sign in
register
Watch
Disney Plus Eros Now Select Apple TV Channel Apple TV
+5
Around the World in 80 Days
Around the World in 80 Days
+5
JustWatch
Your probable score
?
Around the World in 80 Days

Around the World in 80 Days

2004
Comedy, Adventure
2h 0m
Fabulous adventures, hilarious predicaments and exhilarating action await an all-star international cast as three unlikely heroes attempt to settle an outrageous wager in this spectacle based on the novel by Jules Verne. (Walt Disney Pictures)

Directed by:

Frank Coraci

Screenwriter:

David N. Titcher, Jules Verne

Starring:

Kathy Bates, Jackie Chan, Ewen Bremner, Rob Schneider, John Cleese, Luke Wilson, Owen Wilson, Steve Coogan, Cécile De France, Jim Broadbent, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Maggie Q

Franchise:

Around the World in 80 Days

Genres:

Comedy, Adventure

Countries:

Germany, Ireland, UK, USA

Languages:

English, French, Cantonese, German, Hindi, Turkish
imdb IMDb
Update history
Suggest edit

Around the World in 80 Days

2004
Comedy, Adventure
2h 0m
Your probable score
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer
Avg Percentile 25.59% from 2181 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

(2191)
Compact view
clear
Compact view
Show
Sort
barthalenBarthalen
Rated 02 Feb 2017
25
13th
The Rob Schneider Project- day 19. A baffling day at the H.U.R.R.S. labs as we were forced to study this boring, racially confused piece of nonsense. When Rob briefly appeared (as himself) it once more felt like relief to us. Unnerving. And all the time, a shady figure was watching us from the observation lounge above. Our mysterious Project Leader? The team left in relatively good spirits, chuckling about that Arnie cameo. Not me. I know which movie will be next... Schneider-annoyance factor: 3
Rated 02 Feb 2017
joelwatchesmoviesjoelwatchesmovies
Rated 26 Mar 2019
6
42nd
It's pretty goofy-in a cringe-y way sometimes (the plot and the green screens are pretty hard to take seriously), but mostly it's just a lot of fun, with humour that comes often and is often quite clever (see the accidental artwork arising from the altercation) and an adventure that brings with it plenty of cool kung fu action and bumbling side characters. It wasn't at the forefront obviously, but there were hints of good character development for Coogan's progressive yet uptight scientist too.
Rated 26 Mar 2019
begoniabolbegoniabol
Rated 03 Feb 2017
18
20th
Schneider quest, film 19: Hard to find the words to describe how I felt while watching this movie. Mostly anger, mostly depression. What we found out though, is that Jackie Chan looks like a Chinese Rob Schneider. Excitement was felt everytime Jackie Chan was on screen, but quickly faded when we realized it WAS.. Jackie Chan. 10 points to Arnie cameo.
Rated 03 Feb 2017
martrynmartryn
Rated 26 Mar 2007
47
12th
Walt Disney. What. the. fuck? Honestly, was it really necessary to completely destroy Jules Verne. Jules fucking Verne? Not the worst movie of all time, and it has Arnold in it acting hilarious, so there are some perks.
Rated 26 Mar 2007
nobambanobamba
Rated 20 Jun 2020
30
15th
Watched the older one recently. This was about as bad as I remembered. For some reason I thought they made a stop in Hong Kong because of Jackie Chan, but maybe I got it mixed up with the book. Chan's usually bad in his English films since for some reason people want him to act. De France was unnecessary but I suppose they couldn't do the Indian princess anymore. Coogan felt like a cheap Alan Rickman. Best compliment is that they didn't rehash the old film's stops. Fav scene: Arnie.
Rated 20 Jun 2020
corbadCorbad
Rated 30 Sep 2017
70
53rd
Turkish Arnold aside (though his hair is hilarious), the film is innocent, adventurous fun; creative fight choreography and Lau Xing's mother well make up for its cheap sets and erratic pace.
Rated 30 Sep 2017
slantmagSlantMag
Rated 15 Oct 2011
10
9th
"Basically an excuse to give Jackie Chan a hundred different places to beat people up." - Ed Gonzalez
Rated 15 Oct 2011
muutanetmuutanet
Rated 17 Jul 2010
9
6th
I was going to give this movie a really bad score, but I have to say a short Schwarzenegger scene saved the movie. (Really, this was pretty torture adaptation and I'm not a big fan of Anonymous ADHDicks.)
Rated 17 Jul 2010
ruderude
Rated 09 Jun 2009
60
33rd
This is a film that tries to distract the viewer from its lack of a clear protagonist and slight racism with a litany of cameos so that the audience can blurt out every ten minutes or so, "Hey look, it's John Cleese!"
Rated 09 Jun 2009
punchinelloPunchinello
Rated 14 Aug 2007
30
5th
Not only is this more cruelty towards Jackie Chan, they also got Steve Coogan involved in this tripe. But the biggest crime of all, is their lazy, awful portrayal of Wong Fei Hong as pyjama wearing, pyjama wearing farmer as played by Sammo Hung (!).
Rated 14 Aug 2007
glumpy99glumpy_99
Rated 01 Oct 2024
62
22nd
The walking definition of “they don’t make ‘em like they used to”: has its share of good lines and inspired silliness (especially during Schwarzenegger’s segment), but lacks the sense of huge scale epic that the Todd version had in spades, substituting a curiously pinched (and cheap looking) world design, hampered by some very ugly CGI renderings of the various global locations that Coogan and Chan encounter, and the stars’ duelling sensibilities give the film an awkward, stuttering quality.
Rated 01 Oct 2024
racunaracuna
Rated 22 May 2023
70
35th
Funny how the villain of this Disney movie is the voice of "scientific consensus" about everything.
Rated 22 May 2023
war_machineWar Machine
Rated 15 Nov 2021
50
8th
Ilikeherpaintingchanginghismindaboutimpressionistart+arnoldlol+schneiderlol+thoughttherewasmorehotairballoonlol+bothwilsons
Rated 15 Nov 2021
metismetis
Rated 06 Aug 2021
50
6th
????????
Rated 06 Aug 2021
wetwillieswetwillies
Rated 21 Mar 2021
60
10th
Viewed March 20, 2021. One of Jackie's more effective American movies. The sequence set in France is pretty delightful and there's a cameo from Sammo Hung.
Rated 21 Mar 2021
hakkanarejohakkanarejo
Rated 08 Jan 2021
100
91st
Passepartout is a Chinese thief who steals a valuable Buddhist heirloom and then tries to hide in the traveling company of eccentric London inventor and adventurer Phileas Fogg. Fogg has made a bet with the members of his gentlemen's club to travel the world in eighty days. During his tour, Passepartout regularly uses his great fighting techniques to defend Fogg from the many dangers they encounter. A major threat poses a detective chasing them, who assumes that Fogg raided the Bank...
Rated 08 Jan 2021
quintonjaminQuintonjamin
Rated 03 May 2020
50
35th
It's not great, but it's a lot of fun seeing Arnold Schwarzenegger, John Cleese, and Kathy Bates pop up for a scene. Chan and Broadbent are enjoyable and I really like Coogan.
Rated 03 May 2020
mwestcottmwestcott
Rated 13 Apr 2018
60
26th
This adaptation of Vern's novel deviates in a ton of ways. So for fans of the original work this movie is going to be a let down. However its adventurous tone, hilarious cameos, and sense of humor may win you over. If not Jackie Chan surely will.
Rated 13 Apr 2018
seenmanyseenmany
Rated 30 Dec 2016
70
20th
for children mainly
Rated 30 Dec 2016
gnalkhereGnalkhere
Rated 25 Oct 2015
40
6th
Of course they'd adapt the book with more appeal to it. It makes Jules Verne seem more nuts, despite some of the inventions made in this film seem like something Verne would actually come up with
Rated 25 Oct 2015
tonitonigoTonitonigo
Rated 18 Jul 2015
50
10th
It's been a while since I've seen this, but it's a fun family film I suppose. I wouldn't go out of my way to recommend it.
Rated 18 Jul 2015
glm01glm01
Rated 27 May 2015
46
7th
46.000
Rated 27 May 2015
bowfingerbowfinger
Rated 07 Jul 2014
10
6th
Chan is a French butler, Arnold is an Ottoman sultan, and Kathy Bates is the Queen of England! Laughing already? Shut up!
Rated 07 Jul 2014
mrhappyMr.Happy
Rated 16 May 2014
58
8th
It's cute and all, very fun details in the film. It's just that when it all came together it failed to really entertain me. I'll have to admit I too think that despite this film makers their good efforts, this film just fails to entertain enough to be a hit for me, it is indeed a flop for jackie chan I think. Go watch Shanghai Noon and Shanghai Knights instead, very much alike films but those I really found enjoyable and this one I found meh.
Rated 16 May 2014
pluggedinPluggedIN
Rated 21 Apr 2014
60
62nd
Walden Media, the company responsible for producing this film, has made a big deal about its desire to "create responsible entertainment ... that conveys positive values," meant to be enjoyed by the whole family. Around the World in 80 Days lives up to that mission statement at times, but not all of the time. It had the potential to be one of the year's foremost films for the whole family. But it didn't use it fully, or faithfully. (pluggedin.com)
Rated 21 Apr 2014
jnsonejijnsoneji
Rated 20 Feb 2014
75
8th
Could have been far better.
Rated 20 Feb 2014
sliderccslidercc
Rated 10 Oct 2012
5
7th
extremely bad
Rated 10 Oct 2012
iyisinekiyisinek
Rated 27 Mar 2012
72
54th
paris, istanbul, kalküta, türkiye, hindistan, çin, yolculuk, seyehat, mucit (Kraliyet bilim akademisine girmek isteyen Phileas Fogg, 80 günde dünyayi gezmekle ilgili bir bahse girer. Yardimcisi Paspartu ile yola cikar) Hos bir komedi. Rated on March 27th, 2012 İkinci izleyişim oğlumla birlikte koronavirüs ysaklari döneminde oldu. Oğlum çok beğendi ben sekiz sene sonra verdiğim puanı değiştirmeyerek beğeni mi test etmiş oldum. Bu arada Türk Prens kısmı berbatmış.
Rated 27 Mar 2012
majikatmajikat
Rated 08 Dec 2011
75
43rd
I would never have chosen to watch this film and yet it did have a fair bit of entertainment value. There were some good effects throughout the film and of course some good Martial Arts choreography from Jackie Chan, in fact even the usually irritating Steve Coogan did a good job - a good adventure!
Rated 08 Dec 2011
ribcageribcage
Rated 18 Sep 2011
15
5th
remembered it being bad when i saw it in theaters..was just over the age it's aimed at... caught a bit of it on tv...was bad. was feeling masochistic so i went to watch it from the beginning...but i just couldn't do it knowing it didn't get any better and turned it off after 10 minutes
Rated 18 Sep 2011
tarwebroodtarwebrood
Rated 23 Aug 2011
40
12th
poor adaptation of this classic. Newer != better, as it's lacking a lot of atmosphere from the original and (better) 1989 version of the same movie.
Rated 23 Aug 2011
rossRoss
Rated 05 Jul 2011
30
20th
It actually could have been decent. But it is just too silly and Jackie Chan sucks.
Rated 05 Jul 2011
lepuppy7Lepuppy7
Rated 25 Apr 2011
3
7th
A disgrace of a Jackie Chan movie.
Rated 25 Apr 2011
maartenmaarten
Rated 22 Apr 2011
31
18th
Boring and predictable, but... Cécile de France :D
Rated 22 Apr 2011
tsvetetsvete
Rated 04 Feb 2011
100
96th
1
Rated 04 Feb 2011
stripyStripy
Rated 19 Dec 2010
72
34th
"This is the Royal Academy of Science! We don't have to prove anything!"
Rated 19 Dec 2010
valenzettiValenzetti
Rated 04 Nov 2010
40
7th
I'll tell you what I'd like to see: a movie made entirely of behind-the-scenes footage of Steve Coogan. "A bleak portrait of a man on the edge."
Rated 04 Nov 2010
priokanopriokano
Rated 06 Aug 2010
5
44th
vi no dia do niver da Helo!!!
Rated 06 Aug 2010
ch866CH866
Rated 02 Mar 2010
66
4th
It lacks flow on the history, its just messy and confusing
Rated 02 Mar 2010
frederikaFrederikA
Rated 13 Oct 2009
40
17th
a mess of a movie, but with some good bits here and there
Rated 13 Oct 2009
bolivarbolivar
Rated 12 Sep 2009
70
54th
enjoyed the absurdity of it all.
Rated 12 Sep 2009
selfishotterSelfishOtter
Rated 15 Aug 2009
35
12th
Arnie as an Ottoman prince. That's all you need to know.
Rated 15 Aug 2009
okkervilOkkervil
Rated 31 Jul 2009
50
38th
A poor adaptation, but a fun movie for the most part. Don't judge it too harshly.
Rated 31 Jul 2009
mifuneMifune
Rated 29 Jul 2009
75
40th
big production fun
Rated 29 Jul 2009
ndsurfer8908NDsurfer8908
Rated 17 Apr 2009
67
26th
Oh Jackie Chan...quit trying to act.
Rated 17 Apr 2009
hedphursthedphurst
Rated 31 Jan 2009
30
14th
Based on a classic. This one's not a classic.
Rated 31 Jan 2009
imthatdingoImThatDingo
Rated 09 Jan 2009
18
23rd
Sorry...could'nt finish it. From the look of it though, that's a good thing!
Rated 09 Jan 2009
haileyHailey
Rated 04 Oct 2008
45
9th
Had a lot of promise, but wasted on a dumb subplot!
Rated 04 Oct 2008
blake_leydenBlake Leyden
Rated 01 Aug 2008
44
19th
read the book...it is a good one.
Rated 01 Aug 2008
pedro1309pedro1309
Rated 04 Jul 2008
60
31st
alright
Rated 04 Jul 2008
vandelay1Vandelay1
Rated 14 Jun 2008
40
36th
watchavke
Rated 14 Jun 2008
dungevskidungevski
Rated 20 Sep 2007
75
25th
Adventures are described in unique funny way connecting the people in different cultures and interaction between them and the main role in this must-see movie.
Rated 20 Sep 2007
stflyst_fly
Rated 22 Aug 2007
0
2nd
crapfest
Rated 22 Aug 2007
mayomayo
Rated 14 Aug 2007
57
27th
Despite an abysmal start the film eventually becomes moderately entertaining.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
skycaptainskycaptain
Rated 14 Aug 2007
70
32nd
A fun movie that doesn't require repeat viewings.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
medMed
Rated 14 Aug 2007
0
0th
Utterly awfull from start to finish.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
lokiLoki
Rated 14 Aug 2007
40
14th
A silly movie for young Jackie Chan fans.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
spoonerspotspoonerspot
Rated 14 Aug 2007
62
4th
Not worth the price of stale popcorn and flat Coke
Rated 14 Aug 2007
taleaTalea
Rated 14 Aug 2007
50
9th
I love the art direction. Unfortunately, that's the only thing this dreadfully dull film has going for it.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
vincentevincente
Rated 14 Aug 2007
2
0th
null
Rated 14 Aug 2007
jetjaguarjetjaguar
Rated 30 Jun 2007
70
34th
Surprisingly good. It's not exactly what Verne had in mind, I imagine, but it's a lot of fun nonetheless.
Rated 30 Jun 2007
thedicemanTheDiceman
Rated 01 Mar 2007
35
13th
Watchable.
Rated 01 Mar 2007

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...