An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power

An Inconvenient Truth did a good job of bringing together the facts and figures to provide a solid overall picture of global warming. 'Sequel' on the other hand is a waste of time: Ostensibly reporting on the difficulties implementing global ecological measures, most of the doc is just following Gore around conferences without much rhyme or reason. The fact some dissenters (like the Indian PM) give solid arguments on why they're sticking with fossil fuels hardly helps the cause either.

In many respects a sad, sobering follow-up to the original film spotlighting Gore's continuing, passionate advocacy as he fights what increasingly seems to be a losing battle; it's frustrating to note Gore's reasoned, forceful and intelligent arguments continuing to fall on deaf ears, then and now. Film also provides a concise and compelling overview of the political landscape since 2006, and like the first film, weaves in some emotional personal reflection to great effect.

sadly, this seems more about gore than climate change

suprisingly similar to the one with leo, but a tiny bit more critical

Markedly different focus than the first movie. This is more about Al Gore's current work on environmental issues than the straight-forward presentation of issues seen in the first film. The quality is about the same but the first movie is the critical one to watch.

Ten years on an the Right Reverend Al Gore, the apostle of global warming, er climate change, is back in the pulpit with more evangelistic sermonizing, doubling down with a sequel, An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power (more rightly titled An Obnoxious Sequel: A 'Documentary' to My Dreams of Power), set for release this summer. He declares that "sea level rise and storm surge flooded the 9/11 Memorial". So why, after Hurricane Sandy was gone did sea level turn out to be the same? Showing the