbeebeedeedop
Rated 07 Apr 2012
10
2nd
The premise is interesting and promising, but the actual movie turned out to be one of the worst action movies of the decade. DO NOT WATCH THIS ONE, unless you just watch the first 15 minutes and tell yourself it will be a good movie...
Rated 07 Apr 2012
chemtrailschemtrails
Rated 20 Mar 2012
25
9th
Hot garbage
Rated 20 Mar 2012
bakcheiabakcheia
Rated 14 Mar 2012
0
6th
lol, this piece of shit
Rated 14 Mar 2012
sanderapSanderAP
Rated 19 Feb 2012
40
17th
i liked the idea, but it kind of sucks...
Rated 19 Feb 2012
kramyessevKramYessev
Rated 27 Jan 2012
41
20th
Look no further than the cast to see why this sucked (Not Sam Jackson, obviously).
Rated 27 Jan 2012
colinloguecolinlogue
Rated 12 Dec 2011
46
9th
It's almost fun enough to overcome how bad it is, but the two leads are just so unlikable that it never really had a chance. I'm not sure if it's a fault of the script, which is certainly devoid of subtlety but could have been made into something fun, or the actors, who are unable to convince us that their characters could be viewed by another human as anything other than repulsive. Jamie Bell and Samuel L. Jackson don't take it as seriously and give some wonderfully entertaining performances.
Rated 12 Dec 2011
troothTrooth
Rated 10 Nov 2011
24
4th
The whole story is just a mess. Like... Samuel L. Jackson hates jumpers... For no adequately explained reason. This guy invites a girl he hasn't seen in many years to go to Italy with him... And she does it without any hesitation! It's so easy for romance to spring up when the script calls for two characters to be inextricably (and inexplicably) attracted to each other.
Rated 10 Nov 2011
slantmagSlantMag
Rated 26 Oct 2011
10
9th
"The lazy regard for David's moral crisis, or lack thereof, is pitiful." - Jeremiah Kipp
Rated 26 Oct 2011
kojilessKojiless
Rated 23 Oct 2011
14
14th
Decent effects, but crappy acting across the board. Shallow characters and a poorly written script don't help, either.
Rated 23 Oct 2011
burkayadaligburkayadalig
Rated 01 Oct 2011
42
6th
pathetic...
Rated 01 Oct 2011
difontaineDifontaine
Rated 04 Sep 2011
37
7th
Oh for a good main character. Come for Sammy L and Jamie Bell.
Rated 04 Sep 2011
sweekodenSweekoden
Rated 15 Jul 2011
39
21st
Awesome premise, but uninspired in execution and ultimately unengaging. Why anyone would give leading roles to Hayden Christensen and Rachel Bilson boggles my mind.
Rated 15 Jul 2011
ptendencyPtendency
Rated 27 Jun 2011
85
59th
para ver...
Rated 27 Jun 2011
glmglm
Rated 22 May 2011
55
21st
54.500
Rated 22 May 2011
randytravisrandytravis
Rated 04 May 2011
78
23rd
Not a bad one. Some action, some sci-fi, all decent stuff. The drama was alright.
Rated 04 May 2011
djrossdjross
Rated 09 Apr 2011
20
3rd
Not interesting. Score based on partial viewing.
Rated 09 Apr 2011
frederikaFrederikA
Rated 23 Feb 2011
30
8th
A fine concept, but a boring, aimless movie...
Rated 23 Feb 2011
guy-piranhaguy piranha
Rated 21 Feb 2011
50
23rd
A jumper is something you put a baby in. So hayden christensen is well cast.
Rated 21 Feb 2011
yamabushiyamabushi
Rated 16 Feb 2011
28
12th
Samuel L. Jackson amazes me again, taking part in another pathetic production ("Snakes on a plane" was the first one)...well maybe not as idiotic as mentioned earlier. Idea and plot base were great...were. Construction of scenario reminds me Uwe Boll's movies, beside a few scenes that were good enough, the rest sucks the big way. Some special effects rise a score a bit but let's face it - another good story, mixed into bad acting, plastic scenes and a lot more poo than you can imagine.Stay away.
Rated 16 Feb 2011
sirstuckeySirStuckey
Rated 08 Feb 2011
30
7th
If you are going to allow characters to have powers above and beyond that of the normal person and give said characters rules to which they can perform said powers (let's say...if they are being hit with a certain amount of electricity, they can't jump), you can't have one of the characters go against the rules without any explanation just so you can have a bigger ending. That's lazy writing. It's also lazy writing to have really horrible dialogue. Actors were awful too.
Rated 08 Feb 2011
diegocfqdiegocfq
Rated 25 Jan 2011
40
8th
The only hing i like about this movie is the main idea of 'jumping', everything else is crap.
Rated 25 Jan 2011
armondwhiteArmondWhite
Rated 10 Jan 2011
1
0th
Liman's movie candy is philistine, banal and lacks surrealist thrill. His sci-fi, quasi-political allegory is like an X-Men or Hulk narrative told from the ass end.
Rated 10 Jan 2011
tsvetetsvete
Rated 07 Jan 2011
91
60th
1
Rated 07 Jan 2011
artsy72artsy72
Rated 06 Jan 2011
75
0th
good fun.
Rated 06 Jan 2011
untrustableuntrustable
Rated 06 Jan 2011
30
10th
So forgettable I forgot what I was gonna write about it.
Rated 06 Jan 2011
mrgreedyMrGreedy
Rated 05 Jan 2011
66
17th
Could have been a lot better. Very shallow acting. Not enough of Jackson in the film.
Rated 05 Jan 2011
gillsoloGillSolo
Rated 26 Dec 2010
80
73rd
Really fun movie with cool effects and neat action. Great concept, really makes you wonder what you would do if you had those abilities. The only shitty thing about the movie was Hayden Christensens shitty emotional struggles and that stupid Rachel Bilson bullshit. The British kid was pretty cool, and Sam Jackson always kicks ass, especially with white hair.
Rated 26 Dec 2010
vahidtrvahidtr
Rated 08 Oct 2010
57
9th
a sci-fi movie about Jumpers . the only thing the movie brings , is beautiful scenes from cities in the world .
Rated 08 Oct 2010
cylindriccylindric
Rated 30 Sep 2010
70
6th
it was okay
Rated 30 Sep 2010

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...