sign in
register
Watch
Peacock Premium Peacock Premium Plus Max Amazon Channel
+9
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
+9
JustWatch
Your probable score
?
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire

Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire

2005
Suspense/Thriller, Fantasy
2h 37m
Harry finds himself selected as an underaged competitor in a dangerous multi-wizardary school competition. (imdb)

Directed by:

Mike Newell

Screenwriter:

Steve Kloves, J.K. Rowling

Starring:

Gary Oldman, Ralph Fiennes, Michael Gambon, Alan Rickman, David Tennant, Brendan Gleeson, Maggie Smith, Jason Isaacs, Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, Robert Pattinson

Franchise:

Harry Potter

Genres:

Suspense/Thriller, Fantasy, Adventure, Mystery

Countries:

UK, USA

Languages:

English, French, Latin
imdb IMDb
Update history
Suggest edit

Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire

2005
Suspense/Thriller, Fantasy
2h 37m
Your probable score
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer
Avg Percentile 50.18% from 14086 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

(14205)
Compact view
clear
Compact view
Show
Sort
alex_watkinsAlex Watkins
Rated 16 Jul 2007
3
38th
Rushed and sloppy; though the movie is as confident in its choices as Prisoner of Azkaban was, it's not to the same effect, because the choices are nowhere near as good. It seems fucking campy. The book is either my favorite or second-favorite in the series, and this doesn't quite hold up to it. Still, I enjoy it.
Rated 16 Jul 2007
billyshearsBillyShears
Rated 12 May 2012
75
65th
The guy replacing Dumbledore after the first two movies is such a different character. He'd spit in your mouth and call it a spell.
Rated 12 May 2012
beedubBeeDub
Rated 14 Jul 2015
85
62nd
Skims over too much narrative ground to really be effective (this book, not the seventh, should have been two movies), but still reasonably entertaining.
Rated 14 Jul 2015
kasperlKasperL
Rated 13 Jul 2011
60
50th
AKA "The One Where Nothing Happens So We'll Just Invent A Completely Unnecessary Dispute Between Harry And Ron And Throw A Ball And A Tournament".
Rated 13 Jul 2011
jebJeb
Rated 20 Dec 2009
67
49th
This is kind of a middle film based on likeability. It is worse than Azkaban, but greater than the first two. The noticeable production flaws and terrible character developments from the first two have remerged, but the dark and broody yet bewitching feeling of the third has been retained. Difficult to rate.
Rated 20 Dec 2009
lucluc
Rated 09 Nov 2008
65
43rd
It's a family-movie but for me not so intresting. It's not my type of family-movie that I want to see. It's now the fourth movie and it's always the same : the same school, witches etc. I hope they will not make 10 movies like that !
Rated 09 Nov 2008
misterlizardmisterlizard
Rated 31 Jul 2011
40
43rd
Making your kids' movie into something 'darker' should involve more than turning down the brightness in post-production.
Rated 31 Jul 2011
evranaevrana
Rated 18 Aug 2012
51
15th
I caught it on TV. Harry Potter makes me feel old, as I can never understand what is all the fuss about it. For me, everything in it screams 'mediocre' and it is basically a mish-mash of all fantasy ideas with half-cooked social commentary. I can't even find one likable character in it. Most probably, I will watch all of the series over the next 20 years and will never be able to make sense of it. Maybe production quality gets better or something....
Rated 18 Aug 2012
mwgerbmwgerb
Rated 14 Nov 2010
32
17th
The notably dark visual style, decent performances, and some entertaining scenes don't make up for the absolute shambles they made of the plot. Adapting a novel, even a lengthy one, is not an excuse for such a terrible, rushed exposition. Neither is cutting away from major scenes for budgetary concerns, and rushing on to the next plot point that has to be referenced.
Rated 14 Nov 2010
hellboy76hellboy76
Rated 20 Sep 2010
68
65th
More Potter, the highlight of this one is Gleeson. Newell was a mistake after Cuaron.
Rated 20 Sep 2010
grahamjGrahamJ
Rated 05 Jun 2010
67
21st
Decent. Inferior to Azkaban. Lacks that film's visual flair. Often feels disjointed; plot points are introduced suddenly or are dropped abruptly. Feels like a highlights reel of a much better and less fragmented movie. Needs longer running time, and a better use of it.
Rated 05 Jun 2010
overratedoverrated
Rated 19 Jan 2010
28
19th
Harry Potter is really not my thing and this is the only film I've seen, dragged into it by a group of friends with nothing better to do. At the risk of this becoming a critique of the series in general, I don't get the appeal of a blank slate protagonist thrown into the worst aspects of high-school drama and cheesy CGI-heavy fantasy. Like that test where HP has to save his friends from the lake... you're saying teachers kidnapped them and left them to die in order to raise the stakes?
Rated 19 Jan 2010
uniquenameUniqueName
Rated 15 Jan 2009
70
34th
Harry's losing it, the charm and mystery solving adventure of the first two is nearly entirely lost. And this is nowhere near the dark brooding nature of Azkaban.
Rated 15 Jan 2009
lachapellelachapelle
Rated 14 Aug 2007
68
29th
This film is just all right, and honestly, a bit of a disappointment after the first three. The CGI is superb, but it does not make up for very large plot holes. Hopefully the fifth movie will capture the spirit better.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
obdurateObdurate
Rated 06 Mar 2023
80
67th
I'll give this an 80 because it ends strongly, once Voldemort shows up. It was a 75 before that because it is better than the first, on par with the second. Gleeson and Pattinson are great additions, especially Gleeson since he was given a lot to work with. There are flaws, somebody pointed out pointless Harry/Ron arguing, which is true. The directing is not as good as Prisoner, but the acting as a whole may be the strongest it's been up to this point.
Rated 06 Mar 2023
rihreyrihrey
Rated 19 Apr 2020
64
85th
how come absolutely everyone's straight at Hogwarts, it makes no fucking sense.
Rated 19 Apr 2020
harmonicaHarmonica
Rated 13 Feb 2019
72
40th
From a storytelling perspective the strongest or at least most involved film of the series upto this point. The plotting is engaging, even if the central premise of the inter-school wizarding tourney just seems overly grisly. Though a little light on laughs, and gloomy throughout, it has real dramatic clout. For the first time, the teachers are no longer able to wholly protect the students in the face of true peril (though you might think the PTA would step in at some point..).
Rated 13 Feb 2019
corbadCorbad
Rated 03 Apr 2015
70
53rd
Misses a great deal of material, but tells what it can in a movie's time frame through occasionally lovely cinematography, solid art direction, and acting that is a little unbalanced (I'm looking at you, Hermione).
Rated 03 Apr 2015
vengefulkbmVengefulKBM
Rated 09 Feb 2015
35
11th
Pretty ineptly put together, the clear worst of the Harry Potter movie franchise. I try to set aside my fandom for the books, but what they did to the plot here is pretty much just a mess. Spending half an hour at a school dance and going on a long tangent with a dragon chase scene, only to skip over practically all of the interesting parts for noticeably rushed exposition, is not my idea of a good adaptation of any novel. The entry of Big Bad Voldemort into the series is pretty good, though.
Rated 09 Feb 2015
hsncrspywlhsncrspywl
Rated 06 Aug 2013
58
25th
This film suffers from a very oppressive & bleak tone - it looks so grey and bland! While the climax of the film is very dark (and featuring Ralph Fiennes chewing a lot of scenery) the rest of the film kind of suffers from this shift in tone - while the plot becomes near incomprehensible at points, often needing resolved with the return of endless expository dialogue. The cast are great, especially the young leads, although I found their hairstyles irritating.
Rated 06 Aug 2013
ddrudgesd_drudges
Rated 08 Apr 2013
20
17th
Tries to be an exact reproduction of the book and unsurprisingly fails. There is no effort to adapt the story to explain the stuff that was cut due to time constraints, resulting in an incoherent mess. I actually had to have many of the key points explained to me by a fan. Apart from the very end, the movie didn't advance the main story at all. Skip it.
Rated 08 Apr 2013
basasdurabasasdura
Rated 15 Feb 2013
65
47th
These fucking haircuts, man, this is like the ugly hair year in the wizard world.
Rated 15 Feb 2013
judsonladyjudsonlady
Rated 21 Oct 2012
60
46th
Kind of a let down after Prisoner of Azkaban. Story line didn't seem to flow as well as 2&3. Guess it's your normal middle child of the series syndrome striking again.
Rated 21 Oct 2012
purgatospurgatos
Rated 14 Oct 2012
65
40th
This one had a ghost trying to check out Harry Potter's wiener.
Rated 14 Oct 2012
adoubleadouble
Rated 22 Sep 2012
68
40th
Not awful, but kind of sloppy and disjointed. Ideas from the book are introduced and then either disappear after 5 minutes or are never followed up on. Gleeson is fun as always, and Ralph Fiennes' first scene as Voldemort is one of my favorite of the series. Not as good is the tottally pointless Ron/Harry arguing, the pretty dull action scenes, and the Quidditch World Cup that you get to see for like 30 seconds.
Rated 22 Sep 2012
zioZio
Rated 12 Jun 2012
50
33rd
The tipping point for the series. It had its moments, and some very nice imagery, but this is where the angst of the series builds up and starts taking itself far too seriously. Goblet of Fire is not a bad movie as it still is fun to watch and maybe the best of the later Potter films, but it is a point of no return from the wonderment from the that the first three films had.
Rated 12 Jun 2012
myfavchordsmyfavchords
Rated 16 Feb 2012
76
57th
This is not the best in the series but it is still a good movie. The three leads do a great job in this one. If you are a Harry Potter fan then obviously check this one out.
Rated 16 Feb 2012
naurunauru
Rated 07 Aug 2011
42
37th
The plot doesn't really make sense, nor do the motivations of the characters, but at least Brendan Gleeson is on hand to elevate the scenes he's in. Glad to see a sliver of darkness toward the end, though it isn't nearly enough for the viewer to feel fairly compensated for the self-indulgent runtime.
Rated 07 Aug 2011
angrypierreangrypierre
Rated 23 Jan 2011
71
52nd
These films are getting darker, which is good, and longer, which isn't so good. I continue to hope that Ron and Hermionie will be less whiny in the next one. I think I will probably be disappointed.
Rated 23 Jan 2011
elahnElahn
Rated 11 Sep 2010
50
20th
An enjoyable time waster. Worth watching, if it's on.
Rated 11 Sep 2010
mr_filmMr. Film
Rated 25 Jul 2010
89
70th
Second best HP after Prisoner. These both films show the matureness the latter films had, but without sacrificign the heart the early films had. All in all, these two succeed in both at being mature and having a heart
Rated 25 Jul 2010
okkervilOkkervil
Rated 01 Aug 2009
50
38th
As with most all the Potter films, this is a perfectly okay watch, and it does nothing exceptional.
Rated 01 Aug 2009
janusjanus
Rated 15 Dec 2008
55
25th
An unenthusiastic followup to Cuaron's artful Prisoner of Azkaban. It feels rushed, cutting most of the book's amusing tangents (to be fair, the novel is over 700 pages), and the result is a film that moves quickly but gives the audience no time to savor any of the detail of Rowling's world. The three leads seem tired of their roles, and I don't blame them.
Rated 15 Dec 2008
fake_shempFake Shemp
Rated 01 Dec 2008
5
3rd
Sister makes me take her to see the Harry Potters... bleugh!
Rated 01 Dec 2008
mini_tMini-T
Rated 09 Nov 2008
82
32nd
For the moment only have seen the first one , and this one. Expected more of the 3 'great challenges' , and Fleur and Kruml. Alsow tought hole the film would be more darker ( from what I have heard ). Liked the Potter vs Voldemort confrontation , and that's why I want to see the rest. For Voldemort. I can understand why many people love it , but I think it's just alright and fun to look at.
Rated 09 Nov 2008
magbMagb
Rated 07 Aug 2008
70
39th
This is a decent film, but it has a rather rushed feel to it. I imagine that some parts must be fairly confusing to people who haven't read the book. I don't think I've read the book since it was published, and I found myself puzzled by certain parts. There are also too many scenes that felt like they should've been there but that were obviously taken out/never filmed for time reasons -- the quidditch world cup match comes to mind.
Rated 07 Aug 2008
ihatemoviesIHateMovies
Rated 18 May 2008
75
35th
At points this movie is laughably awful, but I love me some HP.
Rated 18 May 2008
willofgaiawillofgaia
Rated 14 Aug 2007
70
22nd
A disappointment after Prisoner of Azkaban.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
ytadelYtadel
Rated 14 Aug 2007
7
84th
A fun fantasy flick. The kid actors are noticeably improved; Rupert Grint in particular comes into his own with a surprising comic flair as Ron and won a lot of laughs from me. The major set pieces like the Yule Ball and the resurrection of Voldemort capture the feel of the book, although the movie also emulates the book's extremely scattershot storyline. Nonetheless, it's an entertaining Potter.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
triffidtriffid
Rated 14 Aug 2007
83
61st
Not as good as the Prisoner, but still a surprisingly good HP adaptation. The beginning must be confusing for people who didn't read the book, but the ending is just perfect, with Fiennes as an incredible Voldemort. I have to admit I was truly frigthened in the cinema, which hasn't happened to me for a very long time.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
vince_leoVince Leo
Rated 14 Aug 2007
60
36th
While the baggage and confusing mythos are beginning to necessitate reading the books to truly understand just what is going on during any given scene, I'm not going to succumb to the impulse. My rationale is as it always has been with book adaptations: if you have to read the book in order to understand a movie, then it isn't really that good of an adaptation then, is it?
Rated 14 Aug 2007
ndkchkNdkchk
Rated 14 Aug 2007
74
55th
Best one yet.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
lightcatlightcat
Rated 14 Aug 2007
75
0th
Conventional wisdom has it that this, the fourth installement in the lucrative Harry Potter series, is also the best. I beg to differ. It's dark, scary, and even features Daniel Radcliffe in a soapsud-filled bathtub, but the whole never does add up to more than the sum of its parts. To see true justice done to Harry Potter, watch Alfonso Cuarón's "Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban": sheer magic, made with an obvious relish for the proceedings at hand.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
martintellerMartinTeller
Rated 27 Jan 2007
68
32nd
Not as distinctive (or as fun) as Azkaban, it still does a damn good job. It's a bit rushed, even with all the superfluous bits from the book cut out. There's so much ground to cover that important plot threads like Harry's increasing unpopularity arise and get resolved in the space of a few minutes. This is also a rather dark and gloomy entry in the series, and earns its PG-13 rating. Even the ending is very subdued, lacking the triumphant oomph of the previous films.
Rated 27 Jan 2007
zaveraZavera
Rated 23 Aug 2024
100
72nd
It is so cool
Rated 23 Aug 2024
gracesigmabaddiegracesigmabaddie
Rated 23 Aug 2024
99
36th
So good i loved that Cedric died even tho he was hot
Rated 23 Aug 2024
thatyoungmthatyoungm
Rated 18 Nov 2023
88
61st
I actually really like the darker tone this film sets, as this is the first real turning point in the franchise where the stakes are raised and the film tackles more mature subject matter. I think there are still some really inventive sequences here and the first taste of what a Harry vs Voldemort spell battle would look like. Serves as a bridge for the back half of the series, but still well done.
Rated 18 Nov 2023
matthagenmatthagen
Rated 13 Jul 2023
49
39th
I hate to say it, but this plot is a mess. I largely don't understand the chain of events or character motivations. Why is Ron mad at Harry, only for that idea to fall apart completely? How in the world did the events depicted take up an entire school year? Did some children almost get murdered at the bottom of the sea? Is anyone still down there? How in the hell did Harry get from the maze to a graveyard, and then back again? Magic I guess. It's all so convenient. It's fine I guess.
Rated 13 Jul 2023
bzymusbzymus
Rated 13 Apr 2023
68
35th
audiovisual 73 acting 70 overall feeling 62 avg 68
Rated 13 Apr 2023
kubricksuckskubricksucks
Rated 10 Apr 2023
75
54th
The plot of this one is silly but like all the movies the casting and acting are what make it entertaining (couldn't care less about the books). Radcliffe becomes progressively more unbearable as things progress, but at least we get the good Dumbledore.
Rated 10 Apr 2023
mindvrmindvr
Rated 23 Feb 2023
40
17th
Pretty terrible as a standalone movie, weak as moving book illustration.
Rated 23 Feb 2023
sweekodenSweekoden
Rated 02 Jan 2023
49
30th
Stretches one's suspension of disbelief at every turn in a way the previous ones didn't. Like, this seems an extraordinarily poorly thought out event, and apparently it used to be even worse by including kids much younger than this? Ain't no way...
Rated 02 Jan 2023
jessjess125Jessjess125
Rated 12 Aug 2022
92
85th
Oh the wild hair year
Rated 12 Aug 2022
ceekay19Ceekay19
Rated 30 Mar 2022
70
54th
Dumbledore: "Dark and difficult times lie ahead. Soon we must all face the choice between what is right and what is easy."
Rated 30 Mar 2022
ab_i_hayaAb-ı Haya
Rated 14 Mar 2022
65
19th
01.17 Hobbit
Rated 14 Mar 2022
peyezpeyez
Rated 22 Jan 2022
6
55th
The glimpses Rowling gives us, however fleeting, of a wizarding world beyond her own sod leave me wishing she had been brave enough to commit and take us somewhere outside of Hogwarts, The Center of the Known Universe, for this story. Instead, the plot imports some French girls and... uh... "our friends from the North." The tournament is decent fun, and the stakes finally seem to hit the sweet spot for this franchise. I like it.
Rated 22 Jan 2022
detoxDetox
Rated 07 Jan 2022
65
34th
By far the best movie of the franchise. The first 30 minutes are a constant happening and after that you get some good high school drama and the crazy tournament. The finale really stuck with me when I read the book as a kid and I'd say Newell succeeded in brining a bit of real darkness to the movie in his vision of it. Sure, the movie as a whole is super uneven, especially when it comes to the side characters, but I had great fun with it nevertheless.
Rated 07 Jan 2022
themovieguruTheMovieGuru
Rated 29 Dec 2021
94
81st
The main characters are growing up (their adolescent reactions and overall behavior deliciously realistic), and so does the franchise. Things start to get seriously ominous, with Lord Voldemort making a full return in what is a particularly spectacular film.
Rated 29 Dec 2021
nzpete006NZPete006
Rated 06 Jul 2021
88
74th
Harry potter is pog
Rated 06 Jul 2021
yusufklksyusufklks
Rated 01 Jun 2021
70
59th
Serideki keyifli işlerden.
Rated 01 Jun 2021
soixistSoixist
Rated 30 Mar 2021
75
43rd
Good
Rated 30 Mar 2021
greenerGreener
Rated 11 Feb 2021
73
70th
Considering the original book's length, the movie very well captured/visualized most of the important moments within a short running time.
Rated 11 Feb 2021
punqPUNQ
Rated 02 Jan 2021
70
96th
Too many one-off characters for my liking, but I had forgotten Robert Pattinson had a prominent role in a Harry Potter movie, so that was a nice surprise. The fairytale aspect managed to carry the experience to be magically thrilling, but this 4th one was probable the weakest at this point.
Rated 02 Jan 2021
doyler29doyler29
Rated 20 Dec 2020
70
42nd
I don't really have much interest in the world of Harry Potter. Back in the 2000's, I saw the first 3 films at various points, but I remember almost nothing about them. My complaints are really aesthetic. If magic were real, but it all existed within the bounds of this silly stereotypical wizard shit, I'd be greatly disappointed.
Rated 20 Dec 2020
brellbrell
Rated 07 Nov 2020
10
8th
the real start of the bad ones, and I hated it for that. I remember not being crazy about PoA until this one came out, and then PoA graduated to ''actually great in comparison, let's just play it on a loop instead''. still not crazy about this even after the fanwank wore off
Rated 07 Nov 2020
dogeatmoondogeatmoon
Rated 16 Oct 2020
65
45th
Probably the most fun Harry Potter movie.
Rated 16 Oct 2020
moviesky08moviesky08
Rated 22 Aug 2020
82
88th
Dumbledore: Perhaps. Personally, I've never had much time for heroes (Senin gibi kahramanlara hiç saygı duymadım).
Rated 22 Aug 2020
pug000pug000
Rated 17 May 2020
35
47th
Changed too much from the book, one of the weakest movies of the franchise.
Rated 17 May 2020
vaudevillianVaudevillian
Rated 14 May 2020
70
25th
What an immediate drop in quality.
Rated 14 May 2020
twillistwillis
Rated 19 Jan 2020
45
8th
A truly underwhelming movie. The most intricate book of the series is reduced to a random series of events, an uninspired video game on the big screen that hurries along to an underwhelming conclusion contrasted with its massive in-story significance. Worst HP movie.
Rated 19 Jan 2020
aalperraaaalperraa
Rated 23 Oct 2019
75
55th
2019, Kartal/Istanbul; 16.02.2023, Falmer/Brighton UK
Rated 23 Oct 2019
emirhanshnEmirhanShn
Rated 19 Oct 2019
84
77th
Yine çok başarılı bir film,efektlerin ve senaryonun çok kaliteli olduğu, başyapıt kalitesine çok yakın bir yapım.
Rated 19 Oct 2019
dyannethorneDyanneThorne
Rated 08 Jun 2019
79
82nd
"calmly"
Rated 08 Jun 2019
meinallesmeinalles
Rated 23 Jan 2019
100
65th
Labirent çok iyiydi.Şu çocuk ölmeseydi her şey iyidi.Düşmüştüm ben ona :(((
Rated 23 Jan 2019
adornmentadornment
Rated 24 Nov 2018
74
62nd
This has zero subtlety and zero visual effects budget. However, the sense of wonder is amplified with excellent set designs. The talented cast carries through and give the characters life. The mix of suspense and coming-of-age drama makes this a perfect bridge movie between the first lighter half and final darker half.
Rated 24 Nov 2018
sopachuco13sopachuco13
Rated 17 Nov 2018
90
84th
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire is a great addition to the Harry Potter series. This movie finally brings in Ralph Fiennes as Voldemort and he is a character that we love to hate. David Tennant was also added in a small part but he does a fantastic villain as well. Brendan Gleeson as Mad Dog Moody does a fantastic job. The story of a tri-wizard tournament works well during the fourth movie. This movie moves towards the darker themes that will continue through the rest.
Rated 17 Nov 2018
vv238vv238
Rated 21 Sep 2018
54
55th
Newell is trying to channel Cuaron's directorial efforts in Goblet of Fire but, no offense to the former, he just isn't nearly as good as the latter. This entry seems to ride the line between the darker tone of Azkaban and the children's whimsy of the first two. As a result, it hits a mediocre middle-ground that doesn't do anything particularly well or poorly either. This entry is necessary to move the larger plot along but unnecessary viewing by any other standard.
Rated 21 Sep 2018
quintonjaminQuintonjamin
Rated 04 Sep 2018
80
80th
Brendan Gleeson is great and all of the returning cast is still good. They stuck a lot into this film, but I think it worked for the most part.
Rated 04 Sep 2018
deusanatoliaDeusAnatolia
Rated 14 Aug 2018
73
47th
"HARRY DID YAH PUT YOUR NAME IN THE GOBLET OF FIYAH?" gets a 100
Rated 14 Aug 2018
rcmaccrcmacc
Rated 25 May 2018
55
40th
Long, dark, and kinda boring can describe 4, 5, and 6 in the Harry Potter franchise, but these are all fine films. The characters continue to grow and the actors own the roles.
Rated 25 May 2018
skolyaskolya
Rated 11 Mar 2018
90
43rd
My favorite of the books, movie is good but due to obvious time constraints a lot of the things I loved aren't in it.
Rated 11 Mar 2018
ikkegoemikkeikkegoemikke
Rated 08 Mar 2018
78
93rd
More reviews here : http://movie-freak.be
Rated 08 Mar 2018
mspraguemsprague
Rated 18 Feb 2018
70
60th
Good good good.
Rated 18 Feb 2018
mwestcottmwestcott
Rated 07 Jan 2018
92
78th
Goblet of Fire shows the character are beginning to grow. Emotions are starting to blossom and the films follow suit. With a much higher level of maturity. While the darkness has been toned down form the last one. The mature themes and attention to the central theme of the series is handled well. Twist after twist for newcomers. And loving attention for the readers. Despite the aspects of the book which had to fall through the cracks.
Rated 07 Jan 2018
jordanraidenjordanraiden
Rated 19 Dec 2017
13
28th
5/7
Rated 19 Dec 2017
lilycowplilycowp
Rated 18 Dec 2017
65
0th
The best of all HP but still HP
Rated 18 Dec 2017
lawlaw
Rated 25 Oct 2017
40
23rd
The movie abbreviates the events of the book so much that nothing has import in this mediocre adaptation.
Rated 25 Oct 2017
vpagnewvpAgnew
Rated 14 Oct 2017
5
0th
Took a turn for the stupid, I have to read a synopsis in order to even remember it, missed potential, acting/side characters same as always, not sure what happened to the color grading, now it's ugly; weak movie, average as can be, saved by 5 minutes of Ralph Fiennes.
Rated 14 Oct 2017
luordluord
Rated 04 Aug 2017
45
20th
GoF is one of my favorite books. To say this movie did not do it justice is an understatement.
Rated 04 Aug 2017
arossaross
Rated 21 Nov 2016
88
82nd
scared me as a kid
Rated 21 Nov 2016
seethruskinSeethruskin
Rated 14 Nov 2016
2
10th
Really takes away the magic and fun of the Triwizard Cup which I loved so much in the book. I think at this point it got a bit too serious for its own good.
Rated 14 Nov 2016
bratingsbratings
Rated 29 Oct 2016
81
61st
While it's a step back from its predecessor, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire still manages to capture the exciting spirit of the series through heart-pounding action sequences and a dark style that not only encapsulates its narrative, but also progresses it towards a dramatic conclusion that overshadows most of the film's structural flaws.
Rated 29 Oct 2016
hiromiyamotohiromiyamoto
Rated 21 Sep 2016
81
34th
Mike Newell once mentioned that there were plans to split this film in two. Considering that the book is overlong but fun at best and an incoherent mess at worst, I'm glad that Newell exercised pragmatism in adapting this, but there is one plotline in particular (S.P.E.W.) that I wish hadn't been cut, as it's very important to Hermione's character. It would have been nice to see a Lord of the Rings-style extended edition, but overall, I'm still happy with the final result.
Rated 21 Sep 2016
wwallce4prezWWallce4prez
Rated 28 Aug 2016
60
25th
More of a campy family movie than Azkaban. Better than the first two, but severely mediocre.
Rated 28 Aug 2016
mrsubstituteMrSubstitute
Rated 17 Jul 2016
85
71st
Another solid entry in the Harry Potter franchise that blends together the wonder of the first three entries with the coming doom that comes with the resurrection of the evil Lord Voldemort, played by a gleefully hammy Ralph Finnes.
Rated 17 Jul 2016
dullshimmerDullshimmer
Rated 19 Mar 2016
100
94th
I would say that this movie really shows a great improvement to the Harry Potter movies compared to the entries so far. The cast has grown into their roles well, the effects are well done, and without some of the awkward shots that plagued Prisoner of Azkaban. While the books are getting too large to completely adapt I felt this a well done version.
Rated 19 Mar 2016
war_machineWar Machine
Rated 11 Mar 2016
81
82nd
this one ended better than 3. and that cedric stuff was almost enough to tie. but nah there was stuff i didnt like, or like enough. like voldemort and most of the movie lool. ron and hermione set up was pretty good. every champion but harry shoulda died. wish cedric was a character in the previous 3
Rated 11 Mar 2016
joelwatchesmoviesjoelwatchesmovies
Rated 17 Jan 2016
5
24th
The script awkwardly attempts to juggle its new additions (foreign wizards, a school dance) with an already jam-packed line-up and drops the ball, hastily wrapping up or even discarding plot points (the final twist takes seconds and Crouch Sr. is left in the forest), whilst its secret antagonist is left mostly unexplained (Tennant's overacting doesn't make up for it). There are still lots of enjoyable bits here (see the thankfully well-paced graveyard scene) but the whole is a tad too messy.
Rated 17 Jan 2016
bbeatyBbeaty
Rated 02 Jan 2016
92
45th
Probably my favorite Harry Potter movie.
Rated 02 Jan 2016
evilmangoesEvilMangoes
Rated 30 Nov 2015
85
58th
B+
Rated 30 Nov 2015

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...