Watch
Green Lantern
Green Lantern
+4
Your probable score
?
Green Lantern

Green Lantern

2011
Sci-fi, Suspense/Thriller
1h 54m
A test pilot is granted a mystical green ring that bestows him with otherworldly powers, as well as membership into an intergalactic squadron tasked with keeping peace within the universe.

Green Lantern

2011
Sci-fi, Suspense/Thriller
1h 54m
Your probable score
Avg Percentile 20.36% from 3279 total ratings

Ratings & Reviews

(3299)
Compact view
Compact view
Rated 04 Jul 2011
36
4th
Bland and dull. Green Lantern's ring is only limited by the imagination of it's user. The universe would be screwed if the writers of this film wore the ring.
Rated 29 Jun 2011
45
14th
The definition of 'meh'- plays things far too safe, feeling like every other superhero origin movie ever made and its few good scenes are overshadowed by mostly bland and generic acting, dialogue and plotting. There's nothing that's really BAD or terrible about it (in fact it's still fairly watchable) but it really lacks a personality or true creative spark.
Rated 02 Oct 2011
45
7th
Let's list all the things wrong.. The music score is terrible for a blockbuster, uninteresting love interest, one of the "villains" sprouts into a penis head, Ryan Reynolds is a boring Ken Doll, the CGI effects look lame, and Tim Robbins has a bad hair piece. They should have concentrated on the intergalactic intrigue of the Green Lantern comic instead of dicking around for an hour plus with some silly nonsense plot on earth. They should also never let Campbell direct a superhero film again.
Rated 05 Jul 2011
10
9th
In brightest day, in darkest night, I wish this movie could escape my sight.
Rated 18 Jun 2011
62
42nd
I've heard the word "boring" thrown around a lot to describe this movie, and I can't say that I see it. The movie definitely suffers from a weak script/plot, but Sarsgaard and Reynolds (who won me over even though I wasn't hot on him to start) really save the writers' sorry asses. The FX aren't as bad as you've heard, the acting isn't as bad, it's not boring (just paint by numbers in spots), the villain isn't lame, and Mark Strong is a badass. Decent superhero flick, no more and no less.
Rated 29 Oct 2018
10
3rd
Shitty CGI and boring characters / story / "action".
Rated 09 Jan 2016
10
6th
Rated 26 Dec 2014
50
15th
Disjointed. Reynolds is a fine actor but the script is all over the place and the Lantern suffers from the usual DC issue of making rediculously powerful heroes (Batman excluded) that sound like a 4 year old came up with them. For that to work you need a damned fine backing. That's missing here.
Rated 10 Jun 2012
50
6th
As bad or worse than you've heard.
Rated 18 Aug 2011
49
25th
Terribly underwhelming. Rushes through all the interesting bits and wastes time with bad characters and boring scenes that barely connect with each other. Sloppy work all-over.
Rated 05 Aug 2011
50
38th
Not as bad as it's made out. It is fairly laughable on many levels, but I enjoyed it off and on. I know I've seen probably a dozen films ten times worse than this this year alone, and there is actually plenty of fun to be had here if you're in the mood for utter brainlessness. Decent at best, but some times that's enough. The ridiculous scene during the credits I saw coming a mile off, and I had so hoped we wouldn't have to sit through it as it makes no sense whatsoever, but no such luck...
Rated 23 Jun 2011
44
24th
"No one knows what this threat might be. It could be anything. Abin Sur thought he knew what it was. His final message said only: 'It's Parallax.'" Holy shit this movie was hilarious. I've never been so tempted to talk/riff in a theatre ("Good job Hal, we were just here watching the whole time."). It doesn't deserve the critical thrashing, but it's not very good either. Tough to imagine a space-heavy sequel when this Earthbound set-up was so incredibly costly. The credits stinger makes no sense.
Rated 21 Jun 2011
75
39th
GOOD:Special Effects-Ring constructs,jets,Sinestro,Human Villain,Actress calling out Hal in costume; BAD:Cosmic Villain (Parallax) talking cloud,Story(didn't flow,scenes disconnected),Too campy (Kilowog voice/training, Earth buddy),Humor,Cookie cutter characters (govt, scientist, Senator),Predictable,Voice acting stereotypical,Father story,Score (music),Hal unlikable,Special Effects:Parallax,Guardians,Training not believable,Narrator,Didn't explain ring powers (wormholes, universal translation)
Rated 17 Jun 2011
63
23rd
Enjoyed it for the most part. Sure, they were a bit loose with the Green Lantern mythology, but the changes were the sort that I expect in a movie translation (rather than a total destruction of the source material ala Catwoman.) I liked Reynolds as Hal Jordan and Lively as Carol Ferris. The action sequences with the ring constructs were a lot of fun.
Rated 10 Jul 2023
30
4th
Even Ryan Reynolds knows this was shit.
Rated 28 May 2020
30
24th
With a director like Martin Campbell at the helm, you'd think this one would be a knock out of the ballpark. It isn't. Instead, what we get is one strangely missed note after another, adding up to a movie that isn't bad so much as wrong.
Rated 13 Mar 2015
72
63rd
Not too high on story depth, but still quite entertaining. I liked the various characters, but there is one major flaw: This movie contains too much little sidestories and too many characters and these are all stuffed in well under 2hours. Because of this everything is underdeveloped and absolutely unsatifying. 72 for the potential.
Rated 26 May 2014
1
8th
Why Martin Campbell would take on this project is beyond me. The Lantern story and figure is somewhat interesting, but doesn't show. Reynolds have serious problems with acting serious, even when a giant "cloud of fear" is approaching. Lively's acting skills is not worth mentioning, but her beauty on the other hand, makes this horrorshow, not a total waste. - Bad
Rated 23 Aug 2013
30
10th
It took a lot of will to make it through to the end of this so I take a lot of credit for Ryan Reynolds' triumph
Rated 13 May 2012
30
10th
Lame and ugly-looking. I always finish the movies I watch, no matter how poor they are. 'Green Lantern' made me reconsider this rule. It's not unwatchable, though - just frustratingly uninspired.
Rated 01 Apr 2012
40
9th
I mean, come on! Shining green aliens and one shining green human to save the world from a villain with an over-sized head? Who will win? The suspense is killing me...
Rated 29 Jan 2012
50
21st
I knew this was going to be mediocre as fuuuck when we started getting flashbacks in the opening of the movie to events that unfolded mere minutes earlier
Rated 24 Jan 2012
49
17th
Warner Brothers spent over 200 million dollars on this and couldn't even use a bit of that money to hire writers who know how to write a good story? Or maybe that's the problem, a too many cooks scenario. Direction is serviceable, acting varies. Constant use of CGI sucks out any spectacle, and it looks like they couldn't get it done in time, since it all looks slightly unreal. Not the worst, but its existence and poor box office returns make it apparent some exec has no idea what he's doing.
Rated 17 Jan 2012
40
14th
We need more actors like Reynolds cast in these superhero roles, and I have to admit the whole idea of magic rings based on an entire emotional colour spectrum that is said to be in the comics, and appears here partly, tickled my fancies. The film itself is a generic superhero origin story with barely a villain to defeat at the end and tedious moralising. Also as film critic Armond White has pointed out, Kilowog is racial stereotype that dumbfoundingly never raised any questions in production.
Rated 07 Jan 2012
56
3rd
I cant handle this fake CGI.
Rated 05 Jan 2012
30
22nd
I don't think I've EVER felt this bored while watching a superhero movie. Even the action scenes in the movie were relatively dull, and the whole movie felt rushed in many areas before anything got interesting. It'd be a lot better if the movie focused on the intergalactic aspects of the green lanterns instead of lameass midgar shenanigans.
Rated 03 Jan 2012
20
6th
I didn't expect to love this movie or anything, but it was significantly worse than I ever expected. This film houses everything that is wrong with superhero movies. The 7 screenwriters managed to smooth every rough edge so that the audience can see every plot turn coming 30 seconds in advance. The film is trying to be lighthearted and fun, because frankly it's for children, but also DEADLY SERIOUS, because that's in vogue at the moment. This translates into patchwork writing with no momentum.
Rated 03 Dec 2011
20
6th
A huge letdown! I've never read any of the comics but this flick sucks in almost anything.
Rated 05 Nov 2011
35
20th
Starts out with a queer math lesson, in which we learn that the universe is divided into 3600 quadrants. Furthermore, it is governed by two opposite forces: Will and, erhm, fear. If all that sounds rather underwhelming, it is in perfect thread with the rest of the movie, that focuses on the 'Top Gun' quadrant, as the dude from 'Two Guys, a Girl and a Pizza Place' finds a ring that belongs in 'The Neverending Story' and battles an organic version of 'Unicron'. Mnyes.. quite...
Rated 24 Oct 2011
1
9th
The very definition of meh. I'd even take Spawn over this.
Rated 23 Oct 2011
15
16th
I can't wait for the sequel, Purple Torch
Rated 09 Oct 2011
62
29th
Between this and the Green Hornet, I'd like to declare 2011 the year of the Snarky Green Bastard,
Rated 08 Oct 2011
60
19th
Hadn't I always been a sucker for comics, probably I'd rate this lower. Heavy on visuals, this is a big waste of potential. Also its "doer" versus "thinker" message is a very bad one: it says it is better to be a irresponsible, good-looking macho than a not-so-good-looking loser scientist with father issues. Because yes, you can always find a magic ring that'll plant all knowledge in your brain without even studying or trying to learn anything. And then, you'll also get the girl. Viva ignorami!
Rated 30 Sep 2011
44
19th
Nothing in this movie is really interesting. The CGI isn't as good as it could of been, the suit looked weird and fake, Ryan Reynolds was boring, as was everyone else. Nothing in it was really good, but nothing was really bad. Completely generic on all counts, which is just boring.
Rated 30 Sep 2011
20
12th
I read a lot of criticism about the film before seeing and it was still very disappointing. It's even worse than I expected, everything is bad, no identity.
Rated 29 Sep 2011
30
14th
Despite a few great action scenes this is just stupid... Hollywood is reaching for new super heroes when they do this!
Rated 16 Aug 2011
20
1st
There is this Star Wars mood -- a sense of a big space opera, with millions of races -- but Campbell -- or the producers, now I just don't know who directed it -- is unable to set an appropriate tone at all.
Rated 07 Jul 2011
82
81st
an unrelentingly by the book superhero movie, but it's so watchable that it's failings are made up for. i don't know jack about the green lantern so i can't say if this is true to the plot or not, but no bother, this is a thoroughly entertainingly action packed movie. this comic book outing may pale in comparison to others that have come out in the past ten years, but too many people jump up and group them all together, polarizing the fledgling genre into the awesome and the crap.
Rated 27 Jun 2011
30
23rd
Reynolds fails to deliver and quite boring. The only highlight of this film is how funny the villain looks
Rated 20 Jun 2011
20
16th
"On brightest screen, in threest-D / It's the latest fanchisee. / This superhero's super-slight: / Beware two hours.... Green Lantern bites!"
Rated 19 Jun 2011
60
24th
The only thing this movie does well or consistently is be mediocre.
Rated 19 Jun 2011
52
31st
The central theme of will overcoming fear is ostensibly part of the Corps' concept; the primary flaw in film is therefore the script, which insults and wastes the time of the audience by reminding them of this central theme in practically every other line of dialogue. The script could have benefited by relying more on the strength of the characters and mythology; the respectable cast is ultimately wasted. It's a decent set-up, and if there're to be sequels, they're guaranteed to be much grander.
Rated 18 Jun 2011
78
52nd
Solidly okay, w/ plotlines & aliens that r just interesting enough 2 keep u forgetting that things r proceeding mostly predictably. Unfortunately the plot's anchored by some of the most hackneyed characterizations 2 come down the pike since the Mummy movies & Reynold's umpteenth hot-shot personality disorder substitution 4 character should crash & burn almost everything that follows. That the film manages 2 pull out of such a tiresome nose dive is even more amazing than the impressive CGI.
Rated 05 Jun 2023
73
23rd
Inexplicably aged well. The current state of cape movies makes a guy think "there are flaws but, you know, I've watched Black Adam and this compares really favorably to that."
Rated 14 Aug 2022
0
16th
Thank you, Ryan Reynolds, for never giving up on yourself. Despite so much evidence suggesting you really, really should.
Rated 08 Nov 2021
63
59th
Not as bad as everyone says it is, maybe only outdated at the time it came out. The worse for me was the enemy they picked and the way they featured it
Rated 27 Aug 2021
40
23rd
I thought it really wasn't that bad, but maybe that was because I had expectations of it being another Catwoman. The almost constant CGI wasn't great and the huge forehead villain was terrible. The rest was passable for me.
Rated 04 Aug 2021
71
52nd
its really not that bad
Rated 23 Jul 2021
56
15th
A frustrating effort in that all the pieces seem to be here for a satisfying adventure, but nothing quite clicks into place; Reynolds is pleasingly laid-back and less frenetic than usual, Lively and Waititi are fun sidekicks, but Campbell seems to have lost all of his action direction chops, with action scenes disappointingly rote and by-the-numbers; to be fair, he is handed a fairly limp screenplay (though I liked the moment when Lively cuts through the "Lois Lane" conceit!) Watchable enough.
Rated 28 May 2021
10
0th
Terrible in every way except for Peter Sarsgaard (he is the only aspect of this film that is worth paying attention to) who does a convincing impression of Brad Dourif combined with Philip Seymour Hoffman
Rated 12 Apr 2021
20
17th
This was terrible. He's a test pilot and then people from other galaxies possess a green ring that this pilot gets in the movie. The Ring gives him all sorts of powers. He's fighting now to keep peace with the Galaxy Members etc.
Rated 26 Jun 2020
5
8th
I watched worse films but it's challenging to remember which one.
Rated 16 May 2020
60
14th
It would fit right in to the MCU.
Rated 06 Feb 2020
75
25th
not as bad as the reviews say for me
Rated 12 Nov 2019
22
5th
I can only shrug and shake my head.
Rated 25 Oct 2019
25
5th
Far less than the sum of its tropes. Green Lantern is basically a checklist of genre cliches indifferently spliced together by...Martin Campbell??? Good God, how the mighty have fallen. At least he bounced back a bit with The Foreigner. Sorry I watched it.
Rated 15 Sep 2019
20
4th
admittedly, green lantern is a hard story to tell, intergalactic protectors of the galaxy and yada yada. the only way to actually get that mess palatable would be what guardians of galaxy did, lean heavily to comedy and tongue in cheek. green lantern, though, leans into nothing, as it tries to be a by the numbers cookie cutter superhero flick with an absurd premise. the production quality is also on a cw episode level, which removes any redeeming quality that this movie might have had.
Rated 21 May 2019
53
6th
I don't know a lot about this comic book character but if this film is any indication then it is a weak and lame creation. The script is weak and there are not many good action sequences. Overall this film is disappointing.
Rated 08 May 2019
40
5th
Disappointed.
Rated 14 Nov 2018
65
72nd
The extended cut (which is what my rating reflects) is a good superhero movie with fully developed characters, themes and motifs, brought a little low by its cliches and corniness. It has something to say, and it devotes its full runtime to saying it--and so few superhero movies clear that bar now. The cinema cut, well, cuts a lot of the connective tissue from the story, leaving it a rote husk, so I understand the initial rejection of it. But it deserves a rewatch.
Rated 14 Aug 2018
10
5th
Just because Ryan Reynolds
Rated 01 Feb 2018
70
39th
Not as bad as I thought it was going to be. I was expecting utter trash and was pleasantly surprised... and I HATE Ryan Reynolds.
Rated 09 Aug 2017
43
18th
I didn't completely hate it, emphasis on completely. Reynolds is a charismatic guy and the effects are top-notch; it's everything else that never goes beyond the realm of serviceable.
Rated 21 Jul 2017
25
8th
If there is one thing that the film does in an unapologetic and horrendous way it is CGI. There is bad CGI and there is too much CGI. If there are two things that the film blatantly fails at, then the second one would be the non-existent screenplay possessing unrealistic and uninspired dialogue between characters played by actors with zero chemistry among themselves. There was literally one decent scene in the film (Hal is that you?) and the only redeeming quality is Blake Lively who is sexy.
Rated 29 May 2017
30
7th
2017-05-29
Rated 08 Jan 2017
60
26th
Not as bad as everyone says what everyone says it is. I found it entertaining.
Rated 17 Jul 2016
64
24th
Hal Jordan sucks!!! GIMME JOHN STEWART!!!!!!!!!!!
Rated 26 Apr 2016
12
55th
W3E1P2S1V1M1A1R2. Can't believe how badly this got panned, given that it has one of the best developed thematic undertones of any of the comic films outside TDK. Sure the CGI is corny and the villain is a bit bland, but I was actually looking forward to the sequel it teed up (that probably won't ever happen now).
Rated 17 Mar 2016
40
33rd
Don't understand the hate. Isn't this the stuff of what all superhero movies are made of?
Rated 18 Aug 2015
85
29th
Sworn to preserve intergalactic order, the Green Lantern Corps has existed for centuries. Its newest recruit, Hal Jordan (Ryan Reynolds), is the first human to join the ranks. The Green Lanterns have little regard for humans, who have thus far been unable to harness the powers of the ring each member wears. But Jordan, a gifted and cocky test pilot, may be the corps' only hope when a new enemy called Parallax threatens the universal balance of power.
Rated 18 Jun 2015
3
5th
Some decent special effects fail to save 'Green Latern' from a plague of weak writing, overly-familiar and bland story progression, and a ton of wasted potential.
Rated 08 Jun 2015
52
12th
51.500
Rated 17 May 2015
40
19th
Passes the time.
Rated 23 Feb 2015
64
44th
Liked this a lot on first viewing. Not as much second time around. I think expectations played a part both time. Not the best story they could have told but certainly not as bad as some people have suggested. Reynolds is more than passable and lively is very hot so it's a good watch in the right mindset
Rated 22 Feb 2015
60
13th
Green Lantern has a competent cast and is at times a dazzling journey, but it's severely hampered by a poor screenplay, awkward pacing, and an overall underwhelming experience.
Rated 19 Jan 2015
19
0th
No jokes, no weight, no spectacle, no logic, no story. No one involved seemed to have any interest in it beyond the paycheck.
Rated 16 Sep 2014
70
46th
Top badass moment? Hal's been a Green Lantern for all of about five minutes, when he stomps into the Guardian's hang-out and gives an impassioned speech about Earth and humans and stuff. If you get recruited by a Fortune 500 company, are you really going to barge into the boardroom on your first day and tell the directors, who have been there for basically forever, how to do things? That's got to be badass behaviour in anyone's book. No cats, chainsaws or decapitations.
Rated 06 Aug 2014
20
2nd
One big head too many, tries to make you buy for a second that Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds went to high school together.
Rated 01 Aug 2014
40
13th
It's not completely incompetent or even awful, but it's just so... Lame! It has the same old superhero origin story we've seen so many times before. Reynolds is just obnoxious and irritating. Lively is super boring and her character practically isn't a character at all. The CGI looks like the film was made at least 10 years before it actually was. I literally laughed out loud the first time he appeared in full costume. Overall, it's a waste of money and effort.
Rated 17 May 2014
1
11th
Well that was dumb.
Rated 17 May 2014
30
8th
At least it was under 2 hours.
Rated 02 May 2014
70
36th
The first time that I watched this movie I couldn't get over how bad it was. There was way too much going on for a 2 hour movie. Green Lantern had just too much back story to fill in. Also, I knew that most people would hate all of the weird CG aliens. Now that I have watched this movie again, I know that it isn't that bad. I liked the characters. I liked parts of the script. I even thought that Paralax was a great enemy. But, this movie did not need Hector Hammond, it took away from Paralax
Rated 08 Jan 2014
40
18th
kinda boring and one specific part thats a bit mysogynist but its watchable in a "if nothing else is on" kind of way.
Rated 23 Dec 2013
26
8th
Noisy, overproduced, and thinly written, Green Lantern squanders an impressive budget and decades of comics mythology.
Rated 20 Oct 2013
60
33rd
Heard horrible things about this. Watched it anyway. I'm not a big super hero person, but it was a good movie.
Rated 16 Jul 2013
0
6th
This is one of those films I wish I could un-see just because the knowledge that remnants of it will forever be floating around in my subconscious makes me unbelievably upset. Yes, it was just that bad.
Rated 13 Jun 2013
1
2nd
The Green Lantern is a character I loved in my comic book reading days and I wondered and waited for a Green Lantern film for as long as I can remember. When the film was initially announced I was very excited, but the moment Ryan Reynolds name was mentioned I immediately lost interest. I can't stand him and think he's such an overrated actor. The film turned out to be an unwatchable joke and the stellar supporting cast is completely wasted. Can't believe Martin Campbell directed this mess.
Rated 03 Jun 2013
40
19th
I can't believe I saw this in the theaters. I feel so very bad that they did such a bad movie.
Rated 23 Feb 2013
49
6th
Generic super hero film. Bad script, bad dialogue and boring main character. Incredibly predictable. Ryan Reynolds isn't able to make his character interesting but perhaps this can be blamed entirely on the script. The scene after the credits is ridiculous. Despite all of this, I still thought it was mildly entertaining, if only for the fact that some things are just so bad and nonsensical that it can actually be funny to watch. Some of the visuals do look cool however and Blake Lively is in it.
Rated 17 Jan 2013
70
65th
i love that kind of movies.
Rated 04 Jan 2013
47
12th
Some ok special effects can't save this movie from being one of the worst super hero films of all time. Forgettable characters, and actors working with ridiculous dialogues. Uncharacteristic of Martin Campbell. I'm a Ryan Reynolds fan, but I guess the Green Lantern is just one of those super heroes that don't translate well to the big screen.
Rated 21 Dec 2012
3
0th
A a fabulous example of Hollywood ruining something.
Rated 30 Nov 2012
20
2nd
Even by the standards of the current run of mediocre comic-book movies, this one stands out for its egregious shoddiness.
Rated 05 Sep 2012
20
7th
Green Lantern is awful, although I can't help but find some sick enjoyment in it. Films that are this terrible can sometimes be incredibly fun to mock as they play, and Green Lantern fits that role perfectly. Sure, if you're looking for a movie that will please fans of the comic books series, or one that's actually enjoyable to watch on a level other than ironic, then you'll want to go watch something else. But if you enjoy making fun of bad movies, this is almost a must watch.
Rated 23 Jul 2012
64
15th
Nothing really seems to click through-out the film, whether it be the cheesy will they or won't they, or the dramatics that never really seemed that urgent. Green Lantern is just not authentic in anything, the dialogue is corny, the CGI looks beyond horrible and there never seems to be any real logical flow to the story line. There could have been a better story, one where we cared for Hal Jordan, but this one just never took the right twists and turns to get us there.
Rated 16 Jul 2012
55
13th
not a two times enjoyable movie. the fact is the 1st time isn't so hilarious either
Rated 15 Jul 2012
76
43rd
Ryan Reynolds was an interesting choice for the Green Lantern. I thought he did an ok job for sure but he really wasn't the main problem in this movie. I thought the use of CGI for his suit was a really dumb choice and it looked really fake. Plus some of the aliens looked very bad with the unrealistic CGI used. Now the action was great and of course Blake Lively was very nice to look at. I think if they would have picked a stronger action star and a better CGI artist this movie would be great
Rated 09 Jul 2012
80
78th
I really enjoyed this movie. It wasn't the best movie I have ever seen, but it was very entertaining and better than some other Superhero movies. I absolutely loved Hal Jordan. There were parts that could have improved, but from the other superhero movies I have watched lately, this was surprisingly entertaining.
Rated 07 Jul 2012
77
13th
A disappointingly unfocused and meager take on a rich and promising concept. The story is torn between large-scale space opera and a smaller, more character driven superhero arc, and neither is given enough time to develop into something really gripping.
Rated 23 Jun 2012
60
52nd
4 of 4 -- Entertainment. 1 of 2 -- Food For Thought. 1 of 2 -- Opens The Heart. 0 of 2 -- Sustainability Values.

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...