sign in
register
Watch
Amazon Prime Video Amazon Prime Video with Ads Apple TV
+5
Dumb and Dumber To
Dumb and Dumber To
+5
JustWatch
Your probable score
?
Dumb and Dumber To

Dumb and Dumber To

2014
Comedy
1h 49m
20 years since their first adventure, Lloyd and Harry go on a road trip to find Harry's newly discovered daughter, who was given up for adoption. (imdb) (Summary by Martinelli)

Directed by:

Peter Farrelly, Bobby Farrelly

Screenwriter:

Sean Anders, John Morris, Peter Farrelly, Bobby Farrelly

Starring:

Kathleen Turner, Jeff Daniels, Jim Carrey, Bill Murray, Laurie Holden, Rob Riggle, Don Lake, Steve Tom, Rachel Melvin, Tembi Locke

Franchise:

Dumb and Dumber

Genre:

Comedy

Country:

USA

Languages:

English, Cantonese
imdb IMDb
Update history
Suggest edit

Dumb and Dumber To

2014
Comedy
1h 49m
Your probable score
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer
Avg Percentile 23.25% from 1193 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

(1208)
Compact view
clear
Compact view
Show
Sort
markjpMArkjp
Rated 27 Nov 2014
25
6th
Like jerking off and watching porn out of boredom: Starts off bad but you know it'll get better and you'll be more engaged with the characters before you're done. Ultimately it will end and you'll be somewhat disappointed that you wasted 2 hours of your life. Unlike this movie however, a lazy wank won't leave you slightly embarrassed about what you watched when your were twelve.
Rated 27 Nov 2014
bowfingerbowfinger
Rated 05 Aug 2016
15
9th
if you've watched the original in your teens like I have, the only thing you see is how old they are, and you can't laugh at any of the same jokes any more, and then you realize you're 20 years older, too, and it just pretty much ruins your day.
Rated 05 Aug 2016
gordonbombayGordonBombay
Rated 26 Dec 2014
20
6th
I hate going home for the holidays. I somehow always end up getting stuck at a party with friends from my past. It's sad, when you realize that you longer have anything in common. They're still laughing at the same old jokes and pulling the same old pranks, but what I used to love, I now find annoyingly childish and stupid. It's not their fault. Time just passed them by. I wanted to like this movie, but sadly it was like going home for the holidays.
Rated 26 Dec 2014
kasperlKasperL
Rated 10 Dec 2014
30
10th
I really wanted to like it. But I couldn't. The jokes are too weak, and it rips off the original too often, each time reminding me how funny this ridiculously belated sequel is not.
Rated 10 Dec 2014
marnieMarnie
Rated 22 Nov 2014
20
3rd
My to hundredth ranking...
Rated 22 Nov 2014
moraesfelipemoraesfelipe
Rated 14 Nov 2014
72
75th
While it might not be the sequel of our dreams -- maybe too many "hey, remember how great this was in the original!" speeches --, it pays off in so many moments -- the absurd gags that begin and end this, the absolutely brilliant dream sequences -- that it turns out to be just another honest take on disability by the most underrated American auteurs of the last twenty years. But To also plays like a band reunion -- it satisfies, but makes you depressed.
Rated 14 Nov 2014
cinematicespCinematicESP
Rated 12 Nov 2014
55
5th
Somewhere along the way, the filmmakers forgot that Harry and Lloyd were actually lovable characters, not racist, misogynist perverts. There's a funny movie in there somewhere, but a few too many truly dumb gaffes prevent it from being anything but disappointing.
Rated 12 Nov 2014
billyshearsBillyShears
Rated 30 Oct 2014
50
21st
“Just when I thought you couldn't possibly be any dumber, you go and do something like this... and totally redeem yourself!” I wish this was the case. They turned the characters mean and unlike able. Same problem with the extended cut of the first film, too mean spirited and feels wrong.
Rated 30 Oct 2014
glumpy99glumpy_99
Rated 26 Mar 2023
83
70th
Suspect there’s a nostalgia bone being tickled here, but this is a surprisingly well done (often times hilarious) sequel that gains momentum from a terrific cast; Carrey and Daniels slip easily into their old winning chemistry, but it’s the consistently funny turns from the support cast that help this soar, especially Turner who seems to relish having great fun with the sum total of her 30 years of iconography. It all works very well, even through a forgivable loss of steam during the last act.
Rated 26 Mar 2023
rossRoss
Rated 07 Jun 2015
25
15th
I knew it was going to be awful, but I was surprised that everything and everyone was so unlikable.
Rated 07 Jun 2015
dst7175dst7175
Rated 03 Apr 2015
31
20th
Zero big laughs that the first one had alot of.
Rated 03 Apr 2015
tjekhovTjekhov
Rated 13 Mar 2015
30
17th
the beginning of the film is incredibly weak. The lines are so poor, so scripted, and nothing like the original. What is most concerning is that the two actors agreed to do it. They don't seem to want it all. They say the lines like they're inferring that "i'm too old for this shit". Basically, I think it's bad directing.
Rated 13 Mar 2015
guy-piranhaguy piranha
Rated 02 Jan 2015
30
6th
the only thing this gets straight is neglecting the existence of the prequel by advertising itself as part 2 instead of 3. my advice on how to watch this: hit play, hit mute, start contemplating random aspects of your life, where you come from, where you're going. your expectations for yourself, existence and the logic of it. do this until you see the credits roll. then stop. congrats! you have just watched "dumb and dumber to", but this way, you will not have wasted 2 hours of your life.
Rated 02 Jan 2015
jerkyJerky
Rated 27 Dec 2014
60
72nd
Could never live up to the original (D & D is one of the greatest comedies in history) but still enjoyable. There's a few laugh out loud moments interspersed between mild chuckles.
Rated 27 Dec 2014
fenixdownfenixdown
Rated 15 Dec 2014
65
24th
Throws a big pile of ideas against the wall and some of them stick.
Rated 15 Dec 2014
twincinematwincinema
Rated 27 Nov 2014
20
7th
Other than a few chuckles (the cat farting feathers got a "heh" from someone near me), I saw this in a silent theatre, the first time I have ever had that experience. Lloyd comes across as an aggressive asshole in this film, without any of the likability or charm from the first film.
Rated 27 Nov 2014
robartRobart
Rated 17 Nov 2014
70
61st
BUTTER THAN THE ORIGINAL
Rated 17 Nov 2014
superargoSuperargo
Rated 16 Nov 2014
68
58th
Unnecessary, for sure. Some (most?) of the gags are pretty frigging tired, in all honesty, although it does pick up in energy and inspiration as it goes, and if you're paying money to see a movie entitled DUMB AND DUMBER TO what the hell are you expecting. It's fine. Worth seeing once. I've probably seen the first one ten times, though, so there that is.
Rated 16 Nov 2014
martinelliMartinelli
Rated 16 Aug 2014
100
0th
I like it a lot!
Rated 16 Aug 2014
velvet_croweVelvet Crowe
Rated 20 Sep 2024
77
85th
Don't get the hate for this. Don't like that the movie cops out on the daughter/father dynamic but this manages to be hilarious due to Carrey and Daniel's chemistry and how much they play with their idiotic sense of logic. Legit burst out laughing at the duo taking over the science conference or the wacky conclusions the leads come to regarding Cantonese. Sometimes the jokes are way too obvious, but fuck me if the general character of the film and how much it embraces that put a smile on me.
Rated 20 Sep 2024
slaterman2slaterman2
Rated 08 Oct 2023
37
3rd
It's dumb but not nearly as funny. Also, it really turns these guys into total dicks. It feels like an episode of It's Always Sunny In Philadelphia if the writers forgot that we're supposed to hate the characters. And also forgot that they had to be funny. Dumb and Dumberer is a worse movie in every way, but at least it wasn't cruel or mean-spirited. Quality and humor aside, I'd personally prefer the cannon that features the prequel and the original.
Rated 08 Oct 2023
hassanjwr6hassanjwr6
Rated 17 Oct 2021
93
76th
The Kidney Joke! That killed me. I haven't laughed so hard.
Rated 17 Oct 2021
jpfergusonJPFerguson
Rated 11 Apr 2021
25
3rd
For the most part, this does not feel like a Farrelly brothers film apart from a few moments here and there. If you are looking to watch a follow up to the original film then you are better off watching 'Dumb and Dumberer: When Harry Met Lloyd' in which Richardson and Olsen are more like the young Daniels and Carrey than are the actual Daniels and Carrey as their older selves in this film.
Rated 11 Apr 2021
war_machineWar Machine
Rated 16 May 2020
80
78th
rvw
Rated 16 May 2020
michaelman99MichaelMan99
Rated 27 Jan 2020
24
6th
It was pure shite
Rated 27 Jan 2020
julesfmbjulesfmb
Rated 22 Jan 2020
60
40th
Not bad, just a bit too silly.
Rated 22 Jan 2020
timon88Timon88
Rated 17 Jul 2018
42
34th
Not actually good... at all. But I gotta give it its due: so few comedies ever make me laugh out loud, and this one did--several times.
Rated 17 Jul 2018
vandelay1Vandelay1
Rated 28 Apr 2018
50
51st
okay movie
Rated 28 Apr 2018
kuroelKuroel
Rated 04 Apr 2018
40
11th
Where the original was stupid and gross, but had a genuine heart and charm, this rehash was just borderline offensive.
Rated 04 Apr 2018
koalafishKoalafish
Rated 21 Oct 2017
50
12th
There were a couple of laughs, but most of it was just unfunny
Rated 21 Oct 2017
addehaddeh
Rated 25 Jun 2017
45
16th
Like the first one, but lesser on every level.
Rated 25 Jun 2017
recklessmessrecklessmess
Rated 11 May 2017
27
15th
Man, that grade crossing is really dangerous, someone should do something about it.
Rated 11 May 2017
yiannosYiannos
Rated 22 Apr 2017
45
14th
(Viewed on 05/15): D.A.D.T was a desperate move by Carrey/Farrellys who have struggled to remain relevant in the new millennium. Audiences have trouble accepting Carrey in mature roles, so he went back to the well to reprise a role he was too old for play. He still has chemistry with Daniels, but there are times where they appear to be portraying completely different characters, while a sizable portion of the jokes and cultural references are either recycled and/or outdated.
Rated 22 Apr 2017
tancantancan
Rated 04 Nov 2016
78
56th
not bad as it seems in the trailer
Rated 04 Nov 2016
muzak66muzak66
Rated 10 Jul 2016
44
17th
Jim Carrey is still kinda funny .
Rated 10 Jul 2016
jbynjbyn
Rated 18 Mar 2016
60
21st
I don't understand why this era of redoing films has been so unsuccessful. Time and time again, I see a promising remake, sequel, or reboot with original casts, and I wonder how it could go wrong. Somehow, some way they have all fallen flat. This film isn't in the category of being bad, but it is luke-warm. It is like the coffee you think about spitting out because it is on the verge of being too cold.
Rated 18 Mar 2016
groovysoulsGroovy_Souls
Rated 14 Feb 2016
40
19th
While Dumb and Dumber To wasn't amazing by any means, I believe that there was definitely some love that went into this film. Carrey and Daniels reprise some solid roles even though the script and humor don't always land. Really, it's not as bad as a lot of people said as its never horrible, it just fails as a comedy for not ever being overly funny.
Rated 14 Feb 2016
nuotionuotio
Rated 10 Nov 2015
30
3rd
Prime example of a sequel that came out way too late and failed miserably to understand what was working in the original film. It's hard to believe that the Farrelly bros were digging comedic gold in the 90's. What was funny back then, is now just mean. Daniels seems to have aged better - or maybe his age is easier to hide under Harold's look, but Carrey is just too old for the part and some jokes feel really awkward because of that.
Rated 10 Nov 2015
astrakhanastrakhan
Rated 06 Oct 2015
40
1st
Really poor. Surely these characters have more mileage in them than just repeating similar scenarios and gags from the first film? Also the writing was so weak - huge swathes of the film are pancake flat with zero narrative tension. Largely unfunny jokes, and a fair bit too long. A big disappointment (like most Farrelly films since D&D).
Rated 06 Oct 2015
neibekNeibek
Rated 08 Sep 2015
40
11th
Some funny scenes but nothing more than five minutes of laughs
Rated 08 Sep 2015
joelwatchesmoviesjoelwatchesmovies
Rated 07 Sep 2015
3
5th
The writing here couldn't be more contrived; cringe-worthy joke set-ups (rarely laugh-inducing) dominate the film's comedy landscape that's filled out by obviously desperate attempts at recreating the original's outrageous visual/situational humour, while the plot's movements are painfully stiff. There are good moments (the final twists are great) and the then/now slideshow in the end credits is remarkably redeeming, but up until then the film mostly fails to hit its mark.
Rated 07 Sep 2015
hellboy76hellboy76
Rated 07 Sep 2015
43
12th
As much as the first was a pretty funny romp if you let it be, this one fails to capture any of the original "magic". The mean spiritedness doesn't seem funny, just mean. One or two laughs towards the back half, but you aren't missing anything other than nostalgia if you skip it.
Rated 07 Sep 2015
sirstuckeySirStuckey
Rated 30 Aug 2015
40
14th
Not very good unfortunately. I got a few sporadic laughs but it definitely felt like it was trying to be too much like the first one without half the charm.
Rated 30 Aug 2015
dmbmotherDMBMother
Rated 07 Aug 2015
59
9th
Some epic moments, but a valiant attempt gone awry to revisit the epic hilarity of its predecessor. Bonus points for Breaking Bad reference with a special guest star.
Rated 07 Aug 2015
mfitzgeraldM.Fitzgerald
Rated 05 Aug 2015
2
0th
Vending machine camouflage is the only engaging thing that Dumb and Dumber To has to offer. The Farrelly brothers forgot how jokes work and all attempts of humor range from embarassing to confusing.
Rated 05 Aug 2015
damildamil
Rated 04 Aug 2015
40
13th
This wasn't as bad as I feared it might be, but it's not good. The plot is fine, as these things go, and Carrey and Daniels are likable and fall back into their old characters pretty well. But it simply just isn't very funny. There were a couple of mildly funny jokes, but nothing truly hilarious, and the callbacks to the original felt forced. It's just a nostalgia cash-in, to be sure, but I do think everyone involved could've tried a little harder.
Rated 04 Aug 2015
myfavchordsmyfavchords
Rated 03 Aug 2015
67
20th
I am a huge fan of the original film. So it is really disappointing that this one is not any where close to the original comedy classic. There are some funny moments but there are far fewer ones than in the original film. Jim Carrey has the most funny moments in this one. Overall I would say watch the original instead of this sequel.
Rated 03 Aug 2015
okkervilOkkervil
Rated 28 Jul 2015
38
26th
Pretty bad, but it's not quite the catastrophe many have made out. The script is weak and the whole thing runs out of steam well before the end. It's also somewhat of a shame that the essence Harry and Lloyds characters from the genuinely funny first film is lost, becoming a little too mean spirited. But I nearly pissed my pants laughing when Carrey threw the banana skin into the coffin, so I just can't hate it.
Rated 28 Jul 2015
mattorama12mattorama12
Rated 27 Jul 2015
49
14th
Lloyd comes off as more of a jerk than just dumb. There are some decent jokes here, but it's nothing close to the comedic masterpiece that came before it. Feels like it needed a better editor, too. There were some jokes that seemed like they should have worked, but just fell flat because of timing.
Rated 27 Jul 2015
ryan_luedersRyan Lueders
Rated 23 May 2015
70
31st
I wouldn't say this was to funny but it was okay. I think the film had a consistent amount of laughs, but I never laughed so hard that tears started running down my face like some comedies have. Lloyd and Harry both look a lot older 20 years later but Rachel Melvin gives the movie a more youthful look. It's pretty crazy it took this long for a sequel and maybe it wasn't needed, but I felt like this movie was a reminder of a funny movie back in the 90's that had great music and good laughs...
Rated 23 May 2015
qualeboyqualeboy
Rated 16 May 2015
40
15th
Pretty poor, loved the original.
Rated 16 May 2015
ytadelYtadel
Rated 12 May 2015
3
28th
I was able to sink into the dumbness and get a few genuine laughs in the latter half of the film (primarily the Ken Conference scenes), but overall it has a lot of dead stretches and the distinct whiff of too little too late. It's also noticeably more mean-spirited than the original. Mind you, I'm 100% down for mean-spirited comedy when I know it going in, but it was kind of surprising here, because that's never how I thought of Dumb and Dumber.
Rated 12 May 2015
mrarnmrarn
Rated 19 Apr 2015
35
15th
Couple of laughs built around the same gags as the first film. It gets old pretty quick.
Rated 19 Apr 2015
lookjabbaLookJabba...
Rated 14 Apr 2015
4
22nd
Dumb and Dumber To was a long belated sequel that I was skeptical to see. I love the original and initially I wasn't convinced we needed a sequel 20 years later. But I gave in to the temptation of seeing Harry & Lloyd together again. It's somewhat pleasing and nostalgic to see Jim Carrey & Jeff Daniels return. But this decade plus late sequel just cheaply rips off old and dated gags. Scene for scene this all just feels too familiar. And ultimately I'd much rather of just watched the original.
Rated 14 Apr 2015
drevenantDrevenant
Rated 12 Apr 2015
63
9th
I didn't expect much out of it, based on how I generally receive sequels and comedies in general, but I thought it was pretty hilarious. It felt, to me, a lot like the original. Same sense of humor, same atmosphere, same style of cringe-inducing gags and jokes, all without borrowing too much from the original. I think a lot of people watched this expecting a modernized sequel full of the same jokes they loved before, but what they got was an actual sequel. I thought it was pretty good.
Rated 12 Apr 2015
ribcageribcage
Rated 25 Mar 2015
41
17th
ocassionally funny. felt more like listening to a couple old dudes talk about their wild, crazy glory days...there's some moments to be enjoyed, but mostly it's just old dudes who don't have what they used to have.
Rated 25 Mar 2015
pursusPursus
Rated 03 Mar 2015
75
68th
It's not nearly as bad as people are making it out to be. If you don't go into it expecting it to live up to all of the fond memories you've built up for the original you should have a pretty good time. There's a lot of good sight gags, and some of the jokes worked really well. Honestly, some of the weakest stuff was when they were directly calling back to the first one. It's far better than "Stuck on You" or "Dumb and Dumberer."
Rated 03 Mar 2015
patmanpatman
Rated 23 Feb 2015
31
4th
Unfortunately the love for the first movie was so strong the fans demanded a sequel. Carrey show glimpses and give you a few laughs but there is too many misses and weak points to make it a enjoyable watch.
Rated 23 Feb 2015
rokkobokkorokkobokko
Rated 17 Feb 2015
70
81st
Generally very funny. Sure to be polarizing.
Rated 17 Feb 2015
amazedemonamazedemon
Rated 12 Feb 2015
55
10th
The plot is overly contrived. There are a few genuinely funny moments but they are far and few between. Instead you'll have to sit through a copious fart gags, genitalia humour, and jokes that were best left in the 90's. While Carrey and Daniels do play their parts well, we've got the first film, and this sequel will leave you feeling Dumb and Dumber To(o).
Rated 12 Feb 2015
barraocBarraoc
Rated 08 Feb 2015
50
19th
While I enjoy a good fart joke as well as the next eight year old I felt this had too many.
Rated 08 Feb 2015
parexus2Parexus2
Rated 06 Feb 2015
30
2nd
Dumb and Dumber To honestly just feels like a 90 minute, big budget, parody video that would be on YouTube. The comedy isn't the only awful thing about this either, it's the fact that they changed the way the characters are, where Lloyd just seems more of an obnoxious asshole rather than actually dumb. I didn't expect anything amazing but this is just awful. A parody of itself.
Rated 06 Feb 2015
chemical404chemical404
Rated 05 Feb 2015
10
1st
Racist, misogynistic and downright idiotic movie. It made me feel sorry for Daniels, why did he do it for himself? Cat farting feathers was the best part of two hours movie. Does anyone know if after credits scene when Lloyd and Harry throw their milkshakes and hit the windshield of the trailer behind them is reference/borrowed from some old movie with truckers? I've trying to track down a movie I saw in childhood that has a scene like that for ages.. Drop me message if you have any ideas!
Rated 05 Feb 2015
chmulcr0nchmul_cr0n
Rated 04 Feb 2015
71
60th
Performance greatness :D I think I actually like this one better than the first one. :o So...worthy sequel.
Rated 04 Feb 2015
dmcrimsonDMCrimson
Rated 21 Jan 2015
73
19th
Why did the Farrelly brothers make Harry and Lloyd mean spirited? Where was the Lloyd that was adorably pursuing Mary Swanson?
Rated 21 Jan 2015
ramco1905ramco1905
Rated 18 Jan 2015
77
44th
I took what I expect from it..ıt made me enjoy..thats what I want from a comedy..
Rated 18 Jan 2015
gideonGideon
Rated 27 Dec 2014
2
59th
A bit of a lazy attempt. It's miles beneath the original and somewhat overlong and tedious, at times. There's some chuckles here and there, but not hilarious like its predecessor. I get why it got made, the magic's just gone. Shame.
Rated 27 Dec 2014
dylanwilson6dylanwilson6
Rated 26 Dec 2014
60
27th
I knew it could have never been as good as the first one, but you know what......it could have been worse. It had me chuckling at least throughout, and actually got me to laugh out loud on a few occasions.
Rated 26 Dec 2014
redactedredacted
Rated 26 Dec 2014
32
9th
Kicks off with some low ball racism and a shameless breaking bad reference, not to mention ...what's up with the criticker summary, is that themed or? Competently made road film with comedy that straddles bottom of the barrel, blatant 80's style ignorance and the genuine inoffensive dumbness people popped their popcorn for.
Rated 26 Dec 2014
vorpalkittenVorpalKitten
Rated 25 Dec 2014
0
3rd
Absolutely abysmal.
Rated 25 Dec 2014
wezzoWezzo
Rated 22 Dec 2014
74
35th
Relentlessly stupid, but I laughed more than enough to justify its existence.
Rated 22 Dec 2014
mjvmoviemanMJVmovieMan
Rated 16 Dec 2014
67
39th
It's not a very good movie. But I did laugh. I adore the original, and nothing could have lived up to it. But I did laugh.
Rated 16 Dec 2014
comepeliculacomepelicula
Rated 13 Dec 2014
60
52nd
Yes, it's not as good as the first one, it relays heavily on references from the first movie, the guys are older and the whole plot is not fresh, but despite everything is still funny and I had a couple of good laughs which is the only intention of this film and I appreciate the honesty.
Rated 13 Dec 2014
roonay3kroonay3k
Rated 02 Dec 2014
72
71st
There was no chance this was going to be as good as the original and it wasn't! But there were some very funny moments and it was really great to see Harry & Lloyd again :) The story wasn't that good and I hoped it would be better. Still a funny movie that everyone must watch!
Rated 02 Dec 2014
moribunnyMoribunny
Rated 01 Dec 2014
30
15th
No.
Rated 01 Dec 2014
bullyfanaticBullyFanatic
Rated 26 Nov 2014
50
4th
I didn't expect it to be anywhere near the original, but I did expect it to be better than it was. What we got was Jim Carrey trying too hard and most of the funnier scenes being spoiled in the trailer. It had it's moments, I liked the ending, and the addition of Rob Riggle and Kathleen Turner was nice, but overall, it was disappointing.
Rated 26 Nov 2014
letskillrobotsletskillrobots
Rated 22 Nov 2014
7
17th
Felt more like a sequel to Wedding Crashers.
Rated 22 Nov 2014
pluggedinPluggedIN
Rated 19 Nov 2014
20
12th
Purposefully hurtful gotchas, vulgar sexual smirks that go so far as bestiality, racist grime and, yes, even the aforementioned testicle tear-away leave this pic smelling of something far worse than "merely" another gaseous whoosh. (pluggedin.com)
Rated 19 Nov 2014
stewballStewball
Rated 18 Nov 2014
20
2nd
Dumbest.
Rated 18 Nov 2014
cagedwisdomcagedwisdom
Rated 17 Nov 2014
50
38th
Carrey and Daniels still got it; The Farrelly brothers probably never did. An occasionally nice film brought down by a mostly terrible script.
Rated 17 Nov 2014
jthuskyjthusky
Rated 16 Nov 2014
51
24th
I'm not unhappy that I saw it, even though it really isn't a good movie by any margins. It's lowest-common-denominator humor that's executed well enough that you can laugh at it every now and again.
Rated 16 Nov 2014
clark_novaClark Nova
Rated 16 Nov 2014
90
63rd
They were really milking Jeff Daniels' ass. Now I need an ICE PICK me up. ;)
Rated 16 Nov 2014
dougiedDougieD
Rated 15 Nov 2014
55
19th
Doesn't come anywhere near the quality of the first movie, but it still made me laugh so I will forgive its uneven pacing and flat moments. The gags aren't set up as perfectly as in the original film, but I wouldn't call it a total disappointment. Just an average comedy worth laughing at that will be forgotten the next day.
Rated 15 Nov 2014

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...