sign in
register
Watch
Starz Starz Roku Premium Channel Starz Amazon Channel
+7
Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2
Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2
+7
JustWatch
Your probable score
?
Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2

Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2

2000
Horror
1h 30m
To cash in on all of the "real world" hype of the events in the first film, a man from Burkitsville, Maryland opens a "Blair Witch Hunt" tour, which shows patrons various locations from the original film. A bunch of college students decide to take the tour, and wind up in Rustin Parr's house. There, they decide to camp for the evening, but in the morning, they realize they didn't sleep and they don't remember anything that happened the previous night. From there, they go back to town, and discover that something...or someone has come with them. (imdb)

Directed by:

Joe Berlinger

Screenwriter:

Daniel Myrick, Eduardo Sánchez

Starring:

Kim Director, Jeffrey Donovan, Erica Leerhsen, Tristine Skyler, Stephen Barker Turner, Lanny Flaherty, Kurt Loder, Joe Berlinger, Chuck Scarborough, Bruce D. Reed, Lynda Millard, Deb Burgoyne

Franchise:

Blair Witch

Genre:

Horror

Country:

USA

Languages:

English, German
imdb IMDb
Update history
Suggest edit

Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2

2000
Horror
1h 30m
Your probable score
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer
Avg Percentile 14.86% from 1537 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

(1544)
Compact view
clear
Compact view
Show
Sort
beedubBeeDub
Rated 18 Sep 2016
62
5th
You'd be better off hitting yourself in the head with a brick for 90 minutes.
Rated 18 Sep 2016
paxtonPaxton
Rated 16 Mar 2017
56
32nd
This time around the footage was found by me..........to be boring!. ZING!
Rated 16 Mar 2017
purgatospurgatos
Rated 16 Jun 2008
6
1st
The original came out when I was 13 or 14, I remember because in one of my grade 9 classes we had to do video projects and most of us ripped off Blair Witch. I mention this because every single one of those projects was better than this movie.
Rated 16 Jun 2008
billyshearsBillyShears
Rated 29 May 2014
20
2nd
"Take my card, call me, I'm on the web." I wasn't dumb enough for this.
Rated 29 May 2014
shmendrekShmendrek
Rated 01 Feb 2008
1
10th
A sequel only in name, hastily cobbled together in order to cash-in on the success of the original.
Rated 01 Feb 2008
tripleshTripleSH
Rated 14 Aug 2007
9
4th
Before watching this, I hadn't felt frustrated in a long time. I maybe got a little carried away and was mean to some people. I'm sorry for that, but I blame Artisan Entertainment.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
mjvmoviemanMJVmovieMan
Rated 19 Mar 2007
1
0th
Is this the worst film ever made? I really don't want to know the answer to that.
Rated 19 Mar 2007
syntheseizurSyntheseizur
Rated 03 Jul 2017
57
11th
Capitalizes on the MTV-fueled hysteria of the original and the metafictional motifs of the Scream series with a self-referential satire of the movie's fans. With a non-linear narrative and surreal montages, the movie's an undeniably weird sequel, but it could've afforded to be even more left-field and still commanded an audience. It runs out of ideas by the end, but it's still unfairly maligned. Either way, this goes in the time capsule for 25th century humans to help them understand the '90s.
Rated 03 Jul 2017
groovysoulsGroovy_Souls
Rated 21 Sep 2016
10
3rd
Book of Shadows might have had promise in its earliest developmental stages, but that seems to have quickly fallen apart. Blair Witch 2 is a travesty of a movie, plagued by poor acting, a script written by a Hot Topic employee, and direction that is more annoying than anything I've ever seen. There are a multitude of other problems, including editing, but I don't feel like getting into those. The movie is worthless.
Rated 21 Sep 2016
ytadelYtadel
Rated 16 Sep 2016
0
0th
At this exact moment in time, I'm ready to declare this the worst wide release movie I've ever seen. It's very rare you find a movie that fails at storytelling at this level. One that fails at mood at this level. One with acting this bad. One with pacing this bad. One with dialogue this bad. Finding a movie that does all of those things so apocalyptically badly all at the same time? Well, I present to you Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2, the worst movie of all time.
Rated 16 Sep 2016
aflickeringAFlickering
Rated 30 Aug 2016
3
36th
a potentially really fascinating satirical metahorror, brimming with commentary on its predecessor, which unfortunately got absolutely butchered by an opportunistic studio desperate to ride on the coattails of the original. damn shame, but it still gets a decent rating from me - the more attention it gets, the more chance there is of the director's cut eventually seeing the light of day.
Rated 30 Aug 2016
muzak66muzak66
Rated 29 Oct 2013
6
2nd
This was actually worse then the 1st movie but not by much.
Rated 29 Oct 2013
kramyessevKramYessev
Rated 30 Jan 2012
6
0th
This felt like a taster to what would come ten years later: Paranormal Activity 2. I dread to think what will happen in 2020.
Rated 30 Jan 2012
mr_filmMr. Film
Rated 25 Jul 2010
19
7th
Another film in the never ending list of failed attempts of sequels
Rated 25 Jul 2010
stanthecaddystanthecaddy
Rated 24 Jul 2010
65
28th
Could have been better, but it's not as bad as its reputation.
Rated 24 Jul 2010
lupisterlupister
Rated 28 Apr 2010
57
61st
not that bad, actually
Rated 28 Apr 2010
jebJeb
Rated 21 Jul 2008
35
20th
Unnecessary sequel that falls flat. It needs to be cremated.
Rated 21 Jul 2008
luna6ixLuna6ix
Rated 19 May 2008
81
78th
nandorizzinandorizzi
Rated 10 Oct 2007
0
1st
Nothing is explained: there is no witch, no book of shadows, there is no sense, no scary. The opposite of the first film.
Rated 10 Oct 2007
geopoopGeopoop
Rated 19 Aug 2007
2
6th
I was expecting more jostling and "ooh spooky the cameraman is gone" sorta stuff. Instead, we get feces.
Rated 19 Aug 2007
teddedonTedDedon
Rated 23 Apr 2007
8
2nd
Halo owns it
Rated 23 Apr 2007
nataskaosnataskaos
Rated 22 Nov 2006
36
12th
I wanted to love that movie. I didn't. stupid sequel.
Rated 22 Nov 2006
kritlekroKritlekro
Rated 02 May 2024
75
32nd
Now hear me out. Hear me out. This movie in my eyes deserves this 75 no joke cuz of how stupid it is. I legit ended up enjoying the whole thing countless times just for the fact its THAT bad. It honestly has brought me more joy than the original, its bad but its really good that its bad. If you honestly see it as a sort of comedic parody, try not to take it seriously, you'll have fun.
Rated 02 May 2024
videoetronVideoetron
Rated 08 May 2021
50
9th
I was 13 when I first say it and thought some parts and the ending were dope. Rewatching it as an adult, yeah, it doesn't hold that well after all
Rated 08 May 2021
moraesfelipemoraesfelipe
Rated 23 Nov 2020
30
5th
It has such a terrible reputation that it took me ages to finally watch it. Well, not that bad if you are into its self-conscious, satirical, mockumentary-on-found-footage-horror nature and the 90s-teen-crazy-video-obsessed vibe. It's just too bad it all turns to easy solutions in the second half. Also, the bland, uninspired execution doesn't help too much.
Rated 23 Nov 2020
wwallce4prezWWallce4prez
Rated 28 Oct 2020
40
7th
I would say this is better than its reputation suggests, but the ultimate feeling is still a let down. It is essentially a group of fanatics that get drunk in the woods and suffer the consequences. The rush to get this movie out when the hype was still hot from the original was silly. What you are left with is some good ideas with shotty execution. Joe Berlinger is a good director, but it is no surprise it took him another 20 years to revisit a film that wasn't a documentary.
Rated 28 Oct 2020
vv238vv238
Rated 21 Oct 2020
24
19th
You know what, in spite of the terrible acting, confused plot, complete lack of atmosphere, questionable themes, and the amateurishness of the entire production, I did not and do not hate Blair Witch 2. It is a movie that is trying. It sucks, but it is at least trying.
Rated 21 Oct 2020
rihreyrihrey
Rated 24 Jan 2020
0
0th
wh- what even is this
Rated 24 Jan 2020
pianosamaPianoSama
Rated 13 Oct 2019
60
12th
Though it presents intriguing ideas & the cast try to work with what they have, it's not enough to save what's ultimately an absolute mess. Featuring a jumbled script & nonsensical plot, one-note characters who never come off like the satirized archetypes they're meant to be, & a bafflingly dull ending that does it no favors, it's an unfortunate example of studio intervention at its worst. In another world, it was released as intended & is likely better remembered- as it stands, it's not great.
Rated 13 Oct 2019
lawlaw
Rated 31 Aug 2019
55
47th
People are being unfair to this. It's bad but the entertaining kind of bad. Just don't go in expecting anything other than schlock.
Rated 31 Aug 2019
chmulcr0nchmul_cr0n
Rated 21 Aug 2019
15
0th
Was this really necessary? How profound and clever this movie thinks it is is perfectly on par with how dumb and shitty it actually is.
Rated 21 Aug 2019
picklemanPickle_Man
Rated 18 Sep 2018
5
1st
Embarrassingly bad.
Rated 18 Sep 2018
glumpy99glumpy_99
Rated 23 May 2018
39
6th
Inevitable sequel starts out well, with an intriguing meta-spin on the events of the first film, and while slowly paced, the film does manage to create an unsettling mood. Unfortunately it all falls to pieces in the final act, as events unfold in a completely arbitrary way, robbing the film of any remaining suspense (or even dramatic impact). Completely tonally and conceptually different to Part 1.
Rated 23 May 2018
luordluord
Rated 04 Aug 2017
16
2nd
Confused, confusing and pointless sequel has little to do with the original or with quality.
Rated 04 Aug 2017
buffratingsbuffratings
Rated 31 Jul 2017
15
2nd
Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2 is a meandering, and oftentimes silly, take on the buzz stirred up by the original, and is full of outrageously annoying characters.
Rated 31 Jul 2017
goldblumingGoldbluming
Rated 31 Oct 2016
78
57th
Technically a terrible movie but I find it to be absolutely hilarious and wonderful 90's fun.
Rated 31 Oct 2016
letskillrobotsletskillrobots
Rated 16 Oct 2016
13
31st
Have to give it credit for completely undermining one of the greatest horror movies of all time.
Rated 16 Oct 2016
hadleyreisHadleyreis
Rated 31 Aug 2016
27
6th
Berlinger should really have invested in a better camera stand
Rated 31 Aug 2016
cinematicespCinematicESP
Rated 31 Oct 2015
19
0th
Remember that part with the book of shadows?
Rated 31 Oct 2015
gokcanzgokcanz
Rated 26 Aug 2013
57
29th
* Casting, Acting : 5.5 * Script : 6 * Directing, Aura : 5 * Ease of Viewing : 6 * Naked Eye : 6
Rated 26 Aug 2013
foxyrussianFoxyRussian
Rated 21 Jun 2013
0
0th
This movie was obviously written by someone who doesn't understand how stories work. At times feels like a bad snl skit, other times feels like a movie trying to rip-off the premise of Blair Witch instead of actually being a true sequel, NOTHING this movie attempts is good. It's pretty impressive that everything could be wrong with this movie. Worst movie ever.
Rated 21 Jun 2013
unusedfutureUnusedFuture
Rated 06 Jan 2013
18
2nd
This sequel to The Blair Witch Project is all formula and no creativity, mechanically borrowing elements from the original and other horror movies.
Rated 06 Jan 2013
lumpnboylumpnboy
Rated 25 Jun 2012
25
8th
An under-rated movie, in that people act like it is some kind of mile-stone of bad horror cinema. I'm tempted to boost the score to 28 just for that reason.
Rated 25 Jun 2012
nakashimaNakashima
Rated 11 May 2012
69
37th
I am not sure if this rating would still hold up today if I went back and watched the movie, but it was accurate at the time I watcjed it. I must preface with the fact that I had just watched the boring Blair Witch Project and then gave this one a go. Just for the slight surprising (at the time) twist to what was going on in the movie, it was miles better and at the very least interesting enough that my eyes didn't drift closed at any point.
Rated 11 May 2012
bigjimBig_Jim
Rated 02 May 2012
3
22nd
A bold and interesting concept, terribly executed. Or not executed at all for the most part. A few scenes make this film not a total waste of time, but overall you'll be left confused and frustrated.
Rated 02 May 2012
coheedCoheed
Rated 09 Jun 2011
30
5th
Really, really bland and completely pointless sequel to the original. Despite the history of studio interference on the film Joe Berlinger still deserves criticism for the film's central concept, that the original blurred reality and fiction beyond recognition, which would have been this tired and reliant on eye-rolling 'Is this real?' shocks even if the producers didn't interfere with it.
Rated 09 Jun 2011
nothingsgoodNothingsGood
Rated 23 Mar 2011
0
1st
Quite possibly the nadir of turn of the century popular culture. So bad Berlinger had to go back to doing documentaries for the rest of his career and the only actor who could get work later is the lead of Burn Notice.
Rated 23 Mar 2011
jodamicojodamico
Rated 07 Oct 2010
55
10th
Points for effort, because it is a ballsy twist, but the presentation is inept.
Rated 07 Oct 2010
hellboy76hellboy76
Rated 25 Sep 2010
8
2nd
Although a novel idea to capitalize on the real life aspect with a tour story, its not executed well and ends up being pretty pointless.
Rated 25 Sep 2010
gorejunkygorejunky
Rated 21 Aug 2010
95
79th
I usually take some hits when I reveal that I really enjoyed this guilty pleasure sequel. But, Jeffrey Donovan is so fun to watch here. Good twist. Very highly recommended.
Rated 21 Aug 2010
hovenhoven
Rated 23 Jun 2010
20
3rd
Because it can't live up to its predecessor!
Rated 23 Jun 2010
andrewdAndrewD
Rated 09 Feb 2010
1
0th
No seriously 1. Its that bad.
Rated 09 Feb 2010
teeceeteecee
Rated 05 Dec 2009
10
5th
gaab
Rated 05 Dec 2009
therealj_roTheRealJ-Ro
Rated 16 Nov 2009
15
3rd
A bitching soundtrack (headlined by Marilyn Manson and System of a Down) combined with hot Goth and Wicca chicks cannot polish this turd. Deviated far too far from the original, keeping the like elements between the two only sparse, and lacking virtually any intensity whatsoever. You could take any three-to-five minute section of the first film and find more intensity than you'll find in this ENTIRE MOVIE. You can't sequel indy blockbuster with Hollywood polish. But at least there's tits in it.
Rated 16 Nov 2009
derbarneyDer_Barney
Rated 13 Oct 2009
23
0th
Train. Wreck.
Rated 13 Oct 2009
pigletPiglet
Rated 10 Jun 2009
40
7th
Completely baffles me how they thought this was a good idea.
Rated 10 Jun 2009
ryanscoomerRyanscoomer
Rated 17 Apr 2009
15
10th
I saw this in the theater and was way more entertained by the fight that broke out a few rows down.
Rated 17 Apr 2009
thunderdoltThunderdolt
Rated 17 Mar 2009
75
35th
I thought it was alright. Different from the first movie.
Rated 17 Mar 2009
luciusgoreluciusgore
Rated 18 Feb 2009
15
4th
"This film was cranked out awfully fast."
Rated 18 Feb 2009
eric_janeric-jan
Rated 26 Jan 2009
65
30th
I know its like sacrilegious to say this. But I think part 2 was better than part 1. There, I said it.
Rated 26 Jan 2009
isobelmoonIsobelmoon
Rated 26 Dec 2008
13
14th
Such a bad, bad movie.
Rated 26 Dec 2008
clopinetteClopinette
Rated 26 Dec 2008
50
10th
Not a very good movie by a long shot, but not as horrible as I expected. I thought it was mildly entertaining to watch a group of students slowly go absolutely stark raving mad, and I think the film deserves a little more credit than most people are giving it. Not a lot more, but a little. The editing is confusing and the plot is fuzzy, but from looking at the whole picture I honestly believe it's all intentional instead of bad film making.
Rated 26 Dec 2008
fake_shempFake Shemp
Rated 01 Dec 2008
5
3rd
It only gets 5 for the dude from 'Burn Notice' being in it. Just bad.
Rated 01 Dec 2008
hu7Hu7
Rated 25 Nov 2008
25
5th
A cabin deep in the dark woods. Mystery, murder, witchcraft. And bad movie :(
Rated 25 Nov 2008
astfglAstfgl
Rated 16 Oct 2008
10
5th
I went in expecting a low-budget, atmospheric horror tale about rural folklore and local legend. Instead, I got two hours of goths having sex.
Rated 16 Oct 2008
mckimsonMcKimson
Rated 08 Oct 2008
20
1st
How does this second sequel goes so low
Rated 08 Oct 2008
irvinejumpirvinejump
Rated 30 Sep 2008
10
6th
just shit
Rated 30 Sep 2008
anamelieAnamelie
Rated 06 Aug 2008
60
44th
Muito melhor que o dois.
Rated 06 Aug 2008
batface89batface89
Rated 28 Jul 2008
10
0th
This movie had potential but is nothing like the first. Crap.
Rated 28 Jul 2008
otavio42otavio42
Rated 07 Jul 2008
50
2nd
Meu deus. Grotescamente horrível.
Rated 07 Jul 2008
gr8googlyGr8Googly
Rated 20 Jun 2008
8
1st
Book of Awful
Rated 20 Jun 2008
vandelay1Vandelay1
Rated 14 Jun 2008
50
51st
okay movie
Rated 14 Jun 2008
yilbyilb
Rated 08 Mar 2008
50
39th
Haven't you seen this if yer gonna anyway? Anyway, i thought it was allright, i could have done without the whole intercut custody interviews.
Rated 08 Mar 2008
dustydDustyd
Rated 16 Sep 2007
25
3rd
Turd of a sequel
Rated 16 Sep 2007
jonquilljonquill
Rated 11 Sep 2007
43
3rd
Blair Witch wasn't the greatest movie on the planet, but at least it was creative. The sequel doesn't stand up to either the original, or other horror films of its era. Honestly, a spectacular waste of time.
Rated 11 Sep 2007
stflyst_fly
Rated 21 Aug 2007
0
2nd
Its mind boggling how one of the best and most innovative horor movies of all times could share a franchise with this piece of cockroach turd.
Rated 21 Aug 2007
mathewMathew
Rated 14 Aug 2007
80
82nd
The original was the biggest pile of rubbish I have seen in a while, made for only what they claimed? Bull****, and even with contacts in the industry they pulled off a pile of dung. The sequal is on the other hand a masterpiece IMO, with beautiful girls ( makes all the difference) and a good script it is everything the original isn't. Watch it, watch it now.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
pilgermannpilgermann
Rated 14 Aug 2007
10
1st
The standee used in theaters for this film's advertising was cool. That's about it.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
asilaydyingAsILayDying
Rated 14 Aug 2007
0
1st
The worst movie I have seen in my entire life. I spent my birthday at the movie theatre wasting hours of my life away because of this pathetic excuse for film. The first Blair Witch was only good the first time, until the viewer realized that it wasn't real.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
fudgiebfudgieb
Rated 14 Aug 2007
65
23rd
Underrated, but definitely not the first.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
gibberishgibberish
Rated 14 Aug 2007
65
15th
Not as bad as initially thought, but halfway through the movie stops making sense and the ending really caps of this senselessness. Nevertheless it has its moments.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
ripviciousripvicious
Rated 14 Aug 2007
60
7th
Why? Should have stayed with the same theme.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
runningrunning
Rated 14 Aug 2007
40
7th
not SO bad have seen worst horrors
Rated 14 Aug 2007
infinitezeroInfiniteZero
Rated 09 May 2007
15
1st
Hope you like crap!
Rated 09 May 2007
nilkynarfynilkynarfy
Rated 23 Mar 2007
25
16th
A confusing mess which never validates the brain bleed it causes.
Rated 23 Mar 2007
doctor7doctor7
Rated 24 Feb 2007
2
0th
Not scary. Not funny. Not original. No impressive editing or camera work to speak of. Skip this one for sure.
Rated 24 Feb 2007
sirvasilSirVasil
Rated 07 Jan 2007
0
1st
Crap. Crap! CRAP!!!!!!!!
Rated 07 Jan 2007
moribunnyMoribunny
Rated 27 Nov 2006
0
0th
This calamity has absolutely nothing in common with the excellent The Blair Witch Project. It's just bizarre that Joe Berlinger was the one who made this.
Rated 27 Nov 2006

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...