Film in Which There Appear Edge Lettering, Sprocket Holes, Dirt Particles, Etc.
Film in Which There Appear Edge Lettering, Sprocket Holes, Dirt Particles, Etc.
Your probable score
?
Film in Which There Appear Edge Lettering, Sprocket Holes, Dirt Particles, Etc.

Film in Which There Appear Edge Lettering, Sprocket Holes, Dirt Particles, Etc.

1966
Short Film
6m
Film in which there appear edge lettering, sprocket holes, dirt particles, etc.

Film in Which There Appear Edge Lettering, Sprocket Holes, Dirt Particles, Etc.

1966
Short Film
6m
Your probable score
Avg Percentile 9.83% from 132 total ratings

Ratings & Reviews

(134)
Compact view
Compact view
Rated 03 Oct 2010
0
0th
I watched this in its entirety because my time is worthless, and I can assure you that once you get through the awkward first act, it gets really good.
Rated 06 Apr 2009
5
0th
PSI 4? So underrated.
Rated 14 Nov 2010
25
13th
Well, it's better than Attack of the Clones.
Rated 12 Jun 2008
0
1st
The trailer seemed better
Rated 20 Mar 2012
0
0th
I was hoping for more sprocket holes.
Rated 27 Jun 2010
1
4th
Why do I get the feeling I'm going to be killed in seven days...?
Rated 04 Feb 2008
20
0th
20 points for having the balls to do absolutely nothing with 6 minutes of film time, but it's still an incredible waste of time.
Rated 02 Jun 2007
100
99th
Just kidding. Or am I?
Rated 02 Jun 2011
40
11th
During the first minute I was like "What's this?". Then, deliberately or not, it became hilarious. Unfortunately, after the third minute it gets rather boring. As the story and its complex characters develop, though, there's a remarkable plot twist at 03:51, but it doesn't lead anywhere until the mind-blowing final eight seconds. One must also mention the epic title that describes such a profound film with a mere twelve words, three commas and a dot.
Rated 18 Jan 2009
50
10th
This has serious pacing problems
Rated 28 Jun 2010
40
13th
I watched the whole thing. It's okay.
Rated 02 Mar 2010
7
1st
I'm sure this is somehow a deep display of the artistic theory of film. I don't care; it still sucks.
Rated 28 Oct 2009
15
6th
Margin shifting to center, center to margin needs something happening in the new margin to create the novelty. If you are gonna show me a derivative obvious idea why make a film out of it? A picture would suffice.
Rated 13 Apr 2008
10
3rd
I cheated. I only saw half of it.
Rated 28 Jan 2008
10
1st
What the fuck?
Rated 16 Mar 2015
0
0th
This is a deep, spiritual movie. I think the sprocket holes are supposed to represent the fundamental emptiness of contemporary western culture.
Rated 01 Feb 2015
2
11th
i just rewatched the whole thing to see if i had missed anything the first time round. no. no i had not.
Rated 11 Mar 2014
0
1st
So this is what its like to transcend this reality. My chakras are aligned.
Rated 11 Jan 2013
10
0th
not bad when you watch at 8x
Rated 23 Aug 2012
0
1st
Worst part is that it's not even 6:08 minutes of film in which appear edge lettering, sprocket holes, dirt particles, etc., but maybe 24 (frames!) in cycle in which there appear edge lettering, sprocket holes, dirt particles, etc. This means a fucking second in which there appear edge lettering, sprocket holes, dirt particles, etc. repeating for 368 seconds in which there appear edge lettering, sprocket holes, dirt particles, etc. I think in 5 seconds most people would get the main idea.
Rated 16 Jun 2012
0
0th
Brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Rated 18 Feb 2011
0
4th
Significant for just how long it makes 6 minutes seem. If it weren't for the fact that it was a huge waste of time, I would recommend anyone wanting to extend life to watch this film over and over. I've seen 3 hour films shorter than this.
Rated 27 Jun 2010
0
3rd
Watched all of Summer Lovers, made it like halfway through this.
Rated 04 May 2009
15
1st
Well the ideas behind is are nice. You even think it's neat in the first minute... not 6. It goes into "Shit" territory. Watch it for 30 seconds and then you got the general idea. So points for the ideas expressed, no matter how abstract, and points for it being ballsy.
Rated 10 Aug 2008
5
3rd
Well, it's certainly a descriptive title. And the edge lettering pulses in a somewhat hypnotic way, but boy, I stopped watching after about 30 seconds, concluding that there were more important thins to do in life.
Rated 19 Feb 2024
30
11th
So this seems to have become widely regarded as the quintessential avant-gardist jerk-off or something, but, honestly, I don't resent the time I spent with it at all, and there are plenty of far worse ways to spend the same amount of time. I'm not unimpressed, just totally disaffected.
Rated 27 Jun 2022
55
31st
why y'all so mad
Rated 17 Oct 2016
10
6th
The Ring: Deleted Scene
Rated 04 May 2016
17
0th
I could make a hundred terrible jokes about how this film is a waste of everyones time but luckily my sense of irony has maxed out for the day.
Rated 04 May 2016
3
0th
Yeah
Rated 25 Sep 2015
30
19th
Whats wrong with this film: 1) the title is a huge spoiler. 2) If you listen carefully, then you will notice that it is the same sound throughout the same film. Also, where is the 10 hour version of this? I demand that version be uploaded and that someone records themselves watching it.
Rated 03 May 2014
4
1st
Ambiguity masquerading as substance.
Rated 31 Jul 2013
28
0th
Uhhhh .... yeah. I wouldn't say I was disappointed by this. I liked the sound of it. Probably five or six times longer than it should be. Not for everyone, I suppose.
Rated 08 Jan 2013
5
0th
Zycie jest daremne.
Rated 01 Jul 2012
1
0th
If this is some sort of endurance test, I failed miserably.
Rated 16 Jun 2012
27
2nd
-.-'
Rated 30 Jan 2012
25
8th
respectably inoffensive
Rated 06 Nov 2011
40
7th
beautiful
Rated 18 Aug 2011
6
2nd
I think it's an accomplishment if you're actually able to watch it for more than an hour.
Rated 29 Jun 2011
3
21st
Surprisingly watchable.
Rated 24 Jun 2011
1
0th
The longest and most pointless six minutes of your life. One point for the novel title.
Rated 16 Feb 2011
75
74th
Wait for the ending.
Rated 24 Nov 2010
18
3rd
Well at least it's better than looking at a blank wall for the same amount of time, I guess.
Rated 13 Oct 2010
0
3rd
????????????????????????????????????????????>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>(((***&&&^%^&&**&(*&&**&&*(*(**(???????????????????????????????
Rated 17 Jan 2010
1
0th
For anyone who's ever projected a film, you'll get more interesting results from projecting the tail-end of a reel. I'm sure there's some sort of stupid philosophy behind this but I don't give a damn.
Rated 17 Jan 2010
0
4th
Antithesis of art.
Rated 08 Oct 2009
10
1st
Why?
Rated 09 Sep 2009
30
16th
I really enjoy that sound for some reason.
Rated 25 Jul 2009
0
1st
It's for people thats into philosophy and cinema studies. Not for me.
Rated 25 Feb 2009
10
4th
Wat
Rated 25 Feb 2009
0
1st
This is not that worth being see, do not miss your time.

Cast & Info

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...