sign in
register
Watch
Apple TV Google Play Movies Fandango At Home
+3
In the Mouth of Madness
In the Mouth of Madness
+3
JustWatch
Your probable score
?
In the Mouth of Madness

In the Mouth of Madness

1994
Suspense/Thriller, Fantasy
1h 35m
An insurance investigator begins discovering that the impact a horror writer's books have on his fans, is more than inspirational. (imdb)

Directed by:

John Carpenter

Screenwriter:

Michael De Luca

Starring:

Sam Neill, Charlton Heston, Jürgen Prochnow, Frances Bay, Hayden Christensen, John Glover, Peter Jason, David Warner, Julie Carmen, Bernie Casey, Wilhelm von Homburg

Genres:

Suspense/Thriller, Fantasy, Horror, Mystery

Country:

USA

Language:

English
imdb IMDb
Update history
Suggest edit

In the Mouth of Madness

1994
Suspense/Thriller, Fantasy
1h 35m
Your probable score
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer
Avg Percentile 58.03% from 1985 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

(2004)
Compact view
clear
Compact view
Show
Sort
billyshearsBillyShears
Rated 15 Nov 2017
80
77th
I just saw John Carpenter in concert and the clips from this movie made it look like the coolest thing that has ever been. NOTHING HAPPENS for a good 70% of this, but that other 30%, oh baby, you better believe I read Sutter Cane.
Rated 15 Nov 2017
oldgoatoldgoat
Rated 12 Dec 2013
77
74th
Surprisingly overlooked since no one I know has heard of this, let alone seen it. Aged somewhat poorly, but is a solid movie with memorable aspects.
Rated 12 Dec 2013
tripwyreTripwyre
Rated 15 Oct 2013
75
68th
It's kind of amazing that the movie has both the restraint and pure balls to let a Lovecraftian Cthulhu end-of-the-world scenario play out entirely off-screen, as the horror here is not the apocalypse, or tentacled monsters, but the trapped claustrophobia of being stuck in a fiction with no free will, your life literally on tracks in front of you. Neill sells the descent perfectly, and Carpenter is in fine form -- perhaps his last best work before losing touch. King and Lovecraft would be proud.
Rated 15 Oct 2013
indyatmnINDYATMN
Rated 28 Dec 2022
71
27th
Lots of Lovecraft in this & its all made well enough w/ some good actors, especially Neill, so why did it take so long for me to feel interested or invested? I'm not sure, but maybe it might have helped to know that Neill's character was losing something - a family; a chance at a new life. He's such a cynical loner, nothing seems to matter. The creatures also never shocked or creeped me out. Del Toro's monsters are much creepier. Also: the ending negates why Neill's character was needed at all.
Rated 28 Dec 2022
doyler29doyler29
Rated 07 Mar 2021
70
42nd
The 1990's is the decade where Carpenter seems to really lose interest in filmmaking. He makes some really terrible films, a couple of okay films based on good ideas, and this film which is the best of them, partly because it has the best ideas and a great lead performance from Sam Neill. It's still not up to his early standards, but it's a consistently enjoyable outing with great ideas. There's a kind of stilted awkwardness to the film
Rated 07 Mar 2021
ashwilliamsAshWilliams
Rated 04 Oct 2008
75
47th
This film has one of the best unbroken shots in cinema, as some ax-wielding dude, from all the way across the street, one step at a time, approaches the window of a restaurant. We see it happening; the protagonist doesn't. Then shatter! Masterful direction. Thanks, Carpenter!
Rated 04 Oct 2008
twincinematwincinema
Rated 22 Oct 2023
75
64th
Only John Carpenter can have Sam Neill with a face full of drawn-on crosses and not make it look ridiculous. I think half of this film is spent in the hotel. I am not going to begin to pretend I fully understand the plot, but I just strapped in and felt it wash over me.
Rated 22 Oct 2023
hawkinsHawkins
Rated 20 Oct 2023
73
53rd
A rickety construction that seems to be missing connective tissue, which is mildly confusing but not quite maddening. There's a great detail I have to give props to - the main character's car is obnoxiously dirty the whole time. Movie cars are always so clean, feels engaging to have one begging for "wash me" to be written into the rear window. Actually, it kind of drove me nuts. At one point, I started rubbing the screen, my TV turned off, and in the empty reflection...I was Sam Neill! Spooky.
Rated 20 Oct 2023
mentaculusMentaculus
Rated 24 Feb 2020
69
50th
Not really scary, as such - especially when you realize it's basically every Silent Hill story, with Stephen King as a villain - but it has great moments. A lot of the horror visuals are inspired, and Sam Neill holds the film together. It takes a great actor to scream in terror at the color blue.
Rated 24 Feb 2020
alex_watkinsAlex Watkins
Rated 26 Feb 2015
3
38th
Decent, but kinda fizzles out at the end.
Rated 26 Feb 2015
spamhead80spamhead80
Rated 22 Jul 2013
81
67th
Unsettling and creepy. Sam Neill is fantastic.
Rated 22 Jul 2013
bob_thrillinbob thrillin
Rated 08 Jul 2013
78
60th
Severely underrated. It's goofy as fuck and it knows it, but never falls into the now-common trap of winking at the audience. It's also legitimately creepy, and that ending is perfect.
Rated 08 Jul 2013
moraesfelipemoraesfelipe
Rated 01 Mar 2013
100
99th
This is an absolutely mesmerizing and chilling mix of wrong-man suspense, metafilm and supernatural horror, in which the master finds room to write a beautiful love letter to cinema. Here, fiction is a plague that drives people insane, causes a mass chaos and extinction. The man who initially refused to believe how disturbing and real Cane's fiction was is actually the writer's final protagonist. He watches, as we do, everything on the big screen, laughing and crying. GOAT'S GOAT.
Rated 01 Mar 2013
paxtonPaxton
Rated 07 Apr 2012
87
85th
Movies about books. I like 'em.
Rated 07 Apr 2012
parcalihamparcaliham
Rated 14 Jul 2011
45
16th
14 Temmuz 2011 & donemini bilmiyorum ama simdi izlendiginde kliseler ile orulmus, korkutmayi basaramayan bir film. belki o yaratiklar gosterilmese film daha iyi olabilird.
Rated 14 Jul 2011
gorejunkygorejunky
Rated 22 Aug 2010
85
51st
I am probably in the minority but I enjoyed this John Carpenter work. Helped by a really good performance by Sam Neill this had some good special effects and plenty of twists and turns. Highly recommended!
Rated 22 Aug 2010
overratedoverrated
Rated 10 Jan 2010
75
85th
Underrated. It's never shit-your-pants-terrifying but it's a well done atmospheric Lovecraft homage, and the ending is one of the best in the genre.
Rated 10 Jan 2010
amerigoamerigo
Rated 20 Aug 2009
92
97th
Probably the most accurate representation of the Lovecraftian mythos on film. While it has moments of cheese, on the whole it is a magnificently scripted film that captures the true essence of Lovecraft--the inevitability of our demise and the frailty of our conventional reality perfectly detailed within the scope of a couple of hours. Simply stunning.
Rated 20 Aug 2009
moviesinhellmoviesinhell
Rated 04 May 2009
75
54th
Carpenter and De Luca explore the idea that "sanity" and "reality" are shaped by consensus. The scenario brims with Lovecraftian allusions, starting with the title, a takeoff on H.P.'s _In the Mountains of Madness_. This is rich in dark satire and delivers a goodly number of genuine jolts. Besides, it's hard not to admire any flick savvy enough to include a choice clip from _Robot Monster_.
Rated 04 May 2009
inhmninhmn
Rated 12 Jan 2009
98
80th
carpenter = horror semi-god
Rated 12 Jan 2009
muutanetmuutanet
Rated 11 Apr 2008
71
66th
This movie is asking are we closing madness outside or inside of madhouse. Sam Neill dives (litteraly) into the horrors of the fiction novel. There is not much of character development and acting is not the best of all time, but film is very entertaining horror flick from John Carpenter. Same cathergory than The Kovak Box, but better set than that.
Rated 11 Apr 2008
ayavaronAyavaron
Rated 21 Dec 2007
100
97th
I've never read any of Lovecraft's work so the movie seems fresh and original to me where it would apparently seem derivative to those unfamiliar with Lovecraft. I found this movie to be amazing though. The insanity, the crazy jagged storytelling and the meticulous plot make this movie work in spite of an awful female lead. There's also some humor worked in there in case the rest is simply not awesome enough.
Rated 21 Dec 2007
imaduckimaduck
Rated 19 Oct 2007
85
53rd
Great movie that really caught me by surprise.
Rated 19 Oct 2007
easydiffeasydiff
Rated 05 Apr 2007
88
94th
Carpenter's love letter to Lovecraft, this movie is GREAT.
Rated 05 Apr 2007
badfurdayBadFurDay
Rated 07 Oct 2024
4
23rd
Cool themes and visuals, but I just didn't get into it. It was simply too silly.
Rated 07 Oct 2024
glumpy99glumpy_99
Rated 20 Aug 2024
70
38th
Carpenter has a complete leave of his senses here, starting relatively slowly and even sluggishly, before taking a hand brake turn into crazy town, amping up the visual effects and taking best advantage of Prochnow’s strange screen presence as the demented author. An unwillingness to engage narratively with his material makes this a sometimes cold and distancing experience; outside of Neill and Prochnow, he doesn’t give his distinguished horror cast a great deal to do.
Rated 20 Aug 2024
spookymaskSpookyMask
Rated 11 Aug 2024
80
85th
Almost as good as the sequel, in the Nose of Madness.
Rated 11 Aug 2024
sopachuco13sopachuco13
Rated 30 Jun 2024
90
84th
I really loved In the Mouth of Madness. It is a movie that was aimed right for me. I loved the Alan Wake games. I really like the idea of a writer or creator being able to bring one of their works to live. Sam Neill is really good in this movie. He starts out as straight-laced as they come and by the end of the movie he is a frothing madman. I couldn't see anybody else playing the part. The rest of the casting was standard fare for a John Carpenter movie; solid. I will watch it again for sure.
Rated 30 Jun 2024
brrrpbrrrp
Rated 19 Feb 2024
85
94th
An awesomely unbridled work of horror.
Rated 19 Feb 2024
thereminjamThereminJam
Rated 06 Dec 2023
89
89th
Awesome.
Rated 06 Dec 2023
shockularSHOCKULAR
Rated 31 Oct 2023
85
85th
This had very mixed reviews upon release but has gotten more love as time has passed, and I think the newer audiences are right. It's a Lovecraftian film told like a Stephen King story that really captures the vibes and atmosphere of Lovecraft and his ideas well but actually has competent dialogue and characters to go with it. Would make a fascinatingly diverse double feature with 2006's Stranger than Fiction. Legitimately frightening at times.
Rated 31 Oct 2023
kevin_ruffoKevin Ruffo
Rated 23 Oct 2023
60
34th
could have more lovecraftian carpenter's practical effects
Rated 23 Oct 2023
ericamblerericambler
Rated 21 Oct 2023
67
36th
Book Club: The Eldritch Horror
Rated 21 Oct 2023
sellissellis
Rated 15 Oct 2023
87
81st
Like Barton Fink meets Videodrome with Lynchian flourishes, but a Carpenter film through and through. Features the best editing in Carpenter’s career. Just about perfect for what it intends. Horrific fun.
Rated 15 Oct 2023
filliganFilligan
Rated 11 Oct 2023
86
63rd
This absolutely rules as a psychological horror. Feels like it's torn directly from the pages of 90s Stephen King, self-referential and all. Loaded with creepy imagery, fun tension, and delightful homages to King and Lovecraft, this is undeservedly underrated amongst Carpenter's filmography.
Rated 11 Oct 2023
vv238vv238
Rated 08 Oct 2023
71
75th
In the Mouth of Madness represents the last of great John Carpenter and the world has not been the same since. Neill is great at the center and this is still the best on-screen representation of Lovecraft's ideas. It's not the most consistent film nor does it maintain it's atmosphere for the entire runtime but it does remain a great little flick about the end of the world.
Rated 08 Oct 2023
neonmanNeonman
Rated 24 Nov 2022
68
32nd
A bit of an exercise rather than a genuine story, with both the tale that goes back and forth with reality and the quick-cutting random very '90s editing are initially entertaining, but ultimately exhausting. There are some fun moments, like when he keeps trying to drive away and the film's very meta ending, but they don't really add to the horror or any kind of message/reason.
Rated 24 Nov 2022
montycircusMontyCircus
Rated 31 Oct 2022
20
12th
This film has 2 interesting ideas: what if Stephen King's novels drove his readers into axe-wielding maniacs; and what if Derry and Castle Rock were actual spooky towns in Maine. Unfortunately, the execution is piss poor and forgettable and felt like a low-budget "Outer Limits" episode. By the end it failed to hold my attention.
Rated 31 Oct 2022
daxvDaxV
Rated 01 May 2022
93
88th
What a mind fuck of a movie, the apocalypse trilogy is special. Absolutely creepy in almost every way and like all great Carpenter movies it starts with that slow build of suspense and intrigue before going balls to the wall and this one really goes crazy. I really dug this.
Rated 01 May 2022
panzerwolfpanzerwolf
Rated 28 Mar 2022
80
85th
This kind of stuff is definely made for me. The Lovecraftian horror, the slow sinking into madness, the body horror, the psychological horror, uncertainty of what is real and what is not. Sam Neill does a brilliant job in the main role and while the special effects are somewhat outdated, they still work perfectly for this movie. The ending is a lot more daring than is usual for a lot of horror movies and it just made me like this movie more.
Rated 28 Mar 2022
bruhcringeBruhCringe
Rated 11 Apr 2021
66
41st
????????? - 3 ???????? - 2 ???????? - 2 ????? - 2 ????????? - 2 ????????? ???? - 2 ?????? - 2 ????????????? - 2 ?????? - 2 ???? - 2 ???? - 2 ?????????? ????? ???? - 2 ???????? ?????? - 3 ???? - 3 ?????? - 3 ??????????? - 1 ??????????? - 2 ????? - 1
Rated 11 Apr 2021
larsvontrierLarsVonTrier
Rated 02 Feb 2021
3
72nd
Sam Neill is the only actor I know who can convey paranoia/humor/terror/calm/craziness in just one look. And, how brilliant is Jürgen Prochnow!
Rated 02 Feb 2021
matthagenmatthagen
Rated 07 Oct 2020
57
67th
Seen: 2. A stylish, fun, confident, meta, creepy, off-the-rails, glorious mess of a movie. Its purposeful lack of cohesion holds it back from greatness.
Rated 07 Oct 2020
solomonburrrSolomonBurrr
Rated 10 Mar 2020
73
61st
72.6
Rated 10 Mar 2020
yiannosYiannos
Rated 18 Jun 2019
70
72nd
Carpenter's jettisoned his trademark minimalist style, causing some confusion on release, but this Lovecraftian homage is his most structurally complex film. Like Kane, he is having fun playing with the audiences' perceptions, as the whole concept of reality begins to fold in on the characters, and in turn, on us. Neil gives his best performance as a cynical investigator entangled in Kane's demonic web, and the ending with him in a movie theater is an exhilaratingly bleak black comic knockout.
Rated 18 Jun 2019
evilmangoesEvilMangoes
Rated 12 Jan 2019
95
85th
A-
Rated 12 Jan 2019
hadleyreisHadleyreis
Rated 15 Dec 2018
67
47th
The ridiculousness became a little too ridiculous
Rated 15 Dec 2018
jschlanskyJSchlansky
Rated 31 Oct 2018
80
77th
Sam Neill's accent fluctuates more than a flux capacitor. Flux short for fluctuate, right?
Rated 31 Oct 2018
mwestcottmwestcott
Rated 07 Sep 2018
87
70th
In The Mouth of Madness is a strange mix of two wonderful worlds. The writings of H.P. Lovecraft and the directing style of John Carpenter. While it isn't the most consistent film. It works great on a visual level and injects enough subtly into it's lofty ideas to be a genuinely creepy and unsettling watch.
Rated 07 Sep 2018
picklemanPickle_Man
Rated 29 Aug 2018
75
44th
King/Lovecraft slash fiction.
Rated 29 Aug 2018
capodelnullacapodelnulla
Rated 02 Apr 2018
75
69th
her dönüp baktığım filmi gibi her ilk izlediğim filmi de carpenter'ın her şeye rağmen ne kadar underrated bir yönetmen olduğunu hissettiriyor. kavramlarla oynayarak tür filmi kurmak ve bunu böylesi bir yetiyle yapmak çoğu "büyük" yönetmenin başaracamayacağı bir şey. ayrıca de palma'nın the fury'si ile ikisi-bir-arada olarak tüketilirse tadından yenmez.
Rated 02 Apr 2018
emrekayranciemrekayranci
Rated 18 Jan 2018
85
90th
en sevdigim korku filmlerinden biri
Rated 18 Jan 2018
fancymikeFancyMike
Rated 17 Nov 2017
4
60th
So Sutter Cane is basically Stephen King but better and New Hampshire instead of Maine. Plus a large dose of Lovecraft and Carpenter directing. I didn't know anything about it going in and it was great.
Rated 17 Nov 2017
aflickeringAFlickering
Rated 13 Nov 2016
3
36th
i wanna see your SUPERVISOR.
Rated 13 Nov 2016
jakeaestheteJakeAesthete
Rated 30 Oct 2016
15
13th
John Carpenter and HP Lovecraft are both best appreciated by teenage boys, methinks.
Rated 30 Oct 2016
wetwillieswetwillies
Rated 21 Oct 2015
85
59th
The tragedy of obsession, and it feels even more relevant in a hyperactive world filled with internet fandoms and people saying, "What?! You've never seen The Wire?" A bit vicious in its satire, but also a bizarro blast of fun from start to finish. Unhinged Sam Neill is the best.
Rated 21 Oct 2015
thereeldealthereeldeal
Rated 02 Sep 2015
65
37th
In the Mouth of Madness has Carpenter attempting his most direct Lovecraft tribute yet, complete with genuinely disturbing imagery and special effects that rival The Thing. There's evidence of evolution here but also the opposite. Carpenter's lost his sense of restraint, as evident by the awkward soundtrack that knocks off Metallica's Black Album and the lame dialogue and performances. It helps that the climax is the horror's height, and where the characters talk the least so emotions take over.
Rated 02 Sep 2015
hulothulot
Rated 12 Apr 2015
80
82nd
watched: 2015, 2016, 2021
Rated 12 Apr 2015
constantineconstantine
Rated 06 Mar 2015
78
66th
It haunted me as a kid. It still does.
Rated 06 Mar 2015
laikalaika
Rated 02 Feb 2015
88
93rd
Astonishingly under-appreciated (not to mention not easily available) John Carpenter mid-period horror film. Provides a knowingness and commentary on the nature of reality, fiction, complicity and spectatorship much the same as Wes Craven's New Nightmare and Scream also did, and as excellent as those two films are, this surpasses it. It is also genuinely scary.
Rated 02 Feb 2015
salomaordsalomaord
Rated 02 Jan 2015
50
0th
John Carpenter #1
Rated 02 Jan 2015
troothTrooth
Rated 03 Apr 2014
56
25th
I had pretty high hopes, and there was a lot of potential here, but it's kind of wasted on the fact that you can never really tell what's "real" in the logic of the movie and what's just a fantasy. Maybe that's "the point" but it just kinda left me wondering what I was supposed to take away from the movie.
Rated 03 Apr 2014
moonsmilkmoonsmilk
Rated 23 Nov 2013
8
59th
The last good Carpenter movie. It has it's problems, but that ending is seriously perfect.
Rated 23 Nov 2013
scurryscurry
Rated 14 Nov 2013
60
77th
The perspective is very interesting, but the movie could have gone further, and had a lot more suspense. This is more of an intellectual horror in a way and that's how I'll recommend it.
Rated 14 Nov 2013
begoniabolbegoniabol
Rated 29 Oct 2013
65
53rd
Has some scary bits, like that creepy child, but it's extremely weird (that's the point). And because of that weirdness, it's not my cup of tea. Do like the Lovecraftian atmosphere and monsters
Rated 29 Oct 2013
glm01glm01
Rated 10 Oct 2013
71
41st
70.500
Rated 10 Oct 2013
st_bernaSt. Berna
Rated 13 Feb 2013
50
29th
korku filmleriyle dalga gecen bir korku filmi edasinda. korkutmayi bir anligina bile becerememesi bir yana dursun, komple tasak gecerek izledik filmi. hadi 50'li-60'li yillarda cekilmis olsa donemine gore degerlendireyim ama 90'li yillar icin turunun dandik bir ornegi olmaktan oteye gecememis.
Rated 13 Feb 2013
3drevelation3dRevelation
Rated 09 Jan 2013
33
4th
An absolute mess of a film. I really don't know what else to say.
Rated 09 Jan 2013
drismail08drismail08
Rated 08 Jan 2013
95
98th
film mukemmel ve zor bulunur, izlemyen kacirmasin sacma yorumlara ve puanlara aldanmayin. en iyi gerilim filmlerinden biridir
Rated 08 Jan 2013
taumpytearstaumpytears
Rated 29 Dec 2012
83
35th
A pleasant surprise.
Rated 29 Dec 2012
msdstcmsdstc
Rated 25 Dec 2012
72
70th
Tons of atmosphere with some really strange moments. On one hand it has one or two really great scares. On the other it goes entirely too far over the top. Worth a watch.
Rated 25 Dec 2012
halfangHalfang
Rated 11 Nov 2012
90
72nd
Awesome horror (?) flick.
Rated 11 Nov 2012
sirrobbieSirRobbie
Rated 03 Nov 2012
70
53rd
Some parts were amazing [boy on bicycle]. If it only was more focused and solid it might've been one of Carpenter's finest work.
Rated 03 Nov 2012
gokcanzgokcanz
Rated 26 Oct 2012
70
56th
* Casting, Acting : 6 * Script : 9 * Directing, Aura : 7 * Ease of Viewing : 6 * Naked Eye : 7
Rated 26 Oct 2012
eric_janeric-jan
Rated 25 Oct 2012
70
54th
Here you really see why Carpenter is so much better than most horror movie directors. Amazing tension, a few very creepy scenes and a unique idea of a horror novel come to life put on screen with the right amount of eeriness. Well worth the watch!
Rated 25 Oct 2012
peaceanarchyPeaceAnarchy
Rated 06 Oct 2012
83
72nd
If the mark of a great horror film is that it creeps you out, then this certainly fits the bill. The highlight is definitely Sam Neill, who makes the transitions in his character's state of mind seem perfectly smooth and consistent. Carpenter's direction deserves a nod too, with the visuals and soundtrack combining for a great atmosphere.
Rated 06 Oct 2012
kowryKowry
Rated 11 Jun 2012
30
62nd
While this film certainly had lots of flaws, the Lovecraftian plot and atmosphere made this a really entertaining watch. I also thought this one of Carpenter's strongest films visually.
Rated 11 Jun 2012
spleenspleen
Rated 05 May 2012
78
61st
Something about Jurgen Prochnow never ceases to creep me out. Very underrated Carpenter flick with some decent enough shocks.
Rated 05 May 2012
axleblazeaxleblaze
Rated 13 Mar 2012
83
54th
Fucking crazy.
Rated 13 Mar 2012
mistersplicemistersplice
Rated 08 Jan 2012
40
14th
4- might want to skip this one, not that hot :: great moment when they talk about how "not everyone will read the book"
Rated 08 Jan 2012
hellboy76hellboy76
Rated 01 Jan 2012
67
57th
Underrated horror/thriller from Carpenter. Neill gives a good performance (although I am not sure the lives of insurance investigators are quite like this) and I love that they didn't cop out on the ending and wrap it all up.
Rated 01 Jan 2012
cruelclowncruelclown
Rated 29 Nov 2011
75
62nd
Meta-fiction is nothing new in horror genre, but Carpenter certainly can create a dreadful atmosphere and I always liked Sam Neill's economic performances.
Rated 29 Nov 2011
icybrianIcyBrian
Rated 28 Nov 2011
71
45th
Dark, twisted, & seriously f'ed up. Not bad at all.
Rated 28 Nov 2011
cinematicespCinematicESP
Rated 11 Nov 2011
48
3rd
It has some elements of greatness in the direction, but there's something that keeps it from working. Uninvolving is a good word for it.
Rated 11 Nov 2011
leokittyleokitty
Rated 03 Nov 2011
85
78th
The best Lovecraft movie ever made. ;) Amazing atmosphere and very good performances by the cast. Sam Neill does an excellent job in his role. The last scene of the movie is fantastic.
Rated 03 Nov 2011
aceysaid10AceySaid10%
Rated 09 Aug 2011
82
64th
Overall, not bad. Didn't like the ending but that's consistent with most horror movies. Some cheesy parts but some interesting and well shot parts too.
Rated 09 Aug 2011
iyisinekiyisinek
Rated 28 Jul 2011
30
6th
Kitap, korku romani yazari, kasaba, cinnet getiren insanlar (sacma filmdi, cok sacmaydi, kitaptakiler gercek oluyor. insanlar yaratiga dönüsüyor. ) Begenmedim.
Rated 28 Jul 2011
kojilessKojiless
Rated 23 Jul 2011
60
65th
A little to disjointed to love, but there is a lot to like here.
Rated 23 Jul 2011
davidblastDavidBlast
Rated 07 Jun 2010
60
53rd
Decent enough potpourri of all things Lovecraft, and it is perhaps the best entry to tackle his bizarre universe. It's not scary, and Carmen is annoying, but it does feature Niell, Prochnow and Heston, and the ending is a beauty. Keyword here is: Decent.
Rated 07 Jun 2010
glmglm
Rated 20 Feb 2010
75
55th
75.000
Rated 20 Feb 2010
stanthecaddystanthecaddy
Rated 18 Oct 2009
75
50th
It lacks the immediate punch of other Carpenter movies like Halloween or The Thing but, so long as you've got a bit of patience, it's a fun movie. Sam Neill puts on a solid performance, and Charlton Heston is great in what little screen time that he has.
Rated 18 Oct 2009
yawkcorbyawkcorb
Rated 20 Aug 2009
90
87th
An awesome combination of H.P. Lovecraft and Stephen King. As a sidenote, the DVD features the worst commentary ever. It is the director with the lighting guy, and they talk about how many and what lights were used, and where. That's all they talk about for the whole movie. Brilliant idea there, bringing in the lighting guy to talk about lights... because that is what people want to know about, not any of that boring production crap, no sir, the lights are where it's at.
Rated 20 Aug 2009
twofacednewtTwofacednewt
Rated 06 Aug 2009
60
6th
Was this movie made for T.V or something? I don't think I've ever laughed so hard at a film creature before. Easily Carpenters worst movie.
Rated 06 Aug 2009
freqflyerfreqflyer
Rated 01 Aug 2009
85
83rd
Scares me just thinking of this movie.
Rated 01 Aug 2009
castrophCastroph
Rated 29 Jul 2009
8
85th
Whether you take it seriously or not, it's still a thrill ride.
Rated 29 Jul 2009
ryanscoomerRyanscoomer
Rated 17 May 2009
80
79th
Interesting concept. Overall a good horror flick.
Rated 17 May 2009
nunstranglernunstrangler
Rated 16 Mar 2009
43
16th
Standard horror flick pays homage to or pokes fun at Stephen King (you decide). Worth a look for the above-average special effects and makeup provided by ILM.
Rated 16 Mar 2009
cultofsamecult_of_same
Rated 04 Mar 2009
30
31st
I thought the plot was very original at the time and very creepy.
Rated 04 Mar 2009
irvinejumpirvinejump
Rated 30 Sep 2008
80
84th
Out there, but worth watching
Rated 30 Sep 2008
roastbeefRoastbeef
Rated 05 Sep 2008
90
89th
awesome if you love lovecraft or sam neil
Rated 05 Sep 2008

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...