sign in
register
Watch
Amazon Prime Video Amazon Prime Video with Ads Google Play Movies
+8
Horns
Horns
+8
JustWatch
Your probable score
?
Horns

Horns

2014
Drama, Fantasy
2h 0m
Blamed for the brutal murder of his longtime girlfriend (Juno Temple), a small-town guy (Daniel Radcliffe) awakens one morning to find a pair of horns growing from his head, in this offbeat supernatural thriller from horror ace Alexandre Aja (Haute tension, Piranha 3D). (tiff.net)

Directed by:

Alexandre Aja

Screenwriter:

Joe Hill, Keith Bunin

Starring:

Heather Graham, Kathleen Quinlan, Kelli Garner, David Morse, James Remar, Daniel Radcliffe, Max Minghella, Joe Anderson, Juno Temple, Michael Adamthwaite, Kendra Anderson

Genres:

Drama, Fantasy, Horror, Mystery

Countries:

Canada, USA

Language:

English
imdb IMDb
Update history
Suggest edit

Horns

2014
Drama, Fantasy
2h 0m
Your probable score
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer
Avg Percentile 40.22% from 785 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

(789)
Compact view
clear
Compact view
Show
Sort
gordonbombayGordonBombay
Rated 09 Oct 2014
75
53rd
Huh... so the christians were right after all. Harry Potter IS a path to the devil.
Rated 09 Oct 2014
paxtonPaxton
Rated 15 Nov 2014
63
44th
Since this movie is brand new, you probably assume I saw it in the theater. But, actually, I paid to watch it at home. Yeah. Now who's embarrassed? As an aside, this was my tenth Daniel Radcliffe movie. Tenth! I'd have to drop some serious dating stories to top that embarrassment...like the time I wet my pants while driving back from an NBA game on a first date. First! Joke's on you though. I married that girl.
Rated 15 Nov 2014
pausssepaussse
Rated 08 Mar 2015
80
85th
I enjoyed the movie, wasn't predictable. I recommend it. After reading the criticks, I taught it would be all garbage, was positivly surprised and not at any point bored. Just a bit unclear...
Rated 08 Mar 2015
janusjanus
Rated 04 Aug 2015
80
77th
Radcliffe maintains an effective performance even with two big turds stuck on his face.
Rated 04 Aug 2015
stradivariusStradivarius
Rated 23 Apr 2015
40
11th
Can't seem to decide what kind of movie it wants to be, ends up being mediocre and halfbaked in a number of different directions.
Rated 23 Apr 2015
spokowapSpokoWap
Rated 09 Nov 2014
60
33rd
Przed seansem obiecalem sobie nie porownywac filmu do ksiazki. Nie dalo sie. Jesli nie czytaliscie "Rogow" Hilla, odpuscie sobie film i biegnijcie w te pedy do ksiegarni.
Rated 09 Nov 2014
barraocBarraoc
Rated 22 Oct 2014
70
64th
And a fine set of horns they are indeed.
Rated 22 Oct 2014
medikolaynmedikolayn
Rated 16 Oct 2014
33
7th
the most riddiculous movie ever.
Rated 16 Oct 2014
matthew_parkinsonMatthew Parkinson
Rated 06 Oct 2014
50
47th
Horns is not a success, primarily because it doesn't understand what tone it's trying to go for. Or, its director doesn't understand. It plays out like a black comedy, even though it doesn't really fit that mold and doesn't often try to make us laugh; it's weird to try to describe it. It's also pretty shallow, and its overuse of flashbacks drew me out of the narrative more often than it helped. It's got a good supporting cast and some of the effects are decent, but Horns isn't worth your time.
Rated 06 Oct 2014
glumpy99glumpy_99
Rated 12 Feb 2024
84
73rd
As usual for Aja, this is all over the place tonally and performance wise, but it works - Radcliffe goes straight and sincere, making him the perfect focal point (and foil) for the strange and outlandish characters around him. Probably the best non-King example of actually capturing the unique mood and tone of a King novel, especially as childhood dynamics repeat and reverberate into the “adult” world. Never especially scary, but moments of unsettling gore keep the audience off-guard.
Rated 12 Feb 2024
panzerwolfpanzerwolf
Rated 11 Jan 2023
75
72nd
Oh yeah, I really enjoyed this one. I haven't read the book yet so I don't know how it compares, but going into this completely blind (I just knew the dude grows horns) and it kept me interested in seeing just what will unfold next, and I couldn't guess all the things that were coming. Great performances here from an interesting cast. Just a good, twisted little story.
Rated 11 Jan 2023
elmakebabielmakebabi
Rated 11 Apr 2021
50
21st
One of those "bad but memorable movies".
Rated 11 Apr 2021
xakkmasterXakkMaster
Rated 06 Sep 2020
71
42nd
Radcliffe gives a good performance and the concept is really interesting. Some great moments overall, though the ending confrontations underwhelmed me a bit.
Rated 06 Sep 2020
darrenDarren
Rated 21 Jun 2020
38
13th
Some laughs some okay ideas.
Rated 21 Jun 2020
seethruskinSeethruskin
Rated 07 Jun 2020
2
10th
Kind of an interesting idea I guess, but whenever Aja get bogged down in these "big idea" movies (Mirrors, the second half of High Tension) he makes the films absolute slogs to get through. Maybe some are just meant to play inside the genre confines.....
Rated 07 Jun 2020
goookcegoookce
Rated 03 Aug 2019
65
22nd
That was so fucking cheap and absurdly and disgustingly realistic that i couldn't keep my eyes off. Hep bu çocuğun alnına bişiler oluyor, ne çektin be daniel.
Rated 03 Aug 2019
hardcoreufohardcoreufo
Rated 09 Jul 2018
65
29th
Film is all over the place, it can't decide what it wants to be. Interesting premise though. Has a bit of a Stephen King feel, with the scenes of the characters as kids, not surprising considering Hill's parentage. Bonus points for having Sunset Rubdown playing during the end credits.
Rated 09 Jul 2018
fmoraesfmoraes
Rated 20 May 2018
70
53rd
2018/05/19
Rated 20 May 2018
metalhankmetalhank
Rated 21 Mar 2018
73
84th
One of these flicks that are probably better to know little about before watching. Has quite a few elements from many genres which all seem to come together quite greatly. Radcliff puts in an impressive performance putting in many different emotions.
Rated 21 Mar 2018
realmacgyverRealMacgyver
Rated 15 Mar 2016
70
54th
Radcliffe is great in this. The film itself is great for the most part but looses it a bit and there's zero explanation for why things are even happening. Which is fine, but feels like weak plotting
Rated 15 Mar 2016
catnipCatnip
Rated 03 Feb 2016
50
34th
I liked it right up until the ending.
Rated 03 Feb 2016
thedicemanTheDiceman
Rated 09 Jan 2016
60
62nd
Amusing.
Rated 09 Jan 2016
damildamil
Rated 01 Dec 2015
60
43rd
I really liked the concept, and most of the story is fine, but the execution was problematic. I think a lot of the issue was tone; it didn't seem to know whether it wanted to be a serious crime mystery or a supernatural comedy. It had moments where both of these elements shined, but the juxtaposition made for a confusing experience. Cinematography was good, and the performances were fine. I guess I liked it enough in the end, but I don't really know if it was a good movie.
Rated 01 Dec 2015
modernmillieModernMillie
Rated 07 Sep 2015
75
22nd
I didn't feel like I was watching Harry Potter which I attribute to Daniel's acting. Looking forward to seeing him in more dramatic roles. Interesting premise, with no clear moral beat over your head. Ending seemed anti-climatic from all the lead up.
Rated 07 Sep 2015
istayawayistayaway
Rated 12 Jul 2015
68
20th
Disappointing. A great idea that starts off rather strong but then goes nowhere with said idea.
Rated 12 Jul 2015
topaz024topaz024
Rated 30 Jun 2015
70
26th
A little schizophrenic and tone-deaf, but what works, works nicely. Alexandre Aja, I can't quit you.
Rated 30 Jun 2015
driscarpindriscarpin
Rated 30 May 2015
12
4th
Tem tanta coisa misógina aqui que chega a ser inacreditável.
Rated 30 May 2015
amazedemonamazedemon
Rated 15 May 2015
65
62nd
I wanted to like Horns a lot more than I actually did. The film delivers a good performance from Radcliffe, an interesting concept, some well shot scenes and a well-matched soundtrack. My problem, in essence, boils down to a weak screenplay. It never builds or maintains enough tension to be exciting. It's possibly too long and unfocused. The tragedy is that it showed so much potential. Horns isn't actually bad it's just disappointing.
Rated 15 May 2015
mrhappyMr.Happy
Rated 17 Apr 2015
74
37th
It's not terribly amazing, but the writing stays clever pretty long and Daniel as an actor does great, so though it won't blow you away it's definitely worth the watch.
Rated 17 Apr 2015
clark_novaClark Nova
Rated 11 Apr 2015
74
36th
I just knew a HORNEY joke was going to be on this film.
Rated 11 Apr 2015
groovysoulsGroovy_Souls
Rated 04 Apr 2015
60
40th
Horns was definitely a mix of genres, but it never really decided if it wanted to be Twilight, Fargo, or Se7en. And that cost it. While it tried to figure it out exactly what it was however, there were cool shots and most of the acting was pretty good. The story could have been more focused and improved but Horns is a good movie for what it was, although just a sad reflection of what it could have been.
Rated 04 Apr 2015
ladystardustLadyStardust
Rated 04 Mar 2015
50
6th
Watch Daniel do a Midwestern accent...and a Dublin accent...and a wiseguy accent...and a James Dean accent. Watch him do em all in one sentence. Listen to his jaw audibly tense up from rounding American R's. "Wait...wasn't that line almost too American?" Only Daniel Radcliffe's nuanced acting can produce questions such as these.
Rated 04 Mar 2015
abunchofcatsABUNCHOFCATS
Rated 24 Feb 2015
70
29th
Interesting concept in a confused movie. Rewatch: better than originally thought, nothing amazing but was fun
Rated 24 Feb 2015
yoohooyoohoo
Rated 24 Feb 2015
75
52nd
Interesting premise and a nice setting, Daniel Radcliffe shows us that he isn't just Harry Potter anymore. Strong story throughout, although it ends rather weak.
Rated 24 Feb 2015
dylanwilson6dylanwilson6
Rated 21 Feb 2015
70
50th
It can be funny at time, it can be dark at times and it can be lovely at times. Problem is that it doesn't meet those criteria often enough and just meanders around at points.
Rated 21 Feb 2015
sirstuckeySirStuckey
Rated 13 Feb 2015
40
14th
I read the book, vaguely remember it. I do remember enjoying it, which is the opposite of how I reacted to this movie. acting was ok, story was pretty bad. Not sure if it just doesn't translate to the screen well or if the screenplay was just bad.
Rated 13 Feb 2015
ikkegoemikkeikkegoemikke
Rated 11 Feb 2015
55
42nd
Agatha Christie goes demonic .... My opinion here : http://opinion-as-a-moviefreak.blogspot.be/2014/12/horns-2013.html
Rated 11 Feb 2015
chemical404chemical404
Rated 11 Feb 2015
9
1st
Hated it. Nonsensical teenie paranormal romance stuff.
Rated 11 Feb 2015
burkayadaligburkayadalig
Rated 08 Feb 2015
40
5th
terrible script, terrible editing, mediocre acting, good choice of soundtrack
Rated 08 Feb 2015
eritsukueritsuku
Rated 08 Feb 2015
69
39th
Points for originality, but seems to be the script of a male teenager caught between the worlds of Christian-based morality, love angst, and fantasy. Its points were not subtle, and it seemed to lack focus, at least vis-a-vis take-home messages. Good soundtrack though.
Rated 08 Feb 2015
the_pirateThe Pirate
Rated 02 Feb 2015
79
55th
The only word I can think to describe it is "Weird".
Rated 02 Feb 2015
hellboy76hellboy76
Rated 28 Jan 2015
65
45th
The movie ultimately misses it's mark in storytelling, feeling ut of whack with the subject matter it portrays. Radcliffe is hit or miss at times coming off as forced and wooden. However there is just enough of an interesting vibe to push it to at least a moderately entertaining film. Bonus points for the soundtrack.
Rated 28 Jan 2015
shauny18shauny18
Rated 16 Jan 2015
43
21st
Ive been really impressed with Daniel Radcliffe's movie choices because hes definitely trying something different each time. Unfortunately this one was a bit of a let down. It had all the ingredients for a decent horror/drama movie but its mainly directed at the romance between the lead couple. There are some nice ideas at times but im not sure the film makers knew what film they wanted to make. With a clear genre direction I think there is a better film to be made.
Rated 16 Jan 2015
spaceflohspacefloh
Rated 18 Nov 2014
60
58th
eng; [horns]; ein junge verliebt sich in ein mädchen und sie kommen zusammen, doch eines morgens erwacht er und wird des mordes an ihr beschuldigt obwohl sie sich liebten - eine spurensuche mit diabolischen begleiterscheinungen beginnt.;
Rated 18 Nov 2014
kingjohnbbqKingjohnbbq
Rated 07 Nov 2014
90
65th
I was still skeptical about him moving on from harry potter after his woman in black movie, it was good, not great. This movie was Great. It is this kind of Bizarre concept that I watch movies for really. This movie kind of reminds me of the game Fable, for obvious reasons. Its great to see him have the cthulu ability that brings out the crazy in everyone he meets which tends to make things intense the whole movie. I liked harry potter but hes really becoming a better more sincere actor here.
Rated 07 Nov 2014
wezzoWezzo
Rated 04 Nov 2014
69
23rd
An entertaining, involving story that treads a nice dramatic/horrific line. It feels a little long, though, and the performances are inconsistent, which detracts from the atmosphere somewhat.
Rated 04 Nov 2014
edkrakedkrak
Rated 02 Nov 2014
40
19th
Has some really good scenes especially in the first half, but it ends up being extremely cheesy romance story wrapped up in a horror-comedy disguise. What a wasted potential.
Rated 02 Nov 2014
antidood1antidood1
Rated 28 Oct 2014
75
71st
I want to compare this with Besson's Lucy, because I feel like they have the same sense of fun. Both movies can also be described as "one big mess". I like how this movie has a lot of different aspects (horror, drama, comedy), and they all work surprisingly well. Radcliffe obviously has a lot of fun with his role, although I can't say he ever truly nails it. Juno Temple is really hot. I feel like that needs to be said as well. Oh yeah, the movie.. I'd say it's flawed and pretty awesome.
Rated 28 Oct 2014
omgfridgeomgfridge
Rated 26 Oct 2014
6
52nd
Cool idea with its fair share of problems but can see Radcliffe having fun with the material here.
Rated 26 Oct 2014
ernestinaErnestina
Rated 16 Oct 2014
70
74th
So many things are crossing my mind after watching the movie, that I really don't know what to think, as an overall opinion. The movie is either a masterpiece, a complete waste of time or just weird.
Rated 16 Oct 2014
chmulcr0nchmul_cr0n
Rated 16 Oct 2014
66
43rd
bonus points for the headshot :>
Rated 16 Oct 2014
carsonwidCarsonWid
Rated 15 Oct 2014
60
33rd
There are some good things happening here, but it just doesn't completely click.
Rated 15 Oct 2014
td888td888
Rated 13 Oct 2014
60
57th
It feels like a Wes Anderson movie. Whether that's good or bad, I don't know.
Rated 13 Oct 2014
superargoSuperargo
Rated 09 Oct 2014
66
55th
Yeah, so...the horns stand for guilt. This movie lays it on pretty thick sometimes, what with the devils and the angels and the hells and the heavens, but it's exceedingly well-made and well-shot and well-acted and REALLY good-looking and really moody and kinda gets under your skin and had a few awesome moments and I kinda dug it. That's all, I guess.
Rated 09 Oct 2014
parexus2Parexus2
Rated 06 Oct 2014
75
52nd
Enjoyed it up until the end in which it got a little weird.
Rated 06 Oct 2014
muutanetmuutanet
Rated 05 Oct 2014
47
37th
Juno Temple is a sweet actress. Horns did not know which genera it should like to be. There was a lot of effects without reason. For example what was logic for horns? To make Juno ask if he's horny? A terrible mishmash.
Rated 05 Oct 2014
aquillaAquilla
Rated 05 Oct 2014
65
26th
I was gonna hate this movie. Especially after a certain scene. But then I stopped watching it as the movie it was advertised as. There is only one way to enjoy this one and that is to watch it as a super hero/villain story.
Rated 05 Oct 2014
jackdrekjackdrek
Rated 05 Oct 2014
67
68th
Speaking as a huge fan of Aja, Horns doesn't sit with his previous works as I had hoped. The humorous moments lack the bite of Piranha, momentum lacks the drive of High Tension, and the violence and horror of Hills Have Eyes are absent. Horns is Aja's most visually and technically accomplished work, but also his most conservative work. Tbh I worry he has lost his blistering, manic edge. Fucking Radcliffe was a huge casting mistake; he doesn't have the charisma, darkness or pain to pull this off.
Rated 05 Oct 2014
billyshearsBillyShears
Rated 04 Oct 2014
70
53rd
Radcliffe isn't a good actor } ;)
Rated 04 Oct 2014
donquixoticdonquixotic
Rated 03 Oct 2014
60
52nd
Love the idea but the execution is a bit soft, it's like it should be a weird horror-comedy but it's not funny and it's not horrory enough. Also Radcliffe just looks too wholesome
Rated 03 Oct 2014

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...