sign in
register
Watch
fuboTV Paramount+ Amazon Channel Paramount+ Roku Premium Channel
+10
Hannibal Rising
Hannibal Rising
+10
JustWatch
Your probable score
?
Hannibal Rising

Hannibal Rising

2007
Drama, Suspense/Thriller
2h 1m
In "Red Dragon" we learned who he was. In "Silence of the Lambs" we learned how he did it. Now comes the most chilling chapter in the life of Hannibal Lecter -- the one that answers the most elusive question of all -- why? (MGM)

Directed by:

Peter Webber

Screenwriter:

Thomas Harris

Starring:

Kevin McKidd, Rhys Ifans, Gong Li, Dominic West, Ingeborga Dapkunaite, Gaspard Ulliel, Richard Brake, Denis Ménochet, Helena Lia Tachovska, Aaran Thomas

Franchise:

Hannibal Lecter

Genres:

Drama, Suspense/Thriller, Crime, Horror

Countries:

Czech Republic, France, Italy, UK, USA

Languages:

English, German, Russian
imdb IMDb
Update history
Suggest edit

Hannibal Rising

2007
Drama, Suspense/Thriller
2h 1m
Your probable score
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer
Avg Percentile 31.43% from 1578 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

(1588)
Compact view
clear
Compact view
Show
Sort
davidblastDavidBlast
Rated 12 Jan 2012
15
5th
This is worse character assassination than when those South Park dudes did Matt Damon.
Rated 12 Jan 2012
ytadelYtadel
Rated 17 May 2021
3
28th
LMAO YOUNG HANNIBAL LECTER USING A SAMURAI SWORD TO SLICE UP BAKA GAIJIN AHAHAHAHAHAHA WHILE YOU WERE CANNIBALIZING MY SISTER I STUDIED THE BLADE LMFAO
Rated 17 May 2021
guy-piranhaguy piranha
Rated 08 Sep 2013
40
12th
Pathetic. Completely unnecessary attempt to give a character a backstory that needed none. Having no idea what motivates the legendary cult-cannibal was part of his myth and made him an unpredictable force. Adding this lame revenge plot serves in no way as a justification for becoming the sophisticated monster he is. It could've only been worse if some random asian chick appeared and taught him how to fight like a samurai...yeah, that would've been sooo lame...
Rated 08 Sep 2013
overratedoverrated
Rated 28 Jan 2010
12
6th
The moral of the story is, don't let Nazis eat your family.
Rated 28 Jan 2010
wicheWiche
Rated 24 Feb 2008
26
7th
We've learned one thing from this movie: There's only one Hannibal Lecter and that's Anthony Hopkins.. Ulliel really isn't and that shows of and ruins this movie. Where's the psychological touch for which Lecter is so known?
Rated 24 Feb 2008
panzerwolfpanzerwolf
Rated 28 Nov 2021
20
4th
So how they made Hannibal Lecter seem in this movie is him being the ultimate neckbeard guy, the type who likes to do Youtube videos of them cutting apart stuff with a katana, then tipping their fedora and calling women 'm'lady'. Just huge yikes here. Hannibal as played by Anthony Hopkins was a smart man with a strange sense of charisma, but the Hannibal we see here has nothing going for him charisma-wise.
Rated 28 Nov 2021
war_machineWar Machine
Rated 30 Sep 2021
69
48th
Theyatehislilsis+shetrainshim+samuraimasklol+liedetectornoreactions+sheimpalesthehead/swastikatotrick/save+burysis/bowl+horsepullropechokesingpop-lickblood-eatcheeks-chefsaidmostbest+youatehertoo/havetokillallwhoknowetc
Rated 30 Sep 2021
iamdwgIamdwg
Rated 23 Sep 2021
53
10th
On its own, this film is made....fair enough? If this was your only introduction to the character, you wouldn't hate the movie. It would be very cliche and stereotypical, and feel like an asian fable about vengeance, but not much more than that. But if it's the last Hannibal film you see, you're going to hate it because literally nothing about it feels like Hannibal.......at all.
Rated 23 Sep 2021
kgbelliveaukgbelliveau
Rated 06 Jul 2020
60
11th
I really wanted to feel like this film could offer something as great as the other stories surrounding Hannibal Lecter. Gaspard Ulliel does what he can but the script ultimately creates too many plot holes and too little substance to help it become just as important a story to the Lecter Legacy.
Rated 06 Jul 2020
gatoquentegatoquente
Rated 30 Apr 2019
96
81st
My SCORING: 99-96=Great; 95-90=Very good; 89-85=Good; 84-80=So-so; 79-70=Boring; Below 70=Forget it.
Rated 30 Apr 2019
walkearthwalkearth
Rated 07 Feb 2019
20
5th
Hannibal Rising shows the origins of evil by giving us a plot so horrid with its blatant disregard for the viewer's intelligence in presenting a world devoid of realism, lacking basic cause and effect liaisons and presenting a story supposedly part of the so far more or less consistent world of the other 3 films in the Hannibal saga, but in truth the only common ground being the word "Hannibal," that such an attack on the kindly expectant viewer becomes an abhorrent abomination. Truly evil.
Rated 07 Feb 2019
gideonGideon
Rated 03 Oct 2018
1
16th
A joke of a film. Just horrible.
Rated 03 Oct 2018
anttirAnttiR
Rated 21 Nov 2017
28
2nd
Evil guys were Nazi collaborators, but nothing else is good in this.
Rated 21 Nov 2017
damildamil
Rated 21 Jul 2017
45
17th
It wasn't very good. Dead boring. But then again, so was the novel. As with a lot of horror icons, Hannibal Lecter is much scarier when he isn't explained. It's directed clumsily, and the dialogue pretty trite. The Anthony Hopkins ones are the only Hannibal films worth watching.
Rated 21 Jul 2017
tyrantrcTyrantRC
Rated 23 Apr 2017
77
33rd
Hannibal is a brilliant character, he's not your normally portrayed psychopath, and this movie shows a facet of his live where he was still growing intellectual and sentimentally. The movie will make you feel disgusted with your amoral thoughts and while I do agree that the script could have used more work the acting felt fantastic and all the other elements for a fantastic picture are there. I think a lot of people wanted another Anthony Hopkins film instead of another Hannibal story.
Rated 23 Apr 2017
the_pirateThe Pirate
Rated 04 Feb 2017
75
42nd
As it fits into the Hannibal series, yeah it's garbage; undermines the character and his story. On it's own, I actually do like it. Yeah the villains are beyond one dimensional and are built up as more monstrous than human, but the actor playing Hannibal does a good job being sinister with little dialogue. There's a steady and maintained tone of depression. It's not great by any means, but not worth disregarding altogether.
Rated 04 Feb 2017
aron_ericsonAron Ericson
Rated 15 Jul 2016
15
2nd
When Hannibal is old an all sophisticated he must look back at these finesse-free teenage psycho antics and cringe. Then again, that's how it goes for most of us.
Rated 15 Jul 2016
bratingsbratings
Rated 11 Jul 2016
35
20th
Turns Hannibal Lecter into a joke.
Rated 11 Jul 2016
groovysoulsGroovy_Souls
Rated 25 Jul 2014
40
19th
Wow this is truly sad. The character of Lecter truly did not need a backstory, and surely not one as poor. Bad acting and weird, stylistic direction do not compliment this film's somewhat interesting, if not plot-hole-ridden story. Sadly, this movie is a grab for money and franchise revival. Not worthy of the great psychology and characters seen in Silence and it's sequels.
Rated 25 Jul 2014
louismazziniLouisMazzini
Rated 16 Jul 2014
45
7th
Cannot believe the director let Gaspard Ulliel go with that performance.
Rated 16 Jul 2014
pickpocketPickpocket
Rated 04 May 2014
3
28th
The dude from the wire was good for some lels
Rated 04 May 2014
moraesfelipemoraesfelipe
Rated 28 Jun 2012
15
0th
This one has to be one of the worst, most unnecessary prequels ever made, simply beacuse it wants to solve the whole mystery surrounding Hannibal, telling us what happened to him and what made him become what he is. They finally did: managed to kill Hannibal Lecter.
Rated 28 Jun 2012
brandonsbrandons
Rated 23 Jun 2012
38
14th
Hannibal Rising reduces the horror icon to a collection of dime-store psychological traits.
Rated 23 Jun 2012
matthew_parkinsonMatthew Parkinson
Rated 03 May 2012
20
7th
The performances are poor, the writing is laughable, the plot doesn't flow and the score is overbearing and distracting. It was adopted from a novel written almost solely so that the Lecter novels' author could make sure that his story was the one Hollywood used, and in his haste, he didn't come up with a good or watchable plot. The novel wasn't well-received, and I can see no reason for you to watch this movie. There is no suspense, no joy, and nothing to gleam from this ill-conceived disaster.
Rated 03 May 2012
maartenmaarten
Rated 04 Dec 2011
44
30th
By far the worst film of the series, but an interesting explanation of how a man became 'the monster'.
Rated 04 Dec 2011
alexbrissonAlexBrisson
Rated 26 Nov 2011
10
2nd
The main thing that ruins it for me is that it tries to justify hannibals actions. If it's all or revenge then he's not that messed up after all, I much preferred the image of him that we were given in silence of the lambs, that he was just a crazy, twisted dude. He's definitely scarier when you don't know his backstory. I just hope this hasn't ruined the original for me...
Rated 26 Nov 2011
nothingsgoodNothingsGood
Rated 20 Jul 2011
0
1st
This movie is so awful it actually makes Silence of the Lambs a lesser movie by association.
Rated 20 Jul 2011
doctor7doctor7
Rated 20 Mar 2011
6
2nd
Many people wonder "why did Hannibal become Hannibal? What causes someone to be such a monster?" Well after watching the the prequel which answers all these questions I can safely say you're better off not knowing because it's pretty damn retarded.
Rated 20 Mar 2011
slantmagSlantMag
Rated 09 Mar 2011
10
9th
"The more we learn about the bogeyman, the less terrifying he becomes." - Jeremiah Kipp
Rated 09 Mar 2011
sweekodenSweekoden
Rated 08 Feb 2011
46
27th
The last half hour was pretty tense. Other than that, it's pretty stupid, and pretty dull. And yet I thought it delivered alright entertainment.
Rated 08 Feb 2011
annimalannimal
Rated 13 Dec 2010
80
46th
The young hannibal's face almost makes up for the movie not measuring up its prequels. Almost.
Rated 13 Dec 2010
gecmartinsgecmartins
Rated 16 Nov 2010
1
3rd
They should never have done such thing as messed with Dr. Lecter. How the heck did they not learn from the "Hannibal" fiasco?
Rated 16 Nov 2010
chemical404chemical404
Rated 02 Sep 2010
17
3rd
Hannibal franchise reduced to a crappy b-movie. The kid doing bad Hopkins impersonation was amusing for about 10 seconds. Even Li Gong was terrible. But who wouldn't look bad with dialogs like these. This movie should have never been made.
Rated 02 Sep 2010
cinemaasiaCinema_Asia
Rated 13 Mar 2010
40
4th
Hilarious cash in attempt that was beyond terrible. Even Anthony Hopkins finally decided it wasn't a good idea to continue in the role of Lecter. Somehow Li Gong got involved in this absolute pile of shit too. It's worth seeing for camp value and how far Hollywood will go to keep a "franchise" alive.
Rated 13 Mar 2010
prinzguiprinzgui
Rated 12 Jan 2010
80
20th
It could have been a lot better. It is so, so disappointing when they shit a perfect story like "Silence of the Lambs."
Rated 12 Jan 2010
pewbengpewbeng
Rated 03 Dec 2009
38
28th
Ah, so he's basically a nice guy. What was I thinking. :|
Rated 03 Dec 2009
ivanstrelivanstrel
Rated 19 Aug 2009
60
3rd
Thomas Harris was right during the first 3 films, to not have seen them (this pattern of non-involvement ended before Red Dragon, but after Hannibal - the original movie was 'Manhunter'). He ended up getting involved in the film side and this was the result.
Rated 19 Aug 2009
vespera23vespera23
Rated 12 Aug 2009
64
18th
Not good enough as a stand alone, it looses still more points in my book for being a lackluster prequel to one of my favorite movies. Took the mystique out of Lecter, and I couldn't help thinking about medichlorians during the film.
Rated 12 Aug 2009
anselmi86Anselmi86
Rated 31 Jul 2009
2
0th
Simply laughable.
Rated 31 Jul 2009
zozanZozan
Rated 29 Jul 2009
35
35th
It started very good but after he has evolved to what he is, the film got the path of an ordinary revenge story and murders got repetitive.
Rated 29 Jul 2009
fantacbobFantacBob
Rated 12 Jun 2009
61
45th
I'm not keen on sob stories.
Rated 12 Jun 2009
jkendrickj.kendrick
Rated 21 Mar 2009
12
6th
"...too artsy and staid for its own good, which results in a plodding pace that induces more eyelid drooping than tension."
Rated 21 Mar 2009
eric_janeric-jan
Rated 26 Jan 2009
55
6th
Crappy "part 1"
Rated 26 Jan 2009
phantomzonePhantomZone
Rated 23 Dec 2008
45
10th
Didn't really feel right to me. Didn't feel like we were watching Hannibal.
Rated 23 Dec 2008
mckimsonMcKimson
Rated 27 Sep 2008
89
95th
I love this one , wish you love too
Rated 27 Sep 2008
teeceeteecee
Rated 22 Sep 2008
28
29th
Lidt plat, hannibal er ondskabsfuld - ingen undskyldninger her
Rated 22 Sep 2008
lebarLebar
Rated 18 Sep 2008
80
79th
my favorite hannibal
Rated 18 Sep 2008
vandelay1Vandelay1
Rated 02 Sep 2008
21
15th
bad movie
Rated 02 Sep 2008
miss_jesusmiss jesus
Rated 17 Apr 2008
61
51st
Unlike a lot of people, I think the previous Thomas Harris films (with maybe the exception of Manhunter) are not only not holy, but pretty campy. This movie takes a more serious approach than any of them, and not only does it provide a believable explanation for the origin of Lecter, it's pretty damn well done. Unfortunately, it has to absolutely wallow in some pretty miserable subject matter to do so, making it far from fun to watch.
Rated 17 Apr 2008
knyttelolknyttelol
Rated 23 Mar 2008
57
23rd
The teen playing hannibal is a joke in comparsion to Hopkins, as suspected. He just learnt in a way to speak to sound ironic all the time and makes snobby gestures while doing "evil" stuff, now thats not enough to play a psycopath.
Rated 23 Mar 2008
warchildWarchild
Rated 01 Mar 2008
79
30th
So so film trying to explain the character from one of the best suspense/thrillers of all time.
Rated 01 Mar 2008
nandorizzinandorizzi
Rated 11 Oct 2007
30
19th
Muito desnecessária, apenas para enriquecer os produtores.
Rated 11 Oct 2007
unohav1unohav_1
Rated 28 Sep 2007
80
42nd
I didn't HATE it, but a rather weak film to explain the emergence of the monster.
Rated 28 Sep 2007
dustydDustyd
Rated 17 Sep 2007
25
3rd
really dumb movie
Rated 17 Sep 2007
fyngyrzfyngyrz
Rated 28 Aug 2007
9
62nd
Could have been a lot better.
Rated 28 Aug 2007
stflyst_fly
Rated 23 Aug 2007
43
44th
ok
Rated 23 Aug 2007
harukoHaruko
Rated 06 Aug 2007
15
0th
Crappy sequel spoils the great Hannibal serie. Cut it out with the germain-english accent!
Rated 06 Aug 2007
brando814brando814
Rated 15 May 2007
10
9th
I know it isn't exactly good sport to pick on a three year old but the kid who plays Mischa is terrible, she sounds like Animal from the Muppets. Also Gaspard Ulliel's penchant for overacting doesn't exactly channel Anthony Hopkins as much as make Hopkins wince and say, "Holy Shit, do I really sound like that?"
Rated 15 May 2007
mjvmoviemanMJVmovieMan
Rated 06 May 2007
18
2nd
"You ate my sister!" Apparently he is french, and the studio has tried to ruin one of the greatest characters in film history. Well I won't have it. Likely to be the worst film of the year.
Rated 06 May 2007
thedicemanTheDiceman
Rated 26 Mar 2007
35
13th
Passes the time,instantly forgettable and I cant think of a single redeeming feature about this film.
Rated 26 Mar 2007
walkaboutwalkabout
Rated 07 Mar 2007
40
8th
trying to romanticize Hannibal and make some explanations about the roots of his cannibalism, just seem pointless to me...
Rated 07 Mar 2007
coffeecoffee
Rated 09 Feb 2007
59
30th
Hannibal cult is fu.ked but it's not that bad..
Rated 09 Feb 2007

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...