sign in
register
Watch
fuboTV Apple TV Google Play Movies
+4
10,000 B.C.
10,000 B.C.
+4
JustWatch
Your probable score
?
10,000 B.C.

10,000 B.C.

2008
Romance, Drama
1h 49m
A prehistoric epic that follows a young mammoth hunter's journey through uncharted territory to secure the future of his tribe. (imdb)

Directed by:

Roland Emmerich

Screenwriter:

Roland Emmerich, Harald Kloser

Starring:

Camilla Belle, Cliff Curtis, Omar Sharif, Steven Strait, Joel Virgel, Affif Ben Badra, Mo Zinal, Reece Ritchie, Marco Khan, Nathanael Baring, Mona Hammond

Genres:

Romance, Drama, Fantasy, Adventure

AKA:

10,000 BC

Countries:

South Africa, USA

Language:

English
imdb IMDb
Update history
Suggest edit

10,000 B.C.

2008
Romance, Drama
1h 49m
Your probable score
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer
Avg Percentile 19.75% from 3070 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

(3085)
Compact view
clear
Compact view
Show
Sort
hehejajahehejaja
Rated 26 Apr 2008
20
2nd
One can, without effort, sense that every aspect of this film has been constructed with the thought of making as much money as possible. The title says 10.000 B.C., but the film stink of 2008 all the way through.
Rated 26 Apr 2008
beedubBeeDub
Rated 15 Aug 2015
62
5th
Is Roland Emmerich the poor man's Michael Bay, or is it the other way around?
Rated 15 Aug 2015
skenkereSkenkere
Rated 26 May 2008
14
3rd
The title doesn't come onscreen until 8 min in, and in those 8 min you can tell how terrible this movie will be. I was only expecting a mediocre movie with good eye candy, but I got a godawful movie with mediocre eye candy. The scripting and dialogue are bad beyond description, and the visuals aren't even amazing. There's not enough space to mention all the problems here. Oh by the way, Mammoths built the pyramids, and you can hike between snow, jungle and desert within several "moons."
Rated 26 May 2008
prophet92Prophet92
Rated 26 Jan 2009
37
8th
This very well might be the most generic movie about pre-history I've ever seen. Never mind the overwhelming historical inaccuracy or the fact that the main character apparently ran across the world in three days. ..... .... .. . Yeah, this movie REALLY sucks when it comes to being historically, geographically, or logically accurate, doesn't it?
Rated 26 Jan 2009
gritGrit
Rated 23 Oct 2008
11
8th
After seeing the trailers and thinking that it couldn't be that bad, I decided to give 10,000 BC a viewing. Surpisingly enough it was awful. Although the playing around with history in such a dumb action-based movie can be forgiven to an extent, the poor acting and script cannot. I know that these are meant to be cavemen, but you think they would have at least been semi-interesting. A few of the action CGI affairs are quite good, but they are either over too quickly or rapidly deteriorate.
Rated 23 Oct 2008
doctor7doctor7
Rated 13 Jul 2008
19
10th
billythekydbillythekyd
Rated 28 Jun 2008
28
2nd
What a waste of computer generated mammoths!
Rated 28 Jun 2008
muutanetmuutanet
Rated 31 May 2008
20
15th
I liked the sets in the beginning, but the story and the entire film (acting, dialogue, characters etc.) are terrible bull. It's a mixture of too much of everything with bellow any rates of movie making. What was Emmerich thinking when he finished the film, I wonder?
Rated 31 May 2008
paradiselostParadiselost
Rated 23 Mar 2008
15
1st
This is probably the worst movie I have ever seen in a movie theatre, and i have seen The Pacifier. You can laugh at the utter stupidity of the movie, but even that gets old. I was surprised at the huge disinterest I had in every character throughout the movie, I couldn't care less what happened to them. This movie is utter, utter crap.
Rated 23 Mar 2008
bojanglesBojangles
Rated 16 Mar 2008
20
5th
10,000 B.C. is a story of love, loss, historical mockery, and shitty narration which takes place in a magical land where rain forests, deserts, and the Himalayas are all next door neighbors.
Rated 16 Mar 2008
bofbof
Rated 18 Nov 2011
10
1st
2000 years or so from now, someone will make a movie (or whatever the equivalent is then) in which revolution-era French soldiers use jetfighters to fight off the invading forces of Genghis Khan. And it'll be better than this anachronistic, plotless, clueless mess.
Rated 18 Nov 2011
chiefgchiefg
Rated 16 Nov 2010
15
4th
What an awfully formulaic and xenophobic piece of shit movie. Savages speaking either english, gibberish or gibberish with english accents. A mysterious prophecy alluding to a CHOSEN ONE with a love interest and a chip on his shoulder including an ominous villain. Every stereotype you can think of, crammed into 90 minutes. 10,000 clichés.
Rated 16 Nov 2010
calhardingcalharding
Rated 03 Jun 2009
1
0th
Imagine the rare circumstance where being historically and scientifically accurate would actually deliver a highly entertaining, immersive and universally enjoyable film. Now picture Roland Emmerich gently placing both historical accuracy and entertainment value into an ornate clay bowl, dropping his trousers, and taking a steaming, fat shit all over these twin pillars of cinematic value, all whilst twirling his moustache and laughing maniacally. This is 10,000 BC.
Rated 03 Jun 2009
peaceanarchyPeaceAnarchy
Rated 31 May 2008
29
0th
Absolutely terrible shit. The movie is boring, the setting is absurd, the special effects suck, the acting is mediocre, the music is overbearing. I could go on and on. It's not even enjoyable as a train wreck. The only reason this doesn't get a lower score is that it's pretty forgettable and didn't even inspire hatred from me.
Rated 31 May 2008
strangepantsstrangepants
Rated 26 Mar 2008
35
4th
A mammoth waste of time.
Rated 26 Mar 2008
mjvmoviemanMJVmovieMan
Rated 08 Mar 2008
28
5th
Not since Oliver Stone's 'Alexander' has there been a more embarassing epic. Roland Emmerich takes a mostly talentless cast along with poorly generated CGI creatures and mixes them with some grand set pieces. The result - a giant, disasterous mess that wants to be 'Apocalypto' with the the thrilling action of '300', but it's neither. The story and characters are vastly underdeveloped, but mostly-the bloodless action fails to deliver. Nearly every moment in the film is laughable, what a letdown.
Rated 08 Mar 2008
teddedonTedDedon
Rated 08 Mar 2008
40
12th
There's a lot of hype for this movie, and the trailers coming in front of every movie for the last year certainly justifies that. When all is said and done, the final product here is trite, stereotypical, and overall dull in some places. The writing is atrocious for the most part and there's nothing remotely special about the story it is telling. There are some cool action scenes but there are far too few of them for a movie of this kind. Don't avoid it, just know it isn't all it could be.
Rated 08 Mar 2008
dardandardan
Rated 05 May 2015
28
15th
I don't understand how this is correctly identified as shit, when gravity isn't.
Rated 05 May 2015
kojilessKojiless
Rated 09 Oct 2011
8
7th
Give me 12,000 more years and I may be able to come up with something good to say about this pile of prehistoric mastodon crap.
Rated 09 Oct 2011
shalevshalev
Rated 11 May 2010
40
0th
Overwhelmingly ridiculous.
Rated 11 May 2010
venkateshcvvenkatesh.cv
Rated 29 Dec 2009
50
8th
Its starts off with a premise of presenting a story of stone age man's encounters with wild beasts of all kind. Instead we are treated to a rehashed version of different movies. The one that comes closest in comparison is Mel Gibson's Apocalypto though this is nowhere near Mel's epic effort.
Rated 29 Dec 2009
ewp805ewp805
Rated 02 Aug 2009
23
9th
Look, Camilla Belle! ...and mammoths... in the desert... building pyramids...?
Rated 02 Aug 2009
andaghandagh
Rated 17 May 2009
10
3rd
How does a woolly mammoth survive one day in the middle of the desert? Who knows.
Rated 17 May 2009
revolutionoRevolutiono
Rated 01 Mar 2009
3
4th
A look into an alternate universe where Apocalypto was a piece of shit
Rated 01 Mar 2009
biedronskiBiedronski
Rated 30 Dec 2008
38
15th
I have a feeling that this isn't how things went down in the past. And I REALLY don't think girls were that attractive back then. It was a bad movie but it did have a couple cool scenes. The mammoths were really tight, especially come the end.
Rated 30 Dec 2008
jack_boomJack Boom
Rated 17 Oct 2008
40
9th
The strong special effects and some good battle sequences cannot make up for this shallow, empty excuse of a film. Horrible writing which leads to bad dialogue, an annoying narrator that had no business being in this type of film and not to mention the Hollywood ending that slaps the audience in the face, what a load of crap.
Rated 17 Oct 2008
teeceeteecee
Rated 30 Sep 2008
1
0th
Emmerich sucks - elendig og tåbelig film, hæslig
Rated 30 Sep 2008
jonnyboyjonny_boy
Rated 12 Sep 2008
26
12th
One of the worst screenplays I've seen on screen. Not worth watching even because of the special effects.
Rated 12 Sep 2008
kavuKavu
Rated 11 Sep 2008
25
9th
Fancypants CGI doesn't save this movie from bad acting and a horrible screenplay.
Rated 11 Sep 2008
jebJeb
Rated 21 Jul 2008
8
9th
What was Emmerich thinking?
Rated 21 Jul 2008
miss_jesusmiss jesus
Rated 14 Jul 2008
19
3rd
How do they make movies this big so uninteresting? Seriously, it's amazing.
Rated 14 Jul 2008
frailmagefrailmage
Rated 30 May 2008
45
21st
A n okay movie, though much of it success was lead from the hype around the ads. If it had not been victim to a viral marketing campaign it would have been rated better. But while the plot was just good, the action scenes were lacking, and the only thing that would have put this movie past the 50's for me would have been a sex scene.
Rated 30 May 2008
monstergearMonsterGear
Rated 10 Mar 2008
55
15th
Feels long, and it doesn't really get going until like the last third of the film, when they arrive at the Big Bad Egyptian-type camp. And, hearing the narrator use the term "moons" in reference to time (as in, "traveled for many moons") is, to me, inexplicably annoying and cheesy.
Rated 10 Mar 2008
war_machineWar Machine
Rated 10 May 2024
70
54th
Lotsofcoolshitmainlystory/setting/aesthetic/sotoomuchaction+otherscircleincludesbrotherssisters(tribe/friends)/somegreaterdestiny+getstoobiblical
Rated 10 May 2024
leemarvinsleemarvins
Rated 01 Jan 2023
12
5th
Just a crazy film based on some pseudoarchaeological crackpots book. Roland Emmerich really knows how to ham it up. Unfortunately not that good as an adventure film.
Rated 01 Jan 2023
ytadelYtadel
Rated 06 Jan 2022
1
5th
Actual time traveler from 10000 BC: *watches this movie* “Dafuq?!”
Rated 06 Jan 2022
glumpy99glumpy_99
Rated 30 Oct 2021
26
2nd
Senseless, numbing saga which seems like an excuse for Emmerich to indulge in his cringy brand of patriotism in olden times - yes, we even get a prehistoric version of Bill Pullman's "Independence Day" speech! Not even bad enough to be derisively enjoyable, with a bland cast struggling with their even blander characterisations. When an action adventure can't even come to life during its (surprisingly scant) action scenes, you know you're in trouble.
Rated 30 Oct 2021
sheepslashersheepslasher
Rated 06 Sep 2018
1
11th
There was *almost* some fun in the absurdity of it.
Rated 06 Sep 2018
metalhankmetalhank
Rated 06 Jun 2018
70
76th
I really don't understand what people expect out of a flick like this, you really expect it to be accurate? It's an entertaining action adventure with really good effects and a generally good story.
Rated 06 Jun 2018
rcmaccrcmacc
Rated 15 May 2018
30
19th
Not outright terrible, but really forgettable and boring. The movie lacks anything being good and is kind of overlong
Rated 15 May 2018
anomalyAnomaly
Rated 06 Feb 2018
33
9th
Emmerich wrote this. It shows. The blue/orange color grading is so ridiculous it hurts my eyes.
Rated 06 Feb 2018
ernestinaErnestina
Rated 09 Dec 2017
17
25th
If you check out the actors participating in 10,000 B.C you can see slowly decaying careers after the movie, just saying.
Rated 09 Dec 2017
namlodNamlod
Rated 12 Sep 2017
7
1st
As he does with many of his films, Roland Emmerich prefers flashiness and action over anything with substance. The cast isn't worth getting excited about and the script should have been thrown away before the first reading. Emmerich gets so worked up over making something exciting, he forgets to make something that makes sense.
Rated 12 Sep 2017
realmacgyverRealMacgyver
Rated 06 Dec 2015
40
7th
Garbage. And could have been improved easily.
Rated 06 Dec 2015
schwabeschwabe
Rated 04 Jun 2015
24
1st
just plain bad. time periods been mixed up. stone age meets the pyramid building egyptians, i missed the dinosaurs!
Rated 04 Jun 2015
gkfilmgkfilm
Rated 18 Jan 2015
60
52nd
Entertainment: 4/4. Spirituality: 1.5/3. Sustainability: 0.5/3.
Rated 18 Jan 2015
kutzKutz
Rated 30 Sep 2014
60
23rd
One interesting perspective on the encounter between two races.
Rated 30 Sep 2014
pluggedinPluggedIN
Rated 13 Apr 2014
70
72nd
Let's not make too much of this, though. 10,000 BC is, at its heart, an action-adventure popcorn flick about, um, people who hadn't invented popcorn yet. It might be good for a diversion but it'll never do as fodder for long, espresso-house discussions. That said, it does suggest that civilization is only possible through a shared sense of ethical, moral behavior. And in our whiny, postmodern society, circa 2,000 A.D., that's not a bad lesson to learn. (pluggedin.com)
Rated 13 Apr 2014
bionicninjasBionicNinjas
Rated 18 Feb 2014
10
4th
10,000 times more boring than it should have been.
Rated 18 Feb 2014
ag0stomesmerAg0stoMesmer
Rated 28 Sep 2013
1
20th
Offensively bad. The terrible reviews all hint that people want to see something like this but realistic. Somebody please film Goldings 'The Inheritors'.
Rated 28 Sep 2013
csboydcsboyd
Rated 22 Sep 2013
10
28th
Good idea, poor execution on many levels.
Rated 22 Sep 2013
ecrE.C.R.
Rated 07 Jul 2013
15
2nd
-
Rated 07 Jul 2013
bernie20bernie20
Rated 23 Apr 2013
93
69th
This was a great film. It probabaly had nothing to do with the real history of the world. However, it was amazing with the graphics. Also, it had a cute romance.
Rated 23 Apr 2013
theescapistTheEscapist
Rated 12 Jan 2013
62
27th
Quite generic with a very predictable storyline but still, some visuals look pretty cool. Watchable.
Rated 12 Jan 2013
danastevensdanastevens
Rated 30 Nov 2012
20
2nd
In terms of character development, wit, and simple curiosity, it's dumber than a Neanderthal.
Rated 30 Nov 2012
misterlizardmisterlizard
Rated 24 Sep 2012
10
12th
An insult to the last 12,000 years of human evolution.
Rated 24 Sep 2012
wadalklaklawadalklakla
Rated 21 Sep 2012
65
58th
well despite what everyone says , i guess the story was qauit enjoyable.
Rated 21 Sep 2012
htimanhtiman
Rated 18 Jul 2012
30
4th
This was one boring movie.
Rated 18 Jul 2012
rossRoss
Rated 26 Apr 2012
40
31st
10,000 B.C. is predictable and formulaic as hell, but still not as bad as rumored. The effects are impressive, especially the ones including large animals and Cliff Curtis is always is pleasure to watch.
Rated 26 Apr 2012
glmglm
Rated 23 Apr 2012
47
13th
46.500
Rated 23 Apr 2012
jfsj513jfsj513
Rated 21 Apr 2012
40
17th
Someday soon someone will find some cave paintings. And they'll have a better plot than this.
Rated 21 Apr 2012
fiyayubfiyayub
Rated 08 Oct 2011
30
15th
got to watch it again to be certain
Rated 08 Oct 2011
mrangry52mr_angry52
Rated 12 Jun 2011
0
2nd
I had the unfortunate luck of sitting in front of a group of extremely obnoxious, talkative teenagers. During the first half of the film a few people in my row would routinely turn around and tell them to STFU, which naturally they ignored. Things started to get uncomfortably tense until, somewhere around the midpoint of the movie, we all sort of came to this collective realization that anybody who was still committed to the plot line was a bigger douche than the hecklers.
Rated 12 Jun 2011
grouchoGroucho
Rated 31 May 2011
15
7th
"Our favorite Teutonic huckster presumes that prehistory means that anything narrative goes: hey, who can prove him wrong?"
Rated 31 May 2011
guy-piranhaguy piranha
Rated 17 Apr 2011
15
2nd
hey look, it's apocalypto!
Rated 17 Apr 2011
yamabushiyamabushi
Rated 16 Feb 2011
17
2nd
Special effects can't spare this production. Cheap roleplay, artificial lights like in "Neverending story" but hey! it was decades ago, we have a brand new ways to blend actors with bluescreen. One scene with mammoth is copied twice in this movie and I mean it. Main actress stays almost 90% of whole film, untouchable by dirt and stains, she shines like Megan Fox in transformers...like invisible, anti-stain aura around her. Sentences copied from pre-school book. Common but nice tale - screwed up.
Rated 16 Feb 2011
okkervilOkkervil
Rated 05 Feb 2011
10
8th
Emmerich is an idiot.
Rated 05 Feb 2011
armondwhiteArmondWhite
Rated 10 Jan 2011
1
0th
It's all just F/X opportunities, exposing Hollywood's -- and our own -- non-relationship to history.
Rated 10 Jan 2011
age_jellemaAge Jellema
Rated 03 Jan 2011
30
3rd
come on, why did Emmerich at least try to make this one epic. Maybe he lacks the quality. Ridiculous movie, bad acting, bad script, bad editing, bad pacing, bad everything! I want my lost time back.
Rated 03 Jan 2011
slantmagSlantMag
Rated 21 Oct 2010
15
21st
"Roland Emmerich is partial to cutting-edge special effects and stone-age storytelling, meaning that 10,000 B.C., a dim-witted CG extravaganza set in prehistoric times, is something like his ideal project." - Nick Schager
Rated 21 Oct 2010
thorgallThorgall
Rated 04 Sep 2010
3
16th
the girl is hot.
Rated 04 Sep 2010
dawolfeyDaWolfey
Rated 31 Jul 2010
40
59th
Technological progress was set back by many thousands of years at the conclusion of the film, our hunter gatherer heros with their painted faces, spears, bones on string and primitive shamanic rituals come face to face with a far advanced civilisation with cloth, sextants, maps, boats, optics and metal. What do they do after beating the evil leader of this civilisation? Why they just go back home to their huts in the land of snow and ice, fuck that technology!
Rated 31 Jul 2010
mufy_mufafaMufy Mufafa
Rated 25 Jun 2010
5
34th
Final Rating: 5/100 (F) - Laden with anachronisms, this is incredibly painful for those who are distinguished in the realm of history, the biogeographical studies, and the science of molecular biology, such as myself.
Rated 25 Jun 2010
velvet_croweVelvet Crowe
Rated 05 Jun 2010
6
2nd
They had telescopes before astrology was even invented, Elephants built pyramids thousands of years before they were built and people are seemingly able to travel great distances between multiple terrains on foot with nary an issue. It's like they didn't open up a history book and decided to insult our collective intelligence with things even the most uneducated asstard would know. Lets not forget how AWFUL everything else, even the special effects Emmerich are known for is mediocre at best.
Rated 05 Jun 2010
kennykenny
Rated 30 May 2010
53
30th
Some very exciting action scenes with a few very good scenes but it doesnt realy keep you interested for long enough and some parts are just not understandable and very boring.
Rated 30 May 2010
fantastardfantastard
Rated 23 Apr 2010
30
10th
I'd fully recommend that you DON'T watch this movie.
Rated 23 Apr 2010
mmschwartzmmschwartz
Rated 23 Apr 2010
10
3rd
The inaccuracies in this film blew me away. Do script writers really know so little about the world.
Rated 23 Apr 2010
spaceflohspacefloh
Rated 07 Apr 2010
42
24th
ger; [10.000 B.C.]; im steinzeitalter will der anführer des stammes seine geraubte frau retten - doch dafür braucht er die unterstützung anderer stämme denen ähnliches passierte.; (sehr ähnliche story zu apocalypto);
Rated 07 Apr 2010
vheujgevheujge
Rated 29 Jan 2010
10
2nd
Massive waste of time. Hollywood thinks pretty CGI = good movie. Or just any CGI at all.
Rated 29 Jan 2010
joseywalesjoseywales
Rated 14 Jan 2010
35
12th
haha
Rated 14 Jan 2010
daybrinjerdaybrinjer
Rated 05 Jan 2010
3
0th
I could not finish this movie, it was that bad.
Rated 05 Jan 2010
gilgameshGilgamesh
Rated 03 Jan 2010
79
64th
Cool - almost like a Apocalypto, but litle more like a fairy tale... from deep north to the egypt?? Hah
Rated 03 Jan 2010
vnguyen442vnguyen442
Rated 29 Dec 2009
50
6th
apparently there is a bunch of historically wrong points in this movie which makes this not that ok movie even worse
Rated 29 Dec 2009
thedicemanTheDiceman
Rated 20 Nov 2009
25
6th
Good visuals but thats about all.
Rated 20 Nov 2009
frederikaFrederikA
Rated 13 Oct 2009
40
17th
Emmerich takes a break form his "Destroy civilization by Aliens, Monster or Bad weather" mode and revisits his other directorial MO: "Egyptians being mean to tribal peoples"... Not a terrible movie, just terribly ridicules...
Rated 13 Oct 2009
maxbaronMaxBaron
Rated 05 Sep 2009
58
29th
effects are good.not so bad, not so good,nothing special, ordinary, just fun to pass evening at home.
Rated 05 Sep 2009
djidji
Rated 18 Aug 2009
40
2nd
Dull, implausible movie. They wasted ntheir money and I wasted mine.
Rated 18 Aug 2009
erlanuaierlanuai
Rated 29 Jul 2009
40
1st
A chronological Milk shake
Rated 29 Jul 2009
ahmed413ahmed413
Rated 20 Jul 2009
35
4th
There's no reason for this film.
Rated 20 Jul 2009
johnshaftjohnshaft
Rated 04 Jul 2009
42
8th
Pretty goofy and stupid stuff, with bad acting, cornball dialogue, and fairly unexciting set pieces. At least it is kind of funny to watch.
Rated 04 Jul 2009
indicamIndicam
Rated 30 Jun 2009
0
4th
Prehistoric Goose Egg.
Rated 30 Jun 2009
spleenspleen
Rated 18 Jun 2009
80
69th
Don't ask me why but I liked it. I will admit that this is about as historically accurate as the prehistoric dream sequence in Gilligan's Island that one time.
Rated 18 Jun 2009
brandt64brandt64
Rated 17 Jun 2009
20
4th
Sub-par Apocalypto rip-off.
Rated 17 Jun 2009
fudgiebfudgieb
Rated 06 Jun 2009
50
14th
A fairly cool idea that had a lot of potential. Every character, however is beautiful and the different races are all in one tribe. It just felt so fake the whole way through. Even when I tried to suspend my disbelief and just enjoy the "it's a movie...enjoy it" aspect, there was little to enjoy. Jurassic Park, it is not.
Rated 06 Jun 2009
homunculushomunculus
Rated 05 Jun 2009
1
1st
Whoever made the trailer was really talented D:
Rated 05 Jun 2009
cerebrusCerebrus
Rated 17 May 2009
20
6th
Oh hey, they just set civilization back 1000 years! Cool!
Rated 17 May 2009
martrynmartryn
Rated 26 Apr 2009
15
1st
Just about nothing in this movie makes any sense, and the action sequences were so fucking bad. The end of the movie was also ridiculous. This film is embarrassing on almost every level, and is a complete failure excepting a few special effects.
Rated 26 Apr 2009
ryanscoomerRyanscoomer
Rated 21 Apr 2009
70
64th
Better than I thought it would be. Still not great.
Rated 21 Apr 2009
empiremagempiremag
Rated 01 Apr 2009
1
3rd
"As primitive as a cave painting."
Rated 01 Apr 2009
travisbickleTravisbickle
Rated 14 Mar 2009
80
38th
It is what it is..schlock. But moviemaking schlock at its best.Harmless,benign yet entertaining.
Rated 14 Mar 2009

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...