Watch
Eating Raoul
Eating Raoul
+2
Your probable score
?
Eating Raoul

Eating Raoul

1982
Comedy, Horror
1h 30m
A relatively boring Los Angeles couple discover a bizarre, if not murderous way to get funding for opening a restaurant. (imdb)

Eating Raoul

1982
Comedy, Horror
1h 30m
Your probable score
Avg Percentile 52.69% from 312 total ratings

Ratings & Reviews

(316)
Compact view
Compact view
Rated 28 Oct 2015
9
90th
A great black comedy about the pitfalls of consumerism in a society that is more squeamish about sex than murder. But social commentary notwithstanding, it's funny as hell and has a colorful cast of characters. Lots of laugh out loud moments and the narrative capitalizes wonderfully on the absurdity of its premise. It's basically an X-rated Looney Tunes episode about life in LA for a demented and down on their luck conservative couple. Comparable to early John Waters or early Pedro Almodovar.
Rated 28 Aug 2014
70
53rd
The tone is so off in this it feels like a comedy designed by aliens.
Rated 14 Apr 2019
83
74th
What's great about this comedy film is that even its existence is humorous -- once it ended and it showed the spoilery title, I laughed. It exemplifies an '80s sensibility in how this era reflected nostalgically on the carefree '50s, but now with a sly modern cynicism and capitalist inhumanity. The utter darkness of such a concept is subdued by the childish and blasé nature of this hopelessly, yet weirdly empathetic couple -- the swift run-time also helps this go down smoothly.
Rated 28 Nov 2018
3
38th
The most subversive aspect of Eating Raoul isn't in its portrayal of transgressive, perverted acts; it's that it plays these perversions with all the cheerful verve of a multi-camera sitcom, right down to the protagonists' Dick Van Dyke Show twin marriage beds. This does, admittedly, flatten it a bit - though at 80 minutes and change, it hardly overstays its welcome - but I can't say I've seen much else like it.
Rated 27 Jul 2015
85
87th
Absolutely hilarious and completely original. The brand of light hearted silliness in this film isn't something you see often but when you then use it to offset the dark setting of excess in sex, drugs, and murder in LA; wow is it fun .
Rated 29 Sep 2014
63
61st
Maybe just a little bit too over-the-top silly and campy to be really great, but i did quite like it. Aesthetically it's well done, and while obviously broadly satirical it feels essentially amiable and good-natured more than overly cynical. Like i said, some of the humor is just a bit too cartoonish and juvenile, and in some aspects it's pretty badly dated with all the stuff about swingers, but still in a lot of ways it's not at all unlike if a young Pedro Almodovar made a film in English.
Rated 08 Sep 2011
65
51st
A naive couple need money to make a down payment on their dream home, and fluke their way into running a dominatrix business catering to rich perverts. They kill their clients for their cash, and have a deal with a Chicano thief to dispose of the corpses. Not a bad comedy but the tone is way too light and corny for the dark premise, and the movie gives away the punchline to the final joke right in the title. And there's no blood.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
70
78th
Very likeable comedy.
Rated 28 Oct 2024
93
79th
This movie is a funny satire that ushers in the 80s. Paul Bartel was an underrated director, and I always love Mary Woronov!
Rated 28 May 2024
43
24th
There were only a couple of mildly amusing moments in this incredibly overrated film.
Rated 12 Sep 2023
90
87th
There may not be a more sophisticated comedy from the 1980's. Bartel and Woronov are simultaneously adorable, and the most likeable people in the film, and shockingly amoral. The film satirizes the state of the sexual revolution, which by the early 80's had rendered a monogamous, married couple as extremely radical outsiders. It satirizes the tendency of even the nicest people to drift into moral relativism when their deepest interests are at stake.
Rated 03 Aug 2023
40
18th
This feels like one of those films where my enjoyment of it ultimately depends on my mood that day. Like, you really have to lock into its tone early, or else you are left while the film just ratchets up the nonsense.
Rated 08 Aug 2022
58
73rd
It loses some steam after a while but it's still a charming, weird little film.
Rated 07 Jan 2022
64
51st
Through its satire, Eating Raoul is unapologetically capitalistic, moralistically hypocritical and a little bit racist. The film pairs sordid sex parties with a dishevelled aesthetic that seems more budgetary than artistic. Its portrayal of sexual liberation is ridiculous; which may be satire but comes across as unintentionally not funny. Essentially the film is dated, but that doesn't prevent it from being often amusing. Given the title, I'd thought there would be more cannibalism.
Rated 03 Feb 2021
2
31st
The only thing I remember is the stunning legs of Mary Woronov.
Rated 28 Apr 2020
67
41st
Not my type of humour but it is fun.
Rated 26 Mar 2020
65
51st
Under Quarantine Film Review #9: Quite funny and entertaining with very likable leads. The flat tone of this film enhances the comedy, which I love, but it doesn't manage to hit the transgressive highs as I hoped it would.
Rated 21 Jun 2019
65
36th
It must be the most inconsequential mass-murder film ever made. Not so bizarre as I had anticipated, "Eating Raoul" finds its absurdity by strolling along unimpeded through its illogical premise so easily. Bartel was Proto-Sideways-Giamatti.
Rated 22 Jun 2017
72
33rd
Taking cues from Buñuel's class-based satires, Eating Raoul is both deliriously campy and subversive toward middle class nostalgia in a way that married the decade's tongue-in-cheek sensibilities with a self-reflexivity more characteristic of the art house films of the era. Its goofy self-awareness comes on strong at times, and its premise is stretched thin as is, but its take on sexual liberation, capitalist ideology, and middle-American prudishness is truly unique and well worth exploring.
Rated 27 Sep 2013
61
17th
I think I was overhyped for this one. Still worth a watch though.
Rated 27 Jan 2013
90
80th
Really funny. Once you get into Bartel's comedic groove, it's impossible to look away. The absurdity of every situation grows larger and larger in time, as does the amount of laughs. A gem.
Rated 15 Jan 2013
80
44th
Great use of low budget props and setting, as well as a cast that knew how to make their lines and characters funny.
Rated 17 Nov 2012
60
24th
There's something really orignal about this, but I didn't found it that entertaining or funny.
Rated 24 May 2012
75
54th
Original, entertaining, and risque. Thoroughly enjoyed it.
Rated 10 Nov 2011
67
33rd
If you can look past the campy acting style and low rent production values, this is a lot of fun. But "Parents" did this so much better.
Rated 22 Dec 2009
6
57th
It's quite obvious how low of a budget this film had, but it has its charm. A very nice dark comedy with some moments of near-brilliance.
Rated 17 Mar 2009
83
82nd
Delicious black comedy. Sags a little here and there, but overall a bright original, and hilarious satire; John Paragon has a super bit as a sex shop owner.
Rated 01 Feb 2009
97
96th
Low budget, high laugh. What a great combination of sick and sweet.
Rated 15 Dec 2008
80
61st
hilarious.
Rated 29 Jul 2007
99
88th
Dark comedy masterpiece!
Rated 10 Apr 2007
75
68th
Entertaining piece of trash black comedy.
Rated 30 Mar 2007
90
86th
Very good black comedy. Bon appetit!

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...