Your probable score
?
Fahrenheit 9/11
2004
Documentary, History
2h 2m
Michael Moore's view on what happened to the United States after September 11; and how the Bush Administration allegedly used the tragic event to push forward its agenda for unjust wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. (imdb)
Directed by:
Michael MooreScreenwriter:
Michael MooreFahrenheit 9/11
2004
Documentary, History
2h 2m
Your probable score
Avg Percentile 46.19% from 8296 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews
(8339)
Compact view
Compact view
Show
Sort
Rated 09 Apr 2009
65
43rd
No surprise for me : politics = corruption, everywhere in the world.
Rated 09 Apr 2009
Rated 14 Aug 2007
10
0th
I am a liberal but this movie just pisses me off.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
Rated 14 Aug 2007
30
18th
Fighting the lies of the Bush administration with lies of his own and thus making him no better than Bush himself. Definitely not a source for factual information which makes this "documentary" completely worthless for anyone who really wants to get anything out of it.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
Rated 14 Aug 2007
50
29th
the left will love it, the right will hate it, the middle will just roll their eyes.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
Rated 14 Aug 2007
4
44th
Manipulative, one-sided, blah blah blah, but in 2004 we were deep in the thick of goose-stepping, Dixie Chicking, with-us-or-against-us, beating-the-drums-of-war, rah rah, god bless George Bush and the Republican Party bullshit, and it was a pretty scary time, so although it would have been easy to dismiss four or even two years later, I admire anyone who stood up against Bush back in '04.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
Rated 14 Aug 2007
66
48th
Enjoyable, but it can be manipulative. Don't watch if you cannot digest Moore's politics. It's pretty poor as an attack film on Bush, he could've done a lot more and a fair amount of what's included isn't really interesting. Moore's skills here are quite clear, but the film is flawed.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
Rated 14 Aug 2007
91
93rd
Is it propaganda or is it a stunning expose of the first four years of W's time as President? The fact that we have this debate over the film proves that it IS that compelling. Call him whatever you want, but Michael Moore can throw together a documentary like no one's business.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
Rated 19 Feb 2010
2
15th
Moore uses the same logical fallacies and employs the same ignorance that plagues conspiracy theorist propaganda like Loose Change or Zeitgeist. You'd be better off just watching the infinitely more grounded and insightful documentaries by Adam Curtis, like The Power of Nightmares.
Rated 19 Feb 2010
Rated 13 Sep 2007
65
40th
It's ok, I know it's a documentary and it should just be about facts and information, but bowling for columbine was more entertaining.
Rated 13 Sep 2007
Rated 20 Jul 2021
80
65th
Many saw the footage of Dubya sitting still for 7 minutes in front of schoolchildren after learning of the 9/11 attacks as a great act of journalism. Instead, it illustrates the too often ignored filmmaking skills of Michael Moore as he provides insight into the ineptitude, callousness, and incompetence of a villain. From there, the war's mismanagement comes into focus--wonderfully documented via some heartfelt interviews with young people in Flint, Michigan. A classic time capsule of an era.
Rated 20 Jul 2021
Rated 13 Jan 2020
50
10th
Moore has that kind of manipulative style that you can appreciate only if you agree with him.
Rated 13 Jan 2020
Rated 14 Dec 2011
78
72nd
This is an entertaining thought provoking attack on George W Bush among other things.If you are a fan of Michael Moore then you should check this one out. It is hard to believe that Bush actually got reelected.
Rated 14 Dec 2011
Rated 27 Nov 2011
70
56th
Michael Moore hates George W. Bush. Hates him so much that he hurt what could have been a great movie by going too far in using catty voice-over insults while he could have just let the images speak for themselves. I find most of Michael Moore's movies interesting, and while I often agree with a lot of his political ideas I don't necessarily love how he puts them out there. They seem like they are trying to incite vitriol more than intelligent conversation. It's a shame really.
Rated 27 Nov 2011
Rated 26 Jun 2010
67
36th
Moore is a dick, but a dick that can put together a pretty decent documentary. His ramblings and attacks on the Bush administration get old fast, though.
Rated 26 Jun 2010
Rated 06 Feb 2010
11
12th
communist fatass
Rated 06 Feb 2010
Rated 08 Oct 2009
1
0th
Watching this film requires processing more shit than Mr Moore's toilet.
Rated 08 Oct 2009
Rated 25 Aug 2009
0
0th
Michael Moore's name is synonymous with demagogy, self-aggrandizement and cheap manipulation at best, conspiracy theorizing at worst. Think a leftist version of FOX News, only worse.
Rated 25 Aug 2009
Rated 31 Jul 2009
28
19th
Urghh.... God fucking damn I hate Michael Moore. Even as someone who would be considered liberal (in the US at least) and left-wing ('liberal' & 'left' - are not the same thing!), this is just pure fucking nonsense. Listening to an idiot like Moore is the most dangerous thing any lefty can do. Base your opinions on this rubbish at your own peril!
Rated 31 Jul 2009
Rated 27 Jul 2009
1
0th
Michael Moore makes me ashamed to be a liberal.
Rated 27 Jul 2009
Rated 31 Mar 2009
1
2nd
Michael Moore....He is a terrible man
Rated 31 Mar 2009
Rated 12 Feb 2009
3
11th
I forced myself to watch this since it has such varied press. The lies and half truths told by Moore in this pathetic bush bash made me vomit. do not attempt to watch this without a bath bag
Rated 12 Feb 2009
Rated 28 Jul 2008
80
70th
I'm kinda sad to say that I stood up and applauded at the end of this in theatres. However, I think Moore made some cogent points amongst his ramblings.
Rated 28 Jul 2008
Rated 23 Jun 2008
0
3rd
A REAL A$$wipe
Rated 23 Jun 2008
Rated 17 May 2008
40
3rd
Michael Moore is a hypocritical fat dunce that should go back to directing music videos for rage against the machine. There is no reason this movie should have ever been released for the big screen, this barely passes for PBS.
Rated 17 May 2008
Rated 23 Apr 2008
60
5th
Whatever he's saying against the Bushites is alright with me and he does it quite entertainingly, but this AgitProp piece just contains too many half-truths and downright lies to make me consider this a serious, well-made documentary.
Rated 23 Apr 2008
Rated 09 Mar 2008
0
1st
Manipulative and opprobriously misleading film is nothing except an indulgent conspiracy theory
Rated 09 Mar 2008
Rated 10 Feb 2008
0
3rd
if you rated this movie 1 or higher: celsius 411
Rated 10 Feb 2008
Rated 27 Jan 2008
3
28th
Politics = snooze
Rated 27 Jan 2008
Rated 12 Sep 2007
97
98th
One of a very few movies that I have paid to see in a theatre more than once. The audiences ranged from teenagers to elderly. It prompted spontaneous outbursts from time to time during the movie (Brittney Spears was roundly booed) and both times I saw it in the theatre, there was a standing ovation at the end. I believe history will show this movie to be a lot closer to the truth than the BS put forth by George Bush and his buddies. We'll see.
Rated 12 Sep 2007
Rated 14 Aug 2007
0
0th
Why? Truth or fiction have absolutely no bearing on the lack of quality here. An epic story of 'political marketing' which has absolutely no place in the entertainment industry.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
Rated 14 Aug 2007
70
53rd
Shameless propaganda and manipulation, but really well done.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
Rated 14 Aug 2007
50
30th
The thing is -- I agree with Michael Moore. His politics are my politics. But, overall I hated this movie. It's so freakin' manipulative, it just made me want to walk out. And, I. Agree. With. Him!!!! Arghhh! Frustrating as all hell.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
Rated 14 Aug 2007
80
66th
Excellent, but not quite as excellent as Bowling for Columbine. Moore wisely keeps himself out of the movie for the most part, though it could have used a little bit more of his humor. It gets bogged down occasionally on tangents. For instance, the bit about the military recruiters is enlightening, but goes on far too long. And a lot of the information could have been summarized much more efficiently. There's plenty of good stuff, though.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
Rated 14 Aug 2007
40
10th
Even if I agree with its intent, brainwashing is still brainwashing.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
Rated 14 Aug 2007
71
61st
He sure doesn't play fair at some moments, but it's hard to disagree with what the guy is saying.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
Rated 14 Aug 2007
0
1st
I'm very anti-bush, but this "movie" couldn't even keep my eyes open.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
Rated 14 Aug 2007
30
0th
I liked Moore until I saw this ill-informed piece of propaganda. Moore chooses his "facts" and leaves out the truth.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
Rated 14 Aug 2007
52
22nd
It's not original like Bowling for Columbine and it's just barking... nothing else. I wish Moore would attack Bush with his mind not with his mouth.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
Rated 14 Aug 2007
57
52nd
This movie is manipulative, and presents things that arn't quite true as if they were through supposition (et cetera). At the same time there is also a lot of factual information, just a little out of context and squewed to fit Moore's adjenda (which is not a value judgment, but an observable fact and independant of your agreement on it). This film is a docudrama, not a documentary (which are impartial). If you don't like GW Bush though, it's good.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
Rated 14 Aug 2007
30
16th
It only gets this good a rating because I at least applaud Michael Moore for trying to get people to think. Aside from that, he's a hack of a film-maker and his agenda is so obvious that any documentarian credibility is shit on.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
Rated 10 Apr 2007
10
4th
Almost as many lies as the administrtaion! Impressive!
Rated 10 Apr 2007
Rated 26 Mar 2007
20
3rd
this movie contains the ravings of a delusional man
Rated 26 Mar 2007
Rated 20 Mar 2007
75
67th
While Michael Moore may be the most successful idiot in the film world, the way he presents his documentaries (even without all the facts) can easily sway you to his point of view (that is, until you know all the facts that he failed to make apparent).
Rated 20 Mar 2007
Rated 19 Mar 2007
43
14th
Well done documentary but far too single sided for my liking. Incredibly biased and often hard to take seriously because of that.
Rated 19 Mar 2007
Rated 22 Feb 2007
0
0th
Liberal douche director trying to sway the presidential vote. More like Far From Right 9-11.
Rated 22 Feb 2007
Rated 22 Feb 2007
0
0th
fucking liberal anti-american bastard...filled with too many lies and to much rederict
Rated 22 Feb 2007
Rated 27 Nov 2006
60
23rd
Moore certainly raises some good points, but his technique is still far too dishonest and manipulative. And unlike Bowling for Columbine, Fahrenheit 9/11 is often boring.
Rated 27 Nov 2006
Rated 04 Nov 2023
55
8th
The right message poorly packaged. Moore shines light in the right direction, but the framing is so obviously biased that it's not going to change any minds. It's poor journalism / documentary with a lot of one-sided arguments and childish edits. Showing how thin the other side is would've made this a more powerful piece / argument. But alas, we're left with this...
Rated 04 Nov 2023
Rated 16 Nov 2021
45
35th
Too many fallacies, and I AGREE with the guy.
Rated 16 Nov 2021
Rated 27 Oct 2021
64
20th
Supporters and opponents of the Bush presidency can find ways to use the movie to their advantage. Worth viewing, at the minimum, as a reference. Not the most adroitly crafted film or is it well-balanced. It is, however, quite a terrific attack. Sprawling, uncomfortable -- an angry viewing.
Rated 27 Oct 2021
Rated 21 Feb 2021
71
63rd
Michael Moore is done very good documentary's. This time he had really big case to study and results are not so striking as it was with "Bowling for Columbine". Moore's investigations and storytelling are good to watch as he also uses irony.
Rated 21 Feb 2021
Rated 06 Nov 2020
45
46th
Michael Moore's screeching is good for some mild entertainment but his actual politics are questionable at best. I'm no fan of W. but but after a certain point I went from being mildly entertained to annoyed and at almost no point in time was I ever angry which is I think that Moore was going for.
Rated 06 Nov 2020
Rated 04 Nov 2018
0
5th
Who gave this moron a camera, and can someone please take it away from him? If you're into Alex Jones crap, this might be for you.
Rated 04 Nov 2018
Rated 11 Aug 2017
15
3rd
The documentary that spawned a generation of smartasses who thought they had everything figured out about 9/11 and its repercussions.
Rated 11 Aug 2017
Rated 01 Mar 2017
1
1st
Utter filth. I only gave it a 1 because this movie once held the task of keeping piano level.
Rated 01 Mar 2017
Rated 23 Oct 2016
30
12th
Short on analysis. Still better than CANADIAN BACON.
Rated 23 Oct 2016
Rated 02 May 2015
76
49th
Michael Moore is not a documentarist. He is something of an equivalent to a columnist as a documentary filmmaker. Opinionated, outspoken, angry and loud - Fahrenheit 9/11 is him at the top of his game. Mr. Moore selectively chooses which facts to present to paint exactly the kind of picture he thinks is correct. Fahrenheit 9/11 should be taken with a grain of salt, but the virtue of this kind of film making is its ability to create conversation and controversy. It is a well-crafted opinion piece
Rated 02 May 2015
Rated 06 Dec 2014
62
27th
Very well constructed version of history with drama and jokes. Moore's perspective though comes out simplistic and slippery preventing me from relaxing into the film. Uncomfortable to watch and not wholly in an appropriate manner.
Rated 06 Dec 2014
Rated 11 Aug 2014
90
81st
Less a revelation about Bush than a melodrama of his futile, alarming presidency. Its indictments shouldn't be news to anyone, but Moore delineates them with striking footage and an unremitting narration that basically reasons that Bush is (was, thankfully) inept, lying, fraudulent, failing and has poor preference of friends. While Moore's voice-over modulates from indignation to cynicism, some incisive visual sections speak for themselves.
Rated 11 Aug 2014
Rated 02 Aug 2014
85
59th
Regardless of how Moore fudges the facts (I have yet to do any research), he is undoubtedly a genius filmmaker, especially when it comes to establishing a point of view and developing an argument that is always compelling, if not always inwardly truthful.
Rated 02 Aug 2014
Rated 04 Apr 2014
1
20th
Only made it a few mins after the titles. As I recently watched BFC I knew it wasn't going to get any less bad than the cheap Bush cut-ups on show. I really was right to avoid these all these years. http://goo.gl/3LnfW4
Rated 04 Apr 2014
Rated 04 Apr 2014
30
14th
Incredibly biased "documentary".
Rated 04 Apr 2014
Rated 17 Mar 2014
45
11th
I relate to the general tone of its message, but Fahrenheit 9/11 is a haphazardly put together documentary that lacks charisma. I doubt it changed any minds.
Rated 17 Mar 2014
Rated 21 Feb 2014
20
12th
One point for each minute I made it into the "documentary". Also, this: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/fighting_words/2004/06/unfairenheit_911.html
Rated 21 Feb 2014
Rated 22 Jan 2014
83
61st
Extremely one-sided in its indictment of the Bush administration, but worth watching for the humor and the debates it'll stir.
Rated 22 Jan 2014
Rated 09 Jan 2014
92
43rd
decent documentary on the lead up to and early goings of the Iraq War, Fahrenheit 9/11 is not as good as Moore's previous documentary Bowling for Columbine but it's very good just not great.
Rated 09 Jan 2014
Rated 07 Oct 2013
70
81st
informative
Rated 07 Oct 2013
Rated 25 Jun 2013
90
89th
He may be a fat, bloviating, self-absorbed ass, but god damn if he can tell a story. This is masterfully constructed.
Rated 25 Jun 2013
Rated 27 Dec 2012
75
52nd
Very well done and insightful, but the usual Michael Moore bias is kind of distracting at times. Regardless, it is very eye-opening into the failed presidency of GWB and his administration, and what really happened during the 2000-2004 years, as well as what led to those events.
Rated 27 Dec 2012
Rated 10 Dec 2012
38
2nd
Completely avoiding the politics of the movie, with which, broadly, I do agree with, the amount of half truths (and lies) and lazy insinuations that are passed off as fact in this film is detestable.
Rated 10 Dec 2012
Rated 11 Aug 2012
70
5th
Moore's inflammatory style amused me as a teenager but I find it fairly repulsive now.
Rated 11 Aug 2012
Rated 18 Jun 2012
69
31st
Michael Moore makes good points but he's an ass
Rated 18 Jun 2012
Rated 03 Jun 2012
70
51st
I like Moores style. Deliberately manipulating his audience with humour and making stupid people look even more stupid.
Rated 03 Jun 2012
Rated 08 Mar 2012
40
7th
I enjoyed it when I saw it back in 2004. I've since lost all faith in Moore's ability (desire?) to even somewhat fairly present any material, so I can't rate this as good. That said, it was still well-made, interesting, and funny, so I can't rate it too low.
Rated 08 Mar 2012
Rated 28 Jan 2012
30
4th
The movie that single handedly won the election for John Kerry.
Rated 28 Jan 2012
Rated 27 Jan 2012
50
56th
Had some really great footage I hadn't seen that shed light to the corruption in US politics. Other than that really manipulative and not very good.
Rated 27 Jan 2012
Rated 19 Jul 2011
84
62nd
Extremely one-sided in its indictment of the Bush administration, but worth watching for the humor and the debates it'll stir.
Rated 19 Jul 2011
Rated 18 May 2011
77
73rd
As long as you use the information he presents as food for thought and not base all your beliefs on his film/books then you'll be ok. Stupid White Men is a good book of his.
Rated 18 May 2011
Rated 10 May 2011
0
0th
Love him or hate him. You know what you're in for when you sit down for a round of Michael Moore. This his most accesible and popular film.
Rated 10 May 2011
Rated 23 Apr 2011
60
40th
Exactly what you would expect from Moore. Since the only thing I care about in a documentary is objectivity, I don't consider his movies documentaries, even though most of what he sais is true. Still though, entertaining as hell, quite informative, fun watch but can't take it too seriously because of the tone. And a bit too much dramatization this time.. Less drama please. What's the use of showing that mother for 10 mins? Agitation
Rated 23 Apr 2011
Rated 31 Jan 2011
10
0th
my objection to this film is that is lead the viewer on into Michael Moore's "let's make Bush look like a bumblin idiot" viewpoint. That's fine, but I would have preferred a more subtle approach - the kind of documentary filmmaking that let's the viewer make up his own mind and come to his own conclusions. This film really irritated me. And I'm NOT a fan of Bush.
Rated 31 Jan 2011
Rated 12 Jan 2011
65
17th
Good message, fuck George Bush! Sub par documentary. The thoughts are disorganized. The doc tends to ramble.
Rated 12 Jan 2011
Rated 10 Jan 2011
45
22nd
pedantic and boring.
Rated 10 Jan 2011
Rated 08 Dec 2010
25
23rd
Too much personal view, bias, teasing, mockery. Did not like the style of Moore much. And being 5 years late to see this movie, lots of the stuff being mentioned is already outdated.
Rated 08 Dec 2010
Rated 09 Nov 2010
70
57th
"Fahrenheit 9/11" drags horribly in its first hour -it reminded me more of a news report than a film. It focuses on Moore's main weakness as a filmmaker, his questionable research (like we need proof that Bush is a moron). However, the second hour is a vast improvement, emphasizing on Moore's trademark irony, humor, cleverness and the occasional (obvious, but effective) emotional manipulation. There is some fascinating footage that makes this terribly biased film compelling and worth-watching.
Rated 09 Nov 2010
Cast & Info
Directed by:
Michael MooreScreenwriter:
Michael MooreCollections
Loading ...
Similar Titles
Loading ...
Statistics
Loading ...
Trailer
Loading ...
PSI
?