sign in
register
Watch
Amazon Prime Video AMC Amazon Prime Video with Ads
+11
Carrie
Carrie
+11
JustWatch
Your probable score
?
Carrie

Carrie

2013
Drama, Horror
1h 40m
A sheltered high school girl unleashes her newly developed telekinetic powers after she is pushed too far by her peers. (imdb)

Directed by:

Kimberly Peirce

Screenwriter:

Stephen King, Lawrence D. Cohen, Roberto Aguirre-Sacasa

Starring:

Judy Greer, Chloë Grace Moretz, Julianne Moore, Barry Shabaka Henley, Michelle Nolden, Cynthia Preston, Portia Doubleday, Alex Russell, Max Topplin, Ansel Elgort, Gabriella Wilde, Skyler Wexler

Franchise:

Carrie

Genres:

Drama, Horror

Country:

USA

Language:

English
imdb IMDb
Update history
Suggest edit

Carrie

2013
Drama, Horror
1h 40m
Your probable score
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer
Avg Percentile 26.13% from 1143 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

(1152)
Compact view
clear
Compact view
Show
Sort
jasongirl67Jasongirl67
Rated 22 Aug 2020
50
31st
Nothing spectacular just meh passes the time
Rated 22 Aug 2020
leonardisLeonardis
Rated 26 Oct 2019
64
7th
Not terrible, but certainly not good. I really liked the original so that could be why I wasn't a fan. The elements and way they handled Carries story and the teen angst was done better in the original. This is really well cast, although Carries mom was written quite differently than she was in the first movie. The revenge scene is still pretty entertaining. This wasn't bad, it just feels totally unnecessary and can't decide if it wants to be the original movie or it's own thing.
Rated 26 Oct 2019
ytadelYtadel
Rated 22 Oct 2013
2
14th
For most of its runtime, it's just a bland remake of De Palma's version, not incompetent but with many of the interesting edges sanded down. However, in its final 15 minutes or so, it takes the leap into full-on head-smacking idiocy, complete with a final, uh, "homage" to the original's gravestone scene that may be one of the worst movie moments of 2013.
Rated 22 Oct 2013
cowmanCowman
Rated 20 Oct 2013
40
7th
This movie lacks any form of creativity. It shouldn't even exist. To quote Rihanna: "All I see is dollar signs".
Rated 20 Oct 2013
moraesfelipemoraesfelipe
Rated 08 Dec 2013
30
5th
Everything that is fun and historically relevant about the original is reduced to poor CG, unconvincing acting from good actors and a sleazy direction by a good filmmaker. This is truly bad, lazy entertainment, elevated here and there -- specially in the climax -- by its own self-indulgence with the source, which makes every bad scene look actually hilariously ridiculous.
Rated 08 Dec 2013
billyshearsBillyShears
Rated 24 Oct 2013
45
15th
"They're all gonna laugh at you" The snarkiest usher I've ever encountered. Where did that girl pull out the cellphone during the plug it up shower scene? HOLLYWOOD.The only thing this really does different is that the girls upload the plug it up scene to youtube , but that's just because it's a DUH thing to do if you want to have some bullyin' but I kept on thinking of the other video that shows up later , the auto-tuned remix
Rated 24 Oct 2013
beedubBeeDub
Rated 03 Nov 2024
72
22nd
Ultimately chooses to be a substandard remake of the De Palma film rather than a more faithful adaptation of the King novel, thus robbing itself of its only possible reason to exist. The new ending is incredibly stupid.
Rated 03 Nov 2024
omgfridgeomgfridge
Rated 03 Jan 2017
2
18th
Incredibly unnecessary. When the grave crackled, I cackled.
Rated 03 Jan 2017
suture_selfSuture Self
Rated 31 Jan 2014
3
24th
I have a mixed opinion on remakes. Sometimes I like them, sometimes I don't. I disliked this one. If you're looking for a 2013 horror movie on achieving independence via violent methods, check out Stoker. Carrie 2013 is a tacky retread and Moretz is awful. Overblown helplessness, fake tears, unintentionally funny "LOOK AT MY POWERS NOW!" expressions - it's all really bad and completely lacks the under-the-surface mystery that made Spacek's character enchanting. This is in your face and boring.
Rated 31 Jan 2014
vandelay1Vandelay1
Rated 07 Jan 2014
10
4th
bad movie
Rated 07 Jan 2014
matthew_parkinsonMatthew Parkinson
Rated 20 Oct 2013
50
47th
The Carrie remake is unnecessary but not altogether bad. It's a watered-down, more easily accessible version of De Palma's film, basically. It occasionally attempts to divert but these changes wind up being contradicted by other aspects of the film, leading to tonal inconsistencies. It's all competent and you're unlikely to have a bad experience watching it, but I can't shake the feeling that you're far better off watching the original. It's a horror classic for a reason.
Rated 20 Oct 2013
filmphilFilmphil
Rated 01 Nov 2021
80
39th
The alternative Ending is much better
Rated 01 Nov 2021
luna6ixLuna6ix
Rated 02 Jan 2017
73
44th
There's a lot of hate on this for being unoriginal or lacking in the creativity, apparently people don't realize that it's a remake, it's not supposed to be original. What this movie does have is a decent budget and forty years of technical advancement to update the '76 version with better effects than water with red food coloring. I can support the idea of remaking and updating, but unfortunately Carrie was never that awesome of a story, but Chloe Grace Moretz is way better looking than Spacek.
Rated 02 Jan 2017
okkervilOkkervil
Rated 15 Nov 2014
25
17th
An unnecessary remake that is very simply terrible.
Rated 15 Nov 2014
davidblastDavidBlast
Rated 19 Oct 2014
50
43rd
Another remake using the original as a storyboard, but Peirce has a less unsuccessful time instilling the third act with horror, tragedy and gratuitous revenge. Certain shots of Carrie hovering in the background are positively haunting, or at least better than the split screen original. Moretz does not have the otherworldly look of Spacek, but what she lacks in horror chops, she makes up for with a more sympathetic take on the character. I may never be a fan of remakes, but this one is passable.
Rated 19 Oct 2014
groovysoulsGroovy_Souls
Rated 03 Aug 2014
60
40th
This remake surprisngly was not so bad. This movie is actually endlessly entertaining due to the striking and bold visuals by Pierce as well as the spot on Carrie White characterization by Mortez. However in the department of quality, this movie is lacking essentials. The dialogue is shoddy, as well as most of the supporting cast. Honestly, a great addition to the art of remaking classics, just in need of a better script and cast.
Rated 03 Aug 2014
paxtonPaxton
Rated 23 Mar 2014
44
13th
I was initially attracted to this because the trailer was totally indifferent to first time viewers. It laid the whole story out as if to say, "You saw the original, you know what happens. This time there's Julianne Moore." I was okay with that. No point in masking anything. BUT...the motivation in every single scene through the whole movie seems to be: Does the audience know she's telekinetic? Yeah, we got that. Spacek was cast perfectly. Moretz is a fine actress but this part was not for her.
Rated 23 Mar 2014
muzak66muzak66
Rated 19 Feb 2014
52
24th
Chloe Grace Moretz did a very good as Carrie but other then that the movie was ok.
Rated 19 Feb 2014
ryan_luedersRyan Lueders
Rated 12 Feb 2014
70
31st
I think they got a little Carried away with the violence in this one. Especially with Julianne Moore's character. Still, for a remake this wasn't horrible but I would like the clearly state that this movie really brings nothing new to the table that the original film didn't already do...
Rated 12 Feb 2014
alex_watkinsAlex Watkins
Rated 31 Jan 2014
2
15th
This is like a parody of the '76 classic in every way. Why you gotta fix what ain't broken, Hollywood? Julianne Moore is too good for this movie.
Rated 31 Jan 2014
muutanetmuutanet
Rated 07 Jan 2014
31
22nd
There was so many parts they could do better and different. Follows too close to the original and you cannot beat Sissy Spacek on lead. The again Chloë cannot act.
Rated 07 Jan 2014
nofearnofear
Rated 07 Jan 2014
68
29th
I have to admit I have only seen a few bits and pieces of the original but this was worth a watch, took too long to climax but worth the watch anyway.
Rated 07 Jan 2014
constantineconstantine
Rated 05 Jan 2014
41
8th
A Carrie remake. Someone thought it would be a good idea...
Rated 05 Jan 2014
antidood1antidood1
Rated 09 Nov 2013
70
58th
Some people call this a useless remake, I'd call it an interesting re-imagining. I liked the first movie a lot, but it was far from perfect. This movie sticks closer to the original story of the book, while deepening both Carrie and Margareth as multi-dimensional characters. Carrie is shown here as someone powerful to root for, rather than someone scary to be afraid of. This movie misses the campy charm of the first one, but it's superior in terms of drama and technical aspects.
Rated 09 Nov 2013
superargoSuperargo
Rated 02 Nov 2013
65
53rd
I love the Carrie story, and Moretz does a memorable job here. The climax is suitably large-scale and cathartic. But this is as run-of-the-mill as remakes get. No reason for it to exist, really--nothing new or exciting is done with the story, it's not modernized in any way or made into any sort of commentary on modern adolescence/society. It's just a bunch of people re-telling the CARRIE story. Good story, though, like I said.
Rated 02 Nov 2013
montycircusMontyCircus
Rated 28 Oct 2013
40
38th
Felt like I was watching an extended trailer. Just never grabbed me.
Rated 28 Oct 2013
therealj_roTheRealJ-Ro
Rated 26 Oct 2013
65
31st
Shouldn't be expecting Shakespeare here. It's popcorn fare plain and simple. You don't have to think about it, you just have to watch Carrie White go super nuts over these cunty teenagers being assholes for literally NO RAISIN except, teenagers. You're sitting there waiting for Carrie to finally go full Carrie, and when she does, it's satisfying. Julianne Moore was creepy as hell, and CGM played the role she was handed quite well. Other performances were struggles but to me it's worth seeing.
Rated 26 Oct 2013
dewalldewall
Rated 26 Oct 2013
71
58th
The criticism of this film seems to cluster around two points: it's an uncreative remake, or it's crafted by lesser talents. But I found the differences between the films compelling, the psychology more cohesive, and key moments more rich and nuanced. Some important pieces from King's book were present that showed Carrie in an empowered light which I feel was always intended, and her abilities had more physicality and fearsomeness. Not better in all ways, but still felt worth the remake.
Rated 26 Oct 2013
nothingsgoodNothingsGood
Rated 18 Oct 2013
5
3rd
As far as horror films go, Carrie is a dud. As far as a remake of De Palma's classic, it's an abomination. De Palma's protagonist was a tortured and troubled girl who looked for acceptance and only found hate, Peirce's Carrie is an domestically abused girl who just sort of loses it one day and has a lot of fun in the process. It's that type of horror film that revels in its brutality rather than sits back appalled by it; for reference see Saw III-VII.
Rated 18 Oct 2013
madmanMadMan
Rated 01 Oct 2024
83
45th
Chloë Grace Moretz headlines a good cast, even if the movie is too much a copy of the original. For some reason it features a cyberbully angle that it quickly abandons just to show Carrie using her powers. Also another adaptation that refuses to use the real ending from the book. I enjoyed this one, even if the 1970s original is much better.
Rated 01 Oct 2024
panzerwolfpanzerwolf
Rated 07 Oct 2022
50
20th
This remake constantly makes you question as to just why it was made, though, as it lacks innovation and does subtle modernizing of the original movie, but has no guts to do anything further than that. Carrie going crazy at the school was a very cool scene, though, so I'll give the movie props for that. The relationship between Carrie and her mother is not fully realized and explored here and it felt a bit lukewarm. The first movie does everything better than this one, so why does this exist?
Rated 07 Oct 2022
plovisPlovis
Rated 25 Aug 2021
40
7th
Lets find one of the most attractive young actresses at the moment to play this quiet, awkward, high school outcast. A poorly done unnecessary remake.
Rated 25 Aug 2021
lawlaw
Rated 06 Nov 2019
50
37th
I did like the faux 1970s aesthetic and the presence of Ansel Elgort but that's about all it has going for it. Even Judy Greer can't do much to improve this movie. It's a triumph of try-hard style over substance, lacking in heart, and a clear tumble in terms of quality and artistry from the original. Watch the 1976 adaptation to appreciate the true horror of this story, which is the characters and their heartbreaking relationships.
Rated 06 Nov 2019
mwestcottmwestcott
Rated 04 Jan 2018
60
26th
It is true that the remake of Carrie offers nothing that can't be found in DE Palma's original. Except for one major point. One thing which elevates this film beyond that of a pointless remake: Julianne Moore. This woman is amazing and was tailor made for this role.
Rated 04 Jan 2018
yiannosYiannos
Rated 02 Sep 2017
43
10th
(Viewed in 04/14): A pointless remake that claims greater fidelity to its source material, which is just a respectful way of saying that it lacks imagination. It takes all the fun and lurid qualities of DePalma's original and replaces them with nauseating cliches and eye rolling teen angst. It has been repeatedly noted that Moretz is too attractive to play Carrie, and while there is a grain of truth to that criticism, she isn't all that good in the role, and Moore isn't a patch on Piper.
Rated 02 Sep 2017
luordluord
Rated 09 Aug 2017
50
26th
Moretz makes for a compelling Carrie even if the movie does little unseen stuff with the character.
Rated 09 Aug 2017
tipar822tipar822
Rated 06 Dec 2016
70
90th
I enjoyed a lot, a big star Moretz, I love her.
Rated 06 Dec 2016
goldblumingGoldbluming
Rated 14 Oct 2016
75
52nd
Really good but many scenes of mental illness are extremely intense. Also why show the bucket dropping blood three times in a row from different angles?
Rated 14 Oct 2016
backwardsuitbackwardsuit
Rated 07 Dec 2015
40
7th
A frustratingly uninspired remake that kinda messes up the story, adds nothing relevant & removes everything that was striking and neat in the original. Messy structure, bad casting, horrible CGI, lazy "horror-visuals" & cliched score massively degrade it. Sometimes kinda works when directly copying the original yet abandons all the nuance & aesthetics in favour of flat unconvincing characters & loud dumb effects. The core story is still solid though and Moore hams it up like a boss.
Rated 07 Dec 2015
tsvetetsvete
Rated 26 Jul 2015
98
85th
1
Rated 26 Jul 2015
thedicemanTheDiceman
Rated 26 Mar 2015
40
19th
Pointless remake.
Rated 26 Mar 2015
gokcanzgokcanz
Rated 10 Feb 2015
55
27th
* Casting, Acting : 6 * Script : 5 * Directing, Aura : 4.5 * Ease of Viewing : 6.5 * Naked Eye : 5.5
Rated 10 Feb 2015
eritsukueritsuku
Rated 30 Jan 2015
45
10th
I walked in fully aware of the mess of a film I was about to watch. I was not disappointed in that regard. There are so many aspects that could have been improved upon to to pull the story out of the low quality gutter; e.g., explore Carrie's discovery of her telekinesis, the history of abuse at the hands of her peers, and the personal journey of the one girl who grew a heart (the film spent time on this last example...kinda, but to poor effect). I waste no further time critiquing this one.
Rated 30 Jan 2015
recklessmessrecklessmess
Rated 31 Oct 2014
30
16th
So wait, what was wrong with the original that they needed to remake it? It's not like this one reimagined it, or added anything substantially new, or improved upon acting.
Rated 31 Oct 2014
kalichan88kalichan88
Rated 07 Oct 2014
60
11th
I remember the original one was not as I expected either, but this one was worse. Probably the vision the director had was just different from my interpretation of the first one, but I just kept feeling "not like that!"
Rated 07 Oct 2014
escano777escano777
Rated 19 Jul 2014
40
54th
I never saw the original movie and was unfamiliar with the story. I was pleasantly surprised how good this story is. I always assumed Carrie was a villain but it turns out that it is much more complex. I found myself rooting for her as she went on her killing spree. Enjoyable and better than most films within the genre. It even makes me want to go back and see the original.
Rated 19 Jul 2014
metzmetz
Rated 29 May 2014
40
34th
Has it's moments, but not enough.
Rated 29 May 2014
realmacgyverRealMacgyver
Rated 19 Apr 2014
60
30th
It's decent but takes too long to finish and both the endings make little to no sense.
Rated 19 Apr 2014
troothTrooth
Rated 10 Mar 2014
43
13th
Just another unnecessary remake. It's competently made and all, but it holds absolutely nothing special if you've seen the 70s version.
Rated 10 Mar 2014
kingjohnbbqKingjohnbbq
Rated 05 Mar 2014
83
44th
never really fully watched the original, I know all the major plot points and seen a good deal of it, but never in sequence all the way through. That being said, I thought this was pretty cool. The psychological issues dealing with a religious zealot mental patient for a mother probably would be quite extreme, pushing your mind to figure out anyway of fighting back. I thought it was done well, the characters...aside from the main bad girl...all seemed like real people. the ending was badass.
Rated 05 Mar 2014
td888td888
Rated 22 Feb 2014
50
41st
It's not that bad as people make out it to be.
Rated 22 Feb 2014
mkellinsmkellins
Rated 20 Feb 2014
25
8th
Lacks the subtlety and realism of the original. The overuse of slow motion gore scenes is off-putting and lowers the film to just above the average teen horror movie. Moretz is a terrible choice for Carrie's role. Moore, on the other hand, is great in the role of the crazy mother.
Rated 20 Feb 2014
hajikarimihajikarimi
Rated 13 Feb 2014
80
7th
1206: i am surprised because of Julianne Moore! why she play in such a crap?!?
Rated 13 Feb 2014
mistersplicemistersplice
Rated 25 Jan 2014
40
14th
4- might want to skip this one, not that hot
Rated 25 Jan 2014
wicheWiche
Rated 22 Jan 2014
61
37th
Ok, a remake. It's more modern than the first one, but there is one thing I don't get: The whole idea is that Carrie is bullied because she is an unattractive teenage girl who is quite ignorant. Then why o why is this Carrie a really beautiful (forget that, saw her in the promdress? I mean stunning) girl? The only thing I thought was "and there goes the plot"
Rated 22 Jan 2014
lostinlodoslostinlodos
Rated 21 Jan 2014
90
90th
Finally. somebody mad a Carrie film that does the book justice. And that's despite some modern updates to the film's environment for technology and atmosphere! best version yet! a must see!
Rated 21 Jan 2014
bofbof
Rated 10 Jan 2014
51
26th
The poster says it all, really; the producers think "Carrie" is about a girl who kills people, whereas King's and De Palma's "Carrie" were about an emotionally traumatised girl trying to figure out what "normal" means. Since Moretz basically plays Carrie with three distinct and separate personalities (shy outsider, normal all-American girl about to spring fully-formed, and cold-blooded killing machine) we're left with one long lead-up to a special effects fest. Not bad; just unnecessary.
Rated 10 Jan 2014
daffy69697Daffy69697
Rated 10 Jan 2014
55
3rd
Why did Hollywood even bother with this remake?
Rated 10 Jan 2014
eric_janeric-jan
Rated 08 Jan 2014
60
13th
A little girly for me. Lot of screaming pfff, they could have cut down on that at least :P Grace Moretz was ok, but Moore was extremely irritating to watch (but thats probably just her character..)
Rated 08 Jan 2014
damildamil
Rated 07 Jan 2014
60
43rd
Nowhere near as bad as I thought it might be. It mostly just turned out to be pretty unnecessary. This version just doesn't do enough new things to justify its existence. I did like the way they portrayed Carrie's peers, however. Julianne Moore is good, but as much as I like her, I think Chloe Grace Moretz was miscast in this role. I wouldn't totally advise against seeing this, but if you've already seen the original, I wouldn't bother.
Rated 07 Jan 2014
burkayadaligburkayadalig
Rated 05 Jan 2014
60
19th
just like the original: totally unnecessary... thanks to better CGI and stunts, Carrie got more violent at the end
Rated 05 Jan 2014
lumpnboylumpnboy
Rated 05 Jan 2014
35
25th
I didn't think that much of the original, to be honest.
Rated 05 Jan 2014
moribunnyMoribunny
Rated 04 Jan 2014
15
7th
Yet another totally bullshit remake of a nice 70s horror film. The 'scary' bits are hilarious.
Rated 04 Jan 2014
roonay3kroonay3k
Rated 04 Jan 2014
75
82nd
This was by no means a masterpiece but the acting of Chloe Moretz (Carrie) was outstanding! If the film was better and it wasn't a horror movie I believe she would get an Oscar for her role! I quite enjoyed this movie even tough I was expecting more!
Rated 04 Jan 2014
guy-piranhaguy piranha
Rated 03 Jan 2014
30
6th
whoa. this just screams cheap and rushed into your face for about 90 minutes. the acting is unexpectedly awful, so i can only guess they went with first takes quite a lot. the cut is beyond anything i've experienced from hollywood in quite a while, there's even sound drop outs in the simplest of transitions. makes you wonder if anyone on the crew ever actually SAW a movie. hopefully the cast, especially moretz and moore, will somehow manage to come out of this unblemished...
Rated 03 Jan 2014
csdkcsdk
Rated 03 Jan 2014
70
57th
It was supposed to be a horror movie, but I don't remember being ever scared or tense. Carrie never felt real and believable, as Moretz is too good looking for playing the most shy and unpopular girl in school. Instead, Carrie's mother seemed perfectly creepy. Not an awful movie, but it could have been a lot better.
Rated 03 Jan 2014
spaceflohspacefloh
Rated 17 Dec 2013
60
58th
ger; [carrie]; ein einzelgängerisches Mädchen wird von ihren Mitschülern gehänselt und entwickelt daraufhin psycho-kinetische Fähigkeiten - diese bringen ihre Mitschüler in Bedrängnis als die sich weiter gemein verhalten.;
Rated 17 Dec 2013
yannpanyannpan
Rated 12 Dec 2013
55
10th
I really don't know what went wrong with this film. Can't say it was a disaster or so, but it was really disappointing. I watched it at the cinema, eager to be scared but nothing happened. On the contrary, sometimes I couldn't stop laughing. Maybe the fact that I had quite high hopes for it, since I knew that 1976's "Carrie" was a hit and that Julianne Moore was acting as Carrie's mother, added a bit to my disappointment. Moretz and Moore are really good at their roles though - thank God.
Rated 12 Dec 2013
wezzoWezzo
Rated 02 Dec 2013
75
37th
Hems closely to the original - at times frustratingly so - but an excellent cast and the inherent power of Stephen King's story ensure this remains an eminently watchable, disturbing flick. Great staging, lovely tense build-ups to climactic moments - and heck, Moretz' outstanding performance alone justifies the remake.
Rated 02 Dec 2013
cagedwisdomcagedwisdom
Rated 15 Nov 2013
50
38th
I haven't seen the original, but this felt less like a remake of a 70s horror film and more like an amalgamation of Chronicle and LOL. Which pretty much sums up my experience. I enjoyed the middle, a moderately interesting coming-of-age drama with some charm and heart, and I disliked the horror stuff at the start and end, which feels out of place and poorly thought out. The end in particular is idiotic, and a real bummer in this context, no better when you know what's coming from the start.
Rated 15 Nov 2013
sullalionSullaLion
Rated 14 Nov 2013
65
23rd
I was hoping for more from this remake. The trailer suggested more of an exploration of the psychological development of the Carrier character. Chloe Grace Moretz's acting was excellent, but I think the plot suffered by being simplified for the target demographic of this October release. The pacing seemed off. I look forward to watching it again and thinking about how it could have been better.
Rated 14 Nov 2013
glm01glm01
Rated 29 Oct 2013
61
24th
61.000
Rated 29 Oct 2013
pluggedinPluggedIN
Rated 25 Oct 2013
30
22nd
That real-world red flag, though, waves above a mess of bloody, deadly revenge and loathsome language―a vengeful and gory mayhem that's glazed with twisted, religious insanity. (pluggedin.com)
Rated 25 Oct 2013
t3hjohnsonT3hJohnson
Rated 23 Oct 2013
23
31st
Could have used some better directing.
Rated 23 Oct 2013
dougiedDougieD
Rated 21 Oct 2013
50
15th
The latest remake of Carrie eschews the campy vibe of De Palma's classic for a more serious tone, but still feels like the same movie. Scenes play out almost the same way as before, with much of the same dialogue, and while Judy Greer and Julianne Moore are good in their roles, the rest of the actors range from adequate to just terrible. It brings nothing new to the story and just feels like a carbon copy of a better film. Watchable, but not good in any way.
Rated 21 Oct 2013
trixrabbiTrixRabbi
Rated 21 Oct 2013
68
25th
Does an excellent job expanding on the themes of the original but it lacks craft and the acting is rather weak (with the exception of the always amazing Julianne Moore). However, it makes for a good watch in its own right and Peirce paves her own path while still hitting all the story beats.
Rated 21 Oct 2013

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...